Did the Medieval Church Progress Medicine? (AQA GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Zoe Wade
Reviewed by: Natasha Smith
Did the Medieval Church progress medicine? - Summary
The Medieval Church had both positive and negative effects on medicine.
A positive impact of the Church was hospitals. These were some of the first places to care for the sick. These hospitals were often attached to monasteries. Monks and nuns would look after people, focusing on rest, prayer, and basic hygiene. While they did not try to cure diseases in the way modern hospitals do, they provided comfort and support.
However, the Church also slowed progress in some ways. It strongly controlled medical knowledge and only allowed ideas that matched its teachings. The reliance on spiritual explanations meant that people focused more on prayers and pilgrimages than on finding real cures for illnesses. Additionally, the Church banned dissection, which prevented physicians from learning about the human body through direct observation.
Hospitals in Medieval England
Hospitals were under the supervision of nuns and monks
The Church owned approximately 30% of hospitals
Charitable donations funded the rest
By 1500, there were 1,100 hospitals in England
Bury St Edmunds had at least 6 hospitals, each for different types of illnesses
The hospitals were good at caring, not curing
‘Hospital’ and ‘hospitality’ have the same origin
Nuns and monks made patients feel comfortable but they thought disease was a punishment from God
They believed prayer, not medicine, would cure illness
Positives of Medieval hospitals
Hospitals provided:
rest
good hygiene
hot meals
The few non-religious hospitals hired physicians and surgeons
Negatives of Medieval hospitals
Patients often had to share beds which spread diseases
Hospitals turned away people like:
pregnant women
those with mental illnesses
infectious, terminal diseases
The Church believed that they could not help these people
Examiner Tips and Tricks
When you are analysing how useful a source is, your judgement does not need to include limitations and you can receive full marks without one.
Students’ responses are often given higher marks if they only focus on the source's strengths
This is because the question wants you to pick parts of the source that are useful.
For the source above, just because the source was published in Spain does not mean that it is completely useless for a historian studying Medieval hospitals.
Our exam skills pages provide more help and guidance on the 'How useful' question
How did the Medieval Church prevent progress in medicine?
The Medieval Church blocked progress by:
stating that it was God’s will about who was healthy or not
Ordinary people did not question the authority or wisdom of the Church
continuing to teach and promote Ancient theories such as the Theory of the Four Humours
These ideas were in line with Christian teachings but incorrect
controlling medical information
They refused to publish books that did not match Christian teachings
They controlled universities which taught physicians
The Church arrested the 13th-century monk, Roger Bacon, for suggesting that physicians should not trust old medical textbooks
rejecting medical progress in anatomy
The Church banned dissection
However, in the later Medieval period, the Church began to allow the dissection of criminals
When physicians noticed mistakes in Galen's anatomic teachings, the Church explained that the criminals had sinned which had changed their anatomy
This meant that no progress could be made in anatomy
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?