How did Hitler Break the Treaty of Versailles? (AQA GCSE History)

Revision Note

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Why was Hitler allowed to break the Treaty of Versailles? - Summary

After the First World War, Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles as part of the peace settlement. This treaty placed harsh penalties and restrictions on Germany. Many Germans felt the treaty was unfair and resented it greatly. When Adolf Hitler became the Chancellor of Germany in 1933, he vowed to undo the Treaty of Versailles. His beliefs focused on making Germany a great military power again.

In the 1930s, Hitler began taking steps to break the Treaty of Versailles. He rebuilt Germany's armed forces, reclaimed the Saar and remilitarised areas like the Rhineland - all of which went against the treaty terms. Nations like Britain and France did little to stop Hitler at this time. They wanted to avoid another war. They adopted a policy of appeasement, hoping Hitler would be satisfied.

However, appeasing Hitler and allowing him to keep breaking the treaty. This enabled and encouraged him to take more risks, making more outrageous demands.

Germany leaves the League of Nations

  •  The League of Nations hosted the World Disarmament Conference

    • The event took place in Geneva, Switzerland

    • It ran from 1932 to 1934

  • The World Disarmament Conference failed in 1934

    • Weimar politicians challenged all countries to disarm to the level of Germany

      • France disagreed with Germany’s proposal

  • Hitler became the leader of Germany in 1933

    • He promised not to rearm Germany if all countries destroyed their weapons in five years

      • Hitler was already secretly rearming Germany

      • France, Czechoslovakia and Poland feared for their safety as they bordered Germany. They refused Hitler’s offer

      • Hitler used this as an excuse to leave the League of Nations in November 1933

German rearmament

  • Many people in Britain believed that Germany was right to rearm because:

    • The Treaty of Versailles had been too harsh on Germany

    • Other countries were rearming

  • Hitler could openly display his military strength

    • Nazi Germany used rallies to:

      • Advertise the strength of the German army

      • Show Germany’s lack of respect for the military restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles

    • The 1935 ‘Rally of Freedom’ at Nuremberg reintroduced compulsory military service

      • Celebrated Nazi film-maker Leni Riefenstahl made the film Day of Freedom: Our Armed Forces on the rally

  • By 1939, there were around 1.4 million men in the German armed forces

    • Spending on armaments increased from 3.5 billion marks in 1933 to 26 billion marks by 1939

    • Employment in aircraft construction increased from 4,000 people in 1933 to 72,000 people by 1935

Impact of rearmament to Nazi Germany

Official unemployment figures in Nazi Germany

Year

Unemployment

1933

4,800,000

1934

2,700,000

1935

2,100,000

1936

1,500,000

1937

900,000

1938

500,000

1939

300,000

Infographic comparing German military in 1933 and 1939. Army divisions: 7 to 52, Luftwaffe: none to 4000+ planes, Navy: 4 warships to 54 submarines.
A diagram showing the expansion of Germany’s armed forces between 1933 and 1939

Examiner Tips and Tricks

A focus of this topic in the exam could be whether Hitler’s foreign policy was to blame for the Second World War. Building up the military is usually done to prepare for war. However, Hitler’s rearmament programme may have just been a scare tactic. What is important is how the League allowed Hitler to break the Treaty of Versailles’ military restrictions openly. If the League had reacted more harshly to Hitler, it may have stopped his aggressive foreign policy.

The Dollfuss Affair, 1934

A flowchart describing events in Austria in 1934: Dollfuss's crackdown, violence ordered by Hitler, Dollfuss's assassination, and Austrian military response. The League did not respond.
A flowchart showing the issues in Austria with Dollfuss, the League’s reaction and the eventual outcome

The Saar, 1935

Infographic about the Saar region: coal-mining area, Treaty of Versailles, plebiscite held on January 13th, over 90% vote to rejoin Germany, Hitler's promise.
A flowchart showing the reasons for a dispute over the Saar region, the League’s reaction and the eventual outcome

How was the Saar plebiscite a failure for the League of Nations?

  • The plebiscite was a propaganda victory for Hitler

    • It showed the level of support for his policies, even in a region with Nazi opponents

  • However, the League resolved a dispute legally

    • The League had stuck to the 15-year time limit set in the Treaty of Versailles

    • France and Germany had not gone to war

    • The people of the Saar achieved their aim of re-joining Germany

  • Hitler wanted to use his popularity to fulfil his idea of a Grossdeutchland 

    • To fulfil this, Hitler needed to capture land lost in the treaty

    • The League wanted to avoid war at all costs

  • Hitler could increase his rearmament programme

    • The Saar provided Hitler with key natural resources for the rearmament industries

    • The League of Nations aimed to encourage disarmament

Remilitarisation of the Rhineland, 1936

Flowchart explaining Rhineland invasion, ending with League of Nations' ineffective response. Points: Rhine demilitarized, Franco-Soviet treaty, Hitler's invasion, failure outcomes.
A flowchart showing the reasons for Hitler’s invasion of the Rhineland, the League’s reaction and the eventual outcome

How was the remilitarisation of the Rhineland a failure for the League of Nations?

  • After the 1936 invasion, Hitler built up his defences along the French border

    • Germany constructed the Siegfried Line, a complex system of fortifications

    • The League of Nations had allowed Hitler to get away with breaching the Treaty of Versailles

  • Hitler gained more confidence

    • Hitler knew he could expand Germany without consequences

    • Historians believe that this was the League’s last opportunity to stop Hitler without a world war

  • Hitler developed a strategy to manipulate the League

    • After the invasion, Hitler signed a 25-year non-aggression pact with France and Britain

      • Hitler had no intention of keeping the pact

      • It made Germany seem less aggressive than it was

Map showing Germany's borders in 1933 (dark green), Rhineland remilitarized in 1936 (light green), and Saar plebiscite in 1935 (yellow). Key countries labeled.
A map showing how far Hitler had extended Germany’s territory by 1936

Worked Example

Write an account of how Hilter’s remilitarisation of the Rhineland became a success for his foreign policy

[8 marks]

Partial answer:

The remilitarisation of the Rhineland was a success for Hitler’s foreign policy because it achieved his aim of reversing the Treaty of Versailles. Under the treaty, the Rhineland was demilitarised to ensure that the French border was protected from invasion. In 1936, Germany decided to invade and remilitarise the Rhineland under the claim that enemies surrounded Germany. This was a success for his foreign policy because the League failed to stand up to Hitler. Britain believed that Germany was right to take back the Rhineland and France was preoccupied with elections to seek conflict with Germany. As a result, the invasion of the Rhineland proved to Hitler he could reverse the Treaty of Versailles and expand Germany’s borders without repercussions. This motivated him to take bigger risks in his aggressive foreign policy.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

This is the first paragraph of this answer. To complete this answer, you would need to write another paragraph explaining a different reason why the remilitarisation of the Rhineland was a success for Hitler’s foreign policy.

Your answer could be written in PEE paragraphs: 

  • P- Make a point about the question

  • E- Include knowledge to support the point you have made

    • Focused on the group or development mentioned in the question 

    • Show knowledge to demonstrate cause and/or consequence

  • E- Explain the question

    • Focus on the key demands of the questions 

    • Include a complex explanation showing your understanding of cause and/or consequence 

For further guidance on this question, you can read this revision note on how to answer the 8-mark “Write an account” question.

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.