The Relationship Between the Church & the King in Norman England (AQA GCSE History)
Revision Note
Written by: James Ball
Reviewed by: Natasha Smith
Timeline
Summary
Although the King was the undisputed ruler of Norman England, the Church also had enormous power. As the head of the Church in Western Europe, the pope could influence millions of people - including those in England. Although relations between William and the pope were good at the time of the Conquest, disputes over authority meant that conflict between the Norman kings and various popes was inevitable
The power of the Pope in Norman times
The pope was the most powerful and influential individual in Western Europe during the 11th Century
His authority extended over many countries and kingdoms
Christians, whatever their nationality and whoever their king was, were supposed to obey the pope
This power and influence caused tension and conflict with kings all over Europe - including Norman England
One of the main sources of conflict was the authority of kings over people who worked for the Church
If they were accused of a crime, members of the clergy stood trial in special Church courts
This angered both kings and the general public who saw the Church courts as being too lenient
William I’s power over the Church
When William conquered England in 1066, he did so with the blessing and support of Pope Alexander II
The pope wanted to bring the English Church closer to the rest of Europe and change the way it operated
William wanted to remove all of the Anglo-Saxons from powerful and important positions in the Church and replace them with loyal Normans
Both William and Pope Alexander got what they wanted
After the reforms by William’s friend Archbishop Lanfranc, the English Church was far less isolated from the rest of Europe
There was a more centralised structure of control
William decided who was appointed to key Church positions such as archbishops and bishops
He agreed to the establishment of the Church courts - possibly due to his close relationship with Lanfranc
The Norman monarch’s relationship with the Pope
Norman King | Relationship with the Pope |
---|---|
William I |
|
William II (Rufus) |
|
Henry I |
|
What was the Investiture Controversy?
When bishops were appointed or consecrated, the king would ceremoniously give them a ring and a staff as emblems of their position
This act was known as investiture
In return, the bishop would pay homage to the king
Many in the Church, including Pope Urban II, thought investiture was wrong
They believed the act of investiture implied that bishops got their power and authority from the king rather than the pope
In England, most bishops were tenants-in-chief for the king
The king could not allow key landholders to refuse to pay homage to him as this would:
damage his authority
threaten the whole feudal system
When Archbishop Anselm refused to pay homage to Henry I in 1103, the King exiled him
The pope then threatened to excommunicate Henry
The crisis ended at the Concordat of London in 1107
Henry agreed to give up his rights to investiture
The pope agreed that bishops would pay homage to Henry before they were consecrated
This meant the clergy could still claim that their spiritual power came from the pope
It also meant Henry could still require the bishops to swear loyalty to him
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?