The 12 Mark "How Useful" Question: The Inter-War Years (Q2) (AQA GCSE History)

Revision Note

Natasha Smith

Expertise

History Content Creator

Summary of Question Two

  • Question Two requires you to evaluate how useful two sources are for a historian about the issue outlined

  • You should:

    • Refer to the content and provenance of the sources 

    • Include knowledge that is relevant to the source 

    • Make a judgement on how useful the source is for the given issue in the question

Amount of marks 

12

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 20 minutes

5 minutes of planning 

15 minutes of writing  

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Question Two for The Inter-War Years, 1918-1939
An example of Question Two in Paper 1B
  • In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics:

Year of Exam 

Question Topic 

2018

The causes of the Second World War

2019

The League of Nations 

2020

Remilitarisation of the Rhineland 

2021

The Treaty of Versailles 

2022

The Policy of Appeasement 

Sample 1

The Treaty of Versailles 

Sample 2

The Abyssinian Crisis 

Using the Content & Provenance of a Source

  • A historical source is made up of two sections: 

    • The provenance 

    • The content 

Provenance 

  • Provenance is the background information of a source 

  • The provenance can be found at the top of each source

  • The provenance usually tells you

    • Who created the source

    • What  type of source it is, for example, a newspaper article

    • When the source was made

    • Where the source was created 

  • For the example question, here is a breakdown of the provenance of Source B:

Who

Clifford K. Berryman, a cartoonist

What

A cartoon called Wonder how long the honeymoon will last?

When

1939

Where

Published in the Washington Star, a US newspaper

  • In this question, you should use the provenance of the source to:

    • Help you explain the usefulness of a source

Content 

  • The content is the information presented in the source

  • The content could be a variety of different types of sources such as:

    • A picture 

    • A photograph

    • An extract from a book 

    • A speech 

    • A political cartoon 

    • A letter 

  • In this question, you should use the content of the source to: 

    • Help you explain the usefulness of the source

Making judgements in a 12 Mark "How Useful" Question 

  • The 12-mark "How Useful” question requires you to make a judgement

  • The common mistakes that students make when making a judgement are: 

    • Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by: 

      • Explaining that neither of the sources is useful to a historian 

      • Failing to decide how useful the sources are

      • Not addressing the sources together

      • Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe”  

    • Focusing on reliability rather than how useful the source is. Students do this by: 

      • Not making any judgement about the source’s usefulness

      • Stating that, because the source is unreliable, the source is not useful to a historian

        • All sources are useful for a historian but not all sources are reliable

        • Unreliable sources can be very useful. For example, a German political cartoon on the reactions to the Treaty of Versailles might have biased or inaccurate information. However, it tells historians about the German perspective

  • Good judgements will include:

    • Specific content from the sources

    • The source’s provenance

    • Your knowledge of the time period

      • This will help you to see if the source is accurate or typical for the period

  • Good judgements will also keep going back to the focus of the question

    • For the example question, you must only talk about how useful the sources are for the Nazi-Soviet Pact

  • Your judgement does not need to include limitations and you can receive full marks without one

    • Students’ responses are often given higher marks if they only focus on the source's strengths. This is because the question wants you to pick parts of the source that are useful

  • However, if you include a limitation you will be credited, you must make sure the limitation is: 

    • Supported by knowledge 

    • Focused on the question 

    • Relevant to your answer  

  • Unlike the 8-mark "How Useful" questions, to achieve full marks you need to make a complex evaluation of the sources together by addressing them in combination or as a pair

    • The best place to do this is in your conclusion at the end of your answer

    • Historical sources are always more useful together as they may show 

      • A change in perspective over time 

      • How different people viewed an event or person in history 

      • How an event or person affected different people in the same country or place

"How Useful" Question Structure 

  • You need two paragraphs, one for each source, and a conclusion 

  • Your answer could be written in PEE paragraphs

    • P- Make a point about the question

      • Make it clear how useful the source is

      • Use the source to make an inference about the issue in the question

    • E- Use information from the source and knowledge to support the point you have made

      • Your knowledge should be specific 

      • Focus on the content and provenance of the source

    • E- Explain why this shows that the source is useful 

      • Focus on the given issue in the question 

      • For top marks, your judgement about the source’s usefulness will combine the content of the source, the provenance of the source and your own knowledge of the issue in the question

  • To achieve full marks, you need to repeat this twice, a paragraph for each source

  • For the 12-mark "How Useful" question, you need a conclusion

  • Your conclusion should: 

    • Include both of the sources

    • Address how the sources are more useful together 

    • Be brief 

Worked Example of a "How Useful" Question 

Worked Example

How useful are sources B and C to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939? 

[12 marks]

Source B: A newspaper cartoon called Wonder how long the honeymoon will last? in the Washington Star, created by Clifford K. Berryman, in 1939.

The source was created after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced. 

A cartoon wedding scene with a smiling man and woman exchanging vows, surrounded by flowers and guests.

Source C: Joseph Stalin in a speech in 1941. 

"It will be asked how it was possible that the Soviet government signed a non-aggression pact with so deceitful a nation, with such criminals as Hitler and Ribbentrop … We secured peace for our country for eighteen months, which enabled us to make military preparations."


Answer:

Source B is useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact due to the author. The political cartoon was created by an American cartoonist Clifford K. Berryman in 1939 after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced. The source questions how long this pact will be kept because both Hitler and Stalin had an open dislike of each other's political ideologies. Hitler had previously expressed interest in conquering Russian land as a part of Lebensraum. Therefore, this source is useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact as it demonstrates an international response to the pact and why the pact was so unlikely to be kept due to the mutual dislike between the two countries

Source C is very useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact due to the content. In source C Stalin states the pact allowed the Soviet Union "to make military preparations". In the 1930s Stalin struggled to establish an alliance against Hitler with Britain, Stalin was concerned with the threat Germany posed to the Soviet Union. Hitler had openly stated he wanted to invade the Soviet Union and he also imprisoned and executed Communists in Germany. Source C is useful to a historian studying the Nazi-Soviet Pact because it explains the need for the Soviet Union to make a pact with their enemy to prepare for war. The Soviet Union felt that they had no alternatives due to the lack of progress in negotiations between Britain and France. Furthermore, it also shows a historian that Stalin knew that the Nazis could not be trusted as they needed to make this pact to prepare for war against them. 

Overall, the sources are more useful together because they demonstrate how two different countries had a similar reaction to the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. This highlights how unexpected the pact was and the lack of trust the world had in the Nazis and the Soviet Union. 


You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.