Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2016

Last exams 2025

|

The 16 Mark "How Far do you Agree" Question (Edexcel GCSE History)

Revision Note

Test yourself
Natasha Smith

Expertise

History Content Creator

Summary of Question 3 or 4

  • Questions 3 and 4 require you to:

    • Evaluate the statement in the question

    • To use second-order concepts in your answer

  • You need to evaluate the statement given in the question against other reasons

    • Two possible reasons are provided for you in the stimulus box under the question

  • You only need to answer either Question 3 or 4

    • Do not answer both questions as you will not have time and will not be awarded more marks

  • Unlike for the 16-mark question in Paper One, you are not awarded marks for Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar (SPaG)

Amount of marks 

16 marks

The time that you should spend on the question 

5 minutes of planning

20 minutes of writing

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

A history exam paper asks students to answer one of two questions: about William Duke of Normandy's claim to the English throne or William's reason for introducing the feudal system.
An example of Question 3 and Question 4 in Paper 2B
  • In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics in Anglo-Saxon and Norman England:

Year of Exam 

Question Topic 

2018

Question 3: William's victory at the Battle of Hastings

Question 4: Consequences of the Harrying of the North

2019

Question 3: Reasons for the failure of the Revolt of the Earls (1075)

Question 4: Consequences of the Domesday Book

2020

Question 3: The House of Godwin's power

Question 4: Causes of Anglo-Saxon resistance to Norman rule

2021

Question 3: Reasons for the Revolt of Earls Edwin and Mocar in 1068

Question 4: Changes to society and economy of Anglo-Saxon England

2022

Question 3: How did William I establish control over England

Question 4: Similarities and differences between Norman and Anglo-Saxon government

2023

Question 3: Reasons why King Harold was defeated at the Battle of Hastings

Question 4: The consequences of William I introducing the "forest"

Making judgements in history

  • The 16-mark question relies on your ability to weigh all the evidence and state your opinion

    • Students often find this part the hardest to do 

  • There are some common mistakes students make when making a judgement, they include: 

    • Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by: 

      • Explaining that all of the reasons are the most important 

      • Failing to decide which factor is the most important 

      • Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe” 

  • Contradicting your judgements

    • Students sometimes haven’t planned their answers properly. They start to write their answer with one judgement and then change their opinion halfway through 

      • In the example question ,you state in the introduction that Harold Godwinson did have the strongest claim. However, in the conclusion you state that William Duke of Normandy had the strongest claim

    • Doing this means that there is not a sustained judgement and you can not access Level 4 (13–16 marks) 

  • Good judgements will:

    • Explain the second-order concept outlined in the question in full

      • There is no "right" or "wrong" answer in history

      • If you are unsure of your opinion, pick the side of the argument that you have better or more evidence to support

    • Consider other reasons

      • Even if you fully believe a reason is the most important, you still need to present evidence for other reasons

    • Be sustained throughout your answer 

      • They should be used to structure your answer and help you explain 

      • This is why planning your answer is important

What makes a great conclusion in GCSE History?

  • Conclusions are usually where most of your judgement marks will be awarded

  • Students often rush their conclusions so they are not as developed as they could be

  • All great conclusions have these three elements:

    • Judgement – Start with your opinion. Try to include the words from the question. Consider including referring to the second-order concept mentioned in the question

    • Counter – Give an example from the other side of the argument to show your awareness of this

    • Support – Explain why, after considering all the evidence, you have reached your judgement. Use your best piece of evidence to show your opinion

How to answer a "How far do you agree" question

  • In the exam, you will be given the option of two questions to answer

    • You only need to answer one question

      • You will not receive more marks for writing both questions

    • You should put an "X" in the box next to the question you have chosen to answer

Form with instructions to mark a question choice. "Question 3" and "Question 4" are options, with boxes for marking; "Question 4" is marked.
An example of how to show which option you will be answering in the Anglo-Saxon and Norman England exam
  • The "How far do you agree" question will present you with a statement which you have to create a sustained judgement around

  • For example, Question 3 is:

    • 'In 1066, William Duke of Normandy had the strongest claim to the English throne.'

  • Underneath both Questions 3 and 4, you will have a stimulus box with two key knowledge suggestions

    • If you only use these suggestions in your answer, you are limited to a maximum of 13 marks

    • You can choose not to use any of the suggestions, but you can still achieve full marks

  • To answer this question successfully you should

    • Read the answer carefully and multiple times (if you have the time)

    • Annotate the question to find the key demands of the question

    • Plan your answer

      • In your plan include what key knowledge you wish to use and an outline of your argument

      • This will help you to create a sustained judgement

        AWAITING IMAGE

"How far do you agree" question structure

  • Your answer should consist of:

    • A logical structure e.g. PEEL paragraphs

    • Specific and relevant knowledge

    • A range of knowledge

    • An explanation of the second-order concept outlined in the question

    • A clear and sustained judgement throughout the answer

    • A conclusion

  • If you want to include an introduction you can, but it is not necessary 

  • Your answers could be written in PEEL paragraphs: 

    • P - Make a point about the question

      • This should include your judgement 

    • E - Use evidence that supports the point that you have made (K)

      • Evidence needs to be relevant and specific to the question

    • E - Explain why this evidence supports your point

      • Your explanation should be focused on the second-order concept outlined in the question (SOC)

    • L - Link your explanation back to the question to help sustain your argument and show your understanding of the question

  • The question is out of 16 marks:

    • 6 marks for a wide range of specific knowledge of the period and the topic stated in the question (K)

    • 10 marks for the analysis of the key second-order concepts of cause and consequence, similarities and differences and importance (SOC)

Worked example of a "How far do you agree" question

Worked Example

  1. 'In 1066, William Duke of Normandy had the strongest claim to the English throne.'

    How far do you agree? Explain your answer.

(16)

You may use the following in your answer:

•Godwinson's family connection to Edward the Confessor

•Harold’s embassy to Normandy (1051)

You must also use information of your own.

Answer

I disagree with the statement that, in 1066, William Duke of Normandy had the strongest claim to the throne. The person who had the strongest claim to the throne was Harold Godwinson.

Although William Duke of Normandy had a claim to the throne, it was not the strongest claim. William Duke of Normandy was related to Edward; they were cousins (K). However, this claim is weakened as this is a very distant blood relation and it did very little to strengthen his claim (SOC). Additionally, William claimed that Edward the Confessor named him heir to the English throne in 1056. William was also a successful ruler of Normandy and his claim was supported by the Pope (K). Although he had a claim to the throne, it was not the strongest because there is very little historical evidence that Edward had named William heir in 1056. Additionally, many people in England did not want a foreign ruler and despite his experience in ruling, did not want William to be king (SOC).

Harold Godwinson's claim to the throne was the strongest in 1066. Godwinson had a family connection, although it was not as strong as Edgar the Atheling's as he was not a blood relative. Godwinson was married to Edward's sister - Edith. Godwinson was also the most powerful earl in England and he was promised the throne on his deathbed, which was witnessed by others (K). Therefore, Godwinson has the strongest claim to the throne because he had a family connection and he was also a very powerful and well-experienced claim. His experience gave him a strong influence over other earls and thegns. This would help Godwinson govern England and protect the country from foreign threats of invasion (SOC).

Others had a claim to the throne such as Edgar the Atheling, however his claim was not the strongest. Edgar the Aethling was the closest blood relative to Edward the Confessor when he died in 1066. Edgar was Edward's nephew and Edward took care of Edgar when his father died (K). Although this shows that Edgar the Aethling did have a claim to the throne, his claim was not the strongest as he was very young and inexperienced (SOC). Edgar was 15 when Edward died and lacked any political connections and had no experience of ruling (K). Therefore, Edgar's claim was not the strongest when Edward the Confessor died because of his lack of experience and age. The Witan did not believe that he was strong enough to rule England and protect it from foreign threats of invasion (SOC).

Overall, I disagree with the statement in the question that William Duke of Normandy had the strongest claim to the throne. Although William was a well-experienced ruler and had a weak family connection, there is no evidence to support his claim that Edward the Confessor had promised him the throne (K). This resulted in the Witan supporting Godwinson's claim as he had a family connection, and vast amount of experience and was promised the throne by Edward. Although other people had claims to the throne, such as Edgar the Atheling, their claims were not as strong as Godwinson's because Godwinson had evidence and support to strengthen his claim, which the others did not (SOC).

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.