Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2016
Last exams 2025
Comparing Interpretations Questions (Edexcel GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Natasha Smith
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Summary of Question 3 (b)
Question 3 (b) asks you to explain how the content of Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 are different
The interpretations used in Question 3 (b) will be the same interpretations used in Questions 3 (c) and (d)
Amount of marks | 4 |
---|---|
The time that you should spend on the question | No more than 5 minutes |
An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:
In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics in Weimar and Nazi Germany:
Year of Exam
Question Topic
2018
The challenges facing the Weimar Republic in the years 1919 -23
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Cultural changes in the Weimar Republic in the years 1924 - 29
What is an Interpretation Question
An interpretation is an account based on a point of view of a historical event, person or group
Interpretations are used to explain the past by looking at history from different points of view
This type of question uses different types of interpretations
These interpretations could be accounts written:
After the event
By people who were there at the time
By historians
For the example question above, you will be given two interpretations from the Sources/ Interpretations Booklet
This is an additional booklet to your answer paper. It provides key sources and interpretations needed to answer specific questions in the exam
Question 3 (b) - "What is the main difference"?
The interpretations used in in Question 3 (b) will always be different from one another, because of the interpretations:
Point of view
Author
Date of publication
These interpretations will be different based on their content
As the content will have a different point of view
In the Edexcel Weimar and Nazi Germany 1918- 1939, interpretations are likely to be different based on the following themes across all the topic areas:
Political developments e.g. Weimar or Nazi policies
Social and cultural developments e.g. Weimar or Nazi culture
Economic developments e.g. the effects of hyperinflation or the Wall Street Crash
"What is the main difference" question structure
You only need to identify and explain the key difference between the content of Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 in your response
Your answer needs to :
Identify the key difference in Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2's content (In)
Include a short quote or summary from each interpretation, highlighting their differences (In)
To achieve full marks, you need to include both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 in your answer
Worked example of the Question 3 (b) interpretation question
Worked Example
3 (b) Study Interpretations 1 and 2. They give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29.
What is the main difference between these views?
Explain your answer, using details from both interpretations.
(4)
Answer
Interpretations 1 and 2 have different views about how stable Germany's economic recovery was (In). Interpretation 1 argues that Germany was in a stable position by 1929. Interpretation 1 states that 'the Weimar Republic was much stronger than it had been just after the war' (In). In comparison, Interpretation 2 believes that Germany had not recovered and its stability was fragile (In). It states that 'German prosperity was built on quicksand foundations' as it was 'dependent upon high-interest American loans' (In).
Summary of Question 3 (c)
Question 3 (c) asks you to explain why the authors of Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 have different views
Your answer should focus on why the content is different
You should not repeat what you have written in Question 3 (b)
The interpretations used in Question 3 (c) will be the same interpretations used in Questions 3 (b) and (d)
You can use Sources B and C in this question
However, if you choose not to use them, you can receive full marks
Do not use Source A in this question
If you use Source A in this question, you will not be awarded marks
Amount of marks | 4 |
---|---|
The time that you should spend on the question | No more than 5 minutes |
An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:
In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics in Weimar and Nazi Germany:
Year of Exam
Question Topic
2018
The challenges facing the Weimar Republic in the years 1919 -23
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Cultural changes in the Weimar Republic in the years 1924 - 29
Question 3 (c) - "Why are interpretations different"?
The interpretations used in Question 3 (c) will always be:
Different
Have different points of view
Both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 may have different interpretations due to:
The types of sources they have used to form their interpretation
For example, some interpretations may have placed more weight on political sources whereas others may use more economic, social or cultural sources to form their viewpoint
The authors focus on short, medium or long-term developments or effects
For example, some interpretations may have their interpretation because they have focused on the short-term effects of an event such as the Wall Street Crash. Whereas, others may focus on the long-term effects
You should not explain that the difference between the interpretations is due to the provenance
For example, you should not focus on the date, the background of the author or where it was produced
You will not receive any marks for an explanation focused on the provenance
"Why are the interpretations different" question structure
The most common way of structuring this answer is to focus on the sources that each historian has studied and how this has affected their viewpoint. You can do this by using Sources B and C in your answer
One of the sources will support the argument made in Interpretation 1
The remaining source will agree with the argument given in Interpretation 2
Do not use Source A in your answer, as you will not receive any marks
AWAITING IMAGE
When you come to answering Question 3 (c), you could use this structure:
State that the historians' viewpoints differ because they have given weight to different sources (In)
For Interpretation 1, state that they have looked at sources like Interpretation 1's matching source (either Source B or C). Use evidence from the source and from Interpretation 1 to show how the connect (In)
Repeat this phrasing and structure for Interpretation 2, using its matching source
Your answer should be focused on the enquiry in the question
Some students struggle to do this as they use irrelevant information from the interpretations that are not based on the question
From the example question above, a student may focus on the mention of Nazis in Interpretation 1, and discuss Hitler's rise to power. This is not relevant and will not receive marks
The best solution to this problem is to practice this question and to familiarise yourself with as many interpretations as possible when revising
Both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 must be included in your answer to receive full marks
Worked example of the Question 3 (c) interpretation question
Worked Example
3 (c) Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29.
You may use Sources B and C to help explain your answer.
(4)
Answer
Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29 because they have given weight to different sources. (In). The author of Interpretation 1 will have considered historical sources like Source B. Source B is a journalist who argues how quickly Germany has 'raised herself up to shoulder the terrific burden of this peace'. This supports what is said in Interpretation 1 as they claim that 'the Weimar Republic was much stronger than it had been just after the war' (In). Whereas, Interpretation 2 will have studied sources like Source C. Source C is a speech by Stresemann which states that Germany in 1929 was 'dancing on a volcano' of economic stability. This supports what Interpretation 2 argues because it argues that Germany's stability was built on 'quicksand foundations' (In).
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?