Germany's International Relations, 1924-1929 (AQA GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: Zoe Wade
Reviewed by: Natasha Smith
How did Stresemann improve Germany’s relationship with Europe? - Timeline & Summary
By November 1923, Stresemann had lost his position as chancellor. The coalition government broke down when the SPD decided they no longer wanted to work with Stresemann’s party, the DVP. Stresemann became Foreign Minister under the new government.
As Foreign Minister, Stresemann pursued a number of treaties, such as the Locarno Treaties. He aimed to build better relations with Europe and restore Germany’s reputation as a world power. Stresemann succeeded in his ambitions. In 1926, the League of Nations accepted Germany as a permanent member. In the same year, Stresemann won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Stresemann died in office on 3rd October 1929. His political policies brought stability to the Weimar Republic. Between 1924 and 1929, the public’s support of moderate parties increased. As public confidence in the Weimar government grew, the appeal of extremism weakened. It would take the economic crash in the USA in late October 1929 to undo Stresemann’s work.
The Locarno Treaties
The Locarno Treaties were a series of agreements between Germany, Britain, France, Italy and Belgium
The nations met in Locarno, Switzerland on 16th October and signed the pacts on 1st December 1925
All nations entered the agreements as equals. This was unlike the diktat of the Treaty of Versailles
The terms of the Locarno Treaties
France and Germany promised to keep peace with each other
Germany accepted its western borders as stated in the 1919 Treaty of Versailles
This infuriated the extremist parties in Germany
All members promised to keep the Rhineland demilitarised
To explore the possibility of admitting Germany into the League of Nations
Impact of the Locarno Treaties
Stresemann considered the Locarno Treaties as his greatest achievement because they:
reduced the possibility of future wars
improved the reputation of the Weimar Republic nationally and internationally
In 1926, the Nobel Prize was awarded to Stresemann and French foreign minister Aristide Briand
Entry into the League of Nations
What was the League of Nations?
The League of Nations was a forum where countries could discuss problems before resorting to armed conflict
Woodrow Wilson, the American President, played a leading role in the creation of the League of Nations. It was based on his 14 Points
Part 1 of the Treaty of Versailles established the League
The League did not formally meet until 10th January 1920
For a country to join the League of Nations as a permanent member, it had to receive two-thirds of the members’ vote
A country could leave the League if it gave two years' notice
Why was Germany originally not a member of the League of Nations?
Clemenceau, the French President, wanted revenge
He believed that Germany had started the First World War
Due to Clemenceau’s anger, the Treaty of Versailles banned Germany from joining the League of Nations
What caused Germany to join the League of Nations?
As a result of the Locarno Treaties, the League of Nations met with Stresemann to discuss membership
The Council settled serious disputes between countries
In September 1926, the League agreed to accept Germany as a member
Impacts of joining the League of Nations
Joining the League had positive and negative impacts on Germany
Positive impacts
Boosted German citizens’ confidence in the Weimar Republic
Gained support for moderate parties
Negative impacts
Some people did not want anything to do with the League of Nations
It was associated with the hated Treaty of Versailles
Created anger among extremist parties
Kellogg-Briand Pact
French foreign minister Aristide Briand met with US Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg to discuss further steps towards world peace
The USA was not in the League of Nations. They still believed in achieving world peace
On 27th August 1928, they assembled Germany and 61 other countries to sign the Kellogg-Briand Pact
What did the Kellogg-Briand Pact agree upon?
War should never be used as a means for resolving disputes between countries
Impacts of the Kellogg-Briand Pact
The Kellogg-Briand Pact had positive and negative impacts on Germany
Positive impacts
Boosted German citizens’ confidence in the Weimar Republic
The world saw Germany as a respectable and trustworthy state
They could enter into treaties as an equal to the other signatories
Negative impacts
The pact did not remove the military restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles
This angered extremist parties
Many Germans thought other countries would move towards disarmament. Disappointingly, the pact did not promise this
Germany was still considerably weaker militarily than the rest of Europe, making Germany feel unsafe
Examiner Tips and Tricks
An exam question could ask you if Stresemann's economic or political policies were the most important in Germany's recovery in 1924-1929.
This is a 12-mark question that expects you to refer to these two bullet points and another factor.
To answer this question well you should:
use a range of Stresemann's economic and political policies
explain how they helped Germany to recover from 1924-1929
write a conclusion which explains if it was Stresemann's economic or political policies helped Germany to recover the most in this period
Our exam skills pages give further guidance and advice on the 'bullet point' question
Did Weimar Politically Recover by 1929?
Historians continue to debate today if the Weimar Republic politically recovered by 1929
Arguments that Weimar politically recovered
Support for extremist parties fell in this period
In the May 1928 elections, the Nazi Party only gained 12 seats in the Reichstag
There were no political assassinations between 1924 and 1929
Germany was becoming a respected power in Europe again
Arguments that Weimar did not politically recover
Extremist parties continued to fight against the Weimar government
The Weimar Constitution continued to be flawed
There were six coalition governments in the period of 1924-1929
Whilst this is less than before 1924, this still caused problems with law-making
Worked Example
Read Interpretations A and B.
How does Interpretation B differ from Interpretation A about Gustav Stresemann's impact on Germany?
Explain your answer based on what it says in Interpretations A and B.
[4 marks]
Interpretation A: An extract from The Course of Germany History by A. J. P. Taylor. It was published in 1945
'Stresemann did German democracy a disservice. Stresemann’s Republic was kept going by foreign success and the dose of success had constantly to be increased. Far from consolidating the Republic, Stresemann gave the Germans a taste for blood which the enemies of the Republic could more easily satisfy.'
Interpretation B: An extract from A History of Germany by William Carr. It was published in 1969
'Chancellor Gustav Stresemann’s ‘hundred days’ as Chancellor marked a real turning point in the Republic’s history. He took office when the Republic was at its lowest ebb politically and economically but by the time the ‘great coalition’ collapsed in November 1923, the Republic was well on the road to recovery… confidence in the economy was restored, and reparations put on a realistic footing.'
Answers:
Interpretation A states that Stresemann damaged Weimar Germany. The author states that “Stresemann did German democracy a disservice” (1). The author may think this because Stresemann's economic and political policies angered many extremist parties, such as the Nazi Party (1).
Interpretation B believes that Stresemann positively impacted the Weimar Republic. The author highlights that the “confidence in the economy was restored, and reparations put on a realistic footing” (1). Stresemann's policies began a 'Golden Age' in Germany, where support in the Weimar Republic was high (1).
Examiner Tips and Tricks
To help you understand how the interpretations differ, you should:
read each interpretation once for understand
read the interpretations again, highlighting information that is different between both interpretations
make a note of the main difference between the interpretations
Our exam skills pages give further guidance and advice on comparing interpretations questions
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?