The 8 Mark "How Convincing is the Interpretation About" Question: Elizabethan England (Q1) (AQA GCSE History)

Revision Note

Natasha Smith

Expertise

History Content Creator

 Summary of Question One

  • Question One requires you to evaluate how convincing an interpretation of a given issue is

Amount of marks 

8

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 10 minutes 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Question One for Elizabethan England, c1568-1603
An example of Question One in Paper 2B
  • In previous years, this question has focused on the following topics in Elizabethan history:

Year

Question Topic 

2018

Queen Elizabeth and marriage

2019

The Elizabethan Court 

2020

The Earl of Essex

2021

Catholic plots against Queen Elizabeth I 

2022

Theatre in Elizabethan England 

Sample 1

Sir Walter Raleigh 

Sample 2

Drake’s motives for circumnavigation of the globe 

How to Analyse an Interpretation

  • When analysing an interpretation you should:

  • Read the interpretation carefully 

  • Read the interpretation more than once, if you have time 

  • Focus on just the content of the interpretation

    • If you use the provenance, you will receive no marks for the comments made 

  • Whilst reading the interpretation underline or highlight relevant pieces of text 

  • Annotate the interpretation by attaching your knowledge to the content of the interpretation 

  • When analysing an interpretation, many students forget to focus on the given issue in the question 

    • For example, if a question is asking you about the Spanish Armada and the interpretation includes the Essex Rebellion, you disregard the information about the Essex Rebellion 

Flowchart analyzing the convincing nature of "Interpretation A" about Elizabeth I's policy towards Catholics, featuring quotes and reasons for policy changes.
An image showing how to annotate historical interpretations for the Elizabethan England 1568-1603 course

How is an Interpretation Convincing?

  • Interpretations are used in history to explain the past by looking at history from different points of view

  • Interpretations are convincing because they: 

    • Have accurate knowledge 

    • An understanding of the historical period

    • Show a typical experience or point of view from the historical period

  • The easiest way to decide if an interpretation is convincing is by using your own knowledge

    • For the example question, you could use the 1601 Poor Law as a reason why the interpretation is convincing

Judging Interpretations

  • The “How Convincing” question requires you to make a judgement

  • The common mistakes that students make when making a judgement are: 

    • Not giving a clear judgement. Students do this by: 

      • Failing to decide why the interpretation is convincing 

      • Using language in their answer which is not decisive e.g. “kind of” or “maybe”  

    • Contradicting your judgements

      • Students sometimes haven’t planned their answers properly. They start to write their answer with one judgement and then change their opinion halfway through 

      • Doing this means that there is not a sustained judgement and you can not access Level 4 (6-8 marks) 

  • Good judgements will: 

    • Explain why the interpretation is convincing 

    • Have a substantiated judgement 

    • Be supported with specific knowledge 

    • Be relevant to the interpretations and the question 

  • Although you need to explain how convincing the interpretation is, this does not mean that the interpretation will not be convincing  

  • Your judgement does not need to include limitations and you can receive full marks without one

    • Student's responses are stronger when they are decisive and clear about how convincing the interpretation is 

  • However, if you include a limitation you will be credited, you must make sure the limitation is: 

    • Supported by knowledge 

    • Focused on the question 

    • Relevant to your answer  

“How Convincing is the Interpretation” Structure

  • For the example question above, you will be given an interpretation in an insert

    • An insert is an additional booklet to your answer paper. It provides key sources or interpretations needed to answer specific questions in the exam

The interpretation for the example Question One in Elizabethan England, c1568-1603 as it would look in the insert
The interpretation for the example Question One in Elizabethan England, c1568-1603 as it would look in the insert
  • Your answer should consist of: 

    • Specific relevant knowledge 

    • Content from the interpretation 

    • The wider context of the time

  • Your answer could be written in PEE paragraphs

    • P- Make a point about the question

      • Identify why the interpretation is convincing 

    • E- Use information from the interpretation and knowledge to support the point you have made

      • Your knowledge should be specific 

      • Focus on the content from the interpretation 

    • E- Explain why you find the interpretation convincing 

      • Focus on the given issue in the question 

      • For top marks, you need to show your understanding of the wider context of the time 

  • To achieve full marks, you need to repeat this twice  

Worked Example of a “How Convincing is the Interpretation” Question

Worked Example

How convincing is Interpretation A about attitudes towards poverty in Elizabethan England? 

[8 marks]

Interpretation A: Adapted from A Description of England by William Harrison, written in 1587 

“The vagabonds abide nowhere but run up and down place to place; idle beggars cut the fleshly parts of their bodies to raise pitiful sores and move hearts of passer-by so they will bestow large gifts upon them. It makes me think that punishment is more suitable for them than generosity or gifts. They are all thieves. They take from the godly poor what is due to them.”

Answer:

Interpretation A is convincing as it identifies the negative attitude Elizabethans had towards the undeserving poor. The source states “that punishment is more suitable” for the undeserving poor in England. In 1567 Thomas Herman wrote a book describing the different types of untrustworthy beggars and their tricks. This is convincing because the book written by Herman became very popular in Elizabethan England and hardened the views of the English people towards the undeserving poor. These negative views towards the undeserving poor were reflected in Elizabeth's 1601 Poor Law

Another reason interpretation A is convincing is due to the opinion shared about the deserving poor. The interpretation implies that the deserving poor in Elizabethan England should be given “large gifts”. The 1601 Poor Law stated that the wealthy would be taxed to help support the deserving poor of their local area. These taxes would help to feed, clothe, house and provide work for the deserving poor. This is convincing because during this period the attitudes towards the deserving poor changed from one of punishment in the early Tudor period, to a supportive, charitable and Christian attitude in the Elizabethan times.

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.