Urban Change (AQA GCSE Geography)
Revision Note
Written by: Jacque Cartwright
Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett
Pattern of Urban Change
Urbanisation is:
The process by which an increasing percentage of a country's population comes to live in towns and cities
Urbanisation varies across the globe
High income countries (HICs) show the highest levels of urbanisation, with the lowest levels being in Africa and SE Asia
More people now live in towns and cities than in rural areas
World population doubled between 1950 and 2015, but the urban population more than trebled due to:
The decline of industry in developed countries, as the industry moved overseas to newly emerging economies (NEEs) and low-income countries (LICs) to take advantage of a cheaper workforce, government incentives, tax breaks, etc.
Which led to industrial growth in NEEs and 'pulled' people from rural regions to urban areas, with the hope of a better life and employment
Urbanisation pathway
Countries become more urban as they develop economically
Differences between LICs, NEEs and HICs can be shown as a pathway over time
The pace through the stages slows and flattens or will decline as counter urbanisation gains speed
Urbanisation pathway showing the stages a country will pass through as economic development occurs
HICs have lower rates of urbanisation as towns and cities already exist
In 1900 there were just 2 'millionaire'' cities (London and Paris), by 2018 this had grown to 512
As the growth of cities continues, the term mega city is used to describe cities with more than 10 million people:
In 1970 there were only 4
By 2000 there were 15
In 2018 that rose to 33 with Tokyo having close to 37.3 million people
Due to modern transport and communication, urban areas are sprawling into rural regions to create conurbations, further adding to the growth of urban areas
Urban Trends in HICs & LICs
Urbanisation growth rate differ not only between countries across the globe but also within countries
Table of Global Urban Trends
| HICs | NEEs | LICs |
---|---|---|---|
Rate of urban growth | Slow or declining | Rapid | The fastest rates of urbanisation |
Examples | UK, Germany, Japan, and America | India, Russia, Brazil and China | Sub-Saharan countries such as Rwanda and Ethiopia and Asia such as Vietnam, Bangladesh and the Philippines |
Trend | Because the industrial revolution 'pulled' the population into developing urban areas at that time Nowadays, many people in HICs are being 'pushed' away from overcrowded cities to rural settlements HICs tend to have good transport and communication networks; therefore, people can live in rural areas and commute to cities or work from home | Key trade hub cities are seeing greater growth than others due to investment from the government and TNCs Cities such as Lagos in Nigeria, Shanghai in China, Mumbai in India, Sao Paulo in Brazil and St Petersburg in Russia—none of these are the country's capital Trade such as finance, electronics and manufactured goods | Asia is expected to contribute towards 60% of global growth by 2030 Most new economic development is concentrated in the big cities through investment in low-cost manufacturing of textiles, garments and shoes Push-pull factors lead to high rates of rural-to-urban migration Cities are experiencing higher levels of natural increase in population |
Urbanisation
The main factors affecting the rate of urbanisation are:
Speed of economic development
Economic growth drives urbanisation
The faster the growth of secondary and tertiary employment sectors, the faster the growth of urbanisation
Rate of population growth
Economic growth needs a supply of labour
This demand can be met in two ways:
Natural increase in an urban population: A slow way of meeting demand
Rural-urban migration: This is the more important source of labour as it attracts a wider pool of people into the urban region
Natural increase
Accounts for roughly 60% of urban population growth
Due to decreased death rates and higher birth rates
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Natural increase does not include inward migration of people to a place, just the number of births vs number of deaths. E.g. In one street there were 5 new migrants, 10 births and 2 deaths. The natural increase is 8 people because the migrants chose to move there. If they then had children, then those children would be included in the natural increase rate.
Push-pull factors
There are many reasons for people to migrate to and from urban areas and can be generally classified into push and pull factors
The push factor is the reality of the current situation for the migrant; it is what makes the person consider moving from the place of origin
The pull factor is the perceived outcome; it is what the migrant imagines the move will bring to the place of destination
Push-pull factors are unique to each person depending on their end goal: What is a pull factor for one person may not be for another
These factors can be further divided into:
Social
Economic
Political
Environmental
High levels of unemployment are a push factor, whereas higher wages and a better lifestyle are a pull factor
Therefore, rural-urban migration is usually a combination of factors that cause people to migrate
Examples of push-pull factors leading to migration
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember do not just state the opposite when asked to give push-pull factors
Poverty is a push factor, however, everywhere has certain levels of poverty, so a pull factor could be better welfare and healthcare services
Megacities
Megacities are urban areas with over 10 million residents
In 2007, more people lived in an urban environment than a rural one
By 2050 it is thought that more than two-thirds (7 billion) of the world population will live in urban areas
This scaling up of the urban environment is the fastest in human history
Largest growth of megacities is seen in Asia
Reasons for growth
Four main factors:
Economic development
Encourages population growth which leads to the desirability of goods and services
All megacities act as service centres within the formal economic sector
However, megacities in NEEs are also important manufacturing centres (Mumbai in India or Dhaka in Bangladesh) with thousands working in the informal economy
Population growth
Young people are drawn to live in megacities with their vibrancy, fast pace and opportunities
There is also ‘internal growth’ where people who have moved into the cities have children, so sustaining population growth (Mexico City, Mumbai, Pearl River Delta in China)
Economies of scale
Cheaper to provide goods and services in one place than spread across several cities
Financial savings for local governments in respect of infrastructure provision
Communication and transport are centralised, making savings in time and money
Multiplier effect
As a city prospers, it acts as a beacon to people and businesses
This encourages inward investment
This leads to yet more development and growth
Generating further need for skills and labour and job growth
This cycle multiplies the positive effects and growth continues (San Francisco and the digital development)
World cities
Megacities have a powerful attraction for people and businesses
They are influential cores with large peripheries
World or global cities can be any size but exert particular influences around the globe
They are considered prestigious, with status and power
They are critical hubs in the global economy
The three top (alpha) world cities are London, New York, and Tokyo
These are the financial centres of the world, each with smaller networks of world cities feeding into them
There are only four world cities in the southern hemisphere:
Sydney
Rio de Janeiro
Sao Paulo
Buenos Aires
Worked Example
Which term is best defined by the phrase ‘the increasing percentage of the population living in towns and cities'?
[1 Mark}
| A | Urban regeneration |
| B | Urban sprawl |
| C | Migration |
| D | Urbanisation |
Answer:
D: urbanisation [1]
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?