Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2016

Last exams 2025

|

The Impact of the Wall Street Crash on Germany (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

The Wall Street Crash & its Impact on Weimar Germany - Summary

Historians identify the Wall Street Crash on 24 October 1929 as the ‘turning point’ in the success of the Weimar Republic. A turning point is an event in which a decisive change occurs that affects the course of history. In 1929, many people in Weimar Germany were experiencing a ‘Golden Age’. Extremist parties like the Nazi Party were unpopular in elections. Many historians would argue that, without another economic depression, the Weimar government would have continued to gain popularity and strength. The death of Stresemann on 3rd October 1929 weakened the government.  Stresemann possessed the ability to combat the economic impact of the Wall Street Crash on Germany. Some historians claim that, without Stresemann, the Weimar government lacked decisiveness.

Other historians suggest that Weimar Germany was doomed to fail. The foundations of the Republic were insecure. The Weimar Constitution contained some significant loopholes. The biggest issue was the wording and overuse of Article 48. Historians also argue that Stresemann’s connection of the USA’s economy to Germany through the Dawes Plan would have led to economic collapse sooner or later

In either case, the Wall Street Crash signified the end of the Weimar Republic’s ‘Golden Age’. The subsequent depression in Germany from 1930 marked the true beginning of Hitler’s rise to power.

The Wall Street Crash, 1929

  • Throughout the 1920s, the USA experienced a boom in their economy

    • Britain and France were repaying their wartime loans to the USA

    • As a result, the USA had a surplus of money in their economy

  • The USA’s economy was growing at such a rapid rate that, by October 1929, stockbrokers began to speculate that the market would decline

    • Americans from all areas of society had bought shares in the 1920s. Working-class Americans could not afford for their share prices to drop too far

    • Share prices began to fall

    • Shareholders rushed to sell their shares before their value dropped too significantly

  • Between 24th and 30th October 1929, the USA’s economy collapsed

    • This event is called ‘Black Thursday’

    • People sold 13 million shares

    • Prices plummeted due to the amount of shares available

    • Shares that were worth $20,000 on the morning of 24 October 1929 were worth $1,000 by the end of the day

    • By 30th October 1929, investors had lost $4 billion

    • This event is called the ‘Wall Street Crash’ as Wall Street is where the Stock Exchange is based in New York

Impacts of the Wall Street Crash on Germany

  • The Wall Street Crash created economic collapses across Europe, including Germany

    • The Dawes Plan connected Britain, France and Germany to the USA’s economy. The USA's money allowed the payment of reparations and First World War loans

    • The USA began to recall its loans to save its economy. This jeopardised the economies in Europe

  • The below diagram explains how Wall Street impacted Germany’s economy:

How did the Wall Street Crash cause an economic depression in Germany?

A flow diagram explaining the impact of the 1929 Wall Street Crash on Germany's economy, leading to bank collapses, loan recalls, reduced production, and economic collapse.
A flow diagram explaining how the Wall Street Crash caused Germany's economy to collapse

The Effects of Unemployment

  • The economic issues triggered an employment crisis

    • German banks recalled loans, which forced businesses to close and workers to lose their jobs

    • The USA’s crash affected other countries across the world. Other countries stopped purchasing German goods, which increased unemployment

    • Unemployed workers did not spend money on goods or services. This resulted in even more companies having to make redundancies

  • By September 1931, 4.3 million German workers were unemployed

    • 40% were factory workers

    • Half of all 16 and 30-year-olds did not work

    • By January 1933, unemployment hit 6.1 million people

  • The below table shows how unemployment affected different economic groups in German society:

The impact of unemployment in Weimar Germany

The economic groups of Weimar Germany

The impact of unemployment

The unemployed

Even after raising taxes, the government had to cut unemployment benefits. This increased the hardship of the unemployed. In Berlin, the arrests for theft rose by 24%

Savers

When share prices fell, the value of savings dropped. If people became unemployed, they would not have any savings to survive on

Workers

The workers had to pay increased taxes to support the unemployed. Businesses were forced to cut the real income of workers. The value of wages was 70% of 1928 average wages

The homeless

If workers became unemployed, they could no longer afford their houses. Many unemployed workers established makeshift houses. Homelessness increased violence on the streets, particularly among unemployed young men

Weimar Reaction to Unemployment

  • From 1930 to 1932, the Chancellor of Germany was Heinrich Brüning

    • He was the leader of the Centre Party from 1929

    • The Centre Party was Germany’s moderate party. It was neither left-wing nor right-wing

  • Brüning’s policies to tackle unemployment were controversial

    • He attempted to raise taxes on workers

    • This was ineffective when levels of unemployment increased

    • He began to cut the salaries of public workers and decrease unemployment benefits. This meant that the government could afford these payments to the unemployed

  • The Reichstag did not approve of Brüning’s policies

    • This marked the end of moderate parties working together in the Reichstag

    • Hermann Muller, the leader of the SPD, refused to support Brüning’s approach to unemployment

    • In July 1930, the Reichstag voted against Brüning’s measures

  • Brüning began to bypass the Reichstag in an attempt to rescue Germany’s economy

    • This allowed Brüning to go to President Hindenburg to approve policies rather than the Reichstag

    • In 1932, the Reichstag met only 13 times

    • From 1930-32, the Reichstag passed 29 bills. In the same period, Brüning enacted Article 48 115 times

  • Instead of improving Germany, Brüning weakened the Weimar Republic

    • People started to lose faith in democracy. An increasing number of the German public started to believe that the Weimar government was inefficient and corrupt

    • The autocratic government that Hitler campaigned for did not seem so different to how Brüning was acting

    • Using Article 48 made the chancellor look like a dictator

    • The measures that Brüning implemented did not improve Germany’s economy

Growing Support for the Communist Party (KPD)

  • The support for the KPD grew after the Wall Street Crash

    • From 1928 to 1932, the KPD gained 1 million voters

    • By 1932, the KPD was the largest communist party outside of Russia

  • The KPD benefited from Germany’s economic crisis

    • The levels of unemployment increased. Workers felt frightened that they were going to lose their jobs

    • The value of wages fell. Workers’ living standards dropped significantly. The working classes believed that the KPD would improve their living conditions if they came to power

What prevented the KPD from becoming the largest party in Germany?

  • A communist government scared the middle and upper classes

    • Communists threatened to remove the wealth of the middle and upper classes

      • Communism was against the private ownership of land and property, which was the source of wealth for the middle and upper classes

    • The government in Russia caused fear of communism across Europe

      • Communist Russia was a dictatorship - the people lacked freedom. The German people believed that a communist government would revoke their rights

  • This fear forced the middle and upper classes to look for alternative solutions

    • Their conservative values aligned with the NSDAP’s policies

    • Hitler believed in autocratic rule. Middle- and upper-class Germans believed that the NSDAP were strong enough to repel communism

    • Hindenburg held nationalist, right-wing beliefs. He would not stand for a communist government in Germany

Examiner Tips and Tricks

It is vital to consider the importance of the fear of communism in understanding how Hitler became chancellor in January 1933. Whilst politicians like Hindenburg felt Hitler and the NSDAP were extremists, they disliked the KPD even more. Given the choice between communism and fascism, the upper classes of Germany chose fascism. Fascism did not threaten their wealth or position in society.

Worked Example

Study Interpretations 1 and 2. They give different views about what caused the decline of the Weimar Republic after the Wall Street Crash

What is the main difference between these views?

Explain your answer, using details from both interpretations

4 marks

Interpretation 1: An extract from Weimar and the Rise of Hitler by A.J. Nicholls. It was published in 2000

The real German problem lay in the political structure of the Weimar Republic and the decisions of its political leadership. Instead of trying to find a solution to the crisis to save the republican system, many officials, businessmen and politicians were only too happy to exploit the crisis to change the system. Most of them did not intend to help Hitler into power. By their actions, however, they undoubtedly did so

Interpretation 2: An extract from Weimar and Nazi Germany by Stephen Lee. It was published in 1996

There was now a much greater chance for an extremist party to come to power, especially one which had reorganized itself and changed its whole strategy. A larger part of the population showed interest in Hitler’s ideas and policies, and Nazi policies were addressed to all classes

Answers:

Interpretations 1 and 2 differ about how responsible Weimar politicians were for the collapse of the Weimar Republic. Interpretation 1 states that the actions of Weimar politicians resulted in the failure of the Weimar Republic (1). A quote that supports this is “The real German problem lay in the political structure of the Weimar Republic and the decisions of its political leadership” (1).

Interpretation 2 believes that Hitler’s actions caused the collapse of the Weimar Republic (1). A quote to support this is “A larger part of the population showed interest in Hitler’s ideas and policies” (1).

Worked Example

Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about what caused the decline of the Weimar Republic after the Wall Street Crash

You may use Sources B and C to help explain your answer

4 marks

Source B: A picture taken in 1931. It shows the Protestant Church feeding the unemployed in Berlin. This food was paid for by charity donations, not the government

poverty-in-berlin-1931

Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, USA

Source C: An extract from a Nazi leaflet, distributed in 1932

Big Capitalism and Bolshevism [Russian Communism] work hand in hand: they are born of Jewish thought and serve the master plan of Jewry. Who alone can rescue the farmer from these dangers? NATIONAL SOCIALISM

Answer:

Interpretations 1 and 2 may differ because the historians have studied different sources.

Interpretation 1 states that the actions of Weimar politicians resulted in the failure of Weimar (1). This historian may have studied sources like Source B as it shows that Weimar politicians did not support the unemployed in the economic crisis of the 1930s. The Church was ensuring the unemployed did not die of starvation (1).

Interpretation 2 argues that Hitler’s actions caused the collapse of the Weimar Republic (1). This historian may have used sources like Source C to support his point. Source C shows that Hitler was targeting different people such as farmers. His policies were persuading people to vote for the NSDAP (1).

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.