London by William Blake (WJEC Eduqas GCSE English Literature)

Revision Note

Kate Lee

Written by: Kate Lee

Reviewed by: Jenna Quinn

What is the poem about? 

‘London’ was written by the poet William Blake in 1794, and can be found in his collection entitled Songs of Innocence and Experience (this poem belongs to the latter section). It is a bleak poem which explores the relentlessly miserable reality behind London’s industrial facade. It comments on the negative aspects of London at the time, including child labour, prostitution and the corruption of power and authority. It is a short but obvious criticism of the establishment, including the church, the army and the monarchy, which have allowed the city to fall into such a degraded state. The choice of title and topic, London (the financial and political centre of Britain), also establishes the theme of power in the poem.

Language, structure and form revision 

What happens in the poem? 

Language: 

Form: 

Structure: 



Stanza One:

  • Blake’s speaker sets a dark tone and portrays London as a city controlled by a privileged few

Stanza Two:

  • The focus shifts to the suffering of the city’s inhabitants. Their cries are described metaphorically suggesting the people are imprisoned in their beliefs, or by a lack of freedom

Stanza Three:

  • The speaker criticises the institutions that contribute to the misery and inequality: the church and monarchy

 

Stanza Four:

  • The speaker returns to the people, specifically a newborn child, and the final line implies the future will continue to be bleak

Poems for comparison: 

  • ‘Ozymandias’ by Percy Bysshe Shelley: oppression, corruption of power

  • ‘Afternoons’ by Phillip Larkin: society, appearance versus reality

  • ‘Cozy Apologia’ by Rita Dove: home, resilience, adversity

Key words 

Context: 

Romantic poet 

Social inequality

Hierarchy

Industrial Revolution

Themes: 

Corruption 

Society

Oppression

Appearance versus reality

Poem analysis 

'London' by William Blake

I wander thro' each charter'd street,

Near where the charter'd Thames does flow.

And mark in every face I meet

Marks of weakness, marks of woe.

 

In every cry of every Man,

In every Infants cry of fear,

In every voice: in every ban,

The mind-forg'd manacles I hear

 

How the Chimney-sweepers cry

Every blackning Church appalls,

And the hapless Soldiers sigh   

Runs in blood down Palace walls 

 

But most thro' midnight streets I hear

How the youthful Harlots curse

Blasts the new-born Infants tear

And blights with plagues the Marriage hearse

Language

  • Anaphora (“In every”) alludes to the overwhelming presence of misery, suggesting it is a collective experience and implies an inescapable cycle of poverty 

  • The metaphor of “manacles” implies the populace is imprisoned: they are stuck in a cycle of poverty with little hope of escape

  • Sensory language is peppered throughout which creates an immersive and unsettling experience for the reader

  • The final oxymoron cements Blake’s adverse view of the future: there seems to be no hope

Structure

  • Regular ABAB (alternating couplets) rhyme scheme could represent the relentless monotony of living in this city

  • Simplistic rhymes contrast with the complex ideas explored

  • Deviation from iambic tetrameter here places the stressed syllable first to punctuate the metre with Blake’s anger

  • Enjambment conveys the speaker’s intensity and sense of outrage, adding force to the listing of horrors  

Form

  • Written as a dramatic monologue: the first person speaker conveys the horror of London

  • The use of four quatrains could be symbolic of the rigidity of London’s hierarchy at the time Blake was writing

Overview of themes 

Themes

Key quotations 

Language, form and structure

Corruption

 

“Every blackning Church appalls”




"hapless Soldiers sigh / Runs in blood down palace walls”






‘blights with plagues the Marriage hearse”

Colour symbolism connotes the decaying core of the establishment and alludes to both physical and moral decay

The metaphor of blood is linked with death and suffering, symbolising the corrupt system and creating a feeling of despair and outrage.  Enjambment could reflect this blood flowing, a symbol of guilt

An oxymoron and language associated with disease at the end of the poem creates a bleak tone and reinforces the poem’s message about the city’s lack of hope

Society

“charter’d street [...] charter’d Thames”




“In every voice, in every ban”



Repetition of the adjective “charter’d” symbolises a city that is rigid and controlled and suggests human desire to control even natural forms

Anaphora in this stanza builds a rhythmic intensity that mirrors the relentless suffering described

Oppression

“mind-forg’d manacles”






“Chimney-sweepers cry”

The metaphor suggests that the citizens lack any societal freedom. These “manacles” are not physical chains but mental and social restrictions that limit freedom and happiness


Blake offers a critique of the exploitation of children, as chimney sweeps were often young boys forced into dangerous work. Emotive language is used to contribute to the feeling of misery

Appearance versus reality

“And mark in every face I meet/Marks of weakness, marks of woe”

This parallelism reinforces the idea that these conditions are widespread and that there is a disconnect between London’s outward appearance as a great city and the actual lived experience of its inhabitants. The repetition of “marks” suggests a permanent impact on the people

Historical and literary context 

  • William Blake wrote during the Romantic era:

    • Romantics were interested in the power of nature, humanity and emotion

    • They were generally opposed to the industrialisation and scientific progress sweeping through Europe at the time

    • He uses the symbol of the Thames, a natural body of water, which has been contained and made subject to laws (“charter’d”)

  • Blake lived in London for most of his life:

    • He thought the city was dirty and corrupt, both literally and metaphorically

    • He believed institutions of power, such as the government, the church and the monarchy, to be to blame for this

    • He worked to bring about change, both in the social order and in the minds of people

  • Blake wrote using mostly straightforward language so that his message was accessible to all

  • Blake’s poem centres on London, arguably the capital of the world at that time:

    • This is ironic as such a powerful and influential place, in Blake’s opinion, inflicts suffering and misery on many of its citizens

  • There was a huge gap between rich and poor at the time, so a significant disparity between those who had power, and those who did not

  • Blake was a Christian, but he rejected organised religion and the established church:

    • He viewed it as corrupt and hypocritical

  • Blake empathises most with those who have been the most badly affected by the authoritarian structures which caused the inequalities in his society, focusing on their misery

  • London at the time was full of poverty and disease, and his poem deliberately focuses on working-class citizens, prostitutes and former soldiers to foreground their plight

Comparing poems

Look at this exam-style question about ‘London’:   

How does William Blake present ideas about society in the poem, ‘London’?

Choose one other poem from the anthology in which the poet also writes about society. Compare the way the poet presents society in your chosen poem with the way William Blake presents it in ‘London’. 

In your answer you should: 

  • compare the content and structure of the poems – what they are about and how they are organised 

  • compare how the writers create effects, using appropriate terminology where relevant 

  • compare the contexts of the poems, and how these may have influenced the ideas in them

How you could approach this question: 

Thesis / Essay introduction: Both ‘London’ and ‘Ozymandias’ present ideas about society, exploring how a powerful minority can have a lasting impact on others’ lives. In ‘London’ Blake portrays a society where the actions and decisions of those in power have far-reaching consequences on the common people. In contrast, ‘Ozymandias’ presents the aftermath of a powerful ruler’s reign. 

Similarities

Differences

Both poets explore how tyrannical rulers can exploit the vulnerable in society and suggest that such exploitation is deeply ingrained in the power structure of their societies

Blake explicitly refers to his vulnerable groups, such as orphans and “hapless” soldiers, whereas Shelley employs a broader approach, using the vast desert and ruined statue to symbolise an entire society affected by tyrannical rule

Both poems offer a powerful critique of hierarchies and innately unjust societies. Blake’s poem exposes the systemic oppression in London’s social order, where the powerful exploit the vulnerable, while Shelley’s poem uses the fallen statue of Ozymandias to illustrate the futility of tyrannical power

While Blake criticises several corrupt establishments, including the church, monarchy and industry, Shelley focuses his ire specifically towards the monarchy

Both ‘London’ and ‘Ozymandias’ use juxtaposition to explore society’s future status, highlighting the contrast between the present state of oppression and the potential for change or decay. ‘In ‘London’, the poem juxtaposes the innocence of infants with the corruption of society. Shelley contrasts the once-great statute with the surrounding desolate sands

Blake’s final image of the ‘marriage hearse’ suggests a bleak future; Shelley’s reference to  a ‘colossal wreck’ offers hope of the disruption of power 

Thesis / Essay introduction: Both ‘London’ and ‘Afternoons’ explore ideas about society and challenge romanticised views of its institutions. In ‘London’, the poem explicitly criticises several corrupt establishments, such as the church and monarchy, revealing the harsh conditions faced by orphans and “hapless” soldiers. In contrast, ‘Afternoons’ the poem subtly depicts the mundane and unfilling lives of young mothers, contrasting their current reality with the idealised notion of domestic bliss.

Similarities

Differences

Both poems focus on the minutiae of everyday life, capturing the small and often overlooked details that reveal deeper truths about societal conditions

Blake’s exploration of late 18th-century London focuses on those neglected in society whereas Larkin hones in on the almost natural deterioration of romantic relationships

Both poets use simplistic, straightforward language to express their beliefs about society, enabling the poets to connect more immediately with the reader and thus making their social critique more relatable and impactful

While Blake’s language verges on didactic in its criticism, Larkin’s seems to focus on apathy. Blakes employs direct and emotive language, urging readers to recognise and challenge injustices, whereas Larkin’s poem uses a more subdued observational tone to depict the gradual decline and unfilled lives of young mothers

Both poems appear to end with a negative tone. Blake’s poem concludes with a powerful oxymoron that conveys the poem’s theme of corruption and suffering and Larkin’s poem closes with a sombre observation which conveys a feeling of loss

While both poems end with a note of sadness, Blake’s oxymoronic “marriage hearse” has a brutal finality while Larkin’s couples are merely  unfulfilled and peripheral in their own lives 

Predicted exam questions to prepare for 

  • Compare the way the poet presents corruption in your chosen poem with the way William Blake presents it in ‘London’.

  • Compare the way the poet presents oppression in your chosen poem with the way William Blake presents it in ‘London’.

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Kate Lee

Author: Kate Lee

Expertise: English and Languages Lead

Kate has over 12 years of teaching experience as a Head of English and as a private tutor. Having also worked at the exam board AQA and in educational publishing, she's been writing educational resources to support learners in their exams throughout her career. She's passionate about helping students achieve their potential by developing their literacy and exam skills.

Jenna Quinn

Author: Jenna Quinn

Expertise: Head of New Subjects

Jenna studied at Cardiff University before training to become a science teacher at the University of Bath specialising in Biology (although she loves teaching all three sciences at GCSE level!). Teaching is her passion, and with 10 years experience teaching across a wide range of specifications – from GCSE and A Level Biology in the UK to IGCSE and IB Biology internationally – she knows what is required to pass those Biology exams.