Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2024
First exams 2026
The 16 Mark "How Far do you Agree" Question (Edexcel GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Natasha Smith
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Summary of Question 3 or 4
Questions 3 and 4 require you to:
Evaluate the statement in the question
To use second-order concepts in your answer
You need to evaluate the statement given in the question against other reasons
Two possible reasons are provided for you in the stimulus box under the question
You only need to answer either Question 3 or 4
Do not answer both questions as you will not have time and will not be awarded more marks
Unlike for the 16-mark question in Paper 1, you are not awarded marks for Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar (SPaG)
Amount of marks | 16 |
---|---|
The time that you should spend on the question | 5 minutes of planning 20 minutes of writing |
An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:
In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics in Elizabethan England:
Year of Exam | Question Topic |
---|---|
Question 3: The effective use of naval tactics by the English during the Spanish Armada Question 4: Attitudes towards the poor | |
Question 3: Catholic opposition to Elizabeth Question 4: Sir Francis Drake and his achievements | |
Question 3: Mary, Queen of Scots and her claim to the English throne Question 4: Education in Early Elizabethan England | |
Question 3: Rivalry between England and Spain Question 4: Leisure activities for the rich and poor in Elizabethan England | |
Question 3: The problem of Elizabeth's legitimacy Question 4: The Revolt of the Northern Earls and challenges to Elizabeth's rule | |
2023 | Question 3: England's involvement in the Netherlands Question 4: The increase of exploration by England |
Making judgements in history
The 16-mark question relies on your ability to weigh all the evidence and state your opinion
Students often find this part the hardest to do
There are some common mistakes students make when making a judgement, they include:
Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by:
Explaining that all of the reasons are the most important
Failing to decide which factor is the most important
Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe”
Contradicting your judgements
Students sometimes haven’t planned their answers properly. They start to write their answer with one judgement and then change their opinion halfway through
In the example question, you may state in the introduction that the main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to Walsingham. However, in the conclusion, you state that it was due to religious issues in England
Doing this means that there is not a sustained judgement and you can not access Level 4 (13–16 marks)
Good judgements will:
Explain the second-order concept outlined in the question in full
There is no "right" or "wrong" answer in history
If you are unsure of your opinion, pick the side of the argument that you have better or more evidence to support
Consider other reasons
Even if you fully believe a reason is the most important, you still need to present evidence for other reasons
Be sustained throughout your answer
They should be used to structure your answer and help you explain
This is why planning your answer is important
What makes a great conclusion in GCSE History?
Conclusions are usually where most of your judgement marks will be awarded
Students often rush their conclusions so they are not as developed as they could be
All great conclusions have these three elements:
Judgement – Start with your opinion. Try to include the words from the question. Consider including referring to the second-order concept mentioned in the question
Counter – Give an example from the other side of the argument to show your awareness of this
Support – Explain why, after considering all the evidence, you have reached your judgement. Use your best piece of evidence to show your opinion
How to answer a "How far do you agree" question
In the exam, you will be given the option of two questions to answer
You only need to answer one question
You will not receive more marks for writing both questions
You should put an "X" in the box next to the question you have chosen to answer
The "How far do you agree" question will present you with a statement which you have to create a sustained judgement around
For example, Question 4 is:
"The main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was Francis Walsingham"
Underneath both Questions 3 and 4, you will have a stimulus box with two key knowledge suggestions
If you only use these suggestions in your answer, you are limited to a maximum of 13 marks
You can choose not to use any of the suggestions, but you can still achieve full marks
To answer this question successfully you should
Read the answer carefully and multiple times (if you have the time)
Annotate the question to find the key demands of the question
Plan your answer
In your plan include what key knowledge you wish to use and an outline of your argument
This will help you to create a sustained judgement
AWAITING IMAGE
"How far do you agree" question structure
Your answer should consist of:
A logical structure e.g. PEEL paragraphs
Specific and relevant knowledge
A range of knowledge
An explanation of the second-order concept outlined in the question
A clear and sustained judgement throughout the answer
A conclusion
If you want to include an introduction you can, but it is not necessary
Your answers could be written in PEEL paragraphs:
P - Make a point about the question
This should include your judgement
E - Use evidence that supports the point that you have made (K)
Evidence needs to be relevant and specific to the question
E - Explain why this evidence supports your point
Your explanation should be focused on the second-order concept outlined in the question (SOC)
L - Link your explanation back to the question to help sustain your argument and show your understanding of the question (SOC)
The question is out of 16 marks:
6 marks for a wide range of specific knowledge of the period and the topic stated in the question (K)
10 marks for the analysis of the key second-order concepts of cause and consequence, similarities and differences and importance (SOC)
Worked example of a "How far do you agree" question
Worked Example
'The main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was Francis Walsingham.'
How far do you agree? Explain your answer.
(16)
You may use the following in your answer: • Babington Plot • religious unrest in England You must also use information of your own. |
Answer
I agree that the main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was because of Francis Walsingham (SOC). However, there were other reasons such as Mary's own actions and the continued Catholic threat in England.
The main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to the actions of Francis Walsingham. Walsingham was Elizabeth's spymaster who's role it was to protect her from threats to her reign. During Elizabeth's reign, Walsingham collected evidence of Mary's involvement in plots. During the Babington plot Walsingham intercepted letters which were used in Mary, Queen of Scot's trial (K). Therefore, Walsingham was the main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed as his evidence of Mary's involvement in treasonous acts convinced Elizabeth to execute Mary. The evidence made it impossible for Elizabeth to continue Mary's imprisonment as Walsingham proved that Mary posed a huge threat to Elizabeth's reign (SOC).
Another reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to her own actions during her captivity in England. Mary, Queen of Scots was imprisoned in England for 19 years. During this time, Mary was either connected or physically involved in several plots to kill Elizabeth. However, her choice to be involved in the Babington Plot resulted in her execution as she sent coded letters to Babington and approved the plans (K). Therefore, her own actions resulted in her execution as Elizabeth could no longer persuade the Privy Council not to force her to sign the execution orders. Mary's presence in England was a threat that could no longer be ignored (SOC). Although this was an important reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed, it was not the main reason. Without the evidence Walsingham collected, Elizabeth would have been able to ignore her Privy Council's demands for Mary's execution as she had done for many years (SOC).
A final reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to the Catholic threat in England. Mary, Queen of Scots was a legitimate Catholic heir to the English throne. Many people in England supported her claim as there was ongoing religious unrest in England due to the continuous change of religion since Henry VIII's religious Reformation. However, there was an increased Catholic threat in England because of Elizabeth's excommunication by the Pope and the papal bull (K). Therefore, Mary, Queen of Scots was executed because the Catholic threat in England was a continuous threat which was a challenge to Elizabeth's reign, which could be reduced if Mary was executed (SOC). This understanding was clear to Elizabeth's Privy Council and is one of the reasons why Walsingham collected evidence against Mary to force the execution (SOC).
Overall, I agree that the main reason why Mary Queen of Scots was executed was due to Francis Walsingham. Walsingham collected evidence that forced Elizabeth to order Mary, Queen of Scots' execution. In addition, Walsingham's actions were caused by other factors such as the continuous threat from Catholics in England and Mary's own actions which led to him collecting evidence for her execution (SOC).
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?