Experiments: Types of Experiment (AQA GCSE Psychology)
Revision Note
Written by: Cara Head
Reviewed by: Lára Marie McIvor
Lab experiments
A lab experiment is a research method in which the researcher can exert high levels of control over what happens as part of the experimental process
The researcher controls the environmental factors, such as noise and temperature (possible extraneous variables) so that the effects of the independent variable (IV) upon the dependent variable (DV) can be observed and measured
Lab experiments use a standardised procedure for example:
The same number of participants take part in each condition of the IV
Each participant is given the same instructions (apart from instructions regarding the task as this will differ per condition as per the IV)
The same task/materials are used as far as possible given the IV
Participants are given the same amount of time to complete the task per condition and across conditions if the IV allows it
All variables are kept the same/constant; only the independent variable changes between conditions
Keeping all variables constant means the DV can be measured exactly using quantitative data
Evaluation of lab experiments
Strengths
Due to the high control involved, lab experiments go some way towards establishing a cause-effect relationship
The use of a standardised procedure ensures replicability and reliability
Weaknesses
Demand characteristics may be an issue if participants guess the aim of the study or behave in ways which are self-conscious and unnatural
Lab experiments lack validity as they usually involve participants performing artificial tasks
Field experiments
A field experiment is a research method which takes place in a natural setting, away from the lab
The researcher has less control over what happens as part of the experimental process
The researcher controls the environment to some extent but they have to allow the fact that many extraneous variables are included in field experiments
Field experiments still involve the implementation of an IV and DV, for example:
A confederate of the researcher pretends to collapse on a subway train:
The IV is whether the victim appears to be drunk or disabled
The DV is the number of people who go to the victim’s aid
A researcher implements a ‘Kindness’ programme with half of the Year 5 students in a primary school:
The IV is whether the students have followed the ‘Kindness’ programme or not
The DV is the score they achieve on a questionnaire about prosocial behaviour after one month
Field experiments collect quantitative data but there is also more scope for researchers to obtain qualitative data as part of the research process, for example:
Interviews with passengers who witnessed the ‘victim’ collapsing on the train
Teachers’ observations of behavioural differences in the ‘Kindness’ programme children across the month of the study
Any qualitative data collected could be used to comment on the quantitative findings and shed light on the actions of the participants
Evaluation of field experiments
Strengths
Field experiments are high in ecological validity as they take place in real settings, often without people realising that they are taking part in the research
As people may not know they are being tested/observed they will not succumb to demand characteristics
Weaknesses
The lack of control available to the researcher means that field experiments are lower in reliability than lab experiments
There are ethical issues if a field experiment does not gain informed consent or offer the right to withdraw to participants, plus there is the possible harm that the procedure may inflict on participants
Natural experiments
A natural experiment is a research method which does not manipulate the IV, it uses naturally occurring phenomena, for example:
Age e.g. an experiment in which digit-span recall is tested between a group of young people compared to a group of older people
Gender/sex e.g. the performance of girls is compared to the performance of boys in an experiment testing emotional intelligence
Circumstances e.g. a group of teachers from one school who have received training in empathy are compared to a group of teachers from another school who have not had this training on a task involving correctly identifying emotional states
The researcher has less control over what happens as part of the experimental process as they cannot randomly allocate participants to condition (the participants are the conditions e.g. either young/old, trained/untrained)
Natural experiments collect quantitative data
Evaluation of natural experiments
Strengths
Natural experiments allow researchers to investigate topics/issues that would, otherwise be unethical to manipulate e.g. measuring the cognitive skills of adopted Romanian orphans compared to non-adopted UK children of the same age
Natural experiments have good validity as they measure variables which are liable to change anyway
Weaknesses
It is difficult to establish a cause-effect relationship due to the unknown nature of the naturally occurring variable e.g. ‘gender’ as an IV includes a whole range of other, related variables which are impossible to know and to control
Replicating natural experiments is problematic as the IV is the participants - and people cannot be replicated!
Worked Example
Here is an example of a question you might be asked on this topic - for AO3.
AO3: You need to analyse and evaluate key concepts, ideas, theories and research.
Question: Evaluate the use of field experiments in psychological research. [5]
Model answer:
A strength of using field experiments is that they are conducted in natural settings and usually use realistic tasks which means that participants behave as they normally would i.e. the findings have higher ecological validity than lab experiments
Another strength of field experiments is that participants are often unaware that they are taking part in an experiment which means that they do not show demand characteristics i.e. they behave as they normally would.
A weakness of field experiments is that they can raise ethical issues as participants may not be aware that they are taking part in an experiment which means they may not have given consent and are unaware that they have a right to withdraw.
Another weakness of field experiments is that the researcher has lower control over variables compared to a laboratory setting which means that extraneous variables may affect how participants behave.
A lack of control means that it is difficult for the researcher to establish how the independent variable affects the dependent variable plus less control could mean that it can be difficult to standardise procedures/replicate field experiments which lowers their reliability.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Make sure you know the differences between all three types of experiment as you may be asked questions about a specific type in the exam.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?