Catholic Opposition (AQA GCSE History)

Revision Note

Natasha Smith

Expertise

History Content Creator

Did the Catholics Pose a Significant Threat to Elizabeth’s Religious Settlement?- Timeline & Summary

A timeline of the Catholic plots in Elizabethan England including the Northern Rebellion (1569), Ridolfi Plot (1571), Papal Bull (1570) and Throckmorton Plot (1583).

After the five-year reign of the Catholic Mary I, Catholics were unhappy with the succession of Elizabeth in 1555. As a Protestant, they believed that Elizabeth would change England’s official religion back to Protestantism. 

Elizabeth’s Religious Settlement needed to resolve the issue of religion within England. She had to make the Church of England more Protestant without offending her Catholic subjects. Catholics held important positions in government, especially in the House of Lords. Many wealthy lords and earls in the North of England were Catholic. The pope encouraged Catholics to fight against Protestantism.

The majority of England’s Catholics accepted the Religious Settlement. Catholic rebels caused more of a threat to Elizabeth’s safety than the Puritans. With the Pope’s encouragement, she faced an armed rebellion from the Northern Earls of Northumberland and Westmorland. Elizabeth used force to end this revolt. This signified how important the upholding of the Religious Settlement was to Elizabeth. The revolt marked a change in how Elizabeth dealt with English Catholics.

What was life like for Catholics in England? 

  • When Elizabeth came to the throne in 1558, Catholics expected retaliation for Mary I’s burning of 300 Protestants 

  • Elizabeth’s Religious Settlement aimed to 

    • Unite the country 

    • Include Catholic and Protestant practices 

  • Therefore, Catholics were surprised by the Religious Settlement and many accepted it

  • Those who did not face punishments for repeated recusancy which included:

    • Fines

    • Imprisonment

    • Loss of property or job

    • Death (in extreme cases)

  • However, recusancy fines were rarely given out before 1569

The Northern Rebellion 

Causes of the Northern Rebellion 

  • The Northern Earls of Northumberland and Westmorland rebelled in 1569 because:

    • The earls had grievances with the rule of Queen Elizabeth I

    • Factors within England gave an ideal opportunity to depose Elizabeth

  • Recusancy was very popular amongst the Catholic nobility

    • Historians estimate that one-third of the English nobility did not attend Church of England services

    • The North-West of England contained the majority of recusants

  • The earls of Northumberland and Westmorland were angry with Elizabeth’s Religious Settlement

    • Under Mary I, they had gained wealth and power

    • Under Elizabeth, they no longer influenced the royal court

      • Elizabeth created many new nobles that did not stem from the ancient aristocratic families of England such as Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester and Sir William Cecil

A concept map showing the reasons that motivated the Northern Earls to revolt in 1569
A concept map showing the reasons that motivated the Northern Earls to revolt in 1569

Exam Tip

The Northern Rebellion may also be known as the Revolt of the Northern Earls. It is common in history for rebellions or events to be given different names. When reading the exam question or interpretation, make sure you use the name outlined in your answer.

Events of the Northern Rebellion 

  • Northumberland and Westmorland decided to launch a revolt against Elizabeth in November 1569 

    • Many northern Catholics rallied behind the earls

    • The rebels took Catholic Mass at Durham Cathedral

    • The earls of Northumberland and Westmorland marched an army of approximately 4,600 men south and reached Bramham Moor (north of Leeds)

  • The Revolt of the Northern Earls ended in defeat

    • The majority of England’s nobility, except the Duke of Norfolk, who remained loyal to Queen Elizabeth

    • The Earl of Sussex ended the revolt using royal troops

    • The rebels retreated on 24th November 1569 and the Earl of Sussex ended the revolt on 16th December

Consequences of the Northern Rebellion 

  • Elizabeth aggressively punished the Revolt of the Northern Earls

    • She ordered hundreds of executions of the northern rebels

    • The Earl of Northumberland was executed in York

The consequences of the Northern Rebellion 

Short-term consequences

Long-term consequences

Elizabeth ordered the execution of 450 rebels. While Westmorland escaped, Northumberland was captured and killed in York in 1572

The power of the Percy and Neville families ended with the death and exile of Northumberland and Westmorland 

The Privy Council wanted the execution of Norfolk. Elizabeth released him

The Duke of Norfolk became a focus for Catholic plotters. The Ridolfi Plot in 1572 implicated the Duke of Norfolk in another plan to overthrow Elizabeth

In April 1571, an Act of Parliament widened the definition of treason to include calling Elizabeth a heretic or claiming she was not the queen. It was also treason to print and distribute copies of the papal bull

In 1572, Elizabeth chose the Earl of Huntingdon to lead the Council of the North. Due to Elizabeth's harsh punishment, the majority of English Catholics remained loyal

  • The Revolt of the Northern Earls showed that:

    • Despite concessions, some English Catholics still wanted to depose her

    • Catholics posed a significant threat to the stability of England

    • Catholics needed to be monitored and regulated 

    • Elizabeth was willing to use violence against her subjects to protect her monarchy

  • The Revolt of the Northern Earls was significant to how Elizabeth treated Catholics throughout her reign

The papal bull

  • On 27th April 1570, Pope Pius V released a papal bull 

  • In the papal bull, the pope excommunicated Elizabeth from the Catholic Church

  • This papal bull had significant effects on Elizabeth 

    • It asked all Catholics to end the Elizabethan rule 

      • English Catholics had to decide if they would support the queen or the pope

    • Catholics abroad followed the pope’s instructions and started to plot against Elizabeth 

      • This contributed towards King Philip II of Spain’s Spanish Armada 

    • Inspired English Catholics to plot and rebel against Elizabeth 

The Ridolfi Plot, 1571 

The aims of the Ridolfi Plot

  • Roberto di Ridolfi was an Italian Catholic banker

  • Ridolfi planned to depose Elizabeth with help from Spain  

  • The Ridolfi Plot of 1571 aimed to: 

    • Assassinate Elizabeth 

    • Replace Elizabeth with Mary Queen of Scots 

    • Restore Catholicism 

A flow diagram showing Ridolfi’s plan to overthrow Elizabeth I
A flow diagram showing Ridolfi’s plan to overthrow Elizabeth I

Events of the Ridolfi Plot

  • In March 1571, Ridolfi travelled to the Spanish Netherlands

    • He met with the pope, Philip II and the Duke of Alba

    • He had in his possession a signed letter from the Duke of Norfolk. The letter confirmed that Norfolk was a Catholic and would lead a rebellion against Elizabeth with Philip’s support

  • The meeting was a success for Ridolfi

    • He secured Philip’s support

      • He agreed to send the Duke of Alba and 10,000 men to England when Norfolk required them

      • Historians are unsure about how genuine this support was. Alba wrote to Philip that Spain should only send troops to England if Norfolk succeeded in overthrowing Elizabeth

  • Sir William Cecil uncovered Ridolfi’s plot in the Autumn of 1571

    • Norfolk’s servants betrayed the plan when under interrogation

    • Cecil also had evidence in the form of coded letters in the Duke of Norfolk’s house

    • The Duke of Norfolk was arrested in September 1571

  • Ridolfi’s plan was never enacted

    • Cecil foiled the plan before it began

    • Ridolfi was not in England when Cecil discovered the plot. He never returned to England so he did not face the repercussions of his actions

Consequences of the Ridolfi Plot

Consequences of the Ridolfi Plot 

Short-term consequences

Long-term consequences

Parliament demanded the punishment of the Duke of Norfolk and Mary, Queen of Scots. In January 1572, the government put the Duke of Norfolk on trial for high treason. He was found guilty. His execution took place in June 1572

Elizabeth refused to punish Mary. She remained imprisoned and was still in consideration for the royal succession. This continued the threat Mary posed to Elizabeth’s safety

From 1574, English Catholics were smuggling priests into the country. Wealthy families concealed Catholic priests within their houses in secret hiding places called priest holes'. Any priests caught by government searches would be hung, drawn and quartered. This showed the actions that English Catholics took to keep their faith alive

The plot reinforced that Spain was a threat to England. As the persecution of Dutch Protestants increased, Elizabeth and her government worried that Spain wanted to destroy Protestantism across Europe. Elizabeth pursued a better relationship with France to protect England from Spain

The Throckmorton Plot, 1583

Aims of the Throckmorton Plot

  • Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth’s spymaster, heard rumours of a plot between: 

    • Scottish Jesuits 

    • Mary Queen of Scots 

    • The Spanish Ambassador de Mendoza 

  • The link between these individuals was Francis Throckmorton, a young English Catholic 

  • Throckmorton was planning to:

    • Overthrow Elizabeth 

    • Replace Elizabeth with Mary Queen of Scots 

    • Restore Catholicism to England 

Aims of the Throckmorton Plot

Events of the Throckmorton Plot

  • Historians know very little about how the plan began. This is because:

    • The plotters destroyed many of their letters to conceal evidence of their scheming

    • The government used torture to extract confessions from the plotters

      • They may have said what they believed the interviewer wanted to hear to avoid further punishment

  • The government placed Throckmorton under surveillance in April 1583

    • Throckmorton’s regular visits to Mendoza aroused the government’s suspicions

  • Francis Walsingham did not act straight away

    • He wanted to obtain enough evidence to charge Throckmorton with treason

    • He needed to determine who was conspiring with Throckmorton and Mary, Queen of Scots’ involvement in the plan

  • In June 1583, Walsingham searched Throckmorton’s house

    • The papers at Throckmorton's house showed communication with multiple Catholic nobles in England

    • Throckmorton had been researching which harbours were suitable for an invasion force to land

  • Elizabeth’s government arrested Throckmorton in November 1583

  • Throckmorton stated the plot had gone no further than the planning stage

  • This was because Throckmorton was waiting for the money promised by Philip II

    • Both Throckmorton and Mary, Queen of Scots retracted their confessions 

    • They stated that the investigators used torture

      • This forced them to make false statements of guilt

Consequences of the Throckmorton Plot 

Short and Long-term Consequences of the Throckmorton Plot

Short-term consequences

Long-term consequences

The government charged Throckmorton with treason. His execution took place in May 1584. Elizabeth expelled the Spanish ambassador, Mendoza, from her court. Mary faced no punishment

Throckmorton’s plot listed many Catholic sympathisers in England. Some Catholics fled England after the plot. 11,000 Catholics were arrested or kept under surveillance. Walsingham was more determined to find substantial evidence of Mary’s involvement in plots against Elizabeth

The plot implicated Lord Henry Howard and Henry Percy (the brother of Thomas Percy, the disgraced Earl of Northumberland). Elizabeth arrested both nobles. Percy took his own life in the Tower of London, while the government released Lord Howard without charge

Elizabeth and her government passed another Act of Parliament in 1585. It stated that any subject who helped or sheltered Catholic priests would face the punishment of death

Mary Queen of Scots was moved to Tutbury Castle. Here she had more restrictions placed on her house arrest and was guarded by the Puritan Sir Amias Paulet 

The Spanish Ambassador de Mendoza was sent back to Spain, he was the last Spanish Ambassador to be invited to Elizabeth’s court 

Exam Tip

There are many plots and rebellions that happen that you will need to know for your exam. When revising these plots you may want to create revision cards that focus on second-order concepts such as cause and consequence. This will help you to write the ‘Write an account’ and the ‘Explain the importance’ questions. 

Worked Example

Explain what was important about the Northern Rebellion in 1569

[8 Marks] 

Partial answer:

The Northern Rebellion was important because it showed Elizabeth her compromise of a Religious Settlement did not prevent all Catholics from rebelling. The northern earls, Westmoreland and Northumberland, rebelled against Elizabeth because Catholics had lost considerable power under Elizabeth and the Religious Settlement. Although the rebellion was stopped effectively by the Earl of Essex, the rebellion showed that Catholics were willing to rebel against Elizabeth. This is important because it showed that Elizabeth needed to take action to prevent rebellions in the future. This resulted in the Act of Parliament which widened the definition of treason to protect Elizabeth. 

Exam Tip

Above is a partial answer to an 8-mark “Explain the importance” question. To achieve full marks, you will need to explain two ways the Northern Rebellion was important.

This question relies upon your ability to explain second-order concepts such as cause and consequence or change and continuity. 

For further guidance on this question, read this revision note on how to answer the 8-mark “Explain the importance” question.

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.