Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

Conflict on the Plains, 1862-1868 (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Natasha Smith

Written by: Natasha Smith

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Was War with the US Government the Only Option for the Indigenous Peoples of the Plains? - Timeline & Summary

A timeline from 1862 to 1868 showing Little Crow’s War, Sand Creek Massacre, Fetterman's Trap in Red Cloud’s War, The Second Fort Laramie Treaty, and Red Cloud’s War.

Indigenous tribes wanted to negotiate treaties with the US government to protect their interests. Treaties such as the Fort Laramie Treaty established boundaries and guaranteed rights. In the short term, this helped relations between Indigenous tribes and the US government.

The US government later broke agreements with the Indigenous tribes. The government encouraged white migrants to trespass and settle on Indigenous lands. This led to increased tensions between Indigenous tribes and settlers.

The US government did not protect the tribes as they had promised to do. Many tribes felt that they had no option but to defend themselves by force. Indigenous leaders such as Little Crow, Red Cloud and Sitting Horse led resistance movements against the US government.

The Indigenous tribes fought for their land rights and cultural survival. War was not the desired outcome for Indigenous tribes. However, it became a necessary response to the threat posed by the US government's policies and actions.

The Little Crow War, 1862

What Caused the Little Crow War?

  • Little Crow was the band chief of the Dakota Sioux

  • In 1862, tensions between the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Little Crow's band resulted in armed conflict

Actions

How did this cause conflict?

In 1851, the Dakota Sioux signed a treaty with the US government. They gave up 24 million acres of land for a $1.4 million annuity

  • The Dakota Sioux had to pay off $200,000 of debt to traders before they received the annuity

The number of white settlers increased rapidly in Minnesota

  • Settlers took the fertile farming land within the Dakota Sioux's reservation

  • The remaining area of the reservation could not produce enough food for the Dakota Sioux to survive over the winter

Corrupt agents from the Bureau of Indian Affairs ran the Dakota Sioux's reservation

  • When bands left the reservation to hunt, the agents punished them by keeping the annuity supplies

  • Agents would hold onto supplies until the Dakota Sioux offered to pay high prices for them. They also gave the tribe rotten supplies

In 1858, the government forced the Dakota Sioux to give away half of their reservation land in exchange for money to pay off their debts

  • Little Crow was incredibly angry as the government had broken their promise not to take away land

  • The reservation was already too small to sustain the tribe

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Many Europeans and Americans called the Indigenous peoples of America 'Indians.' This is no longer an accepted term. Please do not use 'Indians' to refer to Indigenous peoples in your exam answers. However, in this section, you will have to use the official name for the government policies towards Indigenous peoples. Many of the policies use the term 'Indian'. You should write the full title of these acts in your exam answers to show specific own knowledge.

Events of the Little Crow War

A flowchart detailing a timeline of the Dakota Sioux in August 1862: crops failed, starvation, agents denied access to food stores, Civil War distractions, Little Crow aids tribe, violence ensues, trials and executions, forced relocation, starvation, Little Crow's death.
A flow diagram showing the events and outcomes of the Little Crow War

The Sand Creek Massacre, 1864

What Caused the Sand Creek Massacre?

Actions

How did this cause conflict?

In 1858, gold was discovered in the Colorado Territory

  • Prospectors began trespassing on Cheyenne and Arapaho land. The Fort Laramie Treaty guaranteed this land to the tribes

  • The white settlers scared the buffalo away

  • The prospectors demanded that the US government move the tribes onto reservations

In 1861, the Arapaho and Cheyenne chiefs signed the Treaty of Fort Wise

  • While the chiefs agreed to move to east Colorado, the young warriors did not

  • A warrior brotherhood called the Dog Soldiers remained in their old land and fought with prospectors

Black Kettle set up camp in Sand Creek to negotiate with the government. He believed that he was under army protection

  • John Evans, the territory governor, saw this as an opportunity to 'kill and destroy' the tribe

Events of the Sand Creek Massacre

  • John Evans hired Colonel Chivington to attack Black Kettle and his tribe

  • On 29th November 1864, Chivington:

    • Led an army of 700 men on horseback into Black Kettle's camp

    • Ignored the camp's white flag of surrender

    • Massacred over 130 men, women and children

    • Scalped the victims and displayed their body parts in local saloons

  • Black Kettle escaped, telling other tribes about the massacre

  • The Dog Soldiers continued to attack forts and white settlers in the Colorado Territory

  • The US government agreed to a new treaty in 1865. It promised:

    • A large reservation for the Cheyenne and Arapaho near the Arkansas River

    • Generous payments were made to the survivors of the Sand Creek Massacre

  • In 1867, the government backed out of the treaty

    • The tribes moved to a reservation half the size agreed upon in 1865

    • The government paid no compensation to the survivors of the Sand Creek Massacre

    • The tribes could use their old hunting grounds

  • Black Kettle died in another US Army massacre in 1868

Red Cloud's War, 1866-1868

What Caused Red Cloud's War?

  • Red Cloud was a respected war chief of the Lakota Sioux

  • By 1866, Red Cloud decided to fight against the US government

Actions

How did this cause conflict?

In 1862, gold was discovered in Montana

  • By 1865, 2,000 prospectors had used the Bozeman Trail to reach Montana. This crossed the hunting grounds of the Lakota Sioux

  • The use of the Bozeman Trail broke the Fort Laramie Treaty

In 1866, the government called a council. They wanted the Lakota Sioux to allow people to travel on the Bozeman Trail

  • Red Cloud discovered that the army had brought materials to build forts

  • Red Cloud knew what happened to Little Crow. He did not trust the US government to stick to its promise of gifts and hunting grounds

Events of Red Cloud's War

A flow diagram showing the events and outcomes of Red Cloud's War
A flow diagram showing the events and outcomes of Red Cloud's War

Worked Example

Explain the importance of Red Cloud’s War (1866–1868) for relations between the Indigenous peoples and the US government

8 marks

Partial answer:

Red Cloud's War was important for US-Indigenous relations because the US government had to recognise the power of the tribe. Red Cloud's War was a two-year conflict that combined forces from the Lakota Sioux, the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes. Red Cloud's ability to unite members from multiple tribes strengthened the threat posed by Indigenous peoples. It was important as the US government realised it could not win Red Cloud's War through violence after the Fetterman's Trap. The US government had to pursue peaceful methods with the Indigenous peoples. This eventually created better relations between the US government and the Indigenous peoples.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

This style of question in the exam paper would be worth 8 marks. An examiner would expect you to write two paragraphs analysing the importance of an event on a wider theme like migration. A good response to this style of question would have:

  • logical structure of paragraphs. Within each paragraph, each sentence should link to the next. This will build a strong argument as to why the event is important to the wider theme

  • Specific own knowledge linked to the event, showing in-depth knowledge of the period

  • clear explanation as to why the event was important to a wider theme. In the example above, you can see the phrase 'This eventually created better relations.' This helps to keep the response focused on the question.

The Second Fort Laramie Treaty, 1868

  • As a consequence of Red Cloud's War, the US government signed the Second Fort Laramie Treaty. It stated that:

The country north of the North Platte River and east of the summits of the Big Horn mountains shall be held and considered to be... Indian Territory

  • The Second Fort Laramie Treaty set out an agreement that:

    • The Great Sioux Reservation was only for the Sioux nation

    • No white migrants could settle or travel through this land

    • The US government would close the Bozeman Trail

    • Red Cloud would move his tribe to a reservation in Dakota

  • While this ended Red Cloud's War, it did not ease tensions

    • Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse refused to sign the treaty

Examiner Tips and Tricks

A question could ask you to write a narrative account of the conflict on the Plains, 1862-1868. A common misconception that students have is that a narrative account is a story. A narrative account answer should follow CHRONOLINK:

  • Put the sequence of events in chronological order

  • Link each section of the narrative to the next event that occurred. You should use linkage terms such as: 'as a consequence', 'this led to' or 'because'.

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.