Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2016

Last exams 2025

|

Comparing Interpretations Questions (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Test yourself

Summary of Question 3 (b)

  • Question 3 (b) asks you to explain how the content of Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 are different

  • The interpretations used in Question 3 (b) will be the same interpretations used in Questions 3 (c) and (d)

Amount of marks 

4

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 5 minutes 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Text discussing different views on German recovery from 1924-29, asking for the main difference and for details from both interpretations to be explained in the answer.
An example of Question 3 (b) in Paper 3

What is an Interpretation Question

  • An interpretation is an account based on a point of view of a historical event, person or group

  • Interpretations are used to explain the past by looking at history from different points of view

  • This type of question uses different types of interpretations

  • These interpretations could be accounts written:

    • After the event 

    • By people who were there at the time 

    • By historians

  • For the example question above, you will be given two interpretations from the Sources/ Interpretations Booklet

    • This is an additional booklet to your answer paper. It provides key sources and interpretations needed to answer specific questions in the exam

Interpretations of the Weimar Republic recovery. One emphasizes political stability and contentment from 1924-1929; the other focuses on economic fragility and dependence on foreign loans.
The two interpretations for the example Question 3 (b) in Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918-1939 as they would look in the Sources/ Interpretations Booklet

Question 3 (b) - "What is the main difference"?

  • The interpretations used in in Question 3 (b) will always be different from one another, because of the interpretations:

    • Point of view

    • Author

    • Date of publication

  • These interpretations will be different based on their content

    • As the content will have a different point of view

  • In the Edexcel Weimar and Nazi Germany 1918- 1939, interpretations are likely to be different based on the following themes across all the topic areas:

    • Political developments e.g. Weimar or Nazi policies

    • Social and cultural developments e.g. Weimar or Nazi culture

    • Economic developments e.g. the effects of hyperinflation or the Wall Street Crash

"What is the main difference" question structure

  • You only need to identify and explain the key difference between the content of Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 in your response

  • Your answer needs to :

    • Identify the key difference in Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2's content (In)

    • Include a short quote or summary from each interpretation, highlighting their differences (In)

  • To achieve full marks, you need to include both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 in your answer

Worked example of the Question 3 (b) interpretation question

Worked Example

3 (b) Study Interpretations 1 and 2. They give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29.

What is the main difference between these views?

Explain your answer, using details from both interpretations.

(4)

Two interpretations of Weimar Germany: one describes stability and contentment from 1924-1929; the other highlights economic fragility and dependence on U.S. loans.

Answer

Interpretations 1 and 2 have different views about how stable Germany's economic recovery was (In). Interpretation 1 argues that Germany was in a stable position by 1929. Interpretation 1 states that 'the Weimar Republic was much stronger than it had been just after the war' (In). In comparison, Interpretation 2 believes that Germany had not recovered and its stability was fragile (In). It states that 'German prosperity was built on quicksand foundations' as it was 'dependent upon high-interest American loans' (In).

Summary of Question 3 (c)

  • Question 3 (c) asks you to explain why the authors of Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 have different views

  • Your answer should focus on why the content is different

  • You should not repeat what you have written in Question 3 (b)

  • The interpretations used in Question 3 (c) will be the same interpretations used in Questions 3 (b) and (d)

  • You can use Sources B and C in this question

    • However, if you choose not to use them, you can receive full marks

    • Do not use Source A in this question

      • If you use Source A in this question, you will not be awarded marks

Amount of marks 

4

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 5 minutes 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Exam question asking to suggest one reason why two interpretations give different views about German recovery from 1924-29, using Sources B and C to explain. Worth 4 marks.
An example of Question 3 (c) in Paper 3

Question 3 (c) - "Why are interpretations different"?

  • The interpretations used in Question 3 (c) will always be:

    • Different

    • Have different points of view

  • Both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 may have different interpretations due to:

    • The types of sources they have used to form their interpretation

      • For example, some interpretations may have placed more weight on political sources whereas others may use more economic, social or cultural sources to form their viewpoint

    • The authors focus on short, medium or long-term developments or effects

      • For example, some interpretations may have their interpretation because they have focused on the short-term effects of an event such as the Wall Street Crash. Whereas, others may focus on the long-term effects

  • You should not explain that the difference between the interpretations is due to the provenance

    • For example, you should not focus on the date, the background of the author or where it was produced

    • You will not receive any marks for an explanation focused on the provenance

"Why are the interpretations different" question structure

  • The most common way of structuring this answer is to focus on the sources that each historian has studied and how this has affected their viewpoint. You can do this by using Sources B and C in your answer

    • One of the sources will support the argument made in Interpretation 1

    • The remaining source will agree with the argument given in Interpretation 2

    • Do not use Source A in your answer, as you will not receive any marks

AWAITING IMAGE

  • When you come to answering Question 3 (c), you could use this structure:

    • State that the historians' viewpoints differ because they have given weight to different sources (In)

    • For Interpretation 1, state that they have looked at sources like Interpretation 1's matching source (either Source B or C). Use evidence from the source and from Interpretation 1 to show how the connect (In)

    • Repeat this phrasing and structure for Interpretation 2, using its matching source

  • Your answer should be focused on the enquiry in the question

    • Some students struggle to do this as they use irrelevant information from the interpretations that are not based on the question

      • From the example question above, a student may focus on the mention of Nazis in Interpretation 1, and discuss Hitler's rise to power. This is not relevant and will not receive marks

      • The best solution to this problem is to practice this question and to familiarise yourself with as many interpretations as possible when revising

  • Both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 must be included in your answer to receive full marks

Worked example of the Question 3 (c) interpretation question

Worked Example

3 (c) Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29.

You may use Sources B and C to help explain your answer.

(4)

Two contrasting interpretations from different authors about the Weimar Republic, noting economic conditions and political stability from 1924 to 1929.
Text from two historical sources about Germany's post-Versailles recovery. Source B: 1930 German journalist notes surprising progress. Source C: 1929 Gustav Stresemann speech warning economic fragility.

Answer

Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29 because they have given weight to different sources. (In). The author of Interpretation 1 will have considered historical sources like Source B. Source B is a journalist who argues how quickly Germany has 'raised herself up to shoulder the terrific burden of this peace'. This supports what is said in Interpretation 1 as they claim that 'the Weimar Republic was much stronger than it had been just after the war' (In). Whereas, Interpretation 2 will have studied sources like Source C. Source C is a speech by Stresemann which states that Germany in 1929 was 'dancing on a volcano' of economic stability. This supports what Interpretation 2 argues because it argues that Germany's stability was built on 'quicksand foundations' (In).

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.