Justification for the Treaty of Versailles (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE History)

Revision Note

The Post-War Treaties

  • Four other treaties created the Versailles Settlement. These are:

    • The Treaty of St Germain

    • The Treaty of Neuilly

    • The Treaty of Trianon

    • The Treaty of Sevres

  • Representatives of each country were forced to sign the treaty

The Treaty of St Germain

Date

Format

Terms

Impacts

September 1919

The Allies' dictated peace treaty with Austria

  • Ending of the Austro-Hungarian empire

  • Loss of land to Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia

  • Anschluss with Germany forbidden

  • Austria limited to 30,000 troops

  • Reparations 

  • Accept blame for starting the First World War

  • Recognition of the League of Nations

  • Land given to Czechoslovakia housed most of Austria’s industry

  • Austria experienced a financial crisis in 1921

  • Never paid reparations

  • The small states created from the old  Austro-Hungarian empire caused conflict and instability in Eastern and Central Europe

Examiner Tip

An exam question could ask you why the Treaty of St Germain was important. In Paper One, this would be worth 6 marks. You would have to fully explain two reasons why the treaty was important using the PEE structure:

  • P - Make a point about the question

  • E - Use evidence that supports the point that you have made

  • E - Explain why this evidence caused the treaty to be important. Avoid repeating the point again. For example, the treaty ended the Austro-Hungarian empire, which had been one of the most powerful empires before the First World War. 

Apply these skills to any of the treaties mentioned below

The Treaty of Neuilly

Date

Format

Terms

Impacts

November 1919

The Allies' dictated peace treaty with Bulgaria

  • Loss of land to Yugoslavia, Greece and Romania

  • Recognise the existence of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes

  • Bulgaria limited to 20,000 troops

  • Reparations set at £100 million

  • Accept blame for starting the First World War

  • Recognition of the League of Nations

  • Loss of access to the Aegean Sea

  • The Allies cancelled 75% of Bulgaria’s reparation bill

  • Bulgaria continued to claim their right to Macedonia

  • Continued unrest in the Balkans

The Treaty of Trianon

Date

Format

Terms

Impacts

June 1920

The Allies' dictated peace treaty with Hungary

  • Ending of the Austro-Hungarian empire

  • Loss of two-thirds of its land and a third of its population

  • Hungary limited to 35,000 troops

  • Reparations

  • Accept blame for starting the First World War

  • Recognition of the League of Nations

  • The collapse of its economy, which resulted in not paying reparations

  • The treaty forced many ethnic Hungarians, called Magyars, out of Hungary

  • Conflict within Hungary during the 1920s

The Treaty of Sevres

Date

Format

Terms

Impacts

August 1920

The Allies' dictated peace treaty with Ottoman Turkey

  • Ending of the Ottoman empire

  • Britain and France to take control of land in the Middle East

  • Loss of control of the Dardanelles Strait, an important waterway

  • Turkey limited to 50,000 troops

  • Allied control of Turkey’s tax system and budget

  • Reparations

  • Accept blame for starting the First World War

  • Recognition of the League of Nations

  • The people of Turkey threatened to overthrow the government

  • The Allies negotiated a new treaty with Turkey in 1923 called the Treaty of Lausanne

  • The new treaty gave Turkey 

    • Land back in Europe

    • Control of the Dardanelles Strait

    • No reparations or restriction of the army

Worked Example

What features of the Treaty of Versailles were shared by the other peace treaties of 1919–20? 

4 marks

Answers:

All five of the post-war treaties made countries accept a War Guilt Clause (1). All allies of Germany had an obligation to pay reparations (1). Each losing nation had to restrict its army (1). The defeated countries all lost territory (1).

Examiner Tip

Other potential answers to this question include:

  • Recognition of the League of Nations

  • All the treaties were diktats

Impact of the peace treaties of 1919-1920

Key Opinions on the Treaty of Versailles

A map showing how the postwar treaties affected Europe
A map showing how the postwar treaties affected Europe

The Treaty of Versailles can be justified

The Treaty of Versailles cannot be justified

Some journalists in Britain insisted that Germany could afford the reparations

Due to economic crashes, Austria’s and Hungary’s reparations were cancelled. When Germany’s economy collapsed, the Allies reduced but did not stop reparations

The French claimed that Germany’s diktat on Russia in 1917, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, was much harsher than the Treaty of Versailles

The Treaty of Lausanne undermined the Treaty of Versailles. It indicated that the Allied politicians knew the Versailles Settlement was unfair

Marshal Foch, the French commander of the Allied forces, stated that the treaty did not protect France from invasion

Some British politicians and journalists believed that the treaty’s terms would cause Germany to start another world war

Some politicians in the USA believed the treaty was the best solution, given the political context in 1919

The Allies had different motives and aims. They were more interested in achieving their own aims rather than creating a fair treaty

Some people in Britain and France thought that the treaty was too lenient. As long as Germany existed as a country, they were still a threat to world peace

Forcing Germans to live under foreign rule and its exclusion from the League of Nations isolated Germany. This increased support for extremist groups in Germany

Contemporary Opinions of the Treaty of Versailles

A cartoon published in a US newspaper, 1921. Germany is saying, ‘Let’s see you collect it.’
A cartoon published in a US newspaper, 1921. Germany is saying, ‘Let’s see you collect it.’
Placard for Lloyd's News on 29th June 1919. It is announcing the signing of the Treaty of Versailles
Placard for Lloyd's News on 29th June 1919. It is announcing the signing of the Treaty of Versailles

“If we aim at the impoverishment of Central Europe, vengeance, I dare say, will not limp. Nothing can then delay for very long the forces of Reaction and the despairing convulsions of Revolution, before which the horrors of the later German war will fade into nothing, and which will destroy, whoever is victor, the civilisation and the progress of our generation.”

A quote from the British economist John Maynard Keynes in The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919)

Worked Example

Study Sources E and F. Whose account can be trusted more, Wilson’s or House's? Explain your answer using details of the sources and your knowledge.

8 marks

Source E:  From a speech by President Wilson during a tour across the US, 8 September 1919

I want to say that I did not find any of my colleagues in Paris reluctant to do justice to Germany. But I hear that this treaty is very hard on Germany. When a country has committed a criminal act, the punishment is hard, but the punishment is not unjust. Germany permitted itself, through an unscrupulous government, to commit a criminal act against mankind, and it is to undergo the punishment, not more than it can endure but up to the point where it can pay it. But the terms of this treaty will not be fully carried out if any one of the great influences that brought that result about is withheld from its implementation. Every great fighting nation in the world is on the list of those who are to constitute the League of Nations. I say every great nation, because America is going to be included among them, and the only choice, my fellow citizens, is whether we will go in now or come in later with Germany.

Source F: A diary extract from Edward House, a member of the USA's delegation to the Paris Peace Conference 

June 29, 1919: I am leaving Paris, after eight fateful months, with conflicting emotions. Looking at the conference in retrospect there is much to approve and much to regret. It is easy to say what should have been done, but more difficult to have found a way for doing it…

How splendid it would have been had we blazed a new and better trail! However, it is to be doubted whether this could have been done, even if those in authority had so decreed, for the peoples back of them had to be reckoned with. It may be that Wilson might have had the power and influence if he had remained in Washington and kept clear of the Conference. When he stepped from his lofty pedestal and wrangled with representatives of other states upon equal terms, he became as common clay.

To those who are saying that the Treaty is bad and should never have been made and that it will involve Europe in infinite difficulties in its enforcement, I feel like admitting it. 

Partial answer:

I believe that House’s account is more trustworthy than Wilson’s (1). This is because of the type of source it is. House was writing in his diary at the time of the Paris Peace Conference. This allowed House to be more honest about his unhappiness with the Versailles Settlement (1). In comparison, Wilson’s source is a speech on his tour of the US. Wilson had to be more positive about the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles to satisfy the American public. Therefore, House is more likely to represent how the US government truly felt about the Treaty of Versailles (1).

Examiner Tip

This question would be worth 8 marks in Paper 1. To complete this answer successfully, you should:

  • Evaluate the nature, origin and purpose of both sources

  • Explain how the two sources differ

  • Consider the author of each source and the knowledge of the historical event, in this case, the Treaty of Versailles

  • Come to a conclusion about which source is more trustworthy

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.