Coastal Management (AQA GCSE Geography): Revision Note
Exam code: 8035
Specification links
The notes on this page cover part of 3.1.3.2 Coastal landscapes in the UK on the AQA GCSE specification. (opens in a new tab)
3.1.3.2 - Key idea: Different management strategies can be used to protect coastlines from the effects of physical processes.
The costs and benefits of the following management strategies:
Hard engineering – sea walls, rock armour, gabions and groynes.
Soft engineering – beach nourishment and reprofiling, dune regeneration.
Managed retreat – coastal realignment.
An example of a coastal management scheme in the UK to show:
The reasons for management.
The management strategy.
The resulting effects and conflicts.
Hard engineering
Coastal management aims to protect the environment and people from erosion and flooding
Some coastal areas cannot get protection or management because of economic constraints
Hard engineering methods
Hard engineering builds sea defences using materials like concrete, wood, or rock
Construction is expensive, and they need regular maintenance
Defences protect against the waves' power
Every type of defence has strengths and weaknesses, such as:
Protecting one area can affect other regions along the coast, leading to increased erosion and flooding
Hard engineering is used when settlements and expensive installations, like power stations, are at risk because the economic benefit exceeds the costs of construction
Hard-engineered defences
Sea wall
These are usually built from concrete and curved outward to reflect the waves' power back out to sea
Advantages
Most effective at preventing both erosion and flooding (if the wall is high enough)
Disadvantages
Very expensive to build and maintain
It can be damaged if the material in front of the wall is not maintained
It can restrict access to the beach
Unsightly to look at
Groynes
Wood, rock or steel piling built at right angles to the shore, which traps beach material being moved by longshore drift
Advantages
Slows down beach erosion
Creates wider beaches
Disadvantages
Beaches along the coast are deprived of sand
Wooden groynes need to be maintained to prevent wood rot
Walking along the shoreline is difficult
Off-shore barriers
Large concrete blocks, rocks and boulders are sunk offshore to alter wave direction and dissipate wave energy
Advantages
Effective at breaking wave energy before reaching the shore
Beach material is built up
Low maintenance
Maintains natural beach appearance
Disadvantages
Expensive to build
Can be removed in heavy storms
Can be unattractive
Prevents surfing and sailing
Rip-rap or rock armour
Large boulders are piled up to protect a stretch of coast
Advantages
Cheaper method of construction
Works to absorb wave energy from the base of cliffs and sea walls
Disadvantages
Boulders can be eroded or dislodged during heavy storms
Gabions
A wall of wire cages filled with stone, concrete, sand, etc., built at the foot of cliffs
Advantages
Cheapest form of coastal defence
Cages absorb wave energy
Can be stacked at the base of a seawall or cliffs
Disadvantages
Wire cages can break, and they need to be securely tied down
Not as efficient as other coastal defences
Revetments
Sloping wooden or concrete fence with an open plank structure
Advantages
Work to break the force of the waves
Traps beach material behind them
Set at the base of cliffs or in front of the seawall
Cheaper than seawalls but not as effective
Disadvantages
Not effective in stormy conditions
Can make beach inaccessible for people
Regular maintenance is necessary
Visually unattractive
Soft engineering
Soft engineering methods
Soft engineering works with natural processes rather than against them
Usually cheaper and does not damage the appearance of the coast
Considered to be a more sustainable approach to coastal protection
However, they are not as effective as hard engineering methods
Soft-engineered defences
Beach replenishment
Putting sand and shingle back onto a beach to replace eroded material
Advantages
Beaches absorb wave energy
Widens beach front
Disadvantages
Has be repeated regularly, which is expensive
Can affect sediment movement along the coast
Removing material from the seabed harms fragile ecosystems like corals and sponges.
Dune regeneration
Planting vegetation creates or stabilises sand dunes and beaches
It reduces wind erosion
Advantages
Dunes act as a barrier between the sea and land
Keeps the coastline looking natural
Dunes absorb the wave energy, reducing erosion and flooding
Cheap method to stabilise dunes
Disadvantages
Hard to protect larger areas of coastline cliffs with this method
Areas have to be zoned off from the public, which is unpopular
Storm waves can damage the dunes
Beach reprofiling
The angle of a beach is reduced to reduce wave energy
Sediment is moved from the lower part of a beach to the upper part
Advantages
Cheap and simple
Increasing the beach's profile creates a wider beach
Wave energy is reduced, which reduces erosion
Has a natural appearance and can protect coastal habitats
Disadvantages
It only works in areas with low wave energy
Dredging sand from the seabed damages marine ecosystems
Taking sand and shingle from offshore areas can lead to more erosion in other areas
Must be repeated often and increases long-term costs
Public access is limited during the process
Managed retreat
Managed retreat is the planned relocation of populations and infrastructure away from eroding or flooding coastlines
Existing coastal defences are abandoned or removed, allowing the sea to flood inland until it reaches higher land or a new line of defences
Advantages
No expensive construction costs
Creates new habitats and increases biodiversity
Salt marshes which act as a natural buffer to erosion and flooding
Reduces the pressure on other areas inland or along the coast
Disadvantages
People lose their land and homes
Saltwater damages current ecosystems.
Relocation can be costly
People and businesses might not get compensation.
Managed retreat can create controversy, especially when it concerns high-value land, leading to pushback from landowners and developers
Cliff regrading and drainage
The angle of a cliff face is reduced to slow mass movement
Drainage tubes remove water from the cliff
Particularly useful on cliffs of clay and limestone (these erode easily and slip when wet)
Advantages
Low cost and sustainable
Stops sudden loss of large cliff sections
Regrading can slow down wave-cut notching at the base of cliffs because it reduces wave energy
Drainage lowers water saturation in the cliff
Disadvantages
It does not stop cliff erosion
Efficient drainage can dry out the cliff face, causing it to collapse
Regrading takes away part of the cliff, causing the cliff to retreat
Managing coastal retreat
There are conflicting views about using a particular type of engineering for coastal defence
Most coastal managers aim to use a range of methods depending on the value of what is being protected
This method is known as Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM)
ICMZ aims to use a combination of methods to best reflect all stakeholder's needs
Coastal strategies
Management of coastal regions is done through identifying coastal cells
This breaks a long coastline into manageable sections and helps identify two related risks:
The risk of erosion and land retreat
The risk of flooding
Identification allows resources to be allocated effectively to reduce the impacts of these risks
The 'cost to benefit' is easier to calculate using coastal cells
Shoreline management plans
Shoreline Management Plans (SMP) set out an approach to managing a coastline from flooding and erosional risk
The plans aim to reduce the risk to people, settlements, agricultural land and natural environments (salt marshes etc.)
There are four approaches available for coastal management, with differing costs and consequences:
Hold the line
Long-term approach and the most costly
Build and maintain coastal defences so the current position of the shoreline remains the same
Hard engineering is the most dominant method used, with soft engineering used to support
Advance the line
Build new defences to extend the existing shoreline
Involves land reclamation
Hard and soft engineering is used
Managed realignment or retreat
Removing some or all coastal defences lets the coastline move naturally.
The land gradually turns into flooded marshes, which protect the area behind.
The natural approach to coastal defence requires no maintenance and creates new habitats for animals and plants.
The sea takes the land, causing conflict, loss of livelihood, and saltwater damage to ecosystems.
Primarily soft engineering with some hard engineering for support.
Do nothing
It's the least expensive option, but it stirs up the most debate.
The coast erodes and retreats landward.
No investment protects the coastline or defends against flooding, despite any past efforts.
How do we choose an approach?
Deciding on an approach is complex and depends on:
Decisions about which approach to apply are complex and depend on:
The economic value of the resources that would be protected, e.g., land, homes, etc.
Engineering solutions: It might not be possible to 'hold the line' for moving landforms such as spits or unstable cliffs
Cultural and ecological value of land: Historic sites and areas of unusual diversity
Community pressure: Local campaigns to protect the region
Social value of communities: Long-standing, historic communities
Worked Example
Study Figure 10 and Figure 11, photographs showing soft engineering strategies.


Discuss the costs and benefits of soft engineering strategies in protecting coastlines. Use Figures 10 and 11 along with your own understanding.
[6 marks]
Answer:
Soft engineering strategies aim to work with natural processes to protect coastlines. They tend to be less intrusive and more sustainable than hard engineering, but they still have trade-offs. [U]
Beach nourishment, as shown in Figure 10, involves adding sand or shingle to a beach to replace material lost through erosion. [E] This can make the beach wider, absorbing wave energy and protecting the land behind. [U] The benefit is that it maintains the natural appearance of the coast and supports tourism, which is economically important. [Ap] However, because waves and longshore drift continue to erode the material, the process is expensive and needs to be repeated regularly. The machinery involved, like the excavators in the image, [E] also disrupts local ecosystems and beach use temporarily. [Ap]
Dune regeneration, shown in Figure 11, helps restore or protect sand dunes using measures like planting marram grass or fencing off areas to allow natural rebuilding. [E] Dunes act as natural buffers against wave energy and storm surges. [U] They are relatively cheap and environmentally friendly. The costs include slow effectiveness—it can take years for dunes to fully regenerate [Ap]—and the need for ongoing maintenance and public cooperation, as seen in the sign telling people to keep off. [E] If people ignore such signs, the dunes can be trampled and the strategy undermined. [Ap]
In conclusion, while soft engineering is more sustainable and environmentally sensitive than hard engineering, it often requires long-term commitment, community support, and maintenance to remain effective. [Ap] These strategies are not a one-time fix but part of a broader, adaptive coastal management plan. [U]
Marking guidance
The focus must be on the two soft engineering strategies shown in the figures, along with other soft engineering methods that have been studied.
Mark allocation
This is a 'level of response' answer. Each point made in the answer does not equal a mark.
2 marks for understanding [U] what beach nourishment and dune regeneration are.
2 marks for application [Ap] showing a balanced discussion of costs and benefits, including effectiveness over time, expense, and environmental impact.
2 marks for evidence [E] showing strong and specific reference to the photographs—machinery in Fig. 10, signage and dunes in Fig. 11.
The command is discuss and answers should present the key points about the strengths and weaknesses of soft engineering, particularly beach nourishment and dune regeneration.
Examiner tips
Use the photos – quote what you actually see.
Balance every benefit with at least one cost.
Conclude – even a single comparative sentence can lift an answer into Level 3 if other elements are sound.
Case study: The Holderness Coast
The Holderness Coastline is located on the East Coast of Yorkshire and runs for 61 km Flamborough Head in the north down to Spurn Head, where it meets the Humber Estuary in the south
It is the fastest-eroding coastline in Europe at 2 m per year
It is made of soft boulder clay and chalk
The coastline has naturally narrow beaches, which give less protection as wave power is not reduced
Longshore drift is the dominant process due to North Sea waves
Waves along the coastline have a long fetch (travel long distances), which increases wave energy

The biggest issue of the Holderness coastline is that it is retreating too quickly
Management
Bridlington is protected by a 4.7 km long sea wall
Gabions have been built at Skipsea
Hornsea's cliffs are formed from soft boulder clay and as a popular tourist destination, its management is aimed at protecting hotels and arcades, and creating a sandy beach. Hornsea has spent money on repairing its wooden groynes at a cost of £5.2 m; it also has a concrete seawall. Recently a stone and steel gabion along with a concrete revetment have been built south of Hornsea, helping to protect the caravan park
Riprap at a cost of £2 m, groynes and beach nourishment at Mappleton have produced a sandy beach and protects the town
Withernsea has a seawall, groynes, riprap and beach nourishment in an effort to widen the beach and so reduce wave energy
2.25% of all UK gas comes through the gas terminal at Easington and £4.5 m was spent on riprap, but the scheme protects the terminal and not the village
Spurn Head is protected with groynes and rock armour
Conflicts
Careful management of coastal regions is necessary to ensure sustainability
Conflict arises when coastal development is seen to be given a higher priority than overall coastal conservation
The management along the Holderness Coast has been successful in part, with the village of Mappleton and the B1242 road no longer at risk from erosion
Due to the use of groynes at Mappleton, sediment has been prevented from moving south, which has increased erosion at Great Cowden
Erosion has destroyed farms along with the loss of 100 chalets at the Golden Sands Holiday Park
Locals have disagreed about where sea defences are located, especially if community land is not protected
Some sea defences negatively impact tourism and reduce the amount of money coming into the area
Spurn Head is at risk of losing habitats due to a lack of sediment to maintain the spit
Overall, maintaining coastal defences is expensive and the cost may be too great to continue defending an area that is eroding quickly and will continue to erode
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?