The 12 Mark "How Useful" Question: The Inter-War Years (Q2) (AQA GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Natasha Smith
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Summary of Question Two
Question Two requires you to evaluate how useful two sources are for a historian about the issue outlined
You should:
Refer to the content and provenance of the sources
Include knowledge that is relevant to the source
Make a judgement on how useful the source is for the given issue in the question
Amount of marks | 12 |
---|---|
The time that you should spend on the question | No more than 20 minutes 5 minutes of planning 15 minutes of writing |
An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:
In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics:
Year of Exam | Question Topic |
---|---|
2018 | |
2019 | |
2020 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
Sample 1 | The Treaty of Versailles |
Sample 2 | The Abyssinian Crisis |
Using the Content & Provenance of a Source
A historical source is made up of two sections:
The provenance
The content
Provenance
Provenance is the background information of a source
The provenance can be found at the top of each source
The provenance usually tells you
Who created the source
What type of source it is, for example, a newspaper article
When the source was made
Where the source was created
For the example question, here is a breakdown of the provenance of Source B:
Who | Clifford K. Berryman, a cartoonist |
---|---|
What | A cartoon called Wonder how long the honeymoon will last? |
When | 1939 |
Where | Published in the Washington Star, a US newspaper |
In this question, you should use the provenance of the source to:
Help you explain the usefulness of a source
Content
The content is the information presented in the source
The content could be a variety of different types of sources such as:
A picture
A photograph
An extract from a book
A speech
A political cartoon
A letter
In this question, you should use the content of the source to:
Help you explain the usefulness of the source
Making judgements in a 12 Mark "How Useful" Question
The 12-mark "How Useful” question requires you to make a judgement
The common mistakes that students make when making a judgement are:
Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by:
Explaining that neither of the sources is useful to a historian
Failing to decide how useful the sources are
Not addressing the sources together
Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe”
Focusing on reliability rather than how useful the source is. Students do this by:
Not making any judgement about the source’s usefulness
Stating that, because the source is unreliable, the source is not useful to a historian
All sources are useful for a historian but not all sources are reliable
Unreliable sources can be very useful. For example, a German political cartoon on the reactions to the Treaty of Versailles might have biased or inaccurate information. However, it tells historians about the German perspective
Good judgements will include:
Specific content from the sources
The source’s provenance
Your knowledge of the time period
This will help you to see if the source is accurate or typical for the period
Good judgements will also keep going back to the focus of the question
For the example question, you must only talk about how useful the sources are for the Nazi-Soviet Pact
Your judgement does not need to include limitations and you can receive full marks without one
Students’ responses are often given higher marks if they only focus on the source's strengths. This is because the question wants you to pick parts of the source that are useful
However, if you include a limitation you will be credited, you must make sure the limitation is:
Supported by knowledge
Focused on the question
Relevant to your answer
Unlike the 8-mark "How Useful" questions, to achieve full marks you need to make a complex evaluation of the sources together by addressing them in combination or as a pair
The best place to do this is in your conclusion at the end of your answer
Historical sources are always more useful together as they may show
A change in perspective over time
How different people viewed an event or person in history
How an event or person affected different people in the same country or place
"How Useful" Question Structure
You need two paragraphs, one for each source, and a conclusion
Your answer could be written in PEE paragraphs
P- Make a point about the question
Make it clear how useful the source is
Use the source to make an inference about the issue in the question
E- Use information from the source and knowledge to support the point you have made
Your knowledge should be specific
Focus on the content and provenance of the source
E- Explain why this shows that the source is useful
Focus on the given issue in the question
For top marks, your judgement about the source’s usefulness will combine the content of the source, the provenance of the source and your own knowledge of the issue in the question
To achieve full marks, you need to repeat this twice, a paragraph for each source
For the 12-mark "How Useful" question, you need a conclusion
Your conclusion should:
Include both of the sources
Address how the sources are more useful together
Be brief
Worked Example of a "How Useful" Question
Worked Example
How useful are sources B and C to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939?
[12 marks]
Source B: A newspaper cartoon called Wonder how long the honeymoon will last? in the Washington Star, created by Clifford K. Berryman, in 1939. The source was created after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced. |
Source C: Joseph Stalin in a speech in 1941. "It will be asked how it was possible that the Soviet government signed a non-aggression pact with so deceitful a nation, with such criminals as Hitler and Ribbentrop … We secured peace for our country for eighteen months, which enabled us to make military preparations." |
Answer:
Source B is useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact due to the author. The political cartoon was created by an American cartoonist Clifford K. Berryman in 1939 after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced. The source questions how long this pact will be kept because both Hitler and Stalin had an open dislike of each other's political ideologies. Hitler had previously expressed interest in conquering Russian land as a part of Lebensraum. Therefore, this source is useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact as it demonstrates an international response to the pact and why the pact was so unlikely to be kept due to the mutual dislike between the two countries.
Source C is very useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact due to the content. In source C Stalin states the pact allowed the Soviet Union "to make military preparations". In the 1930s Stalin struggled to establish an alliance against Hitler with Britain, Stalin was concerned with the threat Germany posed to the Soviet Union. Hitler had openly stated he wanted to invade the Soviet Union and he also imprisoned and executed Communists in Germany. Source C is useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact because it explains the need for the Soviet Union to make a pact with their enemy to prepare for war. The Soviet Union felt that they had no alternatives due to the lack of progress in negotiations between Britain and France. Furthermore, it also shows a historian that Stalin knew that the Nazis could not be trusted as they needed to make this pact to prepare for war against them.
Overall, the sources are more useful together because they demonstrate how two different countries had a similar reaction to the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. This highlights how unexpected the pact was and the lack of trust the world had in the Nazis and the Soviet Union.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?