Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2024

First exams 2026

|

The 16 Mark "How Far do you Agree" Question (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Test yourself
Natasha Smith

Expertise

History Content Creator

Summary of Question 3 or 4

  • Questions 3 and 4 require you to:

    • Evaluate the statement in the question

    • To use second-order concepts in your answer

  • You need to evaluate the statement given in the question against other reasons

    • Two possible reasons are provided for you in the stimulus box under the question

  • You only need to answer either Question 3 or 4

    • Do not answer both questions as you will not have time and will not be awarded more marks

  • Unlike for the 16-mark question in Paper 1, you are not awarded marks for Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar (SPaG)

Amount of marks 

16

The time that you should spend on the question 

5 minutes of planning

20 minutes of writing

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Exam question paper showing two questions. Question 3 asks about Francis Walsingham’s role in Mary, Queen of Scots’ execution. Question 4 asks about poor weather affecting the Spanish Armada's failure.
An example of Question 3 and Question 4 in Paper 2B
  • In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics in Elizabethan England:

Year of Exam 

Question Topic 

2018

Question 3: The effective use of naval tactics by the English during the Spanish Armada

Question 4: Attitudes towards the poor

2019

Question 3: Catholic opposition to Elizabeth

Question 4: Sir Francis Drake and his achievements

2020

Question 3: Mary, Queen of Scots and her claim to the English throne

Question 4: Education in Early Elizabethan England

2021

Question 3: Rivalry between England and Spain

Question 4: Leisure activities for the rich and poor in Elizabethan England

2022

Question 3: The problem of Elizabeth's legitimacy

Question 4: The Revolt of the Northern Earls and challenges to Elizabeth's rule

2023

Question 3: England's involvement in the Netherlands

Question 4: The increase of exploration by England

Making judgements in history

  • The 16-mark question relies on your ability to weigh all the evidence and state your opinion

    • Students often find this part the hardest to do 

  • There are some common mistakes students make when making a judgement, they include: 

    • Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by: 

      • Explaining that all of the reasons are the most important 

      • Failing to decide which factor is the most important 

      • Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe” 

  • Contradicting your judgements

    • Students sometimes haven’t planned their answers properly. They start to write their answer with one judgement and then change their opinion halfway through 

      • In the example question, you may state in the introduction that the main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to Walsingham. However, in the conclusion, you state that it was due to religious issues in England

    • Doing this means that there is not a sustained judgement and you can not access Level 4 (13–16 marks) 

Good judgements will:

  • Explain the second-order concept outlined in the question in full

    • There is no "right" or "wrong" answer in history

    • If you are unsure of your opinion, pick the side of the argument that you have better or more evidence to support

  • Consider other reasons

    • Even if you fully believe a reason is the most important, you still need to present evidence for other reasons

  • Be sustained throughout your answer 

    • They should be used to structure your answer and help you explain 

    • This is why planning your answer is important

What makes a great conclusion in GCSE History?

  • Conclusions are usually where most of your judgement marks will be awarded

  • Students often rush their conclusions so they are not as developed as they could be

  • All great conclusions have these three elements:

    • Judgement – Start with your opinion. Try to include the words from the question. Consider including referring to the second-order concept mentioned in the question

    • Counter – Give an example from the other side of the argument to show your awareness of this

    • Support – Explain why, after considering all the evidence, you have reached your judgement. Use your best piece of evidence to show your opinion

How to answer a "How far do you agree" question

  • In the exam, you will be given the option of two questions to answer

    • You only need to answer one question

      • You will not receive more marks for writing both questions

    • You should put an "X" in the box next to the question you have chosen to answer

Form with instructions to mark a question choice. "Question 3" and "Question 4" are options, with boxes for marking; "Question 4" is marked.
An example of how to show which option you will be answering in the Early Elizabethan England exam
  • The "How far do you agree" question will present you with a statement which you have to create a sustained judgement around

    • For example, Question 4 is:

      • "The main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was Francis Walsingham"

  • Underneath both Questions 3 and 4, you will have a stimulus box with two key knowledge suggestions

    • If you only use these suggestions in your answer, you are limited to a maximum of 13 marks

    • You can choose not to use any of the suggestions, but you can still achieve full marks

  • To answer this question successfully you should

    • Read the answer carefully and multiple times (if you have the time)

    • Annotate the question to find the key demands of the question

    • Plan your answer

      • In your plan include what key knowledge you wish to use and an outline of your argument

      • This will help you to create a sustained judgement

        AWAITING IMAGE

"How far do you agree" question structure

  • Your answer should consist of:

    • A logical structure e.g. PEEL paragraphs

    • Specific and relevant knowledge

    • A range of knowledge

    • An explanation of the second-order concept outlined in the question

    • A clear and sustained judgement throughout the answer

    • A conclusion

  • If you want to include an introduction you can, but it is not necessary 

  • Your answers could be written in PEEL paragraphs: 

    • P - Make a point about the question

      • This should include your judgement 

    • E - Use evidence that supports the point that you have made (K)

      • Evidence needs to be relevant and specific to the question

    • E - Explain why this evidence supports your point

      • Your explanation should be focused on the second-order concept outlined in the question (SOC)

    • L - Link your explanation back to the question to help sustain your argument and show your understanding of the question (SOC)

  • The question is out of 16 marks:

    • 6 marks for a wide range of specific knowledge of the period and the topic stated in the question (K)

    • 10 marks for the analysis of the key second-order concepts of cause and consequence, similarities and differences and importance (SOC)

Worked example of a "How far do you agree" question

Worked Example

  1. 'The main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was Francis Walsingham.'

How far do you agree? Explain your answer.

(16)

You may use the following in your answer:

• Babington Plot

• religious unrest in England

You must also use information of your own.

Answer

I agree that the main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was because of Francis Walsingham (SOC). However, there were other reasons such as Mary's own actions and the continued Catholic threat in England.

The main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to the actions of Francis Walsingham. Walsingham was Elizabeth's spymaster who's role it was to protect her from threats to her reign. During Elizabeth's reign, Walsingham collected evidence of Mary's involvement in plots. During the Babington plot Walsingham intercepted letters which were used in Mary, Queen of Scot's trial (K). Therefore, Walsingham was the main reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed as his evidence of Mary's involvement in treasonous acts convinced Elizabeth to execute Mary. The evidence made it impossible for Elizabeth to continue Mary's imprisonment as Walsingham proved that Mary posed a huge threat to Elizabeth's reign (SOC).

Another reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to her own actions during her captivity in England. Mary, Queen of Scots was imprisoned in England for 19 years. During this time, Mary was either connected or physically involved in several plots to kill Elizabeth. However, her choice to be involved in the Babington Plot resulted in her execution as she sent coded letters to Babington and approved the plans (K). Therefore, her own actions resulted in her execution as Elizabeth could no longer persuade the Privy Council not to force her to sign the execution orders. Mary's presence in England was a threat that could no longer be ignored (SOC). Although this was an important reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed, it was not the main reason. Without the evidence Walsingham collected, Elizabeth would have been able to ignore her Privy Council's demands for Mary's execution as she had done for many years (SOC).

A final reason why Mary, Queen of Scots was executed was due to the Catholic threat in England. Mary, Queen of Scots was a legitimate Catholic heir to the English throne. Many people in England supported her claim as there was ongoing religious unrest in England due to the continuous change of religion since Henry VIII's religious Reformation. However, there was an increased Catholic threat in England because of Elizabeth's excommunication by the Pope and the papal bull (K). Therefore, Mary, Queen of Scots was executed because the Catholic threat in England was a continuous threat which was a challenge to Elizabeth's reign, which could be reduced if Mary was executed (SOC). This understanding was clear to Elizabeth's Privy Council and is one of the reasons why Walsingham collected evidence against Mary to force the execution (SOC).

Overall, I agree that the main reason why Mary Queen of Scots was executed was due to Francis Walsingham. Walsingham collected evidence that forced Elizabeth to order Mary, Queen of Scots' execution. In addition, Walsingham's actions were caused by other factors such as the continuous threat from Catholics in England and Mary's own actions which led to him collecting evidence for her execution (SOC).

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.