The Just War Theory (AQA GCSE Religious Studies A (8062))
Revision Note
Written by: Glenn Millington
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Just War Theory
What is a Just War?
Religions generally oppose war, but many believe fighting is justifiable if it is the only course of action that will prevent a real evil
Within some religious traditions, there are guidelines on the rules for a legitimate war
These guidelines are used to influence the decision to go to war and also how it is fought, therefore making the war just or fair
The message is clear: sometimes if you do not fight, you allow a greater evil to happen than a war would cause, so you have to fight
Christianity and Just War
St Augustine, in the 4th century, was the first to try to write a set of rules regarding this, and eventually, the ‘Just War’ rules were written in detail by St Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century
The rules state that war must:
Have a just or legitimate reason to happen. It must not be to gain territory or resources or in retaliation
Be started and controlled by a proper authority such as a government
Have a clear aim to promote good over evil (for example to protect people)
Have the desired outcome of peace as the reason to go to war
Be a last resort, every effort must be made to resolve conflict peacefully
Have a reasonable chance of success, it would be wrong to risk lives with no chance of success
Make every effort to avoid civilian deaths and that no more force is used than is necessary to win
Further adaptations have been made to the Just War theory up until the present day
There are now internationally agreed conventions on the conduct of war which must be obeyed
The Geneva Convention, accepted by the UK in 1957, lays down the rules that must be adhered to during war
The United Nations, founded in 1945, encourages countries to resolve disputes peacefully
Justification to support a just war can come from the Bible which contains passages that suggest that it is right for leaders to use violence to ensure peace
'If you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God's servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer' (Romans 13: 4)
Many Christians believe that although fighting a just war is acceptable, it is much better if there is no war
Working together to avoid situations where war is a possible outcome is preferable to fighting
Some Christians disagree with the theory of a just war because it defends the concept of war in certain circumstances, and this could lead to a general acceptance of war
Islam and Just War
Although there is no specific just war theory in Islam, codes of conduct have been developed to justify when it is right to fight and set out what is allowed during fighting
The 'Lesser Jihad' obliges Muslims to fight under certain conditions. It covers fighting against non-Muslim aggressors and there are strict rules regarding its conduct
It is generally accepted that war can be just and therefore permitted if it meets the following conditions:
War must be the last resort when diplomacy and negotiation have failed
War must be only in self-defence, and the initial aggression should come from the other side and there should first be attempts to solve the problem peacefully
As lesser jihad is a religious concept, the decision to fight should be made by a state leader
It is done for a just cause, and not for personal gain. The reason should be to protect territory from an outside aggressor or, in cases of civil war, rebel groups from within the state
If an Islamic country has been attacked, countries are allowed to join a conflict to assist another Muslim state which is under threat
If another state has mistreated its Muslim citizens, it is permissible to fight in support of fellow Muslims
If these conditions are met, the war is thought a just one and it is believed that those who fight for the cause of Islam will receive the favour and reward of God
‘Let those of you who are willing to trade the life of this world for the life to come, fight in God’s way. To anyone who fights in God’s way, whether killed or victorious, we shall give a great reward’ (Quran 4:74)
Muslim Attitudes to Conduct in War
The first Islamic caliph and companion of Muhammad (pbuh), Abu Bakr, devised some rules that Muslim armies must obey to govern the way conflict is conducted:
Muslim armies must not commit treachery or stray from the right path
Dead bodies must not be mutilated
Children, women and old men must not be killed
Trees, particularly fruit-bearing ones, must not be harmed because they provide food in the future
Animals must only be killed for food
People who are devout in their faith, such as monks, should not be harmed
Although these rules are over 1300 years old, they still retain relevance in Islam
While Muslims believe that fighting a war using these just war principles is acceptable, they believe it is much better if there is no war, and working to avoid war is a preferable option to fighting
Muslims and Christians would oppose the use of chemical weapons because the damage they would cause is not considered proportionate and can harm innocent civilians, and therefore does not fit the criteria of a just war
Worked Example
Give two of the criteria for a Just War
[2 marks]
Answer
War must only be used as a last resort (1 mark)
War should avoid killing innocent people (1 mark)
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember that religious views relating to war can vary greatly but no Christians or Muslims would just accept war without consideration of the reasons and the consequences.
There will be pacifists (those who are against war and violence) in both religions and this should be considered in any response to exam questions on this topic
Pacifist Views of Just War Theory
Christians have a long history of refusing to take part in war
Many Christians are pacifists of various types, which range from peace activists to those who need a great deal to convince them that war is justified
The Christian argument for pacifism is based partly on Jesus's teaching in the Sermon on the Mount and other places, and in the example that Jesus sets Christians through his life
Some Christians would argue against this because humans have a different role than Jesus had
Christ's pacifist nature and behaviour were part of his unique role as redeemer of humanity
Christians are not redeemers and so their conduct should follow Christ by seeking to bring peace and justice to the world even if this means not always 'turning the other cheek'
Christian groups that emphasise pacifism include:
Mennonites: a church that grew out of the Protestant Reformation in Europe in the early 1500s. They believe Christ's teaching to 'love your enemies' prevents them from participating in any way in military action against another country
Quakers (or The Religious Society of Friends) are a Christian group with a total commitment to non-violence. In 1660 they declared
'the spirit of Christ which leads us into all Truth will never move us to fight and war against any man with outward weapons, neither for the kingdom of Christ, nor for the kingdoms of the world'
Attitudes to just war would depend on the type of pacifism each Christian adheres to
An absolute pacifist believes that it is never right to take part in war, even in self-defence. They think that the value of human life is so high that nothing can justify killing a person deliberately
Conditional pacifists are against war and violence in principle, but they accept that there may be circumstances when war will be less bad than the alternative
Selective pacifists will only oppose wars involving weapons of mass destruction because of the uniquely devastating consequences of such weapons
Active pacifists are heavily involved in political activity to promote peace, and to argue against particular wars
During a war many pacifists will refuse to fight, but some will take part in activities that seek to reduce the harm of war. For example, driving ambulances
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?