Planning Long Term (Edexcel IGCSE Geography)
Revision Note
Written by: Bridgette Barrett
Reviewed by: Jenna Quinn
Risk Assessments & Hazard Mapping
Long Term Planning
Occurs after the hazard event
Looks back at the event and evaluate what could be done to reduce the impact of any future hazard events:
Was emergency aid distributed effectively
Are there areas which are at particular risk should they be protected more or buildings moved
Could warning systems be improved
Are people educated about the risks and do they know what to do during the event to protect themselves?
Can building codes and planning be improved to reduce the number of buildings which collapse
Risk assessment and hazard mapping are both part of the long-term planning process
Risk Assessment
Risk is the probability that a hazard event will have harmful consequences
The more vulnerable a population is the greater the risk that a hazard event will cause deaths, injuries, damage to buildings and impact the economy
The number of deaths from earthquakes has increased
Increasing populations and urban areas means that more people are living in areas at risk
Hazard Mapping and GIS
Maps the areas where earthquakes are most likely to occur
Enables planning of where important services and infrastructure should be located - land use zoning
Identifies correlation between risk and vulnerability
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In the exam you may be asked to look at GIS or hazard maps. The key things to identify are
Which areas are most at risk?
How can they help organisations and government plan?
Identify the main roads into areas for emergency aid
To inform land use zoning so hospitals etc... are not built in vulnerable areas
To coordinate all the agencies involved when there is a hazard event
To identify if there a link between vulnerability and risk
Rebuilding Programmes
In an earthquake, it is the collapsing buildings which cause the most injuries and deaths
Earthquakes cannot be prevented, so reducing the damage to buildings is key to minimising the impacts. This can be achieved by:
Reducing the number of buildings in high risk areas
Building earthquake resistant buildings
Large scale rebuilding is often required after an earthquake event
Existing buildings and structures, such as bridges, can be retrofitted to make them safer in future events
Case Studies: Nepal & Japan
Nepal - A Developing Country
The Asian Development Bank provided US$200 million for rehabilitation
A government task force was created to plan and deal with future earthquakes
An international donor meeting in June 2015 led to US$4.4 billion being pledged (only a small portion has currently been paid to Nepal)
National Reconstruction Authority was formed by the government. Part of the role is ensuring that funding is distributed to help people rebuild their houses
Disaster Management Act passed by the government
Improved building code with increased awareness of the code within communities
Stonemason training courses to ensure that new buildings are earthquake resistance
Increased education and practice of earthquake drills
Japan - A Developed Country
Building Back Better - considers building codes, town planning and infrastructure
New tsunami walls have been constructed 25-30m high
A new US$31 million warning system launched in 2013
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Developed countries often have less to change in their long term planning because their preparation for the hazard is better. However, the costs of any disaster are often greater than in a developing country. This because the buildings, roads and infrastructure that is damaged are more expensive.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?