Love’s Dog (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
Love’s Dog
Each GCSE poetry anthology contains 15 poems, and in your exam question you will be given one poem – printed in full – and asked to compare this printed poem to another. The exam is closed-book, which means you will not have access to the second poem. This does not mean you need to remember every line from memory, but you do need to understand and remember key aspects of the poem. Understanding four things will enable you to produce a top-grade response:
The meaning of the poem
The ideas and messages of the poet
How the poet conveys these ideas through their methods
How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas of other poets in the anthology
Below is a guide to Jen Hadfield’s poem 'Love’s Dog', from the Relationships anthology. It includes:
Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The exam question asks you to compare the way relationships are presented in two anthology poems. 'Love’s Dog', as part of the Relationships anthology, explores themes related to romantic relationships and desire. It is therefore as important that you learn how 'Love’s Dog' compares and contrasts with the way other poems in the anthology present such ideas, rather than understanding the poem in isolation. See the section below on “What to compare it to” for detailed comparisons of 'Love’s Dog' and other poems in the anthology.
Overview
In order to answer an essay question on any poem it is vital that you understand what it is about. This section includes:
The poem in a nutshell
A “translation” of the poem, section-by-section
A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Jen Hadfield’s intention and message
'Love’s Dog' in a nutshell
'Love’s Dog', written by British poet Jen Hadfield, is a debate on the advantages and disadvantages of love. The poem offers a balanced yet unconventional evaluation that highlights complexities in romantic relationships.
'Love’s Dog' breakdown
Lines 1–2
“What I love about love is its diagnosis
What I hate about love is its prognosis”
Translation
The poem begins with the speaker’s opposing feelings about love
The lines use a metaphor that relates to illness:
The “diagnosis” or symptoms (implying physical responses) of being in love are good but the outcome (the “prognosis”) is bad
Hadfield's intention
Hadfield mirrors lines about love and hate to show close connections
The poet suggests the complex nature of romantic relationships brings mixed feelings
Lines 3–4
“What I hate about love is its me me me
What I love about love is its Eat-me/Drink-me”
Translation
These lines continue a list of opposing statements about love
The speaker says love is “me me me”, perhaps implying it can make you self-absorbed
This is contrasted with a reference to a fantasy story, Alice in Wonderland, perhaps to imply its mysterious and magical nature:
The phrase “Eat-me/Drink-me” refers to labelled instructions on a cake and a bottle that change Alice’s size and lead her to an imaginary world
Hadfield's intention
Hadfield continues a list of contrasting statements that assess different aspects of love
In these lines, she alludes to the idea of transformation
Lines 5–6
“What I love about love is its petting zoo
What I love about love is its zookeeper - you”
Translation
Here, the speaker relates love to control and physical care
The couplets list two things the speaker loves as they address a listener
Hadfield's intention
Hadfield, perhaps, highlights ideas about care-giving in relationships
The direct address, accentuated by a dash, suggest a partner who controls and supervises, as well as offers care
Line 7–8
“What I love about love is its truth serum
What I hate about love is its shrinking potion”
Translation
The speaker again refers to the way love can alter someone
These lines suggest love can force truth and make you feel small
Hadfield's intention
The speaker seems grateful for the honesty of intimate relationships:
On the other hand, the poem implies this can be humbling:
Perhaps this suggests uncomfortable truths that must be faced
Lines 9–10
“What I love about love is its doubloons
What I love about love is its bird-bones”
Translation
Here, the lines both describe what the speaker loves about love again
The first line conveys love as precious and valuable:
The word “doubloons” refers to old coins, and connotes to pirates and treasure
This is then contrasted with a starker image of small, bare bones
Hadfield's intention
The strange imagery presents love’s dichotomies
The poet uses incongruous images to symbolise two good things about love:
The imagery connotes to adventure and wealth
The image of “bird-bones” may connote to something that is fragile
Lines 11–12
“What I hate about love is its boil-wash
What I love about love is its spin-cycle”
Translation
These lines refer to a washing machine, which presents love in an unconventional way
The speaker hates the “boil-wash”, connoting to intense heat that purifies
The speaker says they love the “spin-cycle”, connoting to dizziness
Hadfield's intention
Hadfield uses mundane imagery to express intense emotions:
The imagery alludes to ideas of painful purging (a love that purifies)
In contrast, love can bring excitement, maybe confusion
Lines 13–14
“What I loathe about love is its burnt toast and bonemeal
What I hate about love is its bent cigarette”
Translation
The speaker returns to describing two things they hate (“loathe”) about love
The imagery connotes to damaged things: “burnt toast” and a “bent cigarette”
The speaker also mentions “bonemeal” (a fertiliser made of ground animal bone)
Hadfield's intention
Hadfield uses alliteration to draw attention to love’s ability to ruin or break
Darker images illustrate the speaker’s acknowledgment of painful emotions
Lines 15–16
“What I love about love is its pirate
What I hate about love is its sick parrot”
Translation
These lines end the poem with opposing statements about love
The imagery relates back to adventure with the word “pirate” and “parrot”:
Parrots are associated with legendary stories about pirates
However, the speaker ends saying they hate the fact love is “sick”
Hadfield's intention
Hadfield’s evaluation of love ends with allusions to dangerous adventures that can physically weaken
The lines highlight the risk and excitement of romantic relationships
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The exam question asks you to compare the ways poets present ideas about relationships in the poem given to you on the exam paper and one other from the Relationships anthology. For the best answer, you will need to focus on the way themes are presented across two poems.
Perhaps you could begin your answer with a clear argument that clarifies how the poems explore relationships. This is better than providing a list of as many techniques as you can find or remember, as it demonstrates that you have understood themes in the poem and the poets’ intentions. For example, “Hadfield subverts ideas about traditional, romanticised relationships. Similar themes can be found in…”
Writer’s methods
Although this section is organised into three separate sections – form, structure and language – it is always best to move from what the poet is presenting (the techniques they use; the overall form of the poem; what comes at the beginning, middle and end of a poem) to how and why they have made the choices they have.
Focusing on the poet’s overarching ideas, rather than individual poetic techniques, will gain you far more marks. Crucially, in the below sections, all analysis is arranged by theme, and includes Hadfield’s intentions behind her choices in terms of:
Form
Structure
Language
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Examiners specifically state that they are not looking for as many “quotes” or techniques as you can find in the poem(s). In fact, it is better to understand the way themes have been conveyed, and then use language and structural techniques to support your argument.
Identifying sophisticated techniques will not gain you any more marks, especially if these techniques are only ‘spotted’ and the poet’s intentions for this language are not explained. Instead, focus your analysis on the reasons why the poet is presenting their ideas in the way that they do: what is their message? What ideas are they presenting, or challenging?
Form
The form of 'Love’s Dog' defies traditional presentations of love to imply its realistic reflection on romantic relationships. Jen Hadfield offers a balanced assessment of the qualities, and impact, of love.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Romantic relationships | The poem is a first-person reflection that addresses a listener only once | The narrator focuses on their feelings about love rather than speaking intimately to a loved one:
|
Repetition of the speaker’s thoughts suggest introspection:
| Hadfield offers a less emotional speaker who presents an evaluation of love | |
Simple repetition of statements provide conclusions:
| The poem is straightforward, yet it expresses ideas about powerful emotions | |
The balanced form of Hadfield’s poem implies logic, but she juxtaposes this with repetitive ideas about oppositional emotions to show its influence |
Structure
The poem’s structure conveys Hadfield’s ideas about the close connections between love and hate in romantic relationships.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Complex love | The poem makes use of anaphora to show the complexities of love | By repeating “What I love” and “What I hate” Hadfield is able to convey love’s contrasting qualities |
The list is not regular:
| Mixing up lines presents a conflicted speaker:
| |
A lack of punctuation deviates from traditional structures | Hadfield’s poem defies typical examples of romantic poetry as it provides no clear voice | |
Half-rhymes like “diagnosis” and “prognosis” begin the poem:
| The poem’s unconventional rhyme scheme contributes to an unstable speaker | |
Jen Hadfield’s poem is an abstract reflection that presents love as conflicting and inconsistent |
Language
The poem 'Love’s Dog' can be considered post-modern in its employment of metaphorical imagery that undermines traditional romantic symbolism. Its title suggests the poem explores love that can enslave or disenfranchise.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Intense love | A semantic field of illness connotes to love’s “symptoms”:
| The poem’s imagery often connotes to love’s powerful physical impact |
The poem implies love is caring and comforting:
| Hadfield’s poem shows how the advantages of love are connected closely to the disadvantages:
| |
Imagery that alludes to love’s purity is conveyed with “boil-wash” and “truth serum”:
| Hadfield shows love’s ability to expose faults or weaknesses:
| |
Hadfield makes allusions to adventure stories:
| Hadfield implies love is exciting and imaginative, as well as transformative | |
Bizarre imagery draws attention to each metaphor so that Hadfield can emphasise the intense nature of love in a pragmatic way |
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The best answers comment on the way elements of language, form or structure contribute or support an argument on the presentation of the theme in the question. This means you should aim to deliver an integrated comparison of the themes and ideas in this and the other poem you choose for comparison. Focus on the relevance of the methods used by the poet(s). It is better to structure your answer around an exploration of the ideas in the poems. Stay focused on the task and choose your evidence based on the theme named in the question.
Context
Examiners repeatedly state that context should not be considered as additional factual information: in this case, it is not random biographical information about Jen Hadfield or facts unrelated to the ideas in 'Love’s Dog'. The best way to understand context is as the ideas and perspectives explored by Hadfield which relate to romantic and complex relationships.
This section has therefore been divided into two relevant themes that Hadfield explores:
Romantic relationships
Complex love
Romantic relationships
Jen Hadfield, T. S. Eliot Prize winner, was born in 1978 in Cheshire, England
The poem 'Love’s Dog' is part of a collection called Nigh-No-Place, written in 2008
The collection consists of poems that are written as a stream of consciousness:
'Love’s Dog' lacks punctuation and is introspective in nature
It offers a reflection on romantic relationships
Hadfield’s presentation of the negative elements of love in her poem can be considered typical of literature written from a feminist perspective
The speaker’s confident assertions and logical evaluation of romance convey an individualistic view:
The speaker even refers to the way love is “me me me”, implying self-absorption
The poem challenges conventional female perspectives on love and suggests a sense of independence and autonomy:
This may signify an egalitarian presentation of love
It could be reflective of changes in political policy and social attitudes to gender after the Third-wave feminist movement of the 1990s
The poem does not signal any particular gender
In this way, the poem explores romantic relationships in a more impartial way
Complex love
Jen Hadfield studied English Language and Literature at Edinburgh University and went on to complete a higher-level qualification at the University of Glasgow and Strathclyde
Her love for Scotland has been documented:
'Love’s Dog' was influenced by ‘A View of Things’, a poem by Edwin Morgan, a famous Scottish poet
His poem contains the line “what I hate about love is its dog” and it shows parallels between love and hate, like Hadfield’s poem
Her poetry often focuses on the natural world and refers to animals:
In 'Love’s Dog', Hadfield symbolises the comforting nature of love with reference to a “petting zoo”
The poem adds “zookeeper - you” which may imply guardianship or control
The emergence of post-modernism saw a move away from conventions and attitudes found in classical literature
Poems experimented with language and structure, especially by using cynical or nonchalant speakers:
The speaker in 'Love’s Dog' is typically jaded
It is unusual to have the word “hate” mentioned in romantic poetry, especially as many times as it is in this poem
However, this helps present an honest, less idealised perspective on romance
Critical attitudes expressed in postmodern poetry can be considered a response to social and economic pressures of the time:
The poem 'Love’s Dog' was written during a period of recession, a consequence of a financial crash (or crisis) in 2007
Postmodern poetry depicts the realities of life by drawing on common objects to express deep emotions and frustrations in everyday life:
Hadfield alludes to a washing machine to connote to love’s powerful impact
This technique allows Hadfield, and other post-modern artists, to convey strong emotions in a casual, unemotional manner
It also allows romantic poetry to present its ideas ambiguously and allow for various interpretations that are not clichéd
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember, you will be expected to demonstrate your understanding of factors in the author’s life that may have influenced the way they have presented their ideas on relationships.
Context should be connected to the theme named in the task, and can cover aspects of genre (related to poetry), social, literary and historical context, as well as the author’s own personal influences. However, writing a whole paragraph about John Cooper Clarke is not an integrated approach, and will not achieve high marks. Instead, use contextual comments to support your ideas.
What to compare it to
The essay you are required to write in your exam is a comparison of the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. It is therefore essential that you revise the poems together, in pairs, to understand how each poet presents ideas about relationships, in comparison to other poets in the anthology. Given that ‘Love’s Dog’ explores the ideas of romantic relationships and complex love, the following comparisons are the most appropriate:
'Love’s Dog' and 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'
'Love’s Dog' and 'i wanna be yours'
'Love’s Dog' and 'Valentine'
For each pair of poems, you will find:
The comparison in a nutshell
Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences
Examiner Tips and Tricks
For the best responses, examiners are looking for perceptive comments about the way themes are presented. Your analysis should cover the way these ideas are conveyed by the poets’ choices regarding language, form and structure. It is therefore important that you have a thorough knowledge of key ideas (such as the way poems end) rather than just memorising a series of quotations.
It is also essential that you not only write about the named poem, but compare it to one other in the anthology. Only writing about the poem given on the paper will severely limit your marks.
'Love’s Dog' and 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both Jen Hadfield’s 'Love’s Dog' and Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s ‘How do I love Thee? (Sonnet 43)’ present speakers with strong voices who offer arguments on love to an implied listener. However, Hadfield conveys this in a post-modern poem while Barrett Browning uses a traditional sonnet.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both speakers address a romantic partner to convey assured thoughts on love | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)' |
Jen Hadfield’s poem is offered from a personal, first-person perspective:
| Barrett Browning’s poem also depicts a speaker’s thoughts directed to a listener:
| |
Hadfield offers an assertive argument using anaphora, listing “What I love” followed by “What I hate” | Barrett Browning’s speaker also builds a strong argument to prove their love:
| |
Hadfield’s speaker conveys certainty with a strong voice:
| Similarly, Barrett Browning presents an assured speaker:
| |
The poets use strong speakers who are able to clearly express their thoughts on a romantic relationship, and in this way they both deviate from traditional Romantic poetry |
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both speakers describe love as powerfully impactful | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)' |
Hadfield conveys the intensity of love with imagery:
| Barrett Browning presents love as similarly consuming, using hyperbolic language:
| |
Hadfield’s poem alludes to the positive and negative elements of love:
| Similarly, Barrett Browning’s list conveys love with contrasting imagery, placing the oxymoronic “Smiles” next to “tears” | |
Hadfield describes a love that is painful and disorientating:
| Barrett Browning also alludes to darker themes:
| |
The poets both present love as intense and highlight its overwhelming effect |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While Hadfield undermines traditional romantic poetry, Barrett Browning’s conventional sonnet elevates it | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)' |
Hadfield’s poem breaks conventions with its lack of punctuation (other than a dash):
| In contrast, Barrett Browning uses a Petrarchan sonnet:
| |
Hadfield‘s speaker uses simple language to convey a down-to-earth tone | In contrast, Barrett Browning elevates love with archaic language and classical references, such as “thee” and “as men strive for right” | |
Hadfield’s postmodern poem uses everyday items as symbols of love:
| Keeping with tradition, ‘Sonnet 43’ uses religious imagery to imply pure love:
| |
Hadfield subverts conventional romantic ideas to present a realistic evaluation of love, while Barrett Browning’s Victorian poem alludes to Romantic traditions to present all-encompassing love |
Examiner Tips and Tricks
It is a good idea to outline your argument in your introduction, providing a clear overview of the overarching themes within both poems. You can then use the theme to move between both poems to illustrate and support your arguments.
However, this does not mean that you cannot focus on one poem first, and then the other, linking ideas back to the main poem. You should choose whichever structure suits you best, as long as comparison is embedded and ideas for both texts are well-developed.
'Love’s Dog' and 'i wanna be yours'
Comparison in a nutshell:
This is an effective comparative choice to explore the presentation of romantic love in modern poems. While the poems both convey love as powerful, Hadfield’s poem is a balanced abstract reflection, whereas Cooper Clarke’s direct address is an intensive declaration of love.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems can be considered postmodern interpretations of romantic relationships | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'i wanna be yours' |
Hadfield offers a realistic assessment of love:
| Cooper Clarke uses colloquial language to similarly present a realistic portrayal of love, for example “you call the shots” and “wanna” | |
In 'Love’s Dog' simple rhymes like “me” and “me” create an irreverent tone:
| Cooper Clarke creates a casual voice with non-standard grammar and internal rhyme, for example “coffee hot” and “coffee pot” | |
Both poets undermine traditional presentations of romantic relationships with realist poems that convey authentic reflections on love |
Topic sentence | Both poems juxtapose the powerful impact of love with simple imagery | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'i wanna be yours' |
Hadfield uses an unconventional metaphor to describe love’s power:
| Similarly, Cooper Clarke’s symbolism is drawn from everyday life to draw attention to its strength:
| |
Hadfield highlights imagery with alliteration:
| Cooper Clarke uses auditory devices to defy convention:
| |
'Love’s Dog' refers to mundane things that connote to strong emotions:
| Cooper Clarke similarly describes love’s power:
| |
Both poets portray love as physically impactful and potentially dangerous |
Differences:
Topic sentence | Hadfield’s poem is a balanced and conceptual reflection but Cooper Clarke’s lyrical poem conveys a passionate speaker who surrenders entirely to love | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'i wanna be yours' |
Hadfield’s poem consists of regular rhyming couplets that represent a balanced voice:
| Cooper Clarke’s poem, in contrast, is a persistent list using anaphora:
| |
Hadfield’s speaker presents love as oppositional | The speaker in 'i wanna be yours' is submissive, offering a love that is entire | |
Hadfield uses magical allusions to acknowledge love’s ability to delude:
| In contrast, Cooper Clarke’s speaker appears overwhelmed by love:
| |
Hadfield’s reflective evaluation of love contrasts with Cooper Clarke’s dramatic poem, which presents a fervent speaker’s impassioned submission to a romantic relationship |
'Love’s Dog' and 'Valentine'
Comparison in a nutshell:
This is an effective comparative choice to explore the presentation of romantic love in modern poems. While the poems both juxtapose love’s intensity with pragmatism, Hadfield’s poem is a balanced, abstract reflection, while Duffy’s poem is an immediate and emotional address to a lover.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems employ speakers who address a loved one with pragmatism | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'Valentine' |
Hadfield offers a confident and realistic assessment of love:
| Duffy depicts a speaker’s honest assertions on love:
| |
In 'Love’s Dog', simple rhymes like “me” and “me” create an irreverent tone:
| 'Valentine' is also an unconventional romantic poem that uses half-rhyme:
| |
Both poems undermine traditional presentations of romantic relationships with frank speakers who offer balanced ideas about love |
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems juxtapose the powerful impact of love using simple imagery | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'Valentine' |
Hadfield uses an unconventional metaphor to describe love’s power:
| Duffy’s symbolic representation of love is a common onion:
| |
Hadfield uses imagery, highlighted by alliteration, to imply darker ideas:
| Duffy’s poem subverts traditional images of romance with cynicism:
| |
'Love’s Dog' refers to mundane things that connote to painful emotions:
| Duffy’s metaphor, the onion, is extended to similarly convey the risk inherent in romantic relationships:
| |
Both poets portray love as complex and potentially dangerous |
Differences:
Topic sentence | Hadfield’s poem is a symbolic, conceptual reflection while Duffy’s poem depicts a tangible moment in a relationship | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Love’s Dog' | 'Valentine' |
Hadfield’s poem consists of regular rhyming couplets that represent a balanced voice:
| Duffy, in contrast, uses an irregular form to convey an unstable voice:
| |
Hadfield’s poem is a consistent list, suggesting forethought and clarity | However, Duffy creates a sense of spontaneity with one-line stanzas like “I am trying to be truthful.”
| |
Hadfield relates love to magical and fantastical ideas:
| In contrast, Duffy’s presentation of love uses simple household objects like “brown paper”, a “photo” and a “wedding ring” | |
Hadfield’s reflective evaluation of love contrasts Duffy’s dramatic characterisation of a lover offering a Valentine’s Day gift |
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Choose whichever poem you are able to make the most in-depth comparisons with in the exam. For example, you could choose to compare the presentation of romance in 'Love’s Dog' and 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'. Or you might wish to explore the idea of complex desire in 'Love’s Dog' and 'i wanna be yours'. What is important is that you view the poems thematically, with a clear emphasis on relationships. This will give you a better framework in which to write your response in the exam.
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?