Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

The Influence of the Church on 13th Century On Crime & Punishment: Case Study (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Flashcards
Natasha Smith

Expertise

History Content Creator

The Influence of the Church on Thirteenth-Century Crime and Punishment: Case Study - Timeline & Summary

A timeline shows key events: 1164 - Constitutions of Clarendon limit Church's powers, 1215 - Pope forbids trial by ordeal, 1219 - Ordeal abolished, c1500 - Early Modern era, 1536 - Sanctuary ends.

Throughout the medieval period, the Church had immense power. In England, the Church owned one-fifth of the country’s wealth. It also collected one-tenth of all earnings through Church taxes.

Impressive churches and cathedrals were spread across the country. People regularly attended church services. Here, the clergy taught them religious ideas about good and bad behaviour. People believed that the Church could save their souls from hell.

The Church was also an important instrument of law enforcement. It operated an alternative justice system, separate from secular authorities.

How did the Church Define Crime in the Thirteenth Century?

  • The Church was especially concerned with 'moral' crimes

  • This reflected the importance it placed on being a good Christian

Examples of 'moral' crimes

A flowchart illustrating examples of moral crimes including adultery, drunkenness, failure to attend church, and playing games on a Sunday, connected to the central term 'moral crimes'.
A diagram featuring some examples of ‘moral’ crimes, as defined by the Church

Law Enforcement: Church Courts, Sanctuary & Benefit of Clergy

Church courts

  • The Church courts were given official standing in the Norman era

    • In the 11th century, William I encouraged them to deal with ‘moral’ crimes

  • The Church courts:

    • Were responsible for trying clergy accused of crimes

    • Tried those accused of witchcraft (a minor crime in the medieval era)

    • Were overseen by a local bishop

  • Church courts had a different attitude to punishment than other courts did. They:

    • Considered punishments motivated by retribution alone to be wrong

    • Believed that punishments should allow criminals to

      • Reflect on their crimes

      • Regret their actions

      • Reform themselves

    • Dealt more lenient punishments than other courts

    • Used alternatives to capital punishment

Alternative punishments

A diagram showing four illustrations representing acts of penance: a forced pilgrimage, a confession, a church, and an apology at Mass with a host and chalice.
A diagram showing some of the punishments the Church courts used instead of the death penalty
  • Henry II wanted a more standardised legal system

    • He saw separate Church courts as a challenge to his royal authority

    • He met with bishops at the Council of Clarendon to discuss the problem

    • The resulting Constitutions of Clarendon aimed to limit the Church’s power

      • One clause required clergy accused of serious crimes to be tried in secular courts

  • By the 13th century, clergy accused of crimes were tried in

    • Church courts for their first offence

    • Secular courts for their second offence

Sanctuary

  • Only available in important churches, such as those

    • On a pilgrimage route 

    • Linked to an important religious event

  • Those accused of a crime could go to a church and claim sanctuary

    • The ringing of a bell alerted villagers that the criminal was in sanctuary

    • The sheriff was not allowed to arrest them

  • The criminal in sanctuary then had 40 days to either:

    • Attend their trial 

    • Leave the country

      • Those who chose this option had to walk to the nearest port, barefoot, carrying a cross

      • They would then leave by ship

  • Anyone who refused both options became an outlaw

  • Offering sanctuary ended in the early modern era, during the reign of Henry VIII

Benefit of clergy

  • The ‘benefit of clergy’ allowed special treatment to clergy accused of crime

  • It allowed clergy to be tried in more lenient church courts

  • The benefit of the clergy had many flaws. These included:

    • It often extended to anyone connected to the Church

      • It was supposed to only be for priests

      • In reality, church doorkeepers and gravediggers could also claim it

    • It was unequal

      • Women were not allowed to be priests

      • As a result, they could not claim benefit of clergy

    • It was open to abuse

      • Illiterate laymen could claim benefit of clergy

A diagram showing a flowchart explaining the proper and improper use of 'Benefit of Clergy'; literate clergy read Psalm 51, while illiterate laymen memorized it, calling it the 'Neck Verse'.
A diagram showing how illiterate laymen could claim benefit of clergy
  • Reformers criticised sanctuary and benefit of clergy, especially in the later medieval era

  • They believed it allowed criminals to escape punishment

  • The Church’s role in offering protection began to decline

Punishments: Trial by Ordeal

  • Trial by ordeal had been used since Anglo-Saxon times

  • People believed that God had the power to both protect and judge people

  • By the early 13th century, the Church’s attitude to it had changed

    • In 1215, Pope Innocent III ordered priests to stop helping to organise trials by ordeal

A diagram showing a flowchart showing issues with trial by ordeal: Innocent people could be found guilty, outcomes were based on luck, it was legally unreliable and guilty people could be found innocent.
A diagram showing some reasons why trial by ordeal came to an end
  • In 1219, Henry III abolished trial by ordeal

  • Trial by jury became more common

Worked Example

Describe one feature of Church law enforcement in the medieval era

2 marks

Answers: 

The Church offered the benefit of clergy. (1) This allowed clergy accused of crimes to be tried in church courts, which were more lenient (1).

Exam Tip

For questions asking you to ‘Describe one feature’ of something. You can get full marks by:

  • Identifying a feature (1)

  • Giving supporting information about the features (1)

This question previously asked students to describe two features of a given event. This question was out of four marks. However, as of 2025, Edexcel will split this question into two subsections, asking you to describe a feature of two different events. Each subsection is worth two marks.

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.