Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2024
First exams 2026
Law Enforcement in Medieval England (Edexcel GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Natasha Smith
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Law Enforcement in Medieval England – Timeline & Summary
Each level of the hierarchy of Anglo-Saxon society had a role in law enforcement. Local communities played an especially important role. The systems of tithings and the hue and cry proved to be very effective in preventing and handling crime. Trial procedures included trial by jury, where oaths were taken before God, and often played a major role in administering justice. When juries could not reach a verdict, the decision was handed over to God through trial by ordeal. Both types of trials reflected the highly Christian nature of Anglo-Saxon society. With the Norman Conquest of 1066, law enforcement continued to evolve. While the Normans maintained many Anglo-Saxon methods, they also introduced important changes. They built castles, established new positions, new types of courts and a new method of trial. They even changed the language of the legal system, which posed challenges to the population. The later medieval era also saw a mixture of continuity and change. Though many existing methods of law enforcement remained in place, they were often modified or added to. Government-appointed officials and newly introduced royal courts expanded royal authority in law enforcement. The Church also made changes to law enforcement, with Pope Innocent III bringing an end to trial by ordeal in 1215. |
What was Anglo-Saxon Society like?
Anglo-Saxon society was arranged according to a hierarchy
The king was at the top of the hierarchy
He controlled the land
He had two main roles:
To defend England from invaders
To preserve the King's Peace
In the Anglo-Saxon era, most people lived on or in one of the following:
Farms
Small hamlets
Villages
Burhs
Communities were small and tight-knit
Everyone knew everyone else, which meant that
People were expected to look out for each other
Most people had a strong sense of duty towards their community
If an individual committed a crime, they let down their whole community
The crime rate was fairly low
Anglo-Saxons were also devout Christians
They firmly believed in an eternal afterlife
The Church offered ways to help people go to heaven and avoid hell
Every village had a priest
Everyone was expected to attend church and live by its rules
The Church became more influential in law enforcement under the Normans
The beliefs and structure of Anglo-Saxon society impacted how the law was enforced
Anglo-Saxon Law Enforcement
Anglo-Saxon law enforcement was mainly the responsibility of
the local community
the Church
Tithings
Anglo-Saxon England was made up of shires
Each shire was divided into hundreds
Each hundred was divided into ten tithings
Members of each tithing monitored each other
If one tithing member broke the law, the others would be responsible for either
Taking them to court
Paying a fine
One person from each tithing regularly met with the shire reeve
The shire reeve made sure any punishments were carried out
Tithings was an effective self-help system designed to
Prevent crime
Emphasise collective responsibility
The hue and cry
The hue and cry was a way of dealing with crimes when they were committed
Trials
There were two types of trial in Anglo-Saxon England:
Trial by jury
Took place in a court
Men from the village tithing made up the jury
They had to reach a verdict
They did this by listening to accounts from the accused, the accuser and any witnesses
They could also use their knowledge of people’s characters to help
Some cases were settled using oaths to swear innocence
The jury could support the accused by being ‘oath helpers
These oaths, also known as compurgation, were made ‘before God’
People believed that God would punish those who lied under oath
Trial by ordeal
Often took place in a church
Occurred if a local jury could not reach a verdict
The judgement was then handed over to God
The accused would fast for three days and then hear Mass before the trial
A priest was always present
The different types of trial by ordeal methods
Name | Trial by hot iron | Trial by hot water | Trial by cold water | Trial by blessed/consecrated bread |
---|---|---|---|---|
Taken by | Women (usually) | Men (usually) | Men (usually) | Priests (exclusively) |
What the accused had to do | Pick up a red-hot weight and walk three paces with it Have their hand bandaged and then unwrapped three days later | Put their hand in boiling water to pick up an object Have their hand or arm bandaged and then unwrapped three days later | Be tied to a rope and lowered into the water | Eat bread (a priest prayed that the accused would choke on the bread if they lied) |
Outcome if the accused was innocent | The wound was healing cleanly after three days | The wound was healing cleanly after three days | They sank (this was seen as them having been ‘accepted’ by God’s pure water) | They did not choke |
Outcome if the accused was guilty | The wound was festering after three days | The wound was festering after three days | They floated (this was seen as them having been ‘rejected’ by God’s pure water) | They choked |
Norman Law Enforcement
In 1066, William I became the first Norman king of England
He faced opposition from many Anglo-Saxons
Law enforcement therefore became an important priority
William continued many Anglo-Saxon methods of law enforcement
He was especially eager to keep those that were already proving effective, such as
Tithings
The hue and cry
Trial by jury
Trial ordeal
The Normans also changed how the law was enforced
They built castles all over the country:
They introduced new positions
The shire reeve became the sheriff
Foresters enforced the Forest Laws
They added new law enforcement methods to existing ones
Trial by combat was introduced
The accused fought with the accuser until one surrendered or was killed
People believed that God had judged the loser to be guilty
The loser was then hanged
This was often used to settle disputes over money or land
They changed the language of the legal system
Laws were written and court procedures were held in Norman French
Court records were kept in Latin
This disadvantaged most Anglo-Saxons, who understood neither language
The Normans also established new courts:
Manor courts
Introduced after the feudal system came to England
The courts met to discuss and punish crimes that occurred on the lord of the manor’s land
Used to try members of the Church who were accused of crimes
Dealt more lenient punishments than in other courts
Did not use capital punishment
Change and Continuity in Later Medieval Law Enforcement
By the later medieval era, many Anglo-Saxon and Norman methods of law enforcement remained in use
Later medieval kings expanded the role of governments in law enforcement
Law enforcement was no longer just the responsibility of the local community and the Church
Throughout the medieval era, courts decided on people’s guilt or innocence
They were used when suspects:
Did not admit to the crime
Were not caught in the act
Different types of court were used depending on the crime
The different legal courts in Medieval England
Later medieval kings created some new positions of authority in law enforcement
Coroners
Formally appointed by Richard I in 1194
Tasked with investigating deaths that lacked obvious or natural explanations (such as illness)
Keepers
Knights appointed by Richard I from 1195
Tasked with helping to keep the peace in some ‘unruly’ areas
Developed into Justices of the Peace (JPs) by Edward III in 1327
The role expanded when the Justices of the Peace Act was passed in 1361
For example, JPs were now allowed to preside over local courts
Parish constables
Introduced by Edward I in 1285
Responsible for keeping the peace in their parish
Men in the parish volunteered to do this role in their spare time
Held the post for one year
How did law enforcement change and continue throughout the late Medieval period?
Continuity in later medieval law enforcement | Change in later medieval law enforcement |
---|---|
The hue and cry system was still used | From 1285, the sheriff could form a posse to help whenever the hue and cry system failed |
Tithings remained in place | Some towns also had a night watch |
Trial by jury, combat and ordeal were still used |
Worked Example
Explain one way in which law enforcement in the Norman era was different from law enforcement in the later medieval era
4 marks
Answers:
In the Norman era, trial by ordeal (1) was still used when juries could not reach a verdict (1). Whereas, in the later medieval era, trial by ordeal stopped being used after 1215 (1) because Pope Innocent III abolished it (1).
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Be careful not to incorrectly label trial by ordeal as a punishment; it was a method of law enforcement.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?