The 16 Mark "How Far do you Agree" Question: The First World War (Q4) (AQA GCSE History)

Revision Note

Natasha Smith

Written by: Natasha Smith

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Summary of Question Four 

  • Question Four requires you to evaluate the statement in the question 

  • You need to evaluate the importance of the statement given in the question against other reasons

    • These other reasons will not be mentioned in the question 

  • The question can be based on cause, consequence, change and/or continuity 

Amount of marks 

16 + 4 SPaG

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 25 minutes

Spend 5 minutes planning 

Spend 20 minutes writing 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Question Four for The First World War, 1894-1918
An example of Question Four in Paper 1B
  • In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics: 

Making judgements in History

  • The 16-mark question relies on your ability to weigh all the evidence and state your opinion

    • Students often find this part the hardest to do 

  • There are some common mistakes students make when making a judgement, they include: 

    • Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by: 

      • Explaining that all of the reasons are the most important 

      • Failing to decide which factor is the most important 

      • Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe” 

  • Contradicting your judgements

    • Students sometimes haven’t planned their answers properly. They start to write their answer with one judgement and then change their opinion halfway through 

    • Doing this means that there is not a sustained judgement and you can not access Level 4 (10- 12 marks) 

Good judgements will:

  • Explain which reason is the most important 

    • There is no "right" or "wrong" answer in history

    • If you are unsure of your opinion, pick the side of the argument that you have better or more evidence to support

  • Consider other reasons

    • Even if you fully believe a reason is the most important, you still need to present evidence for other reasons

  • Be sustained throughout your answer 

    • They should be used to structure your answer and help you explain 

    • This is why planning your answer is important

  • Try to explore the relationships between causes/ changes/ factors/ consequences that you have presented in your argument 

    • This will help you to evaluate your argument 

      • For the example question, when evaluating the causes of the First World War, one could argue that the alliance system was the main cause of the First World War. In your answer, you could highlight the relationship between the alliance system and other causes of the war such as the Moroccan and the Bosnian Crisis 

What Makes a Great Conclusion in GCSE History? 

  • Conclusions are usually where most of your judgement marks will be awarded

  • Students often rush their conclusions so they are not as developed as they could be

  • All great conclusions have these three elements:

    • Judgement – Start with your opinion. Try to include the words from the question. Consider second-order concepts like short- and long-term consequences, change and continuity and significance

    • Counter – Give an example from the other side of the argument to show your awareness of this

    • Support – Explain why, after considering all the evidence, you have reached your judgement. Use your best piece of evidence to show your opinion

How to get SPaG Marks

  • In Paper 1B, students have access to an additional four marks for answering Question 4

  • This is awarded for SPaG (Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar)

  • SPaG marks are allocated in the following categories:

SPaG mark

Reason for this mark

0

  • The student does not attempt the question

  • The student writes something irrelevant to the question

  • The spelling, punctuation and grammar mean that the answer is too hard to understand

1

  • The spelling, punctuation and grammar have a lot of mistakes but the answer can be understood

  • The student has used a small range of specific historical terms

2-3

  • The spelling, punctuation and grammar are good with some mistakes

  • The student has used a good range of specific historical terms

4

  • The spelling, punctuation and grammar are perfect with no mistakes

  • The student has used a wide range of specific historical terms

  • You can boost your SPaG marks by:

    • Ensuring key terms mentioned in the question are spelt correctly in your answer

    • Making sure that you use paragraphs in your answer

    • Allowing yourself an appropriate amount of time to re-read your answer to check for mistakes

    • Reading the answer in your head as if you were speaking it. Where you would take a breath, make sure there is a comma or full stop

How to Answer a “How Far do you Agree” question 

  • The "How far do you agree" question will present you with a statement which you have to create a substantiated judgement around 

  • For the example question, this is:

    • "'The main cause of the First World War was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.' How far do you agree with this statement?"

  • To answer this question successfully you should

    • Read the answer carefully and multiple times (if you have the time)

    • Annotate the question to find the key demands of the question 

    • Plan your answer 

      • In your plan include what key knowledge you wish to use and an outline of your argument 

      • This will help you to create a sustained judgement 

  • To achieve Levels 3 and 4 (9-16 marks) you must discuss the stated reason in the question 

    • If the question was on the Ludendorff’s Spring Offensive you must discuss this event in one of your paragraphs 

An illustration modelling two different planning approaches to a 16-mark "How far do you agree" question. One of these is a spider diagram; the other approach is a table.
A table and spider diagram displaying an example of how to plan a 16 marker ‘How far do you agree’ question for the  Conflict and tension: the First World War, 1894–1918 course

"How Far do you Agree" Question structure 

  • Your answer should consist of: 

    • Specific knowledge 

    • Relevant evidence 

    • Substantiated judgement 

    • A conclusion 

  • If you want to include an introduction you can, but it is not necessary 

  • Your answers could be written in PEEL paragraphs: 

    • P - Make a point about the question

      • This should include your judgement 

    • E - Use evidence that supports the point that you have made

      • Evidence needs to be relevant and specific 

    • E - Explain why this evidence supports your point

    • L - Link your explanation back to the question by stating how it or is not the most important reason

  • To achieve Level 4 (13-16 marks), you should aim to write three paragraphs and a conclusion

Worked Example of a “How Far do you Agree” Question

Worked Example


'The main cause of the First World War was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand'. 

How far do you agree with this statement? 

[16 marks + 4 SPaG]

Answer:

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was an important reason for the cause of the First World War, but it was not the main cause. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand happened on 28th June 1914. Serbian nationalists, The Black Hand Gang, assassinated the Archduke. The assassination resulted in the Austrian-Hungarian government declaring war on Serbia after Serbia did not accept all ten points from the Ten-Point Ultimatum. This caused World War One because the declaration of war by Austria-Hungary on July 28th 1914 resulted in the alliances being triggered. Therefore, the main cause of the First World War was not the assassination but the alliance system, If the alliance systems were not in place, this would have been a war between the two nations, not a world war. 

The main cause of the First World War was the European alliance system. The main powers in Europe before World War One established two alliance systems; the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, these two alliance systems created tension within Europe by creating secret military alliances and preparations for war. When the assassination of the Archduke happened in 1914, this triggered the alliance systems. Russia declared war on Austria- Hungary which resulted in Germany enacting theirs. In addition, the Treaty of London also contributed towards the First World War, resulting in Britain becoming involved in the conflict due to the terms of the alliance created in 1839. Therefore, the alliance system was the main cause of the First World War causing the major European nations to declare war. 

Another reason why the First World War happened was due to naval race. Germany wished to compete with the British Navy and started to increase their navy and build their versions of the Dreadnought. Due to the Two Power Standard, Britain responded by increasing their naval power. This caused the First World War as it increased tensions within Europe and encouraged other European nations to increase their military because they questioned and feared why Germany was increasing their naval capacity. This was not the main cause although it increased tensions in Europe Britain did not feel the need to come out of Splendid Isolationism solely based upon this reason. 

Overall, the main cause of the First World War was not the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand but was due to the alliance system. Many of the alliances made within Europe before the assassination were based on a military alliance to protect countries from invasion from foreign powers, such as the Dual Alliance. Therefore, when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia it was the alliance system which provoked war, not the assassination itself.

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.