Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2016

Last exams 2025

|

The Arms Race (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Why did an Arms Race Occur After 1945? - Timeline & Summary

Timeline of nuclear developments: 1945-US tests atomic bomb, 1949-Soviet Union tests atomic bomb, 1952-US develops hydrogen bomb, 1953-USSR develops hydrogen bomb, 1957-both test ICBMs.

The USA dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. This marked the start of what historians call 'The Arms Race'. This was a period of time when the USA and the Soviet Union competed against each other to create and stockpile the most advanced weapons. World leaders believed that nuclear technology would prevent either country from becoming too powerful. From 1950-58, nuclear technology vastly developed with the creation of hydrogen bombs and Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). The Arms Race later developed into an ambition for space supremacy in the Space Race of the 1960s. 

The Arms Race intensified Cold War tensions between the USA and the Soviet Union. By 1958, both sides possessed and perfected weaponry that could destroy the world. This increased the mutual distrust between the two countries. The Cuban Missile Crisis showed how distrust over nuclear weapons can cause conflict. New weaponry was considered a way to ensure peace between the USA and the Soviet Union. Many countries still possess nuclear weapons today as they believe they are a deterrent to large-scale war

The Arms Race in the Cold War

  • Truman authorised the use of atomic bombs to end the war with Japan in August 1945

    • At the time, the USA and the Soviet Union were allies under the Grand Alliance

    • Their relationship had worsened after the defeat of Nazi Germany in May 1945 and the subsequent peace conferences

  • Historians believe that the USA's intentions behind the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were as a warning to Stalin

    • At the Potsdam Conference, Truman informed Stalin that the USA had developed:

a new weapon of unusual destructive force

  • The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed that the USA was the strongest superpower. This aimed to stop the Soviet Union's growing international dominance

  • After the bombings, Stalin instructed Soviet scientists to begin developing their own atomic bomb

    • He did not want the USA to retain a nuclear monopoly for too much longer

    • Stalin understood that, to defend against US aggression, the Soviet Union needed the same weaponry that the USA had

  • By 1949, the Soviet Union successfully developed their first atomic bomb

    • The USA felt the need to develop more powerful technology to defend against the growing threat of the Soviet Union

      • This marked the beginning of the Arms Race between the USA and the Soviet Union

The USA and the Hydrogen Bomb

  • Some of the US scientists behind the Manhattan Project created the hydrogen bomb

    • Edward Teller developed the idea of the hydrogen bomb during the Manhattan Project

    • After the Second World War, Teller petitioned the US government on multiple occasions to give him funding to research and create the hydrogen bomb. The government denied each of his requests

  • The uncovering of a spy within the USA's nuclear team triggered the development of the hydrogen bomb

    • Klaus Fuchs was a scientist who had worked on the Manhattan Project

    • In 1950, the US government had evidence of Fuchs' espionage. From 1942 onwards, he passed on information about American nuclear technology to the Soviet Union

      • The US government argued that Fuchs' information sped up the Soviet Union's creation of the atomic bomb by one year 

    • Truman gave permission to Teller to begin the creation of the hydrogen bomb

  • Teller and his colleague Stanislaw Ulam created the first hydrogen bomb in 1952

    • 'Ivy Mike' was the first hydrogen bomb tested

  • In 1953, Russia developed the technology to create a hydrogen bomb

How was the Hydrogen Bomb Different to the Atomic Bomb?

  • A hydrogen bomb is much more powerful than an atomic bomb

  • The table below explains the key differences between the two types of weapon:

Comparison between Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs

 

Atomic bomb

Hydrogen bomb

Detonation

Nuclear fission. The bomb explodes when radioactive atoms like uranium break apart

Nuclear fusion. The bomb explodes when two radioactive atoms come together to form a third atom

Power

Approximately 1,000 kilotons

Approximately 10,000 kilotons

Destructive ability

The atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed 20,000 people instantly. They had a blast radius of roughly 5 square miles

In tests, hydrogen bombs had a blast radius of roughly 44 square miles. The radiation of the bomb could reach up to 18 miles away from detonation

  • A hydrogen bomb is 1,000 times more powerful than an atomic bomb 

    • This shows how quickly nuclear technology developed in the 1950s

  • By the 1960s, the hydrogen bomb had become an incredibly dangerous weapon

    • The Soviet Union tested 'Tsar Bomba' in 1961. It was the largest man-made explosion recorded in history, at 50,000 kilotons (or 50 megatons)

      • The original version of Tsar Bomba was twice as powerful as the one tested in 1961. Soviet scientists believed that it was too dangerous to test

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The Superpower Relations paper examines your narrative skills. A question could ask you to write a narrative account of the development of nuclear weapons between 1945 and 1961. A narrative account answer should follow CHRONOLINK:

  • Put the sequence of events in chronological order 

  • Link each section of the narrative to the next event that occurred. You should use linkage terms such as: 'as a consequence', 'this led to' or 'because'

The first section of your narrative should state the American development and use of the atomic bomb in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Your link should include process words such as 'affected' and 'worsened' to explain Stalin's demands for Soviet scientists to create an atomic bomb.

Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles, 1957

  • While hydrogen bombs became the most powerful weapon, they had limitations if used in warfare

    • An aeroplane needed to drop the bomb over its intended target

      • Aeroplanes in the 1950s had a limited flying capacity before they needed refuelling. This restricted how far away a target was from the USA or its allies

      • As bombs became more powerful, the danger involved in dropping bombs in this way increased. Pilots may be unable to fly away to safety in time. Mushroom clouds contained a high level of radiation that could cause death by radiation poisoning

  • The USA wanted to develop nuclear technology that could hit targets from a further distance away

    • In 1957, the USA created the Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM)

      • The technology behind Nazi Germany's V-2 rockets inspired the creation of ICBMs

      • ICBMs carried nuclear warheads - missiles that exploded using nuclear fission or nuclear fusion

      • ICBMs could hit targets over 2,700 miles away

  • Just a few months after the USA created ICBMs, the Soviet Union had developed the same technology

Examiner Tips and Tricks

You may have noticed a few patterns in the development of the Arms Race. From 1945 to 1958, the USA developed the nuclear technology before the Soviet Union. Some historians may argue that this shows how advanced American science was in this period. This is partially true. What further aided the USA was its capture of former Nazi scientists at the end of the Second World War. The example of ICBMs shows the direct influence of Nazi weaponry on American nuclear technology. Another pattern you may have noticed is the significant development the Soviet Union made in its nuclear capabilities. It took the Soviet Union four years to create its first atomic bomb in 1949. By 1957, the Soviet Union possessed the ability to make ICBMs just a few months after the USA developed them.

The Impact of the Arms Race on US-Soviet Relations

  • The Arms Race impacted US-Soviet relations

    • It caused more fear and tension between the USA and the Soviet Union

      • Both countries had the capability to destroy the other

      • They felt the need to develop new technology that increased their military threat

    • It increased both countries' spending on their military departments

      • During the 1950s, the USA invested more than 13% of its GDP on military spending

      • By the 1960s, the Soviet Union spent more than 20% of its GDP on its defence budget

    • The major leaders of both countries felt the Arms Race was necessary

      • By staying ahead of their rivals, it made each country 'feel' safer

      • Both countries recognised that nuclear technology could destroy the world. They believed that the existence of nuclear weapons would deter warfare

        • In the 1960s, this developed into the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)

  • The diagram below shows the causes and consequences of the Arms Race:

Causes and consequences of the Arms Race

arms-race-multi-flow-diagram

A flow diagram showing the causes and consequences of the nuclear arms race on the USA and the Soviet Union

Worked Example

Explain one consequence of the arms race from 1950-58

4 marks

Answer:

 One consequence of the arms race was an increased fear between the USA and the Soviet Union. The USA's development of the hydrogen bomb in 1952 meant that the country possessed bombs that were 1,000 times more powerful than the atomic bomb. It caused fear in the Soviet Union that the USA could use this technology to attack key cities like Moscow. The Soviet Union felt that they needed to keep up with American nuclear technology to protect themselves. By 1958, both countries had the right to be afraid of each other. Technology allowed both countries to recognise the destructive power they held. Both countries did not trust that their enemies would not use weapons such as hydrogen bombs and ICBMs against them.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

This question has previously asked you to explain two consequences. In the Superpower Relations exam paper for 2025, this question will ask you to explain one consequence. However, there will be two different "Explain one consequence of" questions, each worth four marks.

To gain four marks, the consequence should include:

  • An identified consequence of the event that is stated in the question

  • Specific own knowledge linked to the event that shows in-depth knowledge of the period

  • Using the own knowledge to explain the consequence of the chosen event

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.