Christianity & the Design Argument (Edexcel GCSE Religious Studies B)
Revision Note
Written by: Glenn Millington
Reviewed by: Angela Yates
Christianity and the classical design argument
What is the Design Argument?
The design argument (also known as the teleological Argument) is one of the classical arguments put forward to support the existence of God
It suggests that the world’s order, complexity, and purpose point to the existence of an intelligent designer
The design argument says that because everything in the universe is so intricately made, it must have been created by God. Therefore God exists
The design argument is based on the observation that the universe appears to be ordered, structured, and finely tuned to support life
For example, the earth’s perfect distance from the sun, the laws of physics, and the complexity of living organisms all suggest that the universe is designed for a purpose
Everything in nature, from the movement of planets to the intricate structure of DNA, seems to have been "designed" for a specific function, which many people believe points to a designer
IMAGE: The structure of DNA
A famous example of the Design Argument is the Watchmaker Analogy created by the philosopher William Paley
Paley compares finding a watch on the ground to the world we live in
If you found a watch, you would assume that it was designed by a watchmaker because it has many parts working together for a purpose (telling time)
Paley argues that just as a watch needs a watchmaker, the complexity of the universe and the natural world suggests there must be a designer — God
IMAGE: William Paley’s analogy of the watch
The fine-tuning argument focuses on how the conditions in the universe seem to be precisely adjusted to allow life to exist
For example, if the earth were slightly closer or farther from the sun, or if the force of gravity were slightly stronger or weaker, life would not be possible
The fact that these conditions are perfectly suited for life is seen as evidence of design
Christianity and the Design Argument
Christians believe that the natural world shows clear signs of design, such as the way the Earth is perfectly suited for life (e.g., the right distance from the Sun, the right atmospheric conditions to support life)
This suggests that everything has been created with a purpose, which is also written in the Christian Bible
The intricate details of living things, from the human eye to the way cells work, seem too complex to have happened by chance
Christians argue that this complexity shows evidence of an intelligent designer
The beauty and harmony found in nature like the stars, oceans, and mountains can lead Christians to believe that God created the world in a way that reflects His creativity and love
Divergent understandings of the design argument
Criticism of the Design Argument
Although the Design Argument is a strong argument, there has been much criticism from atheists and humanists who do not agree with the conclusion that God must exist
Some people argue that the complexity of life can be explained by evolution, rather than needing a designer
According to Charles Darwin’s theory, species evolve over time through natural selection, so the appearance of design in nature can be explained by science
The philosopher David Hume pointed out that the universe might not be like a machine (like a watch), so comparing the two might not be valid
He also questioned why a perfectly good God would create a universe with suffering and imperfection if He was the designer
Atheists may point out examples of imperfections and flaws in nature that seem inconsistent with the idea of a benevolent and all-powerful designer
For example, the existence of natural disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis) which cause suffering
The suffering of animals in nature, such as disease and being killed by predators
The wastefulness of evolution, where many species go extinct without leaving descendants
These imperfections suggest that the world may not have been designed by a perfect, all-knowing God
Atheists may also point out that the design argument does not answer the question, "Who designed God?"
The idea of a designer may not solve the problem of origins, but rather move it elsewhere
Atheists argue that the design argument often falls into the trap of the "God of the Gaps" mistake
This means that whenever we don’t understand something (such as the complexity of life or the universe), some people attribute it to God as an explanation
However, as science advances, more natural explanations for complex phenomena are discovered, and the need to include God as an explanation becomes less important
Christian responses to non-religious views on the design argument
Criticism responses to non-religious views on the design argument
Despite criticism of the design argument, many religious people believe that it is still a convincing argument for God’s existence
The argument appeals to people’s common sense, where we naturally assume that things that appear designed, like a watch or a building, were created by someone
The argument is often supported by scientific discoveries about the complexity of the natural world, such as the laws of physics and the fine-tuning of the universe
Christians may believe that some of the imperfections in the world are present for a purpose
For example, God might be testing us or God might have a plan that we do not fully understand
Christians might argue that God Himself does not need a designer because God in infinite and eternal and has always been present
Worked Example
Outline three things the design argument shows about the nature of God
(3)
Answer:
God is powerful enough to create a complex world (1)
God loves us and that is why he created a world which has everything for life to exist (1)
God must be intelligent to have created a world which is so intricate (1)
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You may be asked to evaluate the strength of the Design Argument for God’s existence
For example, the question below is an example of a previous exam question
“The design argument proves that God exists”
Evaluate this statement considering arguments for and against
In your response you should:
refer to Christian teachings
refer to non-religious points of view
reach a justified conclusion (12)
In your response, you should consider the strengths of the argument. For example, the apparent intricacies of the universe (with examples) and the fact that the earth seems to be completely suited to sustain life. From a Christian perspective, this argument is supported by the Bible which talks about God as the Creator and that everything that was created was purposeful
The alternative viewpoint would look for responses that were critical of the argument. For example, the fact that there are parts of the universe that do not appear well-designed (with examples) and the question of who designed the designer (God). You can also include scientific explanations for the existence of complex life (evolution and natural selection)
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?