Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

The Hungarian Uprising, 1956-1958 (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

What Caused the Hungarian Uprising? - Timeline & Summary

Timeline of Hungarian events in 1956. Events: 24th Oct - Imre Nagy becomes president; 28th Oct - Soviet troops leave; 3rd Nov - Hungary to leave Warsaw Pact; 4th Nov - Soviet troops return.

Life in the Eastern Bloc in the 1950s was challenging. The communist economy set Five Year Plans for each satellite state of the Soviet Union. Each satellite state provided the Soviet Union with a valuable product. Five Year targets were often unattainable. The local communist governments still expected workers to strive to meet the planned economic output. The Soviet Union treated and paid their workers poorly, resulting in discontentment and poor health. 

The social situation in Hungary was particularly bad. Hungary's communist leader, Mátyás Rákosi, harshly controlled the country. He stated he wanted Hungary to become a "country of iron and steel". This was despite the fact that Hungary had no iron ore. Hungary suffered from fuel shortages and poor harvests. The people received no help from Rákosi's government. People began to protest for reforms and freedoms. Despite Khrushchev's reputation, he could not reform communism in the Eastern Bloc. When demands for reform continued, Khrushchev reacted the same way as Stalin - with violent repression.

Who was Imre Nagy?

Political unrest in Hungary

  • In October 1956, there were violent protests in Hungary's capital, Budapest

    • Hungarian students led a peaceful demonstration asking for more political and personal freedom 

      • Hungary's secret police arrested protestors and used tear gas to end the march

      • When the students attempted to free the arrested, the police shot at the protestors

    • Soldiers joined the student protestors

      • The Hungarian Communist government requested military support from the Soviet Union

    • By 24th October, the Soviet Union restored order in Budapest

Why did Khrushchev appoint Imre Nagy?

  • Khrushchev decided to change the leadership of Hungary

    • He replaced Rákosi with Imre Nagy

  • Imre Nagy had previously been prime minister of Hungary

    • In 1949, the Communist Party removed Nagy from the government

      • As Minister for Agriculture, he argued for better treatment of the peasants

    • He served as prime minister between 1953 and 1955

      • Other communist members removed Nagy from office. They did not agree with his reforming attitudes

  • Khrushchev believed that Nagy would resolve the unrest in Hungary

    • The people liked Nagy

    • Limited reforms would stop Hungarians from protesting

Nagy's Reforms

  • Within days of becoming prime minister, Nagy introduced a series of reforms

What reforms did Nagy propose for Hungary?

Flowchart detailing Imre Nagy's reforms in Hungary, including reorganization of government, releasing political prisoners, withdrawing Soviet troops, and leaving the Warsaw Pact.
A concept map showing the areas of reform that Nagy attempted to introduce in October-November 1956
  • Khrushchev allowed Nagy some freedom to reform

    • He wanted Hungary to stop protesting against communism

      • The protests made communism look bad to the West

  • Khrushchev could not accept Nagy's attempt to withdraw Hungary from the Warsaw Pact

    • The Soviet Union needed Hungary to remain in the Warsaw Pact

      • Khrushchev may have needed Hungarian troops to suppress uprisings in other satellite states

      • Hungary's withdrawal may have prompted other satellite states to do the same

      • The Soviet Union relied upon the collective security of pro-Communist states as stated in the Warsaw Pact. The satellite states would not protect the Soviet Union if they did not have to 

    • Khrushchev did not want any more independent communist states in Eastern Europe

      • Yugoslavia, under the leadership of Tito, broke away from the Soviet Union's influence in 1948

      • Yugoslavia became closer to the West by accepting military support from NATO. Tito explored different versions of communism that undermined the Soviet Union

      • Khrushchev did not want other satellite states to form alliances with Yugoslavia

Khrushchev's Reaction to the Uprising

  • Khrushchev's reaction to Nagy's reforms was extremely violent

How did Khrushchev stop the Hungarian Uprising?

Flowchart of the events during the Hungarian Uprising of 1956, from Soviet invasion and brutal suppression to the establishment of a new government and Nagy's execution.
A flow diagram explaining Khrushchev's reaction and punishment of the Hungarian Uprising

International Reaction to Russia's Invasion of Hungary

  • When the Soviet invasion force entered Hungary, Nagy believed that the West would support his government

    • Radio Free Europe was a US-funded radio channel that transmitted across Eastern Europe. The station encouraged Eastern Europeans to rise up against the Soviet Union

    • The Marshall Plan showed that the USA would give money to the satellite states. Nagy believed this help would extend to military support

  • Khrushchev's suppression of the Hungarian Uprising shocked many Western nations

    • Khrushchev's actions did not match his previous policies of de-Stalinisation

  • The USA had many issues to consider before they decided whether to help Nagy

Should the USA intervene in the Hungarian Uprising?

Yes - the USA must help Hungary

No - the USA cannot help Hungary

Khrushchev's repression went against the UN's stance on human rights

The USA had a foreign policy of Containment. This meant that the USA did not intervene in countries that were already communist

Nagy's government wanted to increase Hungary's individual freedoms. This matches the democratic values of the USA

Any military intervention in the Eastern Bloc could cause a nuclear war between the USA and the Soviet Union

If the USA could free Hungary from the Eastern Bloc, it could use Hungary's geographical position to intimidate the Soviet Union. It could make an alliance with Hungary or station ICBMs on its border with the Soviet Union

The US government and population still distrusted communist countries. They were unsure if their support would change Hungary's opinion about communism

  • Ultimately, Eisenhower decided not to give military support to Nagy

    • He did not believe the cause was worth risking a nuclear war for

  • Hungary did receive some support from the West

    • European members of NATO accepted Hungarian refugees

Examiner Tips and Tricks

An exam question could ask you to explain the importance of the Hungarian Uprising on Cold War tensions. Whilst the USA was shocked at the Soviet Union, they did not react. Tensions still increased between the USA and the Soviet Union but both countries were unwilling to take direct action against the other.

The Impact of the Hungarian Uprising on Cold War tensions

  • Relations between the Soviet Union and the USA worsened

    • Khrushchev's suppression of Hungary had shocked and appalled the West

    • The relationship between the USA and the Soviet Union continued to deteriorate throughout the 1960s

  • Khrushchev increased his power over the Soviet Union

    • He stated that the execution of Nagy taught:

A lesson to the leaders of all socialist countries

  • Khrushchev's actions tightened the Warsaw Pact

  • The Hungarian Uprising ruined the USA's reputation as a protector of freedom 

    • The USA had an opportunity to help a country free themselves from communism. They did not take the opportunity

    • The event proved that the USA did not back its words with actions

      • Satellite states were less likely to rebel against the Soviet Union

      • It increased the Soviet Union's confidence that the USA would not risk military action against them

Causes and Consequences of the Hungarian Uprising

Flowchart describing causes and consequences of the Hungarian Uprising in 1956. Causes: fuel shortages, discontent about freedom, Imre Nagy's reforms. Consequences: tighter control, USA's reputation ruined, worsening USA-Soviet relations.
A flow diagram showing the causes and consequences of the Hungarian Uprising on the USA and the Soviet Union

Worked Example

Explain one consequence of the Hungarian Uprising in 1956

4 marks

Answer:

 One consequence of the Hungarian Uprising was an increase of Khrushchev's power in Eastern Europe. When Khrushchev became the leader of the Soviet Union in 1956, the West believed that he would be more open to reform. He had begun a process of de-Stalinisation and condemned Stalin's actions as leader. However, Khrushchev brutally repressed the Hungarian's request to leave the Warsaw Pact. He sent 1,000 tanks into Hungary, killing approximately 20,000 Hungarians. This showed other satellite states not to rebel against Khrushchev. It proved the strength of the newly formed Warsaw Pact and the extent of force that the Soviet Union would use to defend the Pact.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

A high-standard response to this question needs to explain what the Hungarian Uprising caused to happen. There are many different approaches to this question. You could explain how the Hungarian Uprising worsened US-Soviet relations or how it damaged the USA's reputation in Europe. Ensure that you explain in detail using specific own knowledge how the Hungarian Uprising caused your chosen consequence to occur. In this example, you can see the use of accurate statistics and dates to support the argument. 

This question has previously asked you to explain two consequences. In the Superpower Relations exam paper for 2025, this question will ask you to explain one consequence. However, there will be two different "Explain one consequence of" questions, each worth four marks.

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.