Sociological Perspectives on Power & Authority (AQA GCSE Sociology)
Revision Note
Written by: Raj Bonsor
Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson
Key thinker: Weber (1947) on power & authority
Sociologists study the way power relationships work in society
They focus on inequalities in power between different individuals and groups
Max Weber (1974) was an influential early sociologist who studied power
He argued that an individual or group has power when they are able to get what they want despite opposition from others
In Weber's view, we exercise power when we influence someone, even against their will
Sources of power
According to Weber, power is based on coercion or authority
Coercion entails the use of force or threats, such as torture or violence
People obey because they believe they have no other option and are compelled to do so against their will
For example, when an abuser demands to look through their partner's phone and threatens to use violence if they don't comply, they are exercising coercive power
Authority is exercised over people when they willingly agree to obey an individual or group because they see it as the right thing to do
Force is unnecessary because people consent to power being exercised over them
For example, a teacher exercises authority over students in the classroom when they willingly answer a question posed to them
Sources of authority
According to Weber, those who are under authority recognise the legitimacy of power and agree to it being used against them
Weber identified three types of authority:
Traditional authority
This type of authority is based on custom and tradition
For example, the authority of the monarchy is based on tradition
Rational legal authority
This type of authority is based on people accepting a set of laws or rules
People obey a group or an individual because they agree with the laws or rules that underpin their authority
Rational legal authority operates within a bureaucracy, i.e. an organisation with a hierarchy and a clear set of rules
For example, prison inmates accept the prison officers' authority to monitor them as they know they will be punished if they break prison rules
Charismatic authority
This type of authority is based on obeying a leader who has exceptional personal qualities that are inspiring
Political or religious leaders with charisma are regarded as extraordinary individuals with the power to cause social change
For example, Martin Luther King Jr (1929–1968) was a charismatic civil rights leader who led the American civil rights movement
Weber recognised that an individual's authority is likely to be a mix of two types of authority
Teachers, for instance, have rational legal authority, but some may also inspire students and thus have charismatic authority
Marxist perspectives on power
Marxist approaches see power as closely linked to social class relationships
The bourgeoisie's power comes from their possession of the means of production, i.e. land, factories and machinery
Marxist approaches argue that the bourgeoisie use their power to exploit the proletariat, i.e. the working class
Because political power stems from economic power, the bourgeoisie also possess political power as a result of their economic dominance
Feminist perspectives on power
Feminist approaches argue that Marxist and Weberian accounts of power do not pay enough attention to gender
Gender inequality is the most important source of division in society
Many feminist approaches to the study of power and power relationships focus on patriarchy
Feminists argue that society is controlled by men who have considerable power within politics and the workplace
Men generally have a bigger share of wealth and social status
Women are held back by a glass ceiling, which acts as an invisible barrier preventing women from reaching top positions and earnings due to oppression and exploitation in work, home and state
Women are under-represented among holders of political power, decision-makers, and senior judges in Britain
Key thinker: Walby (1990) on patriarchy
Feminist sociologist Walby (1990) focuses on gender inequalities and women's subordination in society
Method
Walby reviewed existing research theories from sociology, economics, history and political science
She also examined secondary sources such as historical data and feminist literature
Findings
Walby defines patriarchy as a system of social structures and practices in which men dominate and exploit women
She described six patriarchal structures that restrict women and help to maintain male domination of society:
Paid employment
Whilst in theory the state supports equality between the sexes, women continue to be disadvantaged in the labour market
Women typically earn less than men and are excluded from better-paid work
Women tend to have the worst jobs in the labour market
Women's lesser participation in the labour force results from material constraints, e.g. their wages are so low that paid work is not worthwhile
A disparity exists between girls’ better educational performance and their lower status positions in the workplace
The household
Husbands and partners exploit women by benefiting from their unpaid labour in the home
Women work a triple shift (Duncombe and Marsden), where women who engage in paid work are also more likely to take the lead on domestic tasks and ‘emotional work’ within the family
Culture
Whilst women have gained more freedom, they continue to be subject to social expectations, which apply different standards to the behaviour of men and women
For example, culture differentiates between masculinity and femininity
Femininity is defined in terms of being sexually attractive to men
Sexuality
Whilst women have greater freedom to express their sexuality, they do so while subject to double standards
For instance, women who have multiple partners are usually criticised, but men who have multiple partners are frequently admired by other men
Male violence against women
The use or threat of violence discourages women from challenging patriarchal authority
Male violence is a form of power over women
Except in extreme circumstances, the state declines to take action against it
The state
State policies and actions relating to gender have changed since the 19th century
For example, it is now easier to divorce
While the state is not as patriarchal as it used to be, it continues to do relatively little to protect women from patriarchal power in society
For example, women still generally receive lower wages than men, and equal opportunities laws, e.g., the Equalities Act 2010, are rarely enforced
Conclusion
Walby argued that the nature of patriarchy in Western society has changed
The gender pay gap and qualifications gap have reduced
There has been a shift from private patriarchy to public patriarchy
Evaluation
Liberal feminists argue that legal barriers have been removed and more women are reaching top positions than ever before, thus breaking the glass ceiling
Reasons for this include:
improved educational performance of girls, which has allowed them to reach higher positions in the workplace
increased opportunities for women in the workplace, allowing them to focus on their careers
Critics argue that there have been attempts to recruit more women into politics, e.g., all women shortlists (AWS) were first introduced by the Labour Party in 1997 to address the gender imbalance in parliament
There are more female MPs in the House of Commons than there ever has been and this was achieved without AWS in the 2024 General Election
Catherine Hakim suggests that the gender pay gap exists as women make a lifestyle choice to leave the labour force to have children
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?