Factory & Social Reforms (AQA GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: James Ball
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Summary
From around 1750 onwards, cities and towns such as Birmingham, Manchester and Sheffield grew rapidly as a result of the Industrial Revolution. The living conditions in these cities were appalling. Many people lived in overcrowded slums with no access to clean water.
The factories and mines where people worked were dirty and deadly dangerous places that employed children from the age of six. The terrible living and working conditions suffered by millions in Britain led people to campaign to improve workers' lives. These campaigns resulted in several new acts of Parliament. For some, the new laws went too far and prevented struggling families from earning enough money. For others, they didn’t go far enough and still left many vulnerable people living terrible lives.
Living & working conditions in the Industrial Revolution
Employment of children in factories was widespread in the 18th century
Reports highlighting horrific deaths and injuries of children in these factories shocked the public
The reports led an MP called Michael Sadler to call for laws that limited how long children could work
His call for a 10-hour working day for the under-18s became known as the 10-hour movement
Lord Shaftesbury, a devout Christian, became a prominent supporter of the 10-hour movement
He campaigned for the reform of working conditions in all factories and mines
Robert Owen, who ran factories in Manchester and Glasgow, had shown that workers could be well treated and money could still be made
He opened a school and provided social facilities for his workers
He became famous for arguing that workers should have ‘Eight hours labour, eight hours recreation and eight hours rest’ a day
Examiner Tips and Tricks
With so many important individuals, it can be difficult to remember who did what when it comes to factory and social reform. A good exercise is to imagine you had invited all of the key reformers to a dinner party. Who would you sit next to whom? What do they have in common? What don’t they have in common? Recalling and analysing the similarities and differences between the reformers, will help to establish their key features in your memory
Key social reformers
Living conditions in the new industrial cities caused great concern
Edwin Chadwick stated that life in industrial towns made sickness inevitable
Chadwick argued that if people were sick, they were unable to work and therefore could not pay rent or buy food
The Poor Law meant they would then end up in the workhouse
Chadwick’s report on ‘The Sanitary Conditions of the Labouring Population’ concluded that poverty was caused by a lack of access to clean water, not laziness
Elizabeth Fry was a Quaker who led calls for the reform of prisons
Fry brought the appalling conditions suffered by many imprisoned women and children to the public’s attention
This led to the issue of prison conditions being raised in Parliament and prison conditions being improved
Josephine Butler was a devout Christian
Butler was appalled by how many women had been forced to turn to prostitution in the new industrial cities and by how society treated sex workers
Many people in society believed that sex workers were unworthy of help but Butler blamed the men who used them
Amongst other things, Butler campaigned for the age of consent to be raised from 13 to 16
The Factory Act, 1833
The work of Michael Sadler, Lord Shaftesbury and others led to the Factory Act of 1833 being passed by Parliament
The Factory Act of 1833 stated that:
Children under the age of nine are forbidden to work in factories
Those aged between nine and 13 are limited to working nine hours a day and 48 hours a week
Under 13s have to attend school for two hours a day
Those aged between 13 and 18 are limited to working 69 hours a week
Inspectors are to be appointed to ensure factory owners do not break these laws
Mines Act, 1842
Conditions in Britain’s many mines also caused people to call for reform
Whole families often worked underground for up to 12 hours a day
The 1842 Mines Act outlawed:
Children aged under 10 and women working underground
Children under 15 operating winding machines (that dragged heavy loads to the surface)
Impacts of factory & social reforms
For many people, the Factory Act and Mines Act did not go far enough. They wanted:
All children to be banned from working in factories and mines
The laws to apply to all industries (the current rules did not apply to workers in the silk industry)
For others, including many workers, the reforms went too far because:
The laws limited the amount of hours people worked and reduced how much they could earn
Many families relied on the wages of their small children and feared they would now be sent to the workhouse
Some factory owners argued they would be unable to make a profit without child labour and would be forced to close
Other opponents believed the government had no right to interfere in how industry made money
Opposition did not prevent further reform in the 19th century
The Ten Hours Act of 1847 meant all children in the textile industry were limited to working 10 hours a day
The Ten Hours Act was extended to all industries in 1867
The Factories and Workshops Act of 1878 banned all children under 10 from working and limited a woman’s hours to 12 hours a day
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?