Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

Changing Government Attitudes Toward the Indigenous Peoples of the Plains (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Test yourself
Natasha Smith

Written by: Natasha Smith

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Why did the US Government's Attitudes Change Toward Indigenous Peoples by the 1880s? - Summary

The government had many different influences on their decision-making. Some people believed that the Indigenous peoples could assimilate into US society. They wanted the government to encourage Christianity and farming among Indigenous peoples. Other people were scared of Indigenous peoples and wanted them on reservations to separate them from society. Another group of Americans believed that Indigenous peoples should be exterminated to keep the USA safe. The US government had to navigate these varying opinions in their treatment of Indigenous peoples.

By the late 1880s, the situation between the US government and the Indigenous peoples had changed. The US policy of reservations had destroyed the Indigenous way of life. Tribes could no longer govern themselves. They removed the Indigenous peoples' ability to have a nomadic lifestyle. They also insisted on educating Indigenous children to be Christian and reject their culture. The government's actions left many Indigenous peoples in poverty and illness. Indigenous peoples relied on government support, despite incentives to become self-sufficient through farming.

The government decided to adopt a new approach. They understood that the reservation system was too damaging to Indigenous peoples. They also understood that the tribal structure still existed, with people relying on each other to survive. The government wanted the Indigenous peoples to live more independently, like US citizens.

Aims of the Dawes Act

  • The Dawes Act aimed to:

    • Break up the power of tribes

      • Some chiefs still influenced Indigenous peoples in reservations

      • The US government wanted Indigenous peoples to live as individuals

      • Indigenous peoples would no longer rely on the tribe or annuity, reducing government costs

    • Encourage Indigenous peoples to assimilate

      • The US government wanted Indigenous peoples to farm

      • Assimilation would open up more land for settlers

The Terms of the Dawes Act, 1887

Size of plot

Who could claim?

Additional clause of the Dawes Act

Family homesteads were 160 acres. Single Indigenous persons gained 80 acres and orphans 40 acres

Any of the following people could make a claim:

  • The head of the family

  • Single Indigenous persons

  • Orphans

Anyone who claimed a plot would become a US citizen

Congress only passed the Dawes Act because it stated that leftover reservation land could be sold to white settlers and railroad companies

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The American West exam relies on you knowing specific details about the period. Sometimes this can feel overwhelming. To help with this, try to make connections between key pieces of knowledge. The Dawes Act was essentially a Homestead Act for Indigenous peoples. Ensure that you know the details of the Homestead Act so you can use this knowledge for the Dawes Act, for example, the size of the plot being 160 acres.

The Significance and Issues of the Dawes Act

Achievements

Limitations

The Dawes Act freed up a significant amount of land for white settlers and railroad companies

By 1890, Indigenous peoples had lost over half the land that they held in 1887

Indigenous persons who took up plots could not farm the land. The soil was of poor quality and the plots were too small

Many Indigenous persons sold their plots or were cheated out of the land by white settlers. Some Indigenous persons turned to lawlessness

The Indigenous persons who kept their plots divided it among their children for inheritance. Smaller plots made it even harder to farm

Worked Example

Explain one consequence of the Dawes Act (1887)

4 marks

Answer:

One consequence of the Dawes Act was the loss of land for Indigenous peoples. The Dawes Act gave plots of 160 acres to Indigenous families to establish homesteads. This resulted in a loss of land. By 1890, the Indigenous peoples had lost over half the land that they held in 1887. This is because many Indigenous persons either sold their claims because they did not want to farm them or were cheated of their claims by white settlers. Therefore, the act disadvantaged the Indigenous peoples because they did not have usable land to live on.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

This question has previously asked you to explain two consequences. In the American West exam paper for 2025, this question will ask you to explain one consequence. However, there will be two different "Explain one consequence of" questions each, worth four marks. 

Closure of the 'Indian Frontier', 1890

  • The US census in 1890 declared that the frontier was closed because:

    • There were enough settlers to form states in places like North and South Dakota, Montana and Idaho

    • Railroads crossed from East to West

    • Large cities grew in the West

    • Yosemite National Park, created in 1890, protected the remaining 'wilderness' of the USA

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.