Studies of Affluent Workers (AQA GCSE Sociology)

Revision Note

Raj Bonsor

Written by: Raj Bonsor

Reviewed by: Lucy Vinson

Updated on

The embourgeoisement thesis

  • According to some sociologists, wealthy working-class families were adopting middle-class norms and values in the late 1950s and early 1960s

  • This embourgeoisement thesis claims that their affluence caused them to:

    • support capitalism

    • have aspirations centred on consumerism

    • embrace individualistic, privatised lifestyles focused on themselves and their family

  • Traditional working-class values of solidarity, criticism of capitalism, and support for trade unions and the labour movement had disappeared

Goldthorpe & Lockwood's affluent worker study

  • Goldthorpe and Lockwood's study testing the embourgeoisement thesis was carried out in Luton in the early 1960s

  • The researchers used structured interviews to question affluent manual workers and their wives from three different companies

    • They were asked about their attitudes to work, lifestyles, aspirations and political views

  • Goldthorpe and Lockwood's findings led them to reject the embourgeoisement thesis

  • However, they argued that affluent workers might be part of an emerging 'new' working class who were similar to the middle class in the following ways:

    • They had privatised, home-centred lifestyles

      • Goldthorpe and Lockwood called this privatised instrumentalism

    • They were similar in terms of their instrumental collectivism

      • i.e. they joined in collective actions through trade unions but only to improve their own pay rather than to change society for the benefit of everybody

    • They had an instrumental attitude to paid work, meaning that work was just a means to living a comfortable lifestyle

Key study: Devine (1992): The affluent worker revisited

  • Fiona Devine (1992) has a critical perspective and revisited Luton and the ideas of Goldthorpe and Lockwood two decades after their study

  • Since the early 1960s, the town had experienced a recession

Aim

  • Devine's aim was to explore privatised instrumentalism

    • i.e. how far working-class lifestyles centred on the immediate family in the home in the 1980s

  • Devine interviewed a sample of male manual workers employed at the

    Vauxhall car plant in Luton and their wives

  • By returning to Luton, she was able to make a direct comparison with the work of Goldthorpe and Lockwood in the 1960s, which she was critical of

Findings

  • Devine compared her own findings with those of Goldthorpe and Lockwood:

Goldthorpe and Lockwood: the affluent worker

Devine: the affluent worker revisited

  • Affluent workers were geographically mobile

  • They moved to Luton to find highly paid manual work and to improve their standard of living

  • They had an instrumental attitude towards paid work in that it was a way to improve living standards rather than to get job satisfaction or to make friends

  • Workers were geographically mobile

  • They wanted to improve their living standards but their move wasn't just for this reason

  • Many were forced to escape unemployment and job insecurity and to find affordable housing

  • They were not purely instrumental in their geographical move

  • Affluent workers were like the traditional working class in that their friends were working-class neighbours

  • But like the lower middle class, their lives and social relationships were privatised and home-centred; e.g., they spent leisure time watching TV and socialising with immediate family members (privatised instrumentalism)

  • Families had not moved to Luton on their own but joined family and friends there

  • They helped each other move by providing information on job opportunities and housing in Luton

  • Geographical mobility did not lead to separation from kin and a home-centred and family-centred lifestyle

  • They did not have purely privatised lifestyles

  • Affluent workers had individualistic social and political attitudes

  • They supported the Labour Party for individual gain, and they had an instrumental attitude towards trade unions

  • Unlike the traditional working class, these affluent workers were not motivated by working-class solidarity and the idea of 'sticking together'

  • Their aspirations and their social and political values were not solely individualistic

  • There was plenty of evidence of solidarity among the interviewees rather than individualism

  • Many resented the privileges of inherited wealth and felt it was unfair as it was not earned

  • They felt extreme class inequalities in society were unfair

  • They had lost faith in the ability of the Labour Party to deliver a more just and equal society

Conclusions

  • Devine concluded that working-class lifestyles , norms and values have not changed as much as Goldthorpe & Lockwood's affluent worker study suggested

  • She also rejected the idea of the ‘new working class’ and suggested that affluent workers were critical of capitalism

  • There was limited evidence to support the idea of embourgeoisement and privatised instrumentalism

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.

Lucy Vinson

Author: Lucy Vinson

Expertise: Psychology Subject Lead

Lucy has been a part of Save My Exams since 2024 and is responsible for all things Psychology & Social Science in her role as Subject Lead. Prior to this, Lucy taught for 5 years, including Computing (KS3), Geography (KS3 & GCSE) and Psychology A Level as a Subject Lead for 4 years. She loves teaching research methods and psychopathology. Outside of the classroom, she has provided pastoral support for hundreds of boarding students over a four year period as a boarding house tutor.