Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

Experiments in Surgery & Medicine on the Western Front (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Advances in Surgery During the First World War - Summary

The type and extent of injuries on the Western Front led to the use of many new techniques to treat wounds and infections. The number of casualties allowed doctors and surgeons to perfect their methods.

By 1918, there were many more advances in surgery and medicine. Based on Lister's work on antiseptics, the Carrel-Dakin method, revolutionised the treatment of infection on the Western Front. The Thomas Splint and X-rays existed before the First World War. The environment of the Western Front demonstrated their effectiveness. Casualties in key battles such as Cambrai benefitted from the developments in blood transfusions, which underwent significant progress from 1915-1916.

Many key individuals were pivotal in the evolution of blood transfusions. There were also new techniques devised in brain surgery and plastic surgery. The contribution to medicine and surgery led to the successful treatment of new types of injuries and meant men could return to society after the war.

New Techniques in Wound & Infection Treatment

  • The RAMC struggled to treat soldiers with infections such as gas gangrene:

    • Contaminated conditions on the Western Front made it difficult to perform aseptic surgery

    • Dressing stations and Casualty Clearing Stations (CCSs) were often overcrowded. This made aseptic surgery less achievable

  • There were several methods of treatment used to help those with infection:

Technique

Description

Wound excision or debridement

Cutting away dead or infected tissue from around the wound. This was done to stop the infection spreading. The wound was then stitched back up

Carrel-Dakin Method

Chemical antiseptics like carbolic lotion failed to treat gas gangrene

By 1917, sterilised salt solutions were passed through the wound instead

The solution only lasted for six hours

Amputation

If debridement or the Carrel-Dakin method failed, amputation was used

By 1918, 240,000 men had lost limbs.

Removing the limb prevented the infection from spreading to the organs

The Thomas Splint

  • Wounded soldiers with compound fractures often died from blood loss or infection during transportation:

    • Fractures to the femur were particularly serious

    • The splint used to keep their leg rigid was ineffective

    • Difficult terrain made it more likely that broken bones would damage the muscle when the injured soldier was being transported

    • The infection spread before the soldier arrived at a CCS

  • The use of the Thomas Splint helped to reduce these problems

    • Placed on a soldier's leg they could then be safely carried on a stretcher

    • Kept the injured soldier’s leg rigid by pulling the bones and joints back together

    • Reduced the chance of internal bleeding

    • It became less necessary to use amputation

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Don’t confuse the Thomas Splint with a tourniquet:

The Thomas Splint was used on a soldier’s leg who was placed on a stretcher

A tourniquet is used to prevent blood loss, and an injured soldier could move with it on.

A diagram displaying the history and impact of the Thomas splint. In 1875, Dr. Robert Jones, with Hugh Thomas, designed a splint. By 1916, it increased survival rates from 20% to 82%.
A timeline of the Thomas Splint

Worked Example

Describe one feature of the use of the Thomas Splint.

2 marks

Answers: 

The Thomas Splint was used to stop the movement of a soldier’s fractured femur (1). Excessive moving caused heavy bleeding (1).

Examiner Tips and Tricks

This question previously asked students to describe two features of a given event. This question was out of four marks. However, as of 2025, Edexcel will split this question into two subsections, asking you to describe a feature of two different events. Each subsection is worth two marks.

Mobile X-Rays

  • X-rays enabled doctors to locate bullets and shrapnel before surgery

  • They did have some drawbacks:

    • X-rays could not detect objects like clothing fragments

    • Injured soldiers had to remain still during an X-ray

    • X-rays overheated quickly which made them less reliable

      • Three machines were used in rotation to solve this problem

  • Base Hospitals and some CCSs used unmoving X-rays:

    • Marie Curie had equipped 20 mobile X-rays for the French army

    • Close to the frontlines, six mobile X-rays were used 

      • The quality of the scans was not as good

      • The ability to travel to injured soldiers across the Western Front was very convenient

A vehicle with a nurse and injured soldier, an X-ray machine on a table, and medical equipment inside. A tent is also attached to its back.
An illustration of a mobile x-ray unit

The Battle of Cambrai & Blood Bank

Blood transfusions in the British sector

  • Blood transfusions were used from 1915 in Base Hospitals and 1917 in CCSs

  • Many key individuals contributed to the development of blood transfusions on the Western Front from 1915-16:

Key individual

Discovery

Lawrence Bruce Robertson

Used a syringe to transfer blood from the donor to the patient

Geoffrey Keynes

Designed a portable blood transfusion kit for use at the frontlines:

Stored blood could not be used as there was no refrigeration.

Added a device to help prevent the blood from clotting.

Richard Lewisohn

Added sodium citrate to blood to prevent blood from clotting

Richard Weil

Discovered that sodium citrate allowed blood to be refrigerated and stored for two days

Francis Rous and James Turner

Added citrate glucose which allowed storage of blood for up to four weeks

The blood bank at Cambrai

  • During the Battle of Cambrai in 1917, Doctor Oswald Hope Robertson stored 22 units of universal blood in glass bottles

  • The blood was:

    • Collected 26 days before being used

    • Stored in ammunition boxes packed with ice and sawdust

  • Of 20 Canadian soldiers treated for shock from blood-loss, 11 survived

    • It demonstrated the potential of blood transfusions to save lives

Worked Example

How could you follow up Source A to find out more about the use of blood transfusions on the Western Front?

In your answer, you must give the question you would ask and the type of source you could use.

4 marks 

Source A: From an account written after the First World War by Charlie Shepherd. Charlie Shepherd was a soldier who fought in the war. Here he is describing his experiences in a hospital on the Western Front in 1915.

I was in the hospital. They wanted a volunteer to give blood for a transfusion. I volunteered and they checked that I was the same blood group as the soldier who needed blood.

He'd lost a leg. Gangrene had set in and they'd had to amputate it. Oh, he looked like death! As white as a sheet! 

I've still got the scar where they opened me up to get the tube into my vein. The blood followed up the tube to a bottle and from there it went into the soldier's arm. I was watching him. Believe me, you could see the colour coming back into his face.

Answers:

  • Detail in Source A that I would follow up: ‘they wanted a volunteer to give blood for a transfusion’. (1)

  • Question I would ask: What would happen to the patient if a volunteer could not be found to give blood? (1)

  • What type of source I would look for: RAMC records from 1915 for hospitals carrying out blood transfusions. (1)

  • How this might help answer my question: The records would show how many injured soldiers died from blood loss or shock rather than from a fatal injury. (1)

Examiner Tips and Tricks

For a written source, ensure that you select a short quote and write this into the 'Detail in Source A that I would follow up' section of the answer.

Advances in Surgery

  • Head wounds accounted for 20% of all wounds in the British sector of the Western Front 

    • Injuries were mainly the result of bullets and shrapnel

Why were injuries to the brain such an issue in World War One?

Three panels explaining why brain injuries were dangerous: doctors lacked neurosurgery knowledge, transporting patients was difficult and infections affected the brain.
An illustration of how serious brain injuries were in World War One

How did the treatment of brain injuries improve?

  • A large number of brain injuries and facial injuries led to new medical developments:

Type of surgery

Key individual

Medical development

Brain surgery

Harvey Cushing

An American neurosurgeon. He used magnets to remove metal shrapnel from the brain.

Local anaesthetic did not swell the brain during surgery like a general anaesthetic.

He had an operation survival rate of 71% compared to the average of 50%.

Plastic surgery

Harold Gillies

A New Zealand doctor specialised in ENT. He became interested in facial reconstruction during the war.

Gillies used skin grafts to help restore an injured soldier’s face.

He helped develop a specialist hospital in Kent, called the Queen’s Hospital. By 1917, 12,000 surgeries had been carried out here.

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.