What was International Diplomacy Like in the 1920s? (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Zoe Wade
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
The Washington Naval Agreement, 1922
What is International Diplomacy?
International diplomacy is how countries communicate and work together
This takes the form of negotiating alliances, treaties and agreements
When a country has a friendly foreign policy, international diplomacy is good
When a country has an aggressive foreign policy, they do not want to make compromises, which affects diplomacy
During the 1920s, international diplomacy was good
However, countries made agreements outside of the League’s influence. This was because:
Important nations like the USA, the USSR and Germany were not members
The League was slow at making decisions
The Washington Naval Agreement, 1922
Aims | Countries | Terms | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
| The USA, Britain, Italy and Japan An additional agreement made with Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal and China |
|
|
The Rapallo Treaty, 1922
Aims | Countries | Terms | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
| Germany and the USSR |
|
|
The Locarno Treaty, 1925
Aims | Countries | Terms | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
| Germany, Britain, France, Italy and Belgium |
|
|
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Paper Two presents you with unseen sources and asks you a series of source analysis questions. Before the exam, study as many written and visual sources as you can on the specified core content topic. It may result in you knowing one of the sources that appears in the paper. David Low was born in New Zealand but worked in the UK. He created many political cartoons for The Star (1919 - 1927) and the Evening Standard (1927-1950). He is best known for his cartoons about Hitler and Appeasement, which are covered in Hitler’s Foreign Policy.
The Dawes Plan, 1925
Aims | Countries | Terms | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
| Germany and the USA Created by Charles G. Dawes, an American banker |
|
|
Diagram of the Dawes Plan
The Dawes Plan was risky
Britain, France and Germany were gambling their economies on the USA’s prosperity
In 1929, Stresemann stated that Germany was “dancing on a volcano”. If the USA recalled the loans or experienced a depression, the ‘volcano’ would erupt and destroy the stability of Weimar Germany
The Young Plan, 1929
Aims | Countries | Terms | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
| Germany and the USA Created by Owen Young, an American banker |
|
|
How Did International Diplomacy Impact the League of Nations?
The League encouraged other countries to pursue better international relations
The number of treaties agreed upon shows a positive political environment in the 1920s
Even in the 1920s, League members were bypassing the Assembly and Council
The League of Nations discussed issues but rarely developed solutions
League members entered the above treaties independently, not as representatives of the League
Wilson intended the League to lead the way in international agreements. Instead, it gained a reputation of words over actions
During the 1920s, countries began to ignore the League and pursue their own foreign policies
Worked Example
‘It was the behaviour of member states, not the structure of the League, that led to its failure.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer
10 marks
Partial answer:
I think the behaviour of member states was the main reason why the League failed (1). This is because, from the beginning of the League in 1920, its members were bypassing it (1). An example of this is the Washington Naval Agreement in 1922. The USA, Britain, Italy and Japan entered an agreement to restrict the building of battleships and ease naval competition (1). The Washington Naval Agreement demonstrates a failure in the League of Nations because Britain, France, Japan and Italy were the League’s permanent members yet did not attend as League representatives. This shows that the member states were more worried about achieving their interests rather than embracing co-operation through the League’s Assembly. This mindset would make the League fail regardless of its structure (1).
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In Paper One, a ten-mark question requires you to consider:
Providing a balanced argument. You should have a minimum of three explanations (two on one side; one on the other)
The strength of both sides of the argument. The member states had their own ambitions, for example, Britain wanted to use the League to expand its empire. However, the previous revision note discussed the issues with the League’s structure. For example, the Assembly only met once a year so decision-making could be slow. Therefore, there are multiple reasons why the League of Nations failed.
Concluding your thoughts with a reflection on the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement. Use words like 'partially' or 'fully' to explain this.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?