The Comparing Interpretations Questions: Russia (Q1 & Q2) (AQA GCSE History)

Revision Note

Natasha Smith

Written by: Natasha Smith

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Summary of Question One

  • Question One on Paper One, Section A, outlines an issue

  • The question asks you to explain how the content of two interpretations differ from each other concerning the issue

  • The interpretations used in Question One will be the same interpretations used in Questions Two and Three

Amount of marks 

4

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 5 minutes 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Question One for Russia 1894-1945
An example of Question One in Paper 1A
  • In previous years this question has focused on the following topics in Russian history:

Year of Exam 

Question Topic 

2018

Unpopularity of the Tsar

2019

Lenin’s Government 

2020

Stalin

2021

Stolypin

2022

Rasputin

Sample 1

Collectivism

Sample 2

Lenin and the Bolshevik Revolution 

What is an Interpretation Question?

  • An interpretation is an account based on a point of view of a historical event, person or group

  • Interpretations are used to explain the past by looking at history from different points of view

  • This type of question uses different types of interpretations

  • These interpretations could be accounts written:

    • After the event 

    • During the event

    • By people who were there at the time 

    • By historians 

  • For the example question above, you will be given two interpretations in an insert

    • An insert is an additional booklet to your answer paper. It provides key sources or interpretations needed to answer specific questions in the exam

The two interpretations for the example Question One  in Russia 1894-1945 as they would look in the insert
The two interpretations for the example Question One in Russia 1894-1945 as they would look in the insert

Question One - How are the Interpretations Different?

  • The interpretations used in question one will always be different, because of the interpretation's

    • Author 

    • Point of view 

    • Date of publication 

  • Interpretations can be different based on their content

    • As the content will have a different point of view 

  • In the AQA Russia 1894 - 1945 option, interpretations are likely to be different based on the following themes across all the topic areas: 

    • Political developments e.g. the development of Communism 

    • Social and cultural developments e.g. Changes to a Communist society

    • Economic developments e.g. Modernisation of the USSR

    • Conflict e.g. Russia’s involvement in World War One

“How are the Interpretations Different” Question Structure

  • You need to identify and explain one difference between the two interpretations’ content in your response

  • Your answer needs to: 

    • Identify one way the interpretation content differs

    • Include a short quote or summary from each interpretation, highlighting their differences 

    • Explain how they are different using your own knowledge 

  • To achieve full marks you need to have an extended reasoning within your answer 

Worked Example of the Question One Interpretation Question

Worked Example

How does Interpretation B differ from Interpretation A about Stolypin?

[4 marks]

Interpretation A: Adapted from the Memoirs of Count Witte, published in 1921. 

Witte was the Minister who introduced the October Manifesto (1905). Nicholas II sacked him and later replaced him with Witte’s rival, Stolypin. 

“The October Manifesto had promised people political rights, such as freedom of speech. But Stolypin blocked all attempts to carry out what we had promised. He allowed the police to enter homes and arrest people illegally. The men in Stolypin’s Government were only interested in their own careers and did as they pleased. As a result Stolypin lost the respect of all decent people.”

Interpretation B: Adapted from Government and Opinion in the Reign of Nicholas II by Vladimir Gurko, published in 1939. 

Gurko was a Russian noble and government minister. He helped Stolypin introduce his reforms. 

“Stolypin’s only thought was for the good of his country. He worked successfully with the Duma. Under his clever direction, calm and peace spread throughout the country. Wealth increased rapidly. In 1900 the average Russian had an income of 98 roubles a year, but by 1912 it was 130 roubles. He was one of the most outstanding ministers of Nicholas II.”

Answer:

Interpretation A differs from B as it criticises Stolypin (1). Interpretation A claims that Stolypin damaged political progress made in Russia under the October Manifesto in 1905. Stolypin damaged political progress through his "carrot and stick" approach to governing Russia (1).

Interpretation B differs from interpretation A as it supports Stolypin (1). Interpretation B  states Stolypin brought “direction, calm and peace" as well as "wealth". Stolypin’s economic strategies from 1908 - 1911 saw a dramatic increase in agricultural and industrial production in Russia (1)

Summary of Question Two

  • Question Two on Paper One, Section A asks you to explain why the authors of the interpretations might have different views concerning the issue

  • The interpretations used in Question Two will be the same as those used in Questions One and Three

Amount of marks 

4

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 5 minutes 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Question Two for Russia 1894-1945
An example of Question Two in Paper 1A
  • In previous years this question has focused on the following topics in Russian history:

Year of Exam 

Question Topic 

2018

Unpopularity of the Tsar

2019

Lenin’s Government 

2020

Stalin

2021

Stolypin

2022

Rasputin

Sample 1

Collectivism

Sample 2

Lenin and the Bolshevik Revolution 

Question Two - Why are Interpretations Different?

  • The interpretations used in Question Two will always be: 

    • Different 

    • From an opposing point of view 

      • In the AQA Russia 1894 - 1945 option, you could have interpretations from Royalists and Communists, Mensheviks and Bolsheviks or industrial workers and city dwellers during the 1930s as they have opposing interpretations in Russian History

  • Authors will have different interpretations due to their: 

    • Background 

      • For the example question, Interpretation A was written by Count Witte. Witte was Stolypin's rival

    • Experiences 

      • For the example question, Interpretation B was written by Gurko. He had first-hand experience of Stolypin's reforms

    • Purpose of writing the interpretation

      • For the example question, both interpretations are books. The purpose of books is to inform and educate

    • Audience 

    • Access to information 

    • Origin of information

      • First-hand account 

      • Primary sources 

    • Place and time of writing

      • For the example question, both interpretations were written after Stolypin's premiership

"Why are the Interpretations Different" Question Structure

  • You need to identify and explain one reason why the authors have different interpretations 

  • In this question, you will need to refer only to the interpretation's provenance

Provenance

  • Provenance is the background information of sources

  • The provenance can be found at the top of each source. Essentially it is:

    • Who - The person who created the source

    • What - The type of source it is, for example, a newspaper article

    • When - The date when the source was made

    • Where - The place that the source is based on

  • For the example question, here is a breakdown of the provenance of Interpretation A:

Who

Witte, the Minister who introduced the October Manifesto (1905)

What

A book called the Memoirs of Count Witte

When

1921

Where

Witte was Russian

  • In this question, you should use the provenance of the source to:

    • Help you to identify who the author of the interpretation is 

    • Gain information about the background of the author

    • Understand who is the author's audience 

    • Understand what purpose the author had in writing the interpretation 

    • Understand the context of the interpretation 

      • This will help you explain why the interpretations differ

  • Your answer needs to: 

    • Identify one reason why author A has a different interpretation using the provenance 

    • Include specific knowledge to support your reason

    • Explain why this makes the interpretation different

    • Identify one reason why author B has a different interpretation

    • Include specific knowledge to support your reason  

    • Explain why this makes the interpretation different 

  • To achieve full marks consider choosing a difference which is visible and the same in both provenances

    • For example, the previous experience of the authors or the audience which they are writing for

Worked Example of the Question Two Interpretation Question

Worked Example

Why might the authors of Interpretations A and B have a different interpretation about Stolypin?

[4 marks]

Interpretation A: Adapted from the Memoirs of Count Witte, published in 1921. 

Witte was the Minister who introduced the October Manifesto (1905). Nicholas II sacked him and later replaced him with Witte’s rival, Stolypin. 

“The October Manifesto had promised people political rights, such as freedom of speech. But Stolypin blocked all attempts to carry out what we had promised. He allowed the police to enter homes and arrest people illegally. The men in Stolypin’s Government were only interested in their own careers and did as they pleased. As a result, Stolypin lost the respect of all decent people.”

Interpretation B: Adapted from Government and Opinion in the Reign of Nicholas II by Vladimir Gurko, published in 1939.

Gurko was a Russian noble and government minister. He helped Stolypin introduce his reforms. 

“Stolypin’s only thought was for the good of his country. He worked successfully with the Duma. Under his clever direction, calm and peace spread throughout the country. Wealth increased rapidly. In 1900 the average Russian had an income of 98 roubles a year, but by 1912 it was 130 roubles. He was one of the most outstanding ministers of Nicholas II.”

Answer:

Interpretation A will have a different interpretation to interpretation B of Stolypin due to the author's connection to Stolypin (1). Interpretation A is likely to oppose Stolypin because the Tsar replaced Witte with Stolypin. In addition, Witte was the author of the 1905 October Manifesto and wanted to see the development of the Duma’s power however Stolypin’s ‘carrot and stick’ approach undermined them (1).

Interpretation B has a different interpretation of Stolypin to interpretation B as Vladimir Gurko had a more positive relationship with Stolypin (1). Stolypin and Gurko’s relationship with each other is more positive because they worked alongside each other to introduce reforms as Gurko was a Russian noble and the Minister of the Interior (1)

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 25 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.