The Economy in Nazi Germany (AQA GCSE History)

Revision Note

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Natasha Smith

What problems did the German economy have by 1933? - Summary

By 1933, Germany’s economy was facing severe problems, especially due to high unemployment. The Great Depression had a huge impact on Germany. Millions of Germans lost their jobs as businesses shut down and factories stopped production. Many families struggled to afford basic needs, and poverty was widespread. The lack of jobs and poor living conditions created a lot of anger and frustration, with people feeling like the government wasn’t able to help them or improve their lives.

Another major issue was Germany’s lack of autarky (self-sufficiency). Germany relied on imports for a lot of its food and raw materials, making it vulnerable to problems in the global economy. When the Depression hit, trade decreased. Germany struggled to get the resources it needed. This reliance on other countries made Germany feel weak and less independent. Many Germans believed that the country needed to become more self-sufficient to avoid future economic problems and be stronger on its own.

The Nazi economic policy

  • Hitler appointed Dr Schacht as Minister of the Economy

  • Hitler fired Schacht in 1936, despite his policies improving the economy

    • He replaced Schacht with Hermann Goering

      • Goering had no economic experience

      • Hitler wanted a more radical economic policy

Aims for the Nazi economy

  • To achieve autarky

    • Autarky would mean a blockade would not destroy Germany’s economy or food supply

  • To increase farming output

  • To increase rearmament

  • To implement more government control on the industry

The Four Year Plan

  • Began in 1936 and lasted until 1939

  • Established the Reich Food Estate to guarantee prices for farmers

  • Increased ersatz goods. The Nazis used:

    • coal to make rubber

    • acorns to make coffee

  • The government set production targets for the industry 

    • The government controlled the production of iron ore, coal mining, steel and armament factories

  • Used enslaved labour from

    • People in concentration camps

    • People from newly-occupied German territories

How successful were the Four Year Plan?

  • Business leaders did not support the plan

    • Excessive rearmament decreased Germany’s standard of living

      • This is called a ‘guns, not butter’ economic approach as the Nazis choose rearmament over social welfare

  • Germany had not achieved autarky

    • By 1939, Germany still imported one-third of its raw materials

Did unemployment fall in Nazi Germany?

  • Reducing unemployment was a key focus for the Nazi Party:

    • unemployed workers could support other groups such as the communists if not properly helped by the Nazis

    • people not in work were not contributing to society or the economy

  • By 1939, unemployment in Germany had been reduced to around half a million people

National Labour Service (RAD) 

  • Set up in 1933

  • Provided paid work for the unemployed:

    • workers carried out public jobs such as repairing roads and planting trees

  • From 1935, it was made compulsory for unemployed young men (18-25 years old) to join for six months

  • The pay was poor and many workers complained about the food, having to wear uniforms and working conditions

  • There were 422,000 members in 1935

Autobahns 

  • The Nazis wanted to create a 7,000-mile autobahn (motorway) system to improve transport around Germany:

    • Hitler personally started the project in September 1933

    • by 1935, 125,000 men had been employed to build the motorways

    • around 3,500 km had been completed by 1938

  • The Nazis financed other public work schemes in Germany:

    • buildings, roads, bridges and sports facilities such as the Berlin Olympic Stadium were built

    • spending on public works more than doubled from 18 billion marks in 1933 to 38 billion marks in 1938

Rearmament 

  • Increasing the size of the military would make Germany stronger and provide more jobs

  • The terms of the Treaty of Versailles limited the army to 100,000 soldiers:

    • Hitler ignored this and announced conscription in 1935

    • by 1939, there were around 1.4 million men in the German armed forces

  • The Nazis also needed to produce more weapons and armaments to supply their larger army, which produced more jobs:

    • spending on armaments increased from 3.5 billion marks in 1933 to 26 billion marks by 1939

    • employment in aircraft construction increased from 4,000 people in 1933 to 72,000 people by 1935

Invisible unemployment

  • Many groups of people were not included in Nazi unemployment figures

    • As a result, they were ‘invisible’ in Nazi society

  • Many of the policies intended to reduce unemployment were simply:

    • too expensive

    • not sustainable in the long term

  • While rearmament did provide jobs in the military and armaments industry, these jobs would not be required if Germany was not preparing for war

Who was excluded from Nazi Germany's employment figures?

A flowchart illustrating "Invisible Unemployment," including factors like part-time workers, women, Jewish people, armed forces, rearmament, and prisoners not counted as unemployed.
A diagram showing how the Nazis ‘hid’ the real level of unemployment

Worker organisations in Nazi Germany

The Labour Front (DAF)

  • Hitler banned all trade unions in May 1933 using the powers of the Enabling Act

  • In its place, the Labour Front (DAF) was created to control the rights, hours and pay levels of workers

  • However, the DAF made employment difficult for many workers

An illustration showing loss of workers' rights: inability to negotiate, increased working week by 6 hours, and striking banned with penalties. Text boxes explain changes.
An illustration showing how the DAF impacted workers

Strength Through Joy (KdF)

  • Set up in 1933 as a division of the DAF

  • By 1936, there were 35 million members of the KdF

  • Strength Through Joy aimed to make work seem more enjoyable and prevent unrest

    • It provided out-of-work leisure activities, trips, holidays and even free cars to workers

An illustration comparing event types: lectures/theatre performances (21,000 events, 11 million people), museum tours (60,000 events, 2.5 million people), sports events (400 events, 1.5 million people), holidays/cruises (1,000 events, 700,000 people).
An illustration showing the workers from Berlin who took part in KdF activities from 1933-39

The Volkswagen Scheme

  • The KdF ran a scheme so workers could purchase a new car:

    • the Volkswagen - ‘people’s car’ - was an affordable and fuel-efficient car that the average German could afford

    • workers in the KdF gave five marks per week from their wages so they could eventually receive a Volkswagen

  • However, car factories switched to producing armaments after 1938

    • Workers never received their Volkswagens

Beauty of Labour (SdA)

  • The Beauty of Labour (SdA) programme was set up in 1934 as a division of the KdF

  • The SdA aimed to provide better facilities for workers to improve their working environment

    • It provided facilities such as toilets, changing rooms, showers and canteens

  • By 1938, around 34,000 companies had improved their facilities

  • Many workers were expected to build and decorate the new facilities themselves, for no extra pay and outside of their typical working hours

Examiner Tips and Tricks

A question could ask you in what ways did the lives of the German workers change during Nazi Germany.

You should aim to have two or three well-explained paragraphs about the impact of Nazi economic and working policies. You should try to focus your paragraphs on the positive and negative impacts of Nazi policies on the workers. For example, one paragraph could explain the positives of Strength Through Joy.

Our exam skills pages give further guidance and advice on the 'In what ways' question

Were workers 'better off' in Nazi Germany?

  • Historians continue to debate if workers were 'better off' under Nazi rule

Comparison chart depicting the advantages and disadvantages of employment, wages, labour front, strength through joy, and beauty of labour in Nazi Germany.
A diagram showing how the standard of employment and living improved and worsened by 1939

Worked Example

Why might the authors of Interpretations A and B have a different interpretation about the success of Nazi employment policies before the Second World War?

Explain your answer using Interpretations A and B and your contextual knowledge.

[4 marks]

Interpretation A - An interview in the late 1930s with Hermann Schmidt

Schmidt was a senior figure in the Labour Front (DAF). The Labour Front controlled the rights, hours and pay levels of workers

'I saw seven million men rotting in the streets - often I was there too, and no one, not even the Churches, seemed to care that it was a wicked thing that children of God should be thus left to rot. .. Then Hitler came and he took all those men off the streets and gave them health and security and work at least for the time being.'

Interpretation B - An autobiography by Fritz Thyssen, published in 1941.

By 1930, Thyssen was one of the leading backers of the Nazi Party. He fled Germany in 1939 after 'Kristallnacht' as he disagreed with the Nazis' religious persecution.

'But the People's Car is one of the most bizarre ideas the Nazis ever had. Germany is not the United States. Wages are low. Gasoline is expensive. German workers never dreamed of buying a car. They cannot afford the upkeep; to them it is a luxury.'

Answer

Interpretation B differs from Interpretation A due to the author's background and occupation. The author of Interpretation B is Fritz Thyssen, who left Nazi Germany because he disagreed with other Nazi policies (1). Therefore, it is more likely that he would state that Nazi policies were unsuccessful in improving the lives of workers, such as Strength Through Joy's Volkswagen scheme (1).

However, Interpretation A is more likely to show how successful Nazi policies towards the workers were. Interpretation A was by Hermann Schmidt, a senior figure in the Labour Front (1). Therefore, it is likely to highlight the important impacts of the Nazi policies on areas such as unemployment (1).

Examiner Tips and Tricks

To answer a "Why are the interpretations different" question, you must use the interpretation's provenance.

The provenance can be found at the top of each interpretation. Essentially it is:

  • Who - The person who created the source

  • What - The type of source it is, for example, a newspaper article

  • When - The date when the source was made

  • Where - The place that the source is based on

Using the provenance, you can explain why each author will have a different perspective on the past.

Our exam skills pages give further guidance and advice on comparing interpretations questions

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Sign up now. It’s free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.