Causes of Urbanisation (OCR GCSE Geography B)
Revision Note
Written by: Jacque Cartwright
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Causes of Urbanisation
People have always lived in cities and towns in order to trade goods and services
Towns and cities are essential to the development of a country's economy
They are centres of opportunities, entertainment, education, religion, culture, political administration, industry and more
The modern growth of cities began with the Industrial Revolution in Britain during the 19th century with the 'pull' of work to factories in growing cities from the 'push' of a harsh, rural existence
Subsequently, urban living became linked to better literacy rates and education, improved health, and a longer life expectancy through wider access to health and social services
Urban populations can enjoy cultural entertainment and experiences, along with opportunities to participate in political debates and policies
During the 1960s, approximately 34% of the global population was living in some form of urban settlement
Today, 55% of the world's population lives in urban areas and by 2050 is expected to stand at 68%
The main factors affecting the rate of urbanisation are:
Speed of economic development
Economic growth drives urbanisation
The faster the growth of secondary and tertiary employment sectors, the faster the growth of urbanisation
Rate of population growth
Economic growth needs a supply of labour
This demand can be met in two ways:
Natural increase in an urban population: A slow way of meeting demand
Rural-urban migration: This is the more important source of labour as it attracts a wider pool of people into the urban region
Counter urbanisation
Where people move from an urban area into the surrounding rural region
Natural increase
Accounts for roughly 60% of urban population growth
Due to decreased death rates and higher birth rates
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Natural increase does not include inward migration of people to a place, just the number of births vs number of deaths. E.g. In one street there were 5 new migrants, 10 births and 2 deaths. The natural increase is 8 people because the migrants chose to move there. If they then had children, then those children would be included in the natural increase rate.
Growth in LIDCs
Urbanisation usually occurs because people move from rural to urban areas as a country develops
Since the 1950s, EDCs and LIDCs have seen rapid growth in urbanisation, particularly in South America, Asia and Africa
Between the 1950s and 2000, urban population living in EDCs have doubled and LIDCs by 2021, ACs saw growth slow by less than half
There are three main reasons for urbanisation in EDCs and LIDCs:
Mass rural-urban migration due to population growth and lack of resources in rural areas (push factors)
The lure of the city and the opportunities it represents (pull factors), although many find informal employment and poor housing (push factors)
Natural increase - as development occurs, health care improves; this reduces infant mortality and death rates, although birth rates tend to remain high
Reasons for the rapid growth in rates of urbanisation in EDCs and LIDCs include:
Most new economic development is concentrated within the big cities
Push-pull factors lead to high rates of rural-to-urban migration
Cities are experiencing higher levels of natural increase in population
The decline of industry in ACs
As industry moved overseas to emerging developing countries (EDCs) and low-income developing countries (LIDCs) to take advantage of a cheaper workforce, government incentives, tax breaks, etc.
This led to industrial growth in emerging countries and 'pulled' people from rural regions to urban areas, with the hope of a better life and employment
Push-pull factors
There are many reasons for people to migrate to and from urban areas. These can be generally classified into push and pull factors
The push factor is the reality of the current situation for the migrant; it is what makes the person consider moving from the place of origin
The pull factor is the perceived outcome; it is what the migrant imagines the move will bring to the place of destination
Push-pull factors are unique to each person depending on their end goal: What is a pull factor for one person may not be for another
These factors can be further divided into:
Social
Economic
Political
Environmental
High levels of unemployment are a push factor, whereas higher wages and a better lifestyle are a pull factor
Therefore, rural-urban migration is usually a combination of factors that cause people to migrate
Examples of push-pull factors leading to migration
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember do not just state the opposite when asked to give push-pull factors
Poverty is a push factor, however, everywhere has certain levels of poverty, so a pull factor could be better welfare and healthcare services
Consequences of Rapid Growth in LIDCs
A major challenge faced by LIDCs and EDCs is the growth of squatter settlements, particularly in megacities
The availability and affordability of housing cannot keep up with the rate at which the urban population is increasing in EDCs and LIDCs
This leads to people building their own homes on any vacant land using scrap materials like cardboard, corrugated iron and plastic
These are unplanned and unregulated housing (informal settlements or slums) with little sanitary facilities, freshwater or reliable energy supply
They are usually built on land not owned by them, and they are found:
In areas of no economic value
On the urban edges or fringes
Along main roads or railways
Clinging onto the side of steep slopes
Depending on the country, these informal settlements are also called:
Favelas in Brazil
Shanty towns in the West Indies and Canada
Bustees on the Indian subcontinent
Skid row in the USA
Townships in South Africa
The UN estimates that about a quarter of urban inhabitants (1.6 billion) live in these impoverished slums and squatter settlements and that by 2030, 1 in 4 people on the planet will live in some form of informal settlement
Some cities have 'mega-slums', which are very large, overcrowded areas usually within megacities
The largest are found:
Nairobi, Kenya, with a population of 1.5 million, is crowded into three sprawling slums of mud huts and tin shacks - Kibera being the largest of the three
Neza, Mexico City, Mexico, has a population of 1.1 million people
Dharavi, Mumbai, India, has 1 million people in a warren of narrow lanes, interconnected shacks and single-room living spaces that double as factories
Orangi Town, Karachi, Pakistan, has an estimated population of 2.4 million people across 8000 acres of concrete block homes, with 8–10 people sharing two or three rooms
Khayelitsha in Cape Town, South Africa, has a population of 400,000 in iron and wooden shacks
These slums present serious risks such as fire, flooding and landslides
Slum areas typically suffer from:
Poor, overcrowded, small housing, built very close together using inadequate material and with uncertain electricity supplies
They have restricted access to water supplies
There are little to no sanitation facilities and no solid waste disposal, which leads to a polluted and degraded local environment
There are inadequate health facilities, which, along with poor living conditions, increase sickness and death rates
Slum dwellers have insecure living conditions as they may be forcibly removed by landowners or other authorities
Other challenges are:
Dealing with the amount of waste produced as the city grows
Air pollution from burning fossil fuels, factories and car exhausts
Sewage and toxic chemical pollution of waterways
Congestion on poorly managed or planned road systems
Lack of public transport
Lack of qualified doctors, teachers, etc.
High levels of unemployment and crime
Informal employment and child exploitation
The speed of development is greatest in EDCs and LIDCs
Sao Paulo in Brazil, which grew from 7 million people to over 20 million in 40 years, is now the second-largest urban area in the Americas
Dharavi in Mumbai, India, has a slum settlement of over 1 million people in a 2 km2 area
Urban Trends in ACs
The differences between ACs, EDCs and LIDCs can be shown as a pathway over time
Countries become more urban as they develop economically
As they move through the stages, the pace begins to slow and begins to flatten out or decline as counter urbanisation gains speed
Urbanisation pathway
Urban trends in ACs
During the 20th century, the UK underwent a process of suburbanisation, where people move outwards from urban centres to the suburbs
Urban settlements first appear as a result of agglomeration:
People gather together in one area to sell goods and live
Small trading posts and villages begin to develop
As towns grow, they expand outwards by a process known as suburbanisation:
This adds to the built-up area, but the building densities are generally lower than in the older parts of the town
The new suburbs are made up of mostly houses but also include places of employment and services
Urban settlements continue to prosper and grow, people move out of the town or city altogether and commute to work:
These are called dormitory settlements because many residents only sleep there.
They continue to have links with the town or city they have left
They still make use of urban services, shops, education, and healthcare
Urban sprawl
Urban growth if left unchecked leads to urban sprawl, and many UK cities were soon becoming too large and concerns grew
Urban sprawl creates issues such as:
Loss of farmland to build new homes
Loss of traditional 'green spaces' - school fields, parks etc are being built on
Impact on ecosystems - natural and built (removal of trees increases pollution levels etc.)
Creates impermeable surfaces and surface run-off
By 1947, the UK government introduced 'green belts' in order to limit outward urban growth
Most of these changes have been at the urban fringes due to:
Availability of space for housing, retail and manufacturing - including options for expansion
Cost of land is cheaper to develop
Better access to main arterial routes for private and heavy transport
Many services are now located at the urban fringe - major hospitals, superstores, specialist manufacturing etc.
Counter-urbanisation
This is the movement of people from an urban area into the surrounding rural region
Causes include:
Mobility and accessibility - higher personal car ownership, increase in public transport and road development making easier access to rural areas
Increased wealth - making housing and travel more affordable
Agricultural decline (mechanisation and merger of farms) creates the availability of more land for housing, forcing agricultural workers leave the area
Green belt - people need to go further out to get the rural life they are looking for
Second homes and early retirement - have increased the movement of people from the city to the countryside
Re-urbanisation
The movement of people back into the cities from the surrounding area
Movement is the result of a number of factors:
Increase in jobs
Regeneration of older areas either through rebuilding or redevelopment (factories into spacious apartments)
Improvements in air quality
Improvements in safety
Deindustrialisation
The closure of factories and industries leads to large areas of derelict land and buildings
This leads in to suburbanisation and counter-urbanisation as lack of jobs and poor quality environment causes people to leave the city
More recently this has led to re-urbanisation as the areas are cleared or redeveloped to be replaced by luxury apartments
Urban regeneration and re-imagining
Urban regeneration and urban re-imaging are different
Urban regeneration is the investment of capital in the revival of old, urban areas by either improving what is there or clearing it away and rebuilding
Over time, older parts of urban areas would begin to suffer a decline
Factories would move elsewhere, resulting in job loss
Quality of life and housing become poorer, people moved away
Urban blight sets in
The area needs to be 'brought back to life' = urban regeneration
Urban re-imaging is changing the image and reputation of an urban area and the way people view it
Focusing on a new identity/function
Changing the quality and appearance of the built-up area
Good opportunity for brownfield site development
London Docklands was completely redeveloped and regenerated
London Docklands had new industries, more executive services, homes, entertainment, and leisure, making it the new 'cool' place to be
Together urban regeneration and urban re-imaging = rebranding
These processes add to the continued growth of urban regions
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?