Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2016
Last exams 2025
The 16 Mark "How Far do you Agree" Question (Edexcel GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Zoe Wade
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Summary of Question 5 or 6
Questions 5 or 6 require you to:
Evaluate the statement in the question
To use second-order concepts in your answer
You need to evaluate the statement given in the question against other reasons
Two possible reasons are provided for you in the stimulus box under the question
You only need to answer either Question 5 or 6
Do not answer both questions as you will not have time and will not be awarded more marks
This question has changed the time coverage for this question
Previously, the question focused on a period of at least 200 years
For the 2025 exams, the question will cover either a complete period or at least 200 years
Amount of marks | 16 + 4 SPaG marks |
---|---|
The time that you should spend on the question | 5 minutes of planning 20 minutes of writing |
An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:
In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics in Medicine in Britain:
Year of Exam
Question Topic
Question 5: Understanding the cause of disease
Question 6: Advancements in surgery
Question 5: Galen and his impact on the progress in medical care and treatment
Question 6: The role of the government in the development of care and treatment
Question 5: The work of Florence Nightingale and the development of care and treatment in hospitals
Question 6: The improvements in dealing with infectious disease
Question 5: The role of the church in the progress of care and treatment
Question 6: The significance of the printing press
Question 5: The role of the physician in providing care and treatment
Question 6: The work of Pasteur in understanding the causes of illness
2023
Question 5: The work of Thomas Sydenham
Question 6: People's attitudes towards medicine
Making judgements in history
The 16-mark question relies on your ability to weigh all the evidence and state your opinion
Students often find this part the hardest to do
There are some common mistakes students make when making a judgement, they include:
Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by:
Explaining that all of the reasons are the most important
Failing to decide which factor is the most important
Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe”
Contradicting your judgements
Students sometimes haven’t planned their answers properly. They start to write their answer with one judgement and then change their opinion halfway through
For example, in the example question, you state in the introduction that John Snow was a key turning point in the prevention of infectious disease. However, in the conclusion you state that it was not a key turning point
Doing this means that there is not a sustained judgement and you can not access Level 4 (13–16 marks)
Good judgements will:
Explain the second-order concept outlined in the question in full
There is no "right" or "wrong" answer in history
If you are unsure of your opinion, pick the side of the argument that you have better or more evidence to support
Consider other reasons
Even if you fully believe a reason is the most important, you still need to present evidence for other reasons
Be sustained throughout your answer
They should be used to structure your answer and help you explain
This is why planning your answer is important
What makes a great conclusion in GCSE history?
Conclusions are usually where most of your judgement marks will be awarded
Students often rush their conclusions so they are not as developed as they could be
All great conclusions have these three elements:
Judgement – Start with your opinion. Try to include the words from the question. Consider including a reference to the second-order concept mentioned in the question
Counter – Give an example from the other side of the argument to show your awareness of this
Support – Explain why, after considering all the evidence, you have reached your judgement. Use your best piece of evidence to show your opinion
How to get SPaG marks
In Paper 1, students have access to an additional four marks for answering either Question 5 or 6
This is awarded for SPaG ( Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar)
SPaG marks are allocated in the following categories:
SPaG mark | Reason for this mark |
---|---|
0 |
|
1 |
|
2-3 |
|
4 |
|
You can boost your SPaG marks by:
Ensuring key terms mentioned in the question are spelt correctly in your answer
Making sure that you use paragraphs in your answer
Allowing yourself an appropriate amount of time to re-read your answer to check for mistakes
Reading the answer in your head as if you were speaking it. Where you would take a breath, make sure there is a comma or full stop
How to answer a "How far do you agree" question
In the exam, you will be given the option of two questions to answer
You only need to answer one question
You will not receive more marks for writing both questions
You should put an "X" in the box next to the question you have chosen to answer
The "How far do you agree" question will present you with a statement which you have to create a sustained judgement around
For example, in Question 6, this is:
‘Government action is the most important reason why there were improvements in care and treatment in hospitals during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.’
Underneath both Questions 5 and 6, you will have a stimulus box with two key knowledge suggestions
If you only use these suggestions in your answer, you are limited to a maximum of 13 marks
You can choose not to use any of the suggestions
You can still achieve full marks by not using the two stimulus points
To answer this question successfully you should
Read the answer carefully and multiple times (if you have the time)
Annotate the question to find the key demands of the question
Plan your answer
In your plan, include what key knowledge you wish to use and an outline of your argument
This will help you to create a sustained judgement
AWAITING IMAGE
"How far do you agree" question structure
Your answer should consist of:
A logical structure e.g. PEEL paragraphs
Specific and relevant knowledge
A range of knowledge
An explanation of the second-order concept outlined in the question
A clear and sustained judgement throughout the answer
A conclusion
If you want to include an introduction you can, but it is not necessary
Your answers could be written in PEEL paragraphs:
P - Make a point about the question
This should include your judgement
E - Use evidence that supports the point that you have made (K)
Evidence needs to be relevant and specific to the question
E - Explain why this evidence supports your point
Your explanation should be focused on the second-order concept outlined in the question (SOC)
L - Link your explanation back to the question to help sustain your argument and show your understanding of the question
The question is out of 20 marks:
6 marks for a wide range of specific knowledge of the period and the topic stated in the question (K)
10 marks for the analysis of the key second-order concepts of cause and consequence, similarities and differences and importance (SOC)
4 marks are awarded for Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar (SPaG)
This is an overall mark, not awarded in specific areas of your answer
Worked example of a "How far do you agree" question
Worked Example
‘John Snow’s work on cholera was a turning point in the prevention of infectious diseases c1700-c1900.’
How far do you agree? Explain your answer.
(16 + 4SPaG)
You may use the following in your answer.
You must also use information of your own. |
Answer
I disagree that John Snow's work on cholera was a turning point in the prevention of infectious diseases c1700-c1900. I believe that vaccinations had a bigger impact on preventing infectious diseases (SOC).
Some historians may argue that John Snow's work on cholera was significant for progress in the prevention of disease. Before Snow’s work on the Broad Street cholera epidemic, there was no understanding of how diseases spread. Most people believed in miasma. When Snow removed the handle from the Broad Street pump in 1854, the cases of cholera decreased (K). This proved his theory that contaminated water, rather than miasma, spread disease. This had an impact on the prevention of infectious diseases as this disproved the widely held belief in miasma. In 1884, Koch proved that contaminated water contained cholera which allowed scientists to give better advice to the public on how to avoid catching epidemic diseases. Therefore, Snow had some impact on preventing infectious disease. However, after Snow presented his findings in 1855, the government did not act. The government and the public ignored Snow's findings, showing that it lacked importance. In addition, Snow's findings were only relevant to cause of cholera (SOC).
I believe the most important factor in preventing infectious diseases was the development of vaccinations. Jenner created a vaccine for smallpox and published his findings in 1798. It saved many lives worldwide. By 1800, 100,000 people had been vaccinated (K). However, Jenner's methods in vaccine development could not be replicated to other diseases. It was not until Pasteur's work in vaccines that significant progress in preventing infectious diseases occurred. Pasteur used his method to create vaccines for other diseases such as anthrax and rabies. This meant that, by the start of the 20th century, more dangerous and infectious diseases were vaccinated against (SOC). Therefore, the creation of vaccines was a more significant turning point than John Snow's work. This is because it had a bigger impact on a wider range of diseases than just cholera.
Another important event in the prevention of infectious diseases was the 1875 Public Health Act. This act made it compulsory for local authorities to provide clean water, dispose of waste properly to avoid polluting drinking water and hire a public officer of health to monitor where epidemics of disease occurred (K). This improved the prevention of infectious diseases because it shows the government taking responsibility for preventing diseases. This allowed tougher rules to improve public health to be passed, which improved the living standards of people across Britain. This reduced the number of epidemics and gave the public more knowledge about how to prevent them from catching diseases (SOC). Therefore, the Public Health Act made progress in the prevention of infectious diseases. However, vaccines were a better preventative method as it was a scientific way to prevent diseases rather than relying on the actions of the public and the local governments.
To conclude, I believe that Snow's work on cholera was not a turning point in the prevention of infectious diseases. Whilst Snow's work disproved miasma as a cause of cholera, it had less application for other infectious diseases in c1900. However, the development of vaccines by Jenner and Pasteur had a longer-term impact on infectious diseases (SOC).
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?