Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

The Johnson County War (1892) (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Natasha Smith

Written by: Natasha Smith

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

What Did the Johnson County War Show About Tension Between Homesteaders and Cattle Ranchers? -Summary

In Johnson County, Wyoming, conflicts between homesteaders and cattle ranchers escalated into violence. Cattle ranchers controlled vast areas of land and relied on open grazing. They resented how the homesteaders used the open range. The cattle barons viewed homesteaders as trespassers and wanted them off of the land.

Due to increasing tensions, homesteaders and cattle ranchers organised themselves into associations. Armed confrontations occurred between the two groups. In 1892, a group of Texan gunmen arrived in Johnson County. The cattle barons paid for the gunmen. They tasked them to eliminate alleged rustlers and troublemakers among the homesteaders. Their plan was unsuccessful. The local law enforcement and community protected homesteaders from this attack. The standoff ended with the US Army restoring order.

The Johnson County War exposed the strong tensions between homesteaders and cattle ranchers. It highlighted the extent to which cattle ranchers would protect their economic interests and political power. It demonstrated the challenges of coexistence. There was high competition between different groups seeking to claim the land and resources of the Plains.

What was a Range War?

  • The cattle were on the open range

    • Arguments between the rich cattle barons, homesteaders and smaller ranchers occurred because of this

  • When these arguments became violent, they became known as the Range Wars

    • Different groups fought for control over the land

    • The biggest range war was in Johnson County

Causes of the Johnson County War

Long-term

Medium-term

Short-term

In the 1870s, huge cattle ranches developed in Wyoming, Rich, British investors financed the ranches. Cattle barons began to take over more land for their huge cattle ranches

In the winter of 1886-1887, smaller ranches coped better.  Larger ranchers accused smaller ranches of cattle rustling. ​In court, the jury was mostly ‘ordinary’ small ranchers and homesteaders. Many suspected cattle rustlers were not punished

In 1889, a powerful cattleman named Albert Bothwell accused homesteaders Ella Watson and Jim Averill of stealing his cattle. Averill made the tension worse by calling big ranchers ‘nothing but rich land-grabbers’.​ As a result, Bothwell hung Watson and Averill and took their land and cattle for himself

The cattle barons held important positions in government and became local court judges. The governor of Wyoming (Governor Barber) openly supported the cattlemen

Cattle barons created the Wyoming Stock Growers Association (WSGA). The WSGA banned small ranchers suspected of rustling from the spring round-up. Cattle barons wanted to take the law into their own hands

Homesteaders and small ranchers set up their own ‘Association’ in 1892. They deliberately set out on the spring round-up a month before the larger ranches

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The exam may require you to understand the narrative of the increasing tension between homesteaders and cattle ranchers. Ensure that you understand the core reasons why homesteaders and cattle ranchers fought over the Plains.

Events of the Johnson County War

A flowchart describing events in Spring 1892: WSGA hires gunmen and a lynching party. The party attacks KC ranch and kills leaders. Sheriff Red Angus responds, traps cattlemen, and US Cavalry rescues them.
A flow diagram showing the events of the Johnson County War

The Significance of the Johnson County War

Positive consequences

Negative consequences

The power of cattle barons decreased. Many residents thought that the cattlemen were wrong for their actions

The cattlemen were not brought to justice. This is because:

  • The trial was moved to Cheyenne because the jury would favour the cattlemen over suspected cattle rustlers

  • The WSGA hired the best lawyers from Chicago. They extended the case so long that Johnson County could not afford the trial. All charges were dropped

Due to changes in the cattle industry, cattle barons reduced their ranches and fenced off their land. This reduced tensions between homesteaders and cattle ranchers

Worked Example

Explain the importance of the Johnson County War for homesteading on the Plains

8 marks

Partial answer:

The Johnson County War was important to homesteading because it showed the extent to which cattle barons would go to protect the open range. One of the causes of the Johnson County War was the lynching of two homesteaders by a powerful cattleman named Albert Bothwell. This was important for homesteading as it showed how dangerous a profession it was. Cattle barons held great power and wealth. They could use this to legally or physically hurt homesteaders. Therefore, the Johnson County War showed that cattle barons would resort to violence to protect their interests from homesteaders.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

This style of question in the exam paper would be worth 8 marks. An examiner would expect you to write two paragraphs analysing the importance of an event on a wider theme like migration. A good response to this style of question would have:

  • logical structure of paragraphs. Within each paragraph, each sentence should link to the next. This will build a strong argument as to why the event is important to the wider theme

  • Specific own knowledge linked to the event, showing in-depth knowledge of the period

  • clear explanation as to why the event was important to a wider theme. In the example above, you can see the phrase 'This was important for homesteading.' This helps to keep the response focused on the question

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.