How Have Relationships Within Families Changed Over Time? (AQA GCSE Sociology)
Revision Note
Written by: Raj Bonsor
Reviewed by: Cara Head
Pre-industrial, industrial and modern parent-child relationships
Over time, there have been major changes in the dynamics of parent-child relationships
Pre-industrial parent-child relationships
Children, beyond infancy, were not considered to have needs which differed from those of adults so the concept of childhood did not exist
Young children started working at a young age to support their families because they were viewed as 'mini-adults' who had the same responsibilities and skills as adults
Parental attitudes towards children were very different from today due to high death rates, which encouraged indifference and neglect towards infants
Industrial parent-child relationships
In the 19th century, children's experiences differed according to their social class
Middle-class children were often looked after by a nurse
Working-class children (boys more so than girls) were expected to work in paid employment in factories such as cotton mills and coal mines
Many girls were involved in unpaid work at home such as housework and childminding
The state began to provide education, but since many parents relied on their children's income, poverty may have prevented them from sending their children to school
According to Willmott and Young, childhood became officially recognised as a separate stage of life when children were legally required to attend school up to age 14 (Education Act, 1918)
Modern parent-child relationships
As a result of their increased rights and recognition of their views, families are becoming increasingly child-centred
Class differences still exist in that middle-class families are more likely to have democratic relationships with their children and involve them in major household decisions (such as moving house or where to go on holiday)
Parent-child relationships are emotionally closer and parents are more attentive due to smaller family sizes
The emphasis is less on punishment, obedience and parental authority and more on individual freedom
However, one could argue that these changes have created a 'toxic' childhood as children are increasingly isolated
Due to mobile phones and social media, parents are no longer able to control what their children have access to
Financial dependence
Young people are financially dependent on their families for longer, as the minimum school-leaving age was raised to 18 years in 2015
Even though they may have part-time jobs, young people are legally limited in the number of hours they can work, and the national minimum wage is lower for those under 21
Many young adults move back home to live with their parents, having originally moved away
They are known as boomerang kids who may return to the family home after university, a relationship breakdown or because of expensive housing
This, as well as youth unemployment, can lead to conflict within the family
However, children's dependence on the family can be questioned as:
many children contribute to childcare and housework
some children help out in family businesses
some children are young carers for a family member, providing emotional and practical support
children of immigrant parents may be asked to translate for their parents
Therefore, it could be argued that children contribute a great deal to their families (Scott, 2004)
How people's relationships with wider family have changed
Young and Willmott (1957) studied family life in Bethnal Green in 1950s London and found that:
the extended family flourished among working-class families as many young married couples lived with one set of parents
family ties were strong and 43% of daughters had seen their mothers within the previous 24 hours
In their later study, Willmott and Young (1973) found that the nuclear family had become more separated from the extended family because of:
increasing geographical mobility (moving to another area of the UK or country)
women's increasing involvement in paid work and growing financial independence reduced the need for a supportive extended family
It could be argued that the wider, extended family is becoming less important in Britain and that family ties are weakening
However, due to cultural diversity, there is a relatively high percentage of extended families found in the British Asian community
Alternative view
Charles et al. (2008) studied families in Swansea between 1960 and 2002 and found that family members continue to depend on each other
There were high rates of in-person interactions between family members:
Grandparents regularly cared for their grandchildren, enabling young women to continue paid employment
Fathers helped adult children with home improvements
Adult children looked after their parents
Older grandchildren were involved in caring for their grandparents
Geographical mobility impacted the support family members received, but it came in the form of telephone calls, visits and financial support
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You can use this content to help you answer a question on whether the extended family is still important in Britain today. Include official statistics to support your argument as well as a comparison of what functionalists, feminists and Marxists think about the importance of this family type.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?