Why Did Britain & France Declare War on Germany? (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Zoe Wade
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
British-French Guarantee of Poland, March 1939
After Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia, Britain and France believed that Hitler’s next move was to retake Poland
The Versailles Settlement established the Polish Corridor from German land
Poland cut Germany’s territory into two separate areas
The free city of Danzig lay in Poland
It had been made free in the Versailles Settlement
It used to be a German city and contained many Germans
Hitler had already demanded the return of Danzig
Hitler was expanding eastwards
Czechoslovakia bordered Poland
Britain and France abandoned the concept of appeasement by March 1939
They did not believe that Hitler would stop his aggressive foreign policy
Britain and France had made significant progress in rearmament
IMAGE
A map showing how far Hitler had extended Germany’s territory by March 1939
On 31st March 1939, Britain and France made a formal agreement with Poland
The two countries promised that they would protect Poland’s borders
The Polish Crisis and the Outbreak of War
Hitler was surprised that Britain declared war because:
Britain and France had allowed Hitler to get away with similar invasions
Hitler believed he could negotiate with Britain
Hitler thought that, if he promised not to invade Britain and its colonies, Britain would allow Hitler to control Europe
Hitler believed that he had legitimate reasons to invade Poland
Germans lived in the Polish Corridor
Danzig was originally a German city
He did not think Britain was prepared for war
This morning the British ambassador in Berlin handed the German government a final note stating that unless we heard from them by 11 o'clock that they were prepared at once to withdraw their troops from Poland, a state of war would exist between us. I have to tell you now that no such undertaking has been received, and that consequently this country is at war with Germany |
A section of Chamberlain’s radio broadcast, declaring the outbreak of the Second World War, 3rd September 1939 |
Worked Example
Are you surprised that Germany invaded Poland in September 1939? Explain your answer
10 marks
Partial answer:
On one hand, I am not surprised that Hitler invaded Poland in September 1939 (1). Germany and the USSR signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August. A key term in this pact was the division of Poland between the two powers (1). This meant that Hitler knew that if he invaded Poland he would not be attacked by the USSR. As a result, it should have been very clear to the world powers that Hitler intended to invade Poland quickly to expand his territory (1).
Examiner Tips and Tricks
A strong response for this Paper One question needs to examine both sides of the argument. The next paragraph would explain why it was surprising that Hitler invaded Poland. You could use the British-French guarantee to Poland. Continue to use a clear PEE structure as shown above.
You would then need to write a conclusion explaining how surprised you are that Hitler invaded Poland in September 1939. Remember to use phrases like ‘fully’ or ‘partially’ to explain how surprised you are about Hitler’s actions.
Causes of the Second World War
Cause | Why did this cause the Second World War? |
---|---|
The harsh terms of the treaty caused significant political and economic issues in Germany. Lloyd George warned that the terms would cause a future conflict. The resentment for the treaty was one of the causes of the election of Hitler in 1933 | |
In the 1920s, the League of Nations had proven itself to be weak and ineffective. The League’s lack of action against the Manchurian and the Abyssinian Crises encouraged Hitler to take risks in his foreign policy. Britain and France favoured their own interests over the League’s | |
Hitler’s aims were aggressive and expansionist. Ideas about Grossdeutchland and Lebensraum meant expanding eastwards into other countries. Hitler invested heavily in rearmament and the Luftwaffe. Possessing this much military power made war more likely | |
The policy gave Hitler Austria and the Sudetenland against their governments and the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler viewed Britain and France as weak. This encouraged him to make increasingly outrageous demands that would lead to war | |
The USSR had many reasons to avoid breaking the pact. As a result, Britain and France were weaker without the USSR. The pact gave Hitler the perfect conditions to invade Poland. He knew that, if his actions triggered a war, he would only fight this with Britain and France |
Worked Example
Study Sources A and B. How far do these two sources agree? Explain your answer using details of the sources
7 marks
Source A: From a history book published in 1992 The Czech crisis brought Europe very close to war. Hitler wrote at this time, ‘It is my unalterable decision to smash Czechoslovakia by military action.’ The effects of the Munich Agreement had profound implications for European diplomacy and the balance of power, since with hindsight it is clear that Hitler was now prepared to pursue a policy of war, although he wanted to fight any conflict on his terms. His ultimate objective was still the creation of Lebensraum at the expense of the USSR, but hopefully this could be achieved by Britain’s appeasement policy developing into a more general acceptance of Germany’s dominant position in central and eastern Europe. In March 1939 Germany had secured the self-dissolution of the Czech state. Some historians have pointed to the various military orders Hitler gave at this time for the establishment of long-range bomber squadrons and the construction of a large navy as evidence that he was willing to take on Britain. This may well have been his long-term intention, but in the short term Hitler most definitely did not want a war with Britain and France. How could he avoid such a conflict while pursuing his claims against Poland? It was the hope of neutralising Britain and France which drove Hitler into the arms of Stalin. After the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was signed, Hitler was confident that western military involvement would not follow a German invasion of Poland. But by 3 September Germany was at war with Britain and France. How did Germany find itself in this position? The cause was Hitler’s desire for continental hegemony* and Lebensraum which could only be achieved (as he well knew) by military force *hegemony = the dominance of one group over another |
Source B: From a history book published in 1960 The main thrust of Hitler’s foreign policy was eastwards. He wanted a German empire in eastern Europe but no more. He hoped to achieve this without war. Germany posed no threat to Britain. Chamberlain caused German hostility towards Britain by unnecessarily intervening in the Sudeten crisis of May and September 1938. Hitler may have directed his generals to prepare for war but this was only to make Germany stronger, not to fight a war. Hitler believed that Germany was most likely to make gains in eastern Europe if it was strong. He also believed that Communism might break down without a war, allowing him to get what he wanted with no effort at all. However, he had no firm plans and was willing to improvise and take what was offered to him by circumstances. He wanted no more than to make Germany a great power, an aim which all countries have. Hitler’s speech in August 1939 tells us the importance of the Pact with the Soviet Union, ‘Now the probability is great that the West will not intervene.’ His promise to Britain in August that Germany’s frontier in the West was final and that he would not threaten the British Empire, shows he had no ambitions directed against Britain and France. By the end of August the breach between Poland and its allies Britain and France was widening and could soon be wide open. However, it also gave Hitler a chance and he gambled on it by ordering the attack on Poland. This decision, based as it was on Hitler supposing that Britain and France would not go to war, was a mistake, a miscalculation. |
Partial answer:
Sources A and B disagree on whether Hitler was prepared for a world war (1). Source A states that Hitler planned for the possibility of war. It states that his foreign aim policies “could only be achieved (as he well knew) by military force” (1). Hitler began an aggressive and expensive rearmament programme in 1933. By 1939, there were around 1.4 million men in the German armed forces and a total cost of 26 billion marks on rearmament (1). However, Source B states that Hitler was improvising and did not have a war plan. Source B states that Hitler “hoped to achieve [a German empire] without war” and “gambled” on attacking Poland (1).
Examiner Tips and Tricks
For written sources in Paper Two, use a quote directly from the source to provide evidence. You can use square brackets [...] to replace words like ‘it’ with the event referred to in a previous sentence. This ensures that your quotes are short and to the point. Do not be afraid to take quotes from multiple parts of the source (as the worked example does for Source B). This helps you show the examiner that you understand the overall message of the source.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?