Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

The Summits About Berlin, 1959-1961 (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

How did the Berlin Summits Impact Cold War Tensions? - Timeline & Summary

Timeline showing key Cold War events: Khrushchev's Berlin ultimatum in 1958, talks at Camp David in 1959, Geneva Summit in 1959, U2 incident in 1960, Vienna Summit in 1961.

Khrushchev's Ultimatum forced the West to pay attention to the threat of the Soviet Union. If Khrushchev acted upon his ultimatum, the Soviet Union would fight for the domination of Berlin. This could escalate into a nuclear war. The nuclear arms race between the USA and the Soviet Union made this a more likely outcome. The only way that the USA could respond was to initiate peace talks with the Soviet Union to compromise on the issue of Berlin.

From 1959 to 1961, on four separate occasions, the USA met with the Soviet Union to discuss how to govern Berlin. The early summits established a closer relationship between the USA and the Soviet Union. This supported the desire of both Eisenhower and Khrushchev for peaceful co-existence between the two superpowers. The U-2 spy plane incident in 1960 doomed the summits to failure. The trust and goodwill between the USA and the Soviet Union disappeared. As a result, the summits failed in their aims to resolve the issue of Berlin.

Geneva Summit, 1959

  • The Geneva Summit was the first official meeting to discuss the issue of Berlin

    • Khrushchev met the foreign representatives of France, Britain and the USA

    • The officials chose Geneva as Switzerland was a neutral country

The aims and outcomes of the Geneva Summit, May 1959

Aims of the Geneva Summit

Outcomes of the Geneva Summit

To find a solution for Khrushchev's Ultimatum

The representatives could not agree on what would resolve Khrushchev's ultimatum

To agree on the way that the USA and the Soviet Union could govern Berlin

Eisenhower and Khrushchev's relationship improved. Eisenhower invited Khrushchev to visit the USA later in the year

Camp David Summit, 1959

  • Khrushchev arrived in the USA on 15th September 1959

    • Khrushchev announced to the American crowds that he had come to the USA:

 with open heart and good intentions

  • Khrushchev visited Hollywood and ate hot dogs during his visit

    • This shows his openness to experiencing capitalism

  • During his 12-day visit, Khrushchev and Eisenhower discussed Khrushchev's ultimatum

    • Eisenhower held the meeting at the president's residence at Camp David, Maryland

The aims and outcomes of the Camp David Summit, September 1959

Aims of the Camp David Summit

Outcomes of the Camp David Summit

To find a solution for Khrushchev's ultimatum

The representatives could not agree on what would resolve Khrushchev's ultimatum

To agree on the way that the USA and the Soviet Union could govern Berlin

Eisenhower and Khrushchev's relationship improved. They agreed to hold further talks in Paris the following year

Examiner Tips and Tricks

An exam question may ask you to explain the importance of the summit meetings of 1959-61 on US-Soviet relations. The Camp David summit ended positively. It shows the height of friendly relations between the USA and the Soviet Union since the Second World War. The talks had not convinced Eisenhower that Khrushchev would take back his ultimatum. Eisenhower remained hopeful that the USA and the Soviet Union could come to a compromise. From 1950, the summit meetings about Berlin became more problematic and tense between the USA and the Soviet Union.

Paris Summit, 1960 and the U-2 Spy-Plane Incident

  • The leaders of France, Britain, the USA and the Soviet Union met in Paris on 17th May 1960

  • The Paris Summit intended to discuss the issues with Berlin alongside:

    • An agreement to a Nuclear Test Ban

    • How to react to the newly-established communist government in Cuba

  • Events before the Paris Summit prevented the success of the talks

    • On 1st May, the Soviet Union shot down a U-2 spy-plane

      • The US Air Force and the CIA used U-2 planes to take photos of enemy countries and perform espionage operations

    • Eisenhower initially denied that the plane that the Soviet Union shot down was a spy plane

      • He made a statement claiming that it was a weather plane that had drifted off course

    • The Soviet Union questioned the plane's pilot, Gary Powers

      • Powers admitted that he worked for the CIA and that he used the plane to gain intelligence on the Soviet Union

    • On 16th May, Khrushchev demanded that the USA apologise for the U-2 spy-plane incident

      • He declared that the Soviet Union could not take part in the Paris Summit without an official apology, the end of US spying missions and the punishment of Powers and the CIA

      • Eisenhower refused to apologise. On 11th May, Eisenhower acknowledged that the Soviets had shot down a spy-plane. He stated the importance of US espionage missions for the country's safety 

The aims and outcomes of the Paris Summit, May 1960

Aims of the Paris Summit

Outcomes of the Paris Summit

To find a solution for Khrushchev's ultimatum

The representatives could not agree on what would resolve Khrushchev's ultimatum

To agree on wider international issues such as the communist takeover of Cuba and a Nuclear Test Ban

Khrushchev walked out of the meeting due to the U-2 spy-plane incident. This increased Cold War tensions. 

The countries came to no resolution on these matters

Vienna, June 1961

  • By 1961, there was a significant change in the USA

    • In January 1961, John F. Kennedy replaced Eisenhower as the President of the USA

    • Kennedy was an anti-communist

      • In 1952, in a speech to campaign for his election to the Senate, Kennedy stated that communism was:

an enemy, power[full], unrelenting and implacable who seeks to dominate the world 

  • He took office at the age of 43

    • He is one of the youngest US presidents in history

    • Khrushchev took Kennedy's age as a sign of his inexperience in politics. He believed that he could manipulate Kennedy to remove US influence from Berlin

  • Kennedy had made a fundamental mistake in world politics

    • Kennedy attempted to remove the communist government in Cuba through the 'Bay of Pigs' incident in April 1961. This resulted in an embarrassing failure for the US government

    • Khrushchev wanted to benefit from the 'Bay of Pigs' incident. Khrushchev believed that Kennedy's damaged reputation would make him more likely to agree with his ultimatum

  • The leaders of both countries met in Vienna on 4th June 1961

The aims & outcomes of the Vienna Summit, June 1961

Aims of the Vienna Summit

Outcomes of the Vienna Summit

To find a solution for Khrushchev's ultimatum

Khrushchev took a strong stance on Berlin. He restated to Kennedy his ultimatum. The meeting ended with no resolution on Berlin

To agree on the way that the USA and the Soviet Union could govern Berlin

Kennedy did not want to appear weak to Khrushchev. He refused to compromise with Khrushchev. Kennedy and Khrushchev established a negative relationship with each other

What impact did the summit meetings of 1959 to 1961 have on Cold War tensions?

  • By 1961, US-Soviet relations were very bad

    • Numerous peace talks had not succeeded in resolving the issue of governing Berlin

  • Both countries stopped pursuing cooperation

    • Kennedy and Khrushchev did not want 'peaceful co-existence' with each other

  • The situation in Berlin forced both leaders to take more extreme measures

    • Kennedy increased the US armed forces budget to $2 billion. This indicates that Kennedy considered using the US army to fight the Soviet Union for Berlin 

    • In August, Khrushchev made the decision to resolve the Berlin refugee crisis himself. He constructed a wall between East and West Berlin

The impacts of the peace summits of 1959 to 1961

Flowchart detailing causes and consequences of the Berlin Summits (1959-1961). Causes: Berlin’s refugee crisis, Khrushchev’s ultimatum, efforts to improve relations. Consequences: worsened US-Soviet relations, increased US military budget, creation of Berlin Wall.
A flow diagram showing the causes and consequences of the Berlin summits to US-Soviet relations, 1959-61

Worked Example

Explain one consequence of the Paris Summit in May 1960

4 marks

Answer:

One consequence of the Paris Summit was a worsening of US-Soviet relations. On 1st May, the Soviet Union shot down an American U-2 spy-plane over Russia. Khrushchev demanded the US apologise for the espionage against the Soviet Union before the Paris Summit. Eisenhower refused to apologise. This significantly impacted the success of the talks as Khrushchev believed the USA did not respect the Soviet Union. Khrushchev walked out of the Paris Summit and no resolution on the issue of Berlin was reached. This worsened US-Soviet relations as the Soviet Union became less willing to negotiate with the USA. The lack of US credibility and honesty forced Khrushchev to restate his ultimatum at the Vienna Summit in June 1961.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In this example, you can see the development of wider knowledge of the period. The example has linked the U-2 spy-plane incident with the Paris Summit. This event is significant to understand why the Paris Summit increased tensions between the USA and the Soviet Union. If this is your approach to this style of question, ensure the answer links back to the main event in the question. This answer would not be effective if it only discussed the U-2 spy-plane incident. The example is linked back to the Paris Summit by explaining how the incident caused Khrushchev to leave the meeting.

This question has previously asked you to explain two consequences. In the Superpower Relations exam paper for 2025, this question will ask you to explain one consequence. However, there will be two different "Explain one consequence of" questions, each worth four marks.

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.