Solutions to Impacts of Urban Growth (Cambridge (CIE) O Level Geography)
Revision Note
Written by: Jacque Cartwright
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Solutions to Impacts of Urban Growth
Pollution
Towns and cities have less clean air than its surrounding rural areas
MEDCs, over the last 60 years, have regulations to restrict vehicle and industry emissions
NICs and LEDCs have the highest levels of pollution
Types of Pollution, Impacts and Solutions
Pollutant | Source | Problem | Solution |
---|---|---|---|
| Power stations
|
|
Pedestrianize urban centres Emission charges |
|
|
|
|
| Diesel vehicle Soot from open fires Construction dust |
| Clean air act
|
|
|
| Reduce the amount of electricity generated by thermal power stations Higher taxes on most polluting vehicles |
|
|
| Regular checks on vehicle emissions Laws to regulate emissions Remove most polluting vehicles |
| Coal power stations
|
| Laws to control emissions from industry
|
|
|
| Catalytic converters fitted to car exhausts
|
|
|
|
|
Water, visual and noise pollution
Pollutant | Source | Problem | Solution |
---|---|---|---|
|
| Drinking water contaminated
| Improve sanitation through sewage works
|
| Ugly buildings
| Source of stress Impact on the social structure of cities Overflowing bins can lead to rats, mice and foxes |
Stricter planning
|
| Vehicles
|
| Laws to limit noise levels
|
Managing informal settlements
One challenge common to many urban areas is informal settlements
There are five management options:
Bulldoze and clear away
Clear away but relocate people
Redevelop
Improve using self-help or site-and-service schemes (self-help gives tools/training and low-cost loans to help people help themselves, and S&S schemes provide a new or cleared site with basic services for people to buy at low cost, with low-cost loans to buy materials to make their homes)
Ignore them
Bulldoze and clear away
Operation Murambatsvina (Move the Rubbish), also officially known as Operation Restore Order, was a large-scale Zimbabwean government campaign to forcibly clear slum areas across the country
It affected at least 700,000 people directly through the loss of their homes or livelihood and indirectly around 2.4 million people
Robert Mugabe and his government claimed it to be a crackdown on illegal housing and commercial activities, and to reduce the risk of the spread of infectious disease
Critics saw it as a way of driving out anyone who opposed Mugabe's administration
Clear away but relocate people
Occurring in Kibera, Nairobi, Kenya
In 2003, the Kenyan government and UN-Habitat created the Kenya Slum Upgrading Programme, or KENSUP
it aimed to improve the infrastructure and housing of 5.3 million people living in squatter settlements in Kenya
The first step was to build modern high-rise flats and give the residents a chance to own an apartment in the new development
The flagship of KENSUP in Kibera is several concrete buildings called “The Promised Land” by local residents
The apartments inside are heavily subsidised and provide the formalised services that slums lack – like water, sanitation and electricity
Redevelop
Wholesale clearance and redevelopment of squatter areas is a more drastic approach
This involves simply evicting the squatters and rebuilding the site in a more formal and organised way
This is proposed for Dharavi, Mumbai, India and is the approach taken in the UK for many old inner city slum housing areas
The city authorities of Mumbai want to improve the quality of life of the people who live there
This includes the informal or squatter settlement dwellers
Current approaches across Mumbai are complete demolition of the informal settlements to be replaced by high rise tower blocks for people to live in
Self-help or site-and-service schemes
Self-help schemes give people the tools and training to improve their homes. Low-interest loans are available to help pay for the upgrading
Site-and-service schemes give people the chance to buy or rent a piece of land with basic services on a new or cleared site. Low-interest loans allow people to buy the materials for building their new homes
In Rocinha, self-help schemes have improved the area from squatter settlements to low-quality housing where the majority of homes have basic services like electricity
There are now services in Rocinha including cafes and shops
Some people have been granted legal ownership of the land on which their houses are built
'The Favela Bairro Project' or 'Slum to Neighbourhood' project is a site-and-service scheme
The local authority provides residents from favelas brick houses to rent, built with electricity, running water and sanitation pipes installed
Some people are allowed to buy these houses
Services in these areas also include refusing collection, schools and health centres
Ignore
Some local authorities either turn a blind eye to the informal settlement and hope they go away
Or they do not have the resources to commit to slum redevelopment
But in some places, such as parts of Rocinha in Rio, many informal settlement dwellers have slowly improved the stability, durability and quality of their homes by buying better quality materials and doing the work themselves
In some parts, people have done this so well and built such a stable community that authorities are no longer required to provide assistance
Worked Example
Study the table below on the quality of life in four cities.
City | Persons per Room | Percentage of homes with power and water | Infant Mortality Rate (per 1000 births) | Noise Index (Scale of 1–10) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mumbai, India | 3.5 | 57 | 46 | 9 |
Washington, USA | 0.5 | 99 | 9 | 7 |
Mexico City, Mexico | 1.8 | 94 | 32 | 6 |
Auckland, New Zealand | 0.7 | 100 | 4 | 5 |
NB: The noise index is on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is low and 10 is high
1. Compare the quality of life between cities in LEDCs and MEDCs
[4 marks]
2. Suggest two other factors that affect quality of life. Justify your answers.
[4 marks]
Possible Answer:
There appears to be no link between noise level and economic development [1]. Infant mortality is much higher in cities in LEDCs [1]. Overcrowding appears to be greatest in LEDCs cities, with Mumbai in India with the highest number of people per room [1]. MEDCs have a better supply of power and water [1] but Mexico City, which is an LEDC, has a high figure [1].
Choice of two with justification from a list of possibilities including:
Refuse collection [1]
Mains sewerage/home sanitation [1]
Crime levels [1]
Unemployment or underemployment [1]
Transport availability - public and private [1]
Overall income levels [1]
Available health care - maternity and child [1]
1 mark each for identified factor and 1 mark for reasons up to a max of 4 marks
Case Study - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Background
Brazil is an important agricultural and industrial power, with the strongest economy in Latin America with Brasilia as its capital
In 1950, Rio de Janeiro (Rio) was the capital of Brazil with a population of 3 million
Today it is the second largest city in Brazil (after São Paulo) with a population of over 12.5 million
Rio is a major trading port, with oil refining and shipbuilding industries
The main exports are iron, steel and crude petroleum
Rio is also a major tourist destination and hosted the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics
Migration
Rapid growth from rural to urban migration in search of jobs
Despite having a large agricultural base, there is no land ownership and few opportunities for advancement
It is difficult and unprofitable farming, with low wages and huge wealth disparities
There is a lack of social amenities, and the area is prone to natural hazards
For many internal migrants, the city offers better job opportunities and higher wages
Along with better schooling and healthcare and the potential for a higher quality of life
Housing
Inward migration has put pressure on services and amenities which has led to a housing shortage
Most rural migrants begin life in the favelas, of which Rocinha is the largest, most developed informal settlement, just south of Rio
Over 20 per cent of the population live in around 1000 favelas in and around the city
Found mainly on the edges of the city, on poor-quality land that is not suitable for urban development
People have no legal rights to the land they occupy
Many of the favelas in Rio are now well-established
95% of favela homes are built of solid materials, such as brick, with 75% having a tiled floor
Some have electricity, running water, televisions, computers and access to the Internet
The newer and less well-established neighbourhoods are overcrowded, consisting of shelters made from materials like timber and corrugated iron and clung to the side of the mountain
Transport
The rapid expansion of Rio from the 1950s was not supported by the necessary urban infrastructure planning
Rio de Janeiro’s roads are seriously congested
Rail services are limited
Private bus services are the main means of public transport
The number of cars in the city is increasing as the population rises and people become wealthier
Underground rail services are efficient but with limited stops along its network
Education
Children start school at 4 years old
School days typically last between 3 and 4 hours, due to lack of space in the classrooms
There is no strict national curriculum in Brazil, but teachers follow national guidelines for the state (county) that they are teaching in
Education is often low quality, due to Brazil investing late in its education system
Many of Rio's public schools are in desperate need of repair adding to poor educational attainment
Rio has the highest rate of non-attendance in school, teenage pregnancy and lack of opportunities for further education
Violence can be a barrier to education as in some neighbourhoods it is not always safe for children to travel to school
Crime Rates
These have increased as the city has grown
This is due in part to high unemployment rates and petty crime such as pickpocketing
Rio has a problem with youth crime and gang violence within the favelas
Many residents feel unsafe in their homes as the gangs control the streets with guns, and trade in drugs
Environmental challenges
The majority of the favela's residents illegally tap into the main electrical grid, making electricity poles in the street unsafe with several households connecting to the one pole
Many households in Rio do not have access to safe, running water as many of the main water pipes are damaged and are leaking
Very few houses in the favelas have water directly to their houses
Access to doctors and healthcare varies across the city with poor access to those in the favelas, raising the risk of spreading diseases such as cholera and typhoid
Urban sprawl is an issue as the city continues to grow rapidly, encroaching on surrounding rural (countryside) areas
Air pollution is a major problem, particularly from traffic congestion in the city centre and from industrial zones
Waste disposal is a particular problem in the favelas, where access is difficult and there are no organised sewage or waste recovery systems
Sewage is not properly disposed of, or treated and this ends up in local rivers and Guanabara Bay, polluting the water and damaging the marine wildlife there
Approaches to improvement
The government has viewed favelas as eyesores which portray a poor image of the city
Local communities, charities and government departments work in collaboration to improve conditions in favelas
The government has to balance improvements without attracting further inward migration and therefore, further favela developments elsewhere
Site and service schemes in Rio
Complexo de Alemao (German complex) has 60000 homes built with improved and regulated materials including power, drainage systems and clean water supplies
Accessibility within the favela was improved through the construction of widened, paved roads, providing access for emergency services and rubbish removal
Roads were given formal names and added to maps, bringing the neighbourhood into the wider city
Safety, particularly at night, was improved through street lighting
Underground cables were installed providing residents with permanent power supplies, and effectively stopping illegal tapping into electrical supplies
The Favela Bairro Project (favela neighbourhood project), began in 1994 and ended in 2008
The aim was to provide essential services to residents and to recognise them formally as neighbourhoods of the city
Families were taught to build stable foundations using strong materials
Residents living in homes deemed too unsafe on the steep hillside were relocated by the local government
Solid, brick homes were built with power, running clean water and sanitation pipes, reducing the impact of water-borne diseases such as cholera
Some residents were able to purchase the homes and were given legal rights to the land
The success of these schemes has been mixed, but many living conditions have been improved, but the topography of the area (steep hillsides) has restricted full development
Improvements are restricted by steep hillsides, heavy rains, floods and landslides
Funding is limited, making improvement for all residents impossible
Cultural activities such as samba, capoeira and reggae are run to stop youths from getting involved in gangs and organised crime
Self-help schemes
Sustainable Favela Network is a charity which helps to build resilience and environmental sustainability in favelas
Many of the initiatives tackle environmental issues such as waste management, community gardens and the preservation of natural surroundings
These lead to improvements in the health and well-being of the residents, reducing strain on local government's stretched budgets
A small favela in Rio’s Tijuca Forest, set up its own bio-systems project to treat waste and sewerage in a bid to it more sustainable
Along with a piping system, they also installed a biodigester to generate gas for cooking instead of throwing waste and sewerage into open pits and streams
In other favelas, charities and authorities have provided training, materials and tools to people to improve their own homes
Low-interest loans help to fund these changes
This helps to create a sense of community, improve skills, employability and reduce unemployment
With residents providing the labour, those costs can be spent on providing other amenities such as power, water, health centres, schools etc.
In Rocinha, most of the houses are now concrete and brick, with basic sanitation, plumbing and electricity
This has allowed Rocinha to develop its infrastructure to include bus links, hand businesses such as pharmacies, shops and banks
Rocinha even has its own television channel on cable tv, called TV ROC
Government investment
The Brazilian Federal Savings Bank supported residents by offering them 100% mortgages to purchase a house
This places responsibility on the homeowner for upgrading and maintenance rather than the government, releasing funds to be spent on other amenities such as paved roads, sewerage systems, street lighting
But many favelas are built in areas with poor access or no public transport, making getting employment or travelling to work difficult and therefore, residents' default on mortgage payments
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?