Studies of Affluent Workers (AQA GCSE Sociology)
Revision Note
The embourgeoisement thesis
According to some sociologists, wealthy working-class families were adopting middle-class norms and values in the late 1950s and early 1960s
This embourgeoisement thesis claims that their affluence caused them to:
support capitalism
have aspirations centred on consumerism
embrace individualistic, privatised lifestyles focused on themselves and their family
Traditional working-class values of solidarity, criticism of capitalism, and support for trade unions and the labour movement had disappeared
Goldthorpe & Lockwood's affluent worker study
Goldthorpe and Lockwood's study testing the embourgeoisement thesis was carried out in Luton in the early 1960s
The researchers used structured interviews to question affluent manual workers and their wives from three different companies
They were asked about their attitudes to work, lifestyles, aspirations and political views
Goldthorpe and Lockwood's findings led them to reject the embourgeoisement thesis
However, they argued that affluent workers might be part of an emerging 'new' working class who were similar to the middle class in the following ways:
They had privatised, home-centred lifestyles
Goldthorpe and Lockwood called this privatised instrumentalism
They were similar in terms of their instrumental collectivism
i.e. they joined in collective actions through trade unions but only to improve their own pay rather than to change society for the benefit of everybody
They had an instrumental attitude to paid work, meaning that work was just a means to living a comfortable lifestyle
Key study: Devine (1992): The affluent worker revisited
Fiona Devine (1992) has a critical perspective and revisited Luton and the ideas of Goldthorpe and Lockwood two decades after their study
Since the early 1960s, the town had experienced a recession
Aim
Devine's aim was to explore privatised instrumentalism
i.e. how far working-class lifestyles centred on the immediate family in the home in the 1980s
Devine interviewed a sample of male manual workers employed at the
Vauxhall car plant in Luton and their wives
By returning to Luton, she was able to make a direct comparison with the work of Goldthorpe and Lockwood in the 1960s, which she was critical of
Findings
Devine compared her own findings with those of Goldthorpe and Lockwood:
Goldthorpe and Lockwood: the affluent worker | Devine: the affluent worker revisited |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions
Devine concluded that working-class lifestyles , norms and values have not changed as much as Goldthorpe & Lockwood's affluent worker study suggested
She also rejected the idea of the ‘new working class’ and suggested that affluent workers were critical of capitalism
There was limited evidence to support the idea of embourgeoisement and privatised instrumentalism
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?