The Relationship Between Age & Crime (AQA GCSE Sociology)
Revision Note
Written by: Raj Bonsor
Reviewed by: Cara Head
Official statistics on age & crime
There is a link between age and offending behaviour, with young people (especially males) being more likely to engage in criminal activity than older people
Young people who do engage in crime tend to commit relatively minor offences, such as theft and handling stolen goods
According to the Youth Justice Board (2024), between April 2022 and March 2023:
stop and searches of children (10-17 years) increased by 13% and accounted for over one in five of the total stop and searches
arrests of children increased by 9% compared with the previous year
Young people are more likely to reoffend compared to adults (Ministry of Justice, 2022)
Explanations for the link between age & crime
Excitement
Young people are more likely to engage in crime and deviance as they seek excitement
The experience of rule-breaking is attractive to young people
It is exciting and causes an adrenaline rush
Inadequate socialisation
Functionalist theories argue that children who fail to learn society's norms and values are likely to engage in crime and deviance from a young age
Ineffective primary socialisation is due to poor quality parenting, which leads to crime:
parents don't take responsibility for their children's upbringing
parents don't supervise their children
some children grow up in fatherless families.
Other agencies of socialisation (schools, religion and mass media) also fail to socialise children into society's norms and values because:
schools fail to discipline children
the influence of religious values is declining
mass media (the film and music industry) glamorises gun crime and violence
Therefore, there is a breakdown in the social control of some young people at home and school
This view is supported by the New Right perspective (Murray, 1998), which believes that
inadequate socialisation of the underclass leads to criminal behaviour
families without fathers lack strong male role models so young people find them in inappropriate places
Examiner Tips and Tricks
It is important to recognise the link between the inadequate socialisation explanation of crime and deviance and whether it is impacted by changes in family structure.
A point of comparison to consider is the work of Heidensohn (control theory) and Carlen (class and gender deals), as the inadequate socialisation explanation may not apply fully to women's involvement in crime.
Key thinker: Cohen's (1955) subcultural theory
The values of a specific subculture are used by subcultural theory to explain both adult and juvenile delinquency
Functionalist Cohen (1995) studied juvenile delinquency among working-class boys in North America and found that:
juvenile delinquency is more of a group issue than an individual issue
young males learn to become delinquent by joining groups or gangs where delinquency already exists
being part of a delinquent subculture is a way of life for boys in urban neighbourhoods in large cities
delinquent acts carried out by the boys included stealing, vandalism, violence and truancy
Explanations for juvenile delinquency
Cohen argues that working-class boys hold the same success goals as wider society, but they don't achieve them because of
educational failure and poor employment prospects caused by cultural deprivation
This is because schools are middle-class institutions due to their values and expectations, which disadvantage working-class boys
Cohen argues that because of the lack of opportunity and low social standing, the boys suffer from status frustration
They turn to criminality as an alternative route to success, becoming members of a criminal subculture
This way they gain status and acceptance within their group (i.e. boys in a similar social position)
They also hit back at the school system that has labelled them as failures
Criticisms of Cohen's theory
Cohen's work shows a middle-class bias
He assumes working-class delinquents initially accept middle-class values and aspirations such as educational success
Some argue that the boys' delinquent behaviour is out of resentment against teachers and successful middle-class students
Critics argue that those who commit criminal and deviant behaviour never had the same norms and values as the rest of society
Their primary socialisation led to the development of deviant and/or criminal norms
Once these deviant and criminal norms are accepted, they are difficult to break, especially if they result in a criminal record
Cohen is criticised by feminists for ignoring girls in his research, which prevents his explanation from being generalised to the whole population
Interactionists argue that many people commit criminal acts but only some people are caught and labelled for it (e.g. young people)
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Cohen's subcultural theory links to a combination of factors such as social class, gender and age to explain criminal and deviant behaviour.
Although Willis' (1977) research on anti-school subcultures may seem relevant here, examiners advise against focusing on Willis' research when answering a question on youth crime and negative labelling.
Worked Example
Here is an example of a research methods question in context:
Identify one ethical issue you may need to consider when investigating anti-social behaviour by teenagers
[4 marks]
Model Answer:
Identify the ethical issue:
'Guilty knowledge'.
Explain how the ethical issue would be dealt with in the context of the question:
The researcher will have ‘guilty knowledge’ of anti-social and likely illegal acts. This means that there would be a moral question of whether the researcher betrays the teenagers' confidentiality by reporting this behaviour to the police, especially if it puts other people at risk.
Level 4 response: 4 marks
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?