One Flesh (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
One Flesh
The Edexcel GCSE English Literature Relationships Anthology contains 15 poems. In your exam question, you will be given one poem – printed in full – and asked to compare this printed poem to another poem you have studied. You will not have access to the second poem in the exam.
Rather than trying to remember every line of the comparison poem, you just need to revise and recall the key aspects of the poem. To get a top grade, focus on developing your understanding of:
The meaning of the poem
The ideas and messages of the poet
How the poet conveys these ideas through their methods
How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas of other poets in the anthology
Below is a guide to Elizabeth Jennings's poem 'One Flesh', from the Edexcel Poetry Anthology. It includes:
Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam
Examiner Tips and Tricks
As part of the Edexcel Relationships Anthology, 'One Flesh' examines themes related to romantic love and feelings of loss or distance in a relationship. The exam question asks you to compare the way poets have presented these particular ideas across two anthology poems.
Learn how the themes in 'One Flesh' compare and contrast with other poems in the anthology rather than understanding the poem in isolation.
See the section below on “What to compare it to” for detailed comparisons of 'One Flesh' and other poems in the anthology.
Overview
In order to answer an essay question on any poem, it is important to understand what it is about. This section includes:
The poem in a nutshell
A “translation” of the poem, section-by-section
A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Elizabeth Jennings's intention and message
'Our Flesh' in a nutshell
'Our Flesh', written by the poet Elizabeth Jennings, explores intimate romantic relationships. The poem also examines how familiarity in long relationships can create distances and divisions.
'Our Flesh' breakdown
Lines 1–3
“Lying apart now, each in a separate bed,
He with a book, keeping the light on late,
She like a girl dreaming of childhood,”
Translation
The poem describes a couple in their bedroom, but they are in their own beds
The scene is intimate though; a light is on and the couple appear relaxed
Jennings's intention
Jennings's poem explores a romantic relationship by depicting a private moment
The use of third-person pronouns, though, creates a sense of detachment
Lines 4–6
“All men elsewhere – it is as if they wait
Some new event: the book he holds unread,
Her eyes fixed on the shadows overhead.”
Translation
The couple are isolated and distant from each other as “All men” are “elsewhere”:
This may suggest they feel alone or highlight the private nature of the scene
They appear to be waiting for something to happen and are distracted
Jennings's intention
Jennings describes a couple who seem uneasy in their relationship:
They are each in their own world
They seem isolated even though they are together
The mention of “shadows overhead” creates an ominous tone
Lines 7–8
“Tossed up like flotsam from a former passion,
How cool they lie. They hardly ever touch,”
Translation
These lines describe the way the relationship used to be, full of “passion”:
Their “former passion” has been “Tossed up”, implying it has been disturbed
The speaker describes how “cool” the room is and that they are not close
Jennings's intention
Jennings describes their earlier passion and intimacy to present a loving relationship
She shows how it has changed with contrasting words “passion” and “cool” and an ugly simile “like flotsam” (unwanted rubbish)
The lines emphasise the distance between the couple with two short phrases in one line:
The speaker sounds saddened by the situation
Lines 9–10
“Or if they do it is like a confession
Of having little feeling – or too much.”
Translation
These lines suggest that when the couple do touch it is uncomfortable:
This is implied with the contrasting ideas: “little” and “too much”
The couple’s intimacy is compared to a “confession”:
This may suggest how intimacy makes each partner feel the “truth” about their love; perhaps it makes them see that their relationship has changed
Jennings's intention
Jennings uses religious imagery to connote, perhaps, to the disciplined, ritual-like way they touch each other
The dash in the second line unsettles the mood and conveys imbalance
Lines 11–12
“Chastity faces them, a destination
For which their whole lives were a preparation.”
Translation
These lines refer to a future that is chaste, without sexual intimacy (“Chastity”)
The speaker suggests that not only is it inevitable their relationship will become this way, but also that they prepared for it
Jennings's intention
Here, Jennings appears to imply the couple’s past has led to this moment
There are various interpretations for this reference:
Perhaps Jennings is referring to marriage, or to the the cycle of life, or commenting on the couple’s lack of care for their relationship
Lines 13–14
“Strangely apart, yet strangely close together,
Silence between them like a thread to hold”
Translation
The speaker says that it is strange that their relationship has led them apart
Referring to “Silence” implies a lack of communication
The “thread” simile suggests their connection is thin
Jennings's intention
Here, Jennings highlights the poem’s message about loneliness in relationships
These lines convey, with the repetition of “strangely”, the dichotomies of love
Comparing their bond to a “thread” implies it is fragile
Lines 15–16
“And not wind in. And time itself’s a feather
Touching them gently. Do they know they’re old,”
Translation
Here, the poet describes time metaphorically as a feather to suggest to its soft and ephemeral qualities
This implies the process of ageing is barely noticeable (time is “Touching them gently”)
The poet seems to question whether the couple have noticed the changes
Jennings's intention
Jennings comments on the process of getting old to describe the way the relationship changes without the couple’s knowledge, and to explore the way love alters over time
Line 17–18
“These two who are my father and my mother
Whose fire from which I came, has now grown cold?”
Translation
The speaker tells readers that the poem is describing their parents
The speaker asks how a passionate “fire” that creates life can become “cold”:
This means that the speaker (their child) was born from their love
Jennings's intention
Jennings uses the symbolism of “fire” to reflect the parents’ past passion
This is contrasted with “cold” to show the changes in the relationship
The poem’s ending raises questions about changing relationships, especially marriage
Examiner Tips and Tricks
As the exam question will ask you to compare how the given poem presents a key theme with another one from the anthology, start your answer using the wording of the question and summarise the key theme in the poem.
This demonstrates to the examiner that you have understood what the question is asking of you, but also that you have a good understanding of the poems themselves.
For example, “'One Flesh' explores the key themes about distanced relationships. This theme can be linked to…” .
See the section “What to compare it to” for further suggestions.
Writer’s methods
Although this section is organised into three separate sections – form, structure and language – it is important to take an integrated approach, focusing on the main themes and ideas of the poem and then evaluating how Jennings's choices of language, structure and form contribute to these ideas. In essence, how and why the poet has made the choices they have, in relation to their intentions and message.
Focusing on the poet’s main ideas, rather than individual poetic techniques, will gain you far more marks. In the below sections, all analysis is arranged by theme, and includes Jennings's intentions behind her choices in terms of:
Form
Structure
Language
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Examiners want to see references to language, form and structure – the poetic techniques that a poet has used – to support your analysis of the theme and message of the poem.
They don’t want to see “technique spotting”, which is when a student mentions a technique but without analysing how the poet’s choice to use such a technique contributes to their overall message.
Examiners also want to see relevant evidence in the form of quotations from the poem, but again, only if relevant to your analysis.
Form
The form of 'One Flesh' conveys ideas about close and constant romantic relationships. However, Jennings presents an established relationship that seems distant and cold.
Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
Loss and distance | The poem presents a first-person speaker reflecting on a relationship that is not their own:
| Jennings describes the romantic relationship from a detached perspective:
|
The poem is made up of three regular stanzas to convey their constancy | The poem’s form creates a sense of regularity and routine to describe the established relationship | |
The poem ends without resolution:
| Jennings's poem ends with a confused speaker who appears reluctant to accept the idea that passion will inevitably grow “cold” | |
Jennings explores the lack of intimacy in long-lasting romantic relationships through an uneasy speaker |
Structure
The structure of the poem represents the conventional and constant nature of marriage. However, it is the speaker’s voice that conveys the emotion that is missing in the parents’ relationship.
Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
Complex love
| The poem uses iambic pentameter to create a calm rhythm | The poem’s regular rhythm contributes to the idea of reliability in the relationship |
The rhyme scheme is regular in the first two stanzas:
| The poet presents the couple’s habits as monotonous and lacking excitement | |
Jennings, though, conveys the speaker’s concern and hints at problems:
| The poet alludes to distance in the parent’s relationship and the speaker’s own uneasy response | |
The last two lines break the rhyme scheme with “mother” and “cold” to show the speaker’s emotions :
| The speaker conveys their confusion about the nature of their parent’s marriage | |
| Jennings conveys the speaker’s dismay at the way the familiarity and routine in their parent’s marriage has affected their intimacy |
Language
The poem combines contrasting imagery with phrases that mirror each other to examine the contradictory nature of marriage. Its title alludes to religious ideals of marriage.
Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
Romantic relationships | The title refers to a verse in the Bible that describes marriage:
| Jennings's poem explores the close bond of marriage and draws attention to its traditional values |
Jennings contrasts the idea of “passion” and “fire” with “cool” and “cold” to signify the change in the couple’s intimacy:
| The poem explores how the intensity of love diminishes over time | |
Repetition of the word “strangely” to describe the couple as “apart” and “together” implies the relationship is in some ways unnatural | Jennings's speaker appears uneasy about the surprising distance in their parents’ marriage | |
The speaker describes time as a “feather/Touching them gently” to describe the ageing process | While the poem examines the lack of intimacy in a marriage, Jennings’s use of sensual language recalls their former love | |
| Jennings explores the concept of marriage and the inevitable yet barely perceptible changes that come with ageing and long relationships |
Context
The best way to understand and comment on context in this poem is to explore the ideas and perspectives Jennings explores in ‘One Flesh’:
Complex love
Romantic relationships
Complex love
Elizabeth Jennings (1926–2001) was a prolific and celebrated twentieth-century English poet who published twenty-six collections of poetry and won the Somerset Maugham Award in 1955
Jennings was inspired by Victorian poet Gerald Manley Hopkins:
Both were strict Catholics and suffered from mental illness and depression
This may have contributed to the spiritual themes and religious imagery in Jennings's poems
One of her poetry collections, The Mind Has Mountains, published in 1966, contains a line from Hopkins's mournful poem ‘No worst, there is none’
‘One Flesh’ appears in this 1966 collection and has a similarly melancholic tone
Its gloomy rhetorical question in the last line presents a desperate speaker who finds little comfort in the inevitability of the distance in their parent’s marriage
Elizabeth Jennings was the only female poet to be included in The Movement, a group of English poets whose work took on anti-romantic ideas using traditional conventions:
The poem ‘One Flesh’ uses a regular structure and traditional conventions such as iambic pentameter, and it uses archaic references like “Chastity”
However, this is juxtaposed with more banal, everyday references such as “He with a book”
Jennings's poetry often conveys darker undercurrents in traditional relationships:
‘One Flesh’ acknowledges how “strangely” their relationship has evolved
Romantic relationships
While Elizabeth Jennings grew up during World War II, her poetry reflects the turbulence of the 1960s and 1970s (when most of her poetry, including this poem, was written)
In this way, Jennings's poetry may reflect the changing landscape in post-war Britain, a time of rebellion from the establishment and the rise of popular culture
Experimental poets of the time advocated for civil rights and feminism using unconventional styles to deviate from tradition
However, it has been argued that Jennings reflects a portion of society that looked for constancy instead, in a bid to restore their faith in established ideas:
The poem ‘One Flesh’ presents a disillusioned speaker who seems to question their parents’ marriage
Although the 1960s brought new freedom regarding female sexuality, traditional members of society fought to resist change:
The idea of sex before marriage was considered a defiance of Christian values
A generational clash ensued whereby the younger generation questioned established ideals and values, such as the sanctity of marriage
The poem ‘One Flesh’ alludes to a verse in the Bible that sets out Christian marriage ideals: that two individuals become one upon entering marriage
The poem refers to the idea of preparing for marriage, as if it is the final “destination”, perhaps commenting on society’s attitudes to marriage
What to compare it to
In the exam, you will write a comparison of the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. It is therefore essential that you revise the poems together, in pairs, to understand how each poet presents ideas about love or relationships, in comparison to other poets in the anthology.
Given that 'One Flesh' explores the ideas of romantic relationships and complex love, the following comparisons are the most appropriate:
'One Flesh' and '1st Date – She & 1st Date – He’
'One Flesh' and 'Neutral Tones'
'One Flesh' and 'The Manhunt'
For each pair of poems, you will find:
The comparison in a nutshell
Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences
Examiner Tips and Tricks
One of the best ways to prepare for your exam is to ensure you know how themes are presented across the collection of Relationships poems, rather than revising poems in isolation.
You need to make perceptive comments about the way poets have chosen to present their themes (or messages), and then support your comments with evidence, such as language and structural techniques, as well as referring to the poems’ titles.
Remember, it is essential that you not only write about the named poem, but compare it to one other in the anthology. Only writing about the poem given on the paper will severely limit your marks.
‘One Flesh’ and '1st Date – She and 1st Date – He’
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both poems present emotional distance between a couple in a romantic relationship. However, while Jennings's poem offers a melancholy view of marriage, Cope’s poem is more comedic in nature.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems describe intimate yet uncomfortable moments in a romantic relationship | |
Evidence and analysis | 'One Flesh' | '1st Date – She & 1st Date – He’ |
Jennings illustrates how a couple have grown apart in a marriage:
| Cope presents the thoughts of a nervous couple on a date unable to voice their private feelings:
| |
Jennings's speaker describes the couple one at a time to highlight their separation: “He with a book” and “She like a girl”:
| Cope’s female and male speaker observe each other secretly: “his face it’s a picture/Of rapt concentration”:
| |
In Jennings's poem the couple show little interest in each other, yet the poet hints at repressed desire:
| Cope presents parallel first-person speakers who hide their desires from each other:
| |
The poets both examine barriers in romantic relationships that are a result of repressed feelings |
Topic sentence | Both poets explore the idea of idealised love | |
Evidence and analysis | 'One Flesh' | '1st Date – She & 1st Date – He’ |
Jennings refers to traditional attitudes to marriage, that it is a “destination/For which” the couple’s “whole lives were a preparation”:
| Cope depicts how the lovers’ attempts to appear sophisticated lead to divisions between them:
| |
Jennings's speaker describes the couple’s bedtime routine with a regular rhythm to allude to the relationship’s traditional nature:
| Similarly, Cope’s poem presents speakers who are awkward, yet polite:
| |
Jennings ends the poem with a rhetorical question that conveys the speaker’s confusion at the distant relationship | Cope’s ironic poem ends unresolved:
| |
Both poets depict individuals who feel powerless in love or relationships |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While Jennings's poem is a melancholic reflection on dying passion, Cope presents a comedic insight into a flirtatious first date | |
Evidence and analysis | 'One Flesh' | ‘1st Date – She & 1st Date – He’ |
Jennings employs iambic pentameter to create a steady rhythm to reflect the stagnant yet reliable marriage | Cope gives a portrayal of two individuals nervously starting a relationship:
| |
Jennings's old, married couple do not speak to each other:
| Cope portrays the couple’s troubled thoughts:
| |
Jennings evokes a dark mood describing the couple’s love as “Tossed up like flotsam”:
| Cope’s poem is comedic as it mocks the confused feelings that come from the couple’s desire:
| |
While both poems draw attention to distances in relationships, Jennings's poem expresses disillusionment while Cope’s is lighthearted |
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Begin your answer with a clear overview of the overarching themes within both poems and clearly outline your choice of second poem in your introduction.
In each paragraph of your answer, use the theme to move between both poems and provide evidence to illustrate your arguments.
Alternatively, you could choose to focus on one poem first, and then the other, linking your ideas back to the main theme.
Whichever structure for your answer suits you best, make sure the comparison is embedded and your ideas for both texts are well-developed without too much repetition.
'One Flesh' and 'Neutral Tones'
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both ‘One Flesh’ and ‘Neutral Tones’ explore distance and loss in romantic relationships. However, while Jennings's poem describes a marriage from the perspective of an adult child, Hardy’s poem is a personal direct address to a lover.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems portray distance in loving relationships | |
Evidence and analysis | 'One Flesh' | 'Neutral Tones' |
While the couple in Jennings's poem are married, they are each in a “separate bed” and “Lying apart” | Similarly, Hardy describes two lovers in a long relationship who are together at a lake, yet unable to find intimacy | |
Jennings uses a caesura to highlight the divisions between the couple, such as in, “How cool they lie. They hardly ever touch”:
| In Hardy’s poem, too, the speaker describes an imbalanced relationship:
| |
Enjambment creates a suspenseful mood and hints at lack of resolution: “it is as if they wait/Some new event:” | Hardy employs a simile and ellipsis to suggest love eludes the speaker: “Like an ominous bird a-wing…”
| |
| The poems both portray the sense of isolation that comes from a lack of intimacy in a loving relationship |
Topic sentence | Both poems explore feelings of powerlessness in romantic relationships | |
Evidence and analysis | ‘One Flesh’ | 'Neutral Tones' |
Jennings's first-person speaker expresses concern and surprise at the relationship:
| Hardy’s poem similarly portrays a first-person speaker’s concern:
| |
Jennings uses contrasting diction to show the change in the relationship:
| Hardy, too, employs imagery that conveys the couple’s vulnerability in the face of change:
| |
Religious imagery in Jennings's poem alludes to society’s attitude to love, which the couple have failed to fulfil:
| Hardy’s poem uses religious imagery in a similar way:
| |
| The poets present speakers who are frustrated in their relationships because of unresolved problems, leading to disillusionment |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While Jennings's poem offers an outside perspective on marriage, Hardy’s poem is a personal address to a loved one | |
Evidence and analysis | ‘One Flesh’ | 'Neutral Tones' |
The speaker in Jennings's poem describes their parents’ marriage:
| In contrast, Hardy’s poem is a direct address:
| |
Jennings's couple do not express their feelings:
| Hardy’s poem expresses the couple’s strong emotions, like a smile that is the “deadest thing” and “a grin of bitterness” | |
Jennings's poem describes isolation, such as in the line, “All men elsewhere” | The poem is personal and intimate:
| |
Jennings describes the quiet acceptance of a stagnant marriage, while Hardy’s poem is an emotional depiction of miscommunication in a relationship |
'One Flesh' and 'The Manhunt'
Comparison in a nutshell:
This is an effective comparative choice to explore the presentation of romantic relationships and the complexities of love. However, while Jennings describes the lack of intimacy that comes with familiarity, Armitage describes a sensual, physical relationship.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems portray loving relationships that offer comfort | |
Evidence and analysis | ‘One Flesh’ | ‘The Manhunt’ |
Jennings describes a couple in bed at night:
| Armitage also portrays intimate moments in a relationship:
| |
Jennings conveys a sense of calm constancy in the steady iambic pentameter and regular rhyme scheme | Armitage implies patient tenderness in the relationship with a pattern of verbs:
| |
In ‘One Flesh’, sparse but emotive language conveys the strength of the bond when they touch: “Of having little feeling – or too much.” | Emotive language in ‘The Manhunt’ links the physical to emotional intimacy:
| |
| The poems both describe intimate and long-lasting romantic relationships |
Topic sentence | Both poems offer perspectives on distance in romantic relationships | |
Evidence and analysis | ‘One Flesh’ | 'The Manhunt' |
In Jennings's poem, the relationship has been destabilised:
| Similarly, Armitage’s speaker suggests a change in the relationship:
| |
Jennings hints at a sense of isolation in the relationship:
| Similarly, Armitage uses metaphorical imagery to convey barriers in the relationship, such as a “frozen river” and a “fractured rudder” | |
Both poets present the complexities of love with tender reflections |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While Jennings writes about a love that is fading, Armitage portrays a relationship that attempts to bridge the emotional distance | |
Evidence and analysis | ‘One Flesh’ | 'The Manhunt' |
The relationship in Jennings's poem is described as fragile, like a “thread” or a “feather” | On the other hand, Armitage repeats the phrase “only then” to show an urgent need to regain intimacy:
| |
Jennings's poem is written about the speaker’s parents:
| In contrast, Armitage’s poem presents a steady and determined first-person speaker: “Then I widened the search,/traced the scarring back to its source” | |
‘One Flesh’ ends with a rhetorical question and use of contrast:
| Armitage closes his poem on a hopeful note with the speaker’s enthusiastic and emphatic, “Then, and only then, did I come close.” | |
Jennings's poem offers little hope for the marriage, while Armitage’s poem offers hope that a lost love will be regained |
Examiner Tips and Tricks
It is best to choose poems that specifically explore the theme in the poem. Be as specific as you can when considering similarities and differences, but make sure you are comparing ideas, not techniques.
For example, you could choose to compare the presentation of conflicted relationships in ‘One Flesh’ and ‘The Manhunt’. You might wish to explore the idea of long-lasting love in ‘One Flesh’ and ‘Neutral Tones’.
What is important is that you view the poems thematically, with a clear emphasis on relationships. This will give you a better framework in which to write your response in the exam.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?