Key Studies Summary Table: The Influence of Technologies on Cognitive Processes (HL IB Psychology)

Revision Note

Claire Neeson

Expertise

Psychology Content Creator

Key Studies Summary: The Influence of Technologies on Cognitive Processes

SUMMARY TABLE: KEY STUDIES OF THE INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGIES ON COGNITIVE PROCESSES

Topic

Two Key Studies

The Positive Influence of Technologies on Cognitive Processes

  • Use one of these studies to answer a question on the negative influence of technologies too

  • By using one of these studies for a ‘negative influence’ question you are applying critical thinking i.e. not all technological influence is positive; some research shows that it can also be negative

Blacker et al. (2014)

Morina et al. (2015)

The Negative Influence of Technologies on Cognitive Processes

  • Use one of these studies to answer a question on the positive influence of technologies too

  • By using one of these studies for a ‘positive influence’ question you are applying critical thinking i.e. not all technological influence is negative; some research shows that it can also be positive

Sparrow et al. (2011)

Rosen et al. (2011)

How do I use these studies in an exam question on this topic?

  • HL IB students have a lot of content to cover so the purpose of this revision resource is to slim down and streamline the number of studies you need per topic/exam question

  • The exam question will ask you to either ‘Evaluate’ or ‘Discuss’ either the positive or the negative influence of technologies on cognitive processes

  • You may also be asked ‘To what extent’ technology has a positive or negative effect on cognitive processes

  • For any of the above questions (evaluate, discuss, to what extent) you can use all of the studies presented in the summary table here

  • If you are asked to (for example) ‘Discuss the positive influence of technologies on cognitive processes’ you could use BOTH Blacker et al. (2014) and Morina et al. (2015) plus ONE of the negative influence studies (possibly in less depth) as a counter-argument (Sparrow et al. 2011 or Rosen et al. 2011)

  • Another solution to the above strategy would be to use either Blacker et al (2014) OR Morina et al. (2015) plus ONE of the negative influence studies in depth for a counter-argument

  • Whichever solution or strategy you use in the exam for a question on this topic remember to acknowledge that technologies cannot have a purely positive or negative effect on cognitive processes - always bring in critical thinking and counter-arguments

  • Remember that the HL questions will only ever appear on Paper 1 Section B (ERQ = 22 marks), never on Section A

You've read 0 of your 0 free revision notes

Get unlimited access

to absolutely everything:

  • Downloadable PDFs
  • Unlimited Revision Notes
  • Topic Questions
  • Past Papers
  • Model Answers
  • Videos (Maths and Science)

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Claire Neeson

Author: Claire Neeson

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.