Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

Mary & Elizabeth I's Relationship, 1568-1569 (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Test yourself
Natasha Smith

Expertise

History Content Creator

Why was the Arrival of Mary, Queen of Scots a Turning Point in Elizabeth’s Reign? - Summary

In the study of History, a turning point is an event that significantly changes the present and future of a civilisation. The identification of turning points helps historians to understand the significance and consequences of events in history. The arrival of Mary, Queen of Scots to England in 1568 was a turning point in Elizabethan history. 


Mary’s rule of Scotland created a complex problem for Elizabeth. To many people in England, Mary’s actions in Scotland were indefensible. The people and nobles of Scotland believed that Mary was abusing her power. When she arrived in England, her reputation was ruined.

Due to the Divine Right [of Kings], Elizabeth strongly believed that Mary was the rightful Queen of Scotland. She condemned the Scottish nobles for prosecuting an anointed monarch. She also reminded her advisers that Mary was a mother. She had given birth to James in June 1566. Elizabeth understood that Mary’s marriage to Lord Darnley was an unhappy one. Darnley was an adulterer, a heavy drinker and lacked interest in his royal duties. He murdered Mary’s Italian secretary, David Rizzio, out of jealousy. 

Historians will never understand the truth behind Mary’s response to the murder of her husband. Mary’s arrival in England defined Elizabeth’s reign. The event challenged her principles of monarchy and family.

Murder of Lord Darnley

  • In 1565, Mary, Queen of Scots married Henry Stuart (better known as Lord Darnley

    • Both Mary and Lord Darnley had claims to the English throne through the Tudor family tree 

    • Elizabeth was unhappy with the union 

      • Elizabeth wanted to marry Mary to Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester. Robert was a favourite in Elizabeth’s court. She believed Robert could control and limit the threat Mary posed

      • Elizabeth reluctantly permitted Lord Darnley to marry Mary

  • Mary gave birth to a son, James, in 1566

    • Mary had produced an heir to the Scottish throne. This strengthened Mary’s argument that she should be named Elizabeth’s heir 

    • To English Catholics, Mary was proving her merits as Queen. The unmarried Elizabeth had no intention to have children. If Mary had been Queen of England, she would have secured the line of succession 

  • Mary’s reign in Scotland fell apart in 1567 after the murder of Lord Darnley 

A sequence of four historical events that led to Mary Queen of Scots' arrival to England: the murder of David Riccio in 1566, the deterioration of Darnley and Mary of Scots' relationship, the explosion at Kirk o' Field that killed Darnley and Mary's marriage to the Earl of Bothwell
A storyboard showing the events of Lord Darnley’s murder

Exam Tip

An exam question may ask you to what extent the murder of Lord Darnley affected Elizabeth's decision about Mary, Queen of Scots. The event shocked many Scottish and English people. Acquiring enough barrels of gunpowder to cause a significant explosion would have been expensive. Darnley had escaped from the house. His cause of death was strangulation, showing the intention of the explosion was to cause Darnley’s death. The identity of Darnley’s murderer remains a mystery today. In an exam answer, explain how Mary looked guilty of the murder. Elizabeth saw Mary as a danger to her personal safety.

Reaction of Scottish Nobles

  • Bothwell was not popular amongst the Scottish nobles

    • The nobles believed Bothwell was violent and power-hungry

    • They questioned why Bothwell became Mary’s most trusted adviser after the death of Riccio

    • Even though Bothwell was Protestant, this did not make the nobles support him

  • The Scottish nobles wanted to put Bothwell on trial for Darnley’s murder

    • Bothwell’s supporters intimidated the court until the judge acquitted him of murder

  • The Scottish nobles felt outraged about the speed in which Mary married Bothwell

    • Historians have debated if Bothwell forced Mary into the marriage or whether she saw the political benefits of marrying Bothwell

  • On 15th June 1567, the Scottish nobles declared a civil war on Mary

    • They wanted Mary to abdicate the Scottish throne and admit her guilt in the murder of Darnley

  • The nobles captured Mary at Carberry Hill outside Edinburgh

    • The Scottish nobles paraded Mary through the streets of Edinburgh

    • She was later imprisoned in Lochleven Castle. The castle was on an island in the middle of a loch

  • On 24th July 1567, the Scottish nobles forced Mary to abdicate

    • Her 13-month-old son, James, became the King of Scotland

    • The Scottish nobles took responsibility for James’ education

  • Mary escaped from Lochleven Castle on 2nd May 1568

    • She attempted to raise an army to win back the throne

  • On 13th May 1568, the Battle of Langside near Glasgow saw the defeat of Mary’s army

Mary's Escape From Scotland

  • After Mary’s defeat at the Battle of Langside, Mary decided to flee from Scotland

    • Immediately after the battle, Mary travelled south

  • She reached England by fishing boat on 16th May

    • By 18th May, local officials found Mary and took her to Carlisle Castle

  • Mary had not given up hope of regaining her Scottish throne

    • She believed that Elizabeth would help her defeat the Scottish nobles

Causes and Consequences of Mary’s Arrival in England

A flowchart illustrating the causes and consequences of Mary’s arrival in England, in 1568. Causes: Lord Darnley’s murder, marriage to Earl of Bothwell, rebellion of Scottish nobles. Consequences: anger in Elizabeth’s government, debate on Mary's punishment, increased threat from Catholics.
A multi-flow diagram showing the causes and consequences of Mary’s arrival in England

Exam Tip

Mary believed that travelling to England would be the right decision. She was certain that Elizabeth would help her. Both were queen regnant. Female rulers were rare in the 16th century. Mary believed that Elizabeth would want to restore her monarchy to prove that there were successful female monarchs. They were also second cousins. Family bonds were powerful in Elizabethan England. Mary wanted to emphasise the closeness of their relationship so Elizabeth would be more likely to protect her.

Elizabeth's Reaction to Mary's Arrival

  • Mary’s arrival in England in 1568 worried Elizabeth

    • She knew that Mary wanted her support to overthrow the rebellious nobles who had taken control of Scotland

    • She did not trust Mary. Elizabeth knew her intentions were to be named her heir

    • Mary’s damaged reputation worried Elizabeth. Elizabeth’s association with Mary could ruin her own reputation

  • Mary corresponded with Elizabeth by letter

    • Elizabeth and Mary, Queen of Scots never met, despite Mary’s request for a meeting with Elizabeth

  • Mary wanted to explain to Elizabeth her innocence in the murder of Lord Darnley. Elizabeth was wary of discussing this because:

    • She was unsure if she could believe Mary’s version of events

      • Mary claimed she had not planned Darnley’s murder, despite being unhappy in the marriage

      • Mary, Queen of Scots claimed that Bothwell had kidnapped her and forced her into the marriage. These were serious allegations

    • An English court was about to hear Mary’s case. They would decide if she was guilty of Darnley’s murder

What Options Did Elizabeth I Have?

  • Elizabeth and her advisers considered multiple solutions to the ‘problem’ of Mary, Queen of Scots

What could Elizabeth choose to do with Mary, Queen of Scots?

Option

Positive consequences

Negative consequences

Help Mary regain her Scottish throne

Mary would do anything to receive Elizabeth's help. She could insist that Mary drop her claim to the English throne

If Elizabeth restored Mary as Queen of Scotland,  Mary could use her army to overthrow Elizabeth. The Earls in the north of England would be happy to help Mary restore Catholicism in England

Return Mary to the Scottish lords

If the Scottish nobles imprisoned or killed Mary, she could not take the English throne. Mary’s return to Scotland would make Elizabeth’s government happy. They wanted to maintain a good relationship with the Protestant nobles in Scotland

The imprisonment or murder of an anointed monarch was not acceptable to Elizabeth. She would worry that English nobles would think it was acceptable to treat a monarch in this way

Allow Mary to go abroad

Mary would be safe from the Scottish nobles. She could live her life peacefully in exile

If Mary took refuge in a Catholic country, she could use their resources to rebel against Elizabeth. Philip II of Spain would be happy to help Mary claim the English throne

Keep Mary in England

Elizabeth could keep Mary under close supervision. Imprisonment in England would protect Mary from the Scottish nobles

Mary would remain a constant threat to Elizabeth. Mary would receive letters from Catholic plotters wanting to use her to overthrow Elizabeth

Elizabeth's Decision About Mary

  • The English court lasted from October 1568 to January 1569

    • The Scottish nobles brought letters as evidence

      • These were called the ‘casket letters’, alleged correspondence between Mary and the Earl of Bothwell

      • The content of the letters indicated that Mary had plotted with Bothwell to kill Darnley 

  • Mary undermined the power of the court

    • She stated that, as an anointed monarch, only God could judge her

    • Mary refused to offer a plea unless Elizabeth could guarantee an innocent verdict. Elizabeth refused to promise this

  • Elizabeth could not allow the English court to decide whether Mary was guilty of murdering Lord Darnley. An innocent or guilty verdict for Mary was dangerous for Elizabeth because:

    • If found guilty, Elizabeth would be responsible for overthrowing an anointed monarch. Her actions would validate that the people had the power to choose their monarch. This went against her belief in Divine Right

    • If found innocent, Mary could gain support from a Catholic country to overthrow Elizabeth

  • She decided to imprison Mary indefinitely

    • Mary, Queen of Scots was imprisoned for 19 years

    • She never saw her son James again

Exam Tip

If an exam question asks you to explain why Elizabeth imprisoned Mary, you could argue that the choice satisfied the majority of Elizabeth’s subjects and foreign powers. The religious tension in England had improved but was not resolved. Elizabeth could not afford to upset her people or the European Catholic powers. Despite pressure from her government to decide what to do about Mary, Elizabeth avoided the issue for 19 years.

Worked Example

Describe one feature of Elizabeth’s decision-making about Mary, Queen of Scots in 1569 

2 marks

Answers:

 One feature of Elizabeth’s decision-making about Mary, Queen of Scots (MQoS) in 1569 was the need to avoid upsetting foreign powers (1). Elizabeth knew that MQoS had the support of Catholic powers like Spain. If Elizabeth let MQoS go free, she could use Philip II of Spain to raise an army against Elizabeth (1).

Exam Tip

To achieve full marks, you must provide detailed knowledge about Mary, Queen of Scots to support the identified feature from the question.

This question previously asked students to describe two features of a given event. This question was out of four marks. However, as of 2025, Edexcel will split this question into two subsections, asking you to describe a feature of two different events. Each subsection is worth two marks.

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.