The Battle of Hastings (AQA GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: James Ball
Reviewed by: Natasha Smith
Summary
The Battle of Hastings was a key moment in the Norman conquest of England. William’s forces crossed the English Channel in late September and quickly established a base in Pevensey using an old Roman fort and a pre-fabricated fort they had brought with them.
At the time William landed, Harold was two hundred miles to the north having successfully defeated the attempted Viking invasion by Harald Hardrada, at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. Upon learning of the Norman's arrival, Harold immediately set off south with his army. William stayed at Pevensey, forcing Harold to march all the way to the South Coast to confront the invaders.
William’s arrival in England
AWAITING IMAGE
William’s invasion of England had been delayed by bad weather in the English Channel
The bad weather cleared and William’s invasion force finally left Normandy for England on 27 September
They arrived in Pevensey Bay on 28 September whilst Harold’s army was hundreds of miles away
The invasion of the north of England by Hardrada’s army had occurred just weeks earlier
This meant Harold had moved his housecarls and the fyrd north to meet the Viking invasion
Although the Vikings were successfully defeated, it meant the south of England was undefended when the Norman fleet landed
William’s forces quickly occupied an old Roman fort in Pevensey
They then constructed the wooden fort they had brought with them to provide even more protection
Once they had established a base, they set about attacking and burning local settlements
Godwinson’s reaction to William’s arrival
When Harold Godwinson learned of William’s arrival on the South Coast, he immediately set off on a march to London
This was despite exhaustion from:
marching hundreds of miles to York in the previous week
fighting a prolonged and exhausting battle at Stamford Bridge
Many housecarls and members of the fyrd had been killed or injured fighting against Hardrada’s men and others were weakened by their efforts
Marching another 200 miles in just five days would have exhausted them further
However, new recruits joined the fyrd as Harold marched south
Harold and William exchanged letters and Harold hoped to tempt William north to do battle near London
William decided to wait and reinforce his position near Pevensey
Harold decided to try and catch the Normans by surprise, just as he had the Vikings and marched his army to the South Coast
How did William’s army compare to Harold Godwinson’s?
Soldiers available
Harold’s army
Most of Harold’s 7,000 or so soldiers were peasants who had been pressed to join the fyrd
There were also thegns who had helped recruit the fyrd
Harold’s best troops were the professional soldiers called housecarls
The number of housecarls is unknown but some would have been killed at Stamford Bridge
William’s army
William’s forces also numbered around 7,000
They were well-rested after crossing the channel and seizing Pevensey
William’s army was made up of men from Normandy alongside soldiers from across Europe who fought either for money (mercenaries) or because of the pope’s support
They contained around 800 knights who fought on horseback
Weapons
Harold’s army
The housecarls fought with double-handed axes, javelins and swords
The fyrd often used farm tools such as pitchforks and pick-axes until they scavenged weapons from the dead
William’s army
Norman soldiers had swords, javelins and lances
They also had archers armed with bows and arrows
Armour
Harold’s army
Chainmail suits and leather armour that had metal plates attached
Circular shields
William’s army
Chainmail suits, padded jackets called gambesons and conical helmets with nose guards
Kite-shaped shields
Tactics and skills
Harold’s army
The housecarls were highly trained and skilled warriors
The fyrd were often untrained peasants with little or no experience of fighting
They would have been drilled in how to form a shield wall
William’s army
Most were highly skilled, trained and experienced soldiers
Knights especially had an excellent knowledge of military tactics
Position on the Battlefield
Harold’s army
Harold’s army occupied the top of the steep Senlac Hill
William’s army
William’s army went out to find Harold’s troops
They took up positions on the dry ground at the base of Senlac Hill between two marshy areas
What happened at the Battle of Hastings?
The Battle began when William’s archers unleashed a volley of arrows at the Anglo-Saxon army at around 9 am
The shield wall proved to be an effective defence against the arrows
William then sent his footsoldiers up the hill into the attack
They were unable to force a break in the shield wall
The Norman knights then entered the battle but were unable to charge up the steep and uneven ground of Senlac Hill
The shield wall held firm and the battle raged on for several hours
Historical sources disagree over what broke the deadlock in the battle
Some claim that the Normans deliberately feigned to retreat - causing the Anglo-Saxons to abandon their shield wall and chase after them
Others claim William tried to rally his tiring troops and, when the Norman soldiers flocked to hear him, the Anglo-Saxons thought they were retreating and pursued them
Whatever caused the shield wall to break, without its protection the Anglo-Saxons were quickly overpowered by the Norman knights
The arrows from the Norman archers were also far more deadly without the shield wall to hide behind
Harold and his brothers Leofwine and Gyrth fought to the death at the top of Senlac Hill
Some people believed Harold was killed by an arrow to the eye
Others think he was charged down by a knight
However Harold was killed, and his death caused the Anglo-Saxons to flee the battlefield and William to win the Battle of Hastings
Why did William win the Battle of Hastings?
William’s tactics were a key reason why the Normans won
He moved his archers further up the hill after the shield wall collapsed to give them a better angle of attack
The feigned retreat, if it was a deliberate tactic, led to the collapse of the shield wall
William’s leadership was another key reason why the Normans won
He led by example and took enormous personal risks
It is believed that three horses he was riding were killed from underneath him during the Battle
He moved his fleet up the Normandy coast to shorten the time his ships would spend crossing the English Channel
He ensured his men were well-fed and enforced harsh discipline whilst waiting to cross the English Channel
He decided to wait for Harold at Pevensey Bay rather than enter deeper into an unfamiliar and unfriendly country
As in any military victory, luck was an important factor
William was fortunate that Harold’s armies had marched for hundreds of miles and fought an exhausting battle against the Vikings in the weeks before the Battle of Hastings
William was lucky that his troops were able to cross the English Channel without disaster striking
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You could be asked about what was important about William’s leadership in the run-up to and during the Battle of Hastings. Many students fall into the trap of writing everything they know about the Battle which both wastes time and loses marks. Make sure each point you make, such as moving his fleet up the Normandy coast and being a visible and inspirational figurehead on the battlefield, provides evidence of the importance of William’s leadership.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?