War Photographer (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
‘War Photographer’
Each poetry anthology in the GCSE contains 15 poems, and in the poetry question in the exam you will be given one poem on the paper – printed in full – and asked to compare this given poem to one other from the anthology. As this is a “closed book” exam, you will not have access to the other poems, so you will have to know them very well from memory. Fifteen poems is a lot to learn. However, understanding four things about each poem will enable you to produce a top-mark response:
The meaning of the poem and the story it tells
The ideas and messages the poet wanted to convey
How the poet uses poetic techniques to convey their ideas and messages
How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas and themes of other poems in the anthology
Below is a guide to Carole Satyamurti’s 'War Photographer', from the Conflict anthology. It includes:
Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam
The poem has been taken from Pearson Edexcel’s poetry anthology, the full version of which can be found here.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In your exam, you will be asked to compare 'War Photographer' with another poem from your Conflict anthology. Your comparison should focus on the way each writer presents their ideas about conflict. They may be depicting a personal conflict, or an armed conflict, or – as in this poem – how conflict affects people’s lives and how that is represented.
If the poem printed on your exam paper is 'War Photographer', you should start by stating which poem you’re going to compare it to. For instance, you could compare 'War Photographer' with another poem that focuses on the way that violent conflict affects ordinary people, like Ciaran Carson’s ‘Belfast Confetti’ or Denise Levertov’s ‘What Were They Like?’ Look at the “What to compare it to” section below for detailed suggestions about comparing 'War Photographer' with other poems in the anthology.
Overview
In order to answer an essay question on any poem, it is essential that you understand what it is about. This section includes:
The poem in a nutshell
An explanation of the poem, line-by-line
A commentary of each of these lines, outlining Satyamurti's intention and message
'War Photographer' in a nutshell
'War Photographer' is partly set in a fictional urban war zone that reflects many of the armed conflicts of the 1980s. The poem is a dramatic monologue, in which the speaker, a war photographer, analyses the moral implications of creating images that can create a false representation of war. The speaker compares a pair of photographs she has taken; one is of a laughing pair of privileged young women and one is of a young girl carrying a baby. The second image is taken in the moment before a bomb explodes. However, when the photograph is published, the caption presents it as a hopeful image. Satyamurti criticises the way that pictures can tell an untrue story, and people’s unwillingness to engage with the truth.
'War Photographer' breakdown
Lines 1–8
“The reassurance of the frame is flexible
– you can think that just outside it
people eat, sleep, love normally
while I seek out the tragic, the absurd,
to make a subject.
Or if the picture’s such as lifts the heart
the firmness of the edges can convince you
this is how things are”
Explanation
The edges of a picture, its “frame”, can be interpreted in different ways
The frame can safely contain the picture, separating it from reality:
This allows people to believe that everything outside the frame is fine, and that people’s lives are unaffected
They don’t see what the war photographer sees when she takes the picture:
She looks for tragic and absurd images and experiences them personally
Therefore, she knows the reality of what is outside the frame
However, if the picture is a happy one, people can convince themselves that it is a true representation of life:
They choose to see the picture’s “edges” as solid, with nothing disturbing going on beyond them, so they can convince themselves that “this is how things are”
Satyamurti's intention
Satyamurti uses the visual imagery of a picture’s “frame” or “edges” to represent two things:
The physical frame of a picture
The way that people choose to interpret pictures
She uses the imagery of the frame to criticise people who only want to be reassured:
She is a war photographer, so most of her pictures are “tragic” or “absurd”
But people interpret them as they want, rejecting tragic pictures and accepting happier ones
Thus, they can gain “reassurance”, because they can choose what to believe
The war photographer knows that this is not “how things are”, because a picture is only a moment in time:
The reality surrounding that moment may not be a positive one
This is especially true of pictures taken in war zones, like the one later in the poem
Lines 9–12
“– as when at Ascot once
I took a pair of peach, sun-gilded girls
rolling, silk-crumpled, on the grass
in champagne giggles”
Explanation
The speaker remembers a picture she took at Ascot:
The two girls in the picture are healthy and suntanned
They are wearing silk and drinking champagne
This implies that they are wealthy and enjoy a life of luxury
They are rolling about on the grass, crumpling their silk dresses:
This suggests that they are privileged enough not to care about ruining their expensive clothes
Satyamurti's intention
The girls in the picture represent carefree happiness:
They are either ignorant of the tragedy in the world, or do not care
This stanza reinforces the ideas in the first stanza:
People would rather believe in the truth of this picture, because it is happy
However, the imagery in this stanza contrasts with the later images in the poem:
Satyamurti is illustrating the fact that some people enjoy wealth and luxury, while others endure war and tragedy
Lines 13–16
“– as last week, when I followed a small girl
staggering down some devastated street,
hip thrust out under a baby’s weight.
She saw me seeing her; my finger pressed.”
Explanation
In this stanza, the photographer remembers something that happened “last week”:
The fact that the events she recalls are so recent implies that the situation she photographed is continuing
She was following a “small girl”, who was “staggering down some devastated street”:
The street is devastated by previous bombings
The reason the girl was “staggering” is that she was carrying a baby, but was too small or weak to do so easily
The vivid visual description of her “hip thrust out” conveys the baby’s weight, which almost unbalances her
This emphasises her smallness and vulnerability
The girl sees the photographer about to take a photo of her
Satyamurti's intention
Satyamurti follows the previous scene of privileged young women giggling at Ascot with the scene of a young girl struggling to carry a baby in a devastated street:
The young women are carefree, while the young girl has the responsibility of a baby, even though she is just a child herself
The young women are enjoying a luxurious lifestyle, while the girl has to live in a ruined city
This juxtaposition illustrates the injustice of inequality
Some people enjoy champagne, while others struggle to survive
The speaker’s description of taking the photo allows readers to experience her reality:
She does not help the girl because she is only there to record what she sees
The emphasis on “seeing” reinforces the fact that seeing, or witnessing, is all she can do
The reader becomes a witness who sees the situation from her point of view
Lines 17–21
“At the corner, the first bomb of the morning
shattered the stones.
Instinct prevailing, she dropped her burden
and, mouth too small for her dark scream,
began to run…”
Explanation
When the girl reaches the corner, a bomb goes off, shattering the buildings around it:
“the first bomb of the morning” implies that this is one of many bombs
This suggests that the bombing of the city streets is constant
The girl’s instinct to save herself takes over, and she drops the baby and runs:
The fact that her mouth is “too small for her dark scream” conveys her terror and the volume of her scream
It also emphasises how young and vulnerable she is
Satyamurti's intention
The speaker shows the horror of conflict in unflinching detail:
This reflects the war photographer’s role – she is there to record events
However, it is left up to the reader to decide whether the baby survives or dies:
The speaker has taken the picture just before the explosion and doesn’t describe the aftermath
Satyamurti is prompting readers to make the same choices as people who look at pictures and decide what to believe
Lines 22–28
“The picture showed the little mother
the almost-smile. Their caption read
‘Even in hell the human spirit
triumphs over all.’
But hell, like heaven, is untidy,
its boundaries
arbitrary as a blood stain on a wall.”
Explanation
The picture the speaker takes shows the young girl just before the explosion:
She is described as a “little mother” because she was carrying the baby
Her expression is an “almost smile” or half-smile, because she knows she is having her photo taken
However, when the picture is published, the publishers print it with a caption that makes it seem like a positive picture:
They focus on the bravery and goodness – the “human spirit” – of the young girl who is caring for a baby in the “hell” of a war zone
“Their caption” suggests that the young girl is heroic
This is undermined for the poem’s readers by the speaker’s previous description of what happened next
By dropping the baby to save her own life, the girl shows desperation, not heroism
The speaker returns to the imagery of the frame in her closing observation:
She states that the “boundaries” of hell, just like those of heaven, are arbitrary
This means that they are random and based on personal choice or preference
The simile of those boundaries being as “arbitrary as a bloodstain on a wall” links them with the death and destruction that has taken place in reality
Satyamurti's intention
Satyamurti wants to reveal the way that pictures can present a false image of reality, or allow people to deceive themselves:
The picture does not show the girl’s terror or the baby’s death
Instead, it looks as if the girl is smiling, which allows the publishers to mislead the public
The speaker knows the truth, but she is implicated in the lie because she took the picture:
However, she conveys her anger by distancing herself from “their” misleading caption
She reveals the truth about war that the media fails to show
The final three lines characterise the suffering of war as “arbitrary”:
Some people enjoy the “heaven” of a life of luxury, while others endure the “hell” of living in a war zone
The injustice of the “arbitrary” nature of war links back to the other injustices in the poem:
For instance, the injustice of people choosing not to see reality, but comforting themselves by believing in happy interpretations of pictures
Their actions are also “arbitrary”, because they are not driven by reason or reality
Instead, they prefer not to see the tragedies of other people’s lives
Writer’s methods
This section is split into three separate areas: form, structure and language. You should demonstrate your understanding of the poem by linking these technical areas of Satyamurti's writing together. Think about how Satyamurti's language, structure and form contribute to her ideas and message in 'War Photographer'.
You will gain far more marks by focusing on Satyamurti's themes than on individual poetic techniques. Therefore, the analysis in the following sections is arranged by theme, and examines the intentions behind Satyamurti's decisions about:
Form
Structure
Language
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Think about how Satyamurti uses poetic methods to make her meaning clearer and more effective. You should avoid identifying poetic techniques without linking them to the themes of 'War Photographer'. So, instead of writing “Satyamurti uses plosives”, you could state that “Satyamurti’s use of plosives emphasises the violence that the speaker is witnessing”, then give an example.
Form
'War Photographer' is a dramatic monologue that narrates the experience of a photographer in a war zone. The first-person speaker addresses the unseen listener directly, which makes it feel as though the reader is being addressed directly, too. The poem is written in free verse, with no regular rhythm or rhyme scheme. This reflects the speaker’s train of thought as she makes connections between one subject and another.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
The representation of war | The form of the dramatic monologue makes readers feel as though they are being addressed directly:
| Satyamurti wants to make readers question their own behaviour and responses to the pictures they see:
|
The horror of conflict | The poem employs a free verse form that mimics the speaker’s train of thought:
| This technique allows the speaker to connect ideas and subjects realistically:
|
Structure
The poem begins with a metaphor about the way in which the frame or edges of a picture allow people to interpret them as they choose. It then moves into the past tense to juxtapose two scenarios: one at a racing event in England, then one in a war zone in a foreign country. The fourth stanza describes a horrific scene when a bomb explodes in the city where the speaker is taking photographs. The final stanza describes what happened to the picture the speaker took just before the bomb went off. The structure is cyclical, with the final stanza linking back to the first stanza’s critique of the way pictures can be misinterpreted. Satyamurti uses simile to convey the true horror of what the picture represents and enjambment to mimic the speaker’s train of thought and to emphasise certain words and phrases.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
The representation of war | The metaphor of the frame is used in two ways:
| By linking pictures with people’s responses, the poem connects objects with people’s actions:
|
The two descriptions in the second and third stanzas are connected:
| The juxtaposition of these two images, and the contrast between them, emphasises the theme of injustice:
| |
The horror of conflict | The enjambment used throughout the poem reflects the speaker’s thought patterns as they move from one subject to another:
| Connecting the happy image of the young women with the image of the young girl shows that the speaker cannot escape her memories of the horror of war:
|
The simile in the final stanza connects the “hell” of war with the way it is misrepresented in the media:
| Connecting the representation of war with war itself emphasises two things:
|
Language
Satyamurti uses a range of language techniques to alter the tone of the poem around the subject that the speaker is narrating. The sounds of the language also contribute to the contrast and the connections between the comforting and the tragic pictures the speaker discusses.
Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
The representation of war | The poem employs alliteration and assonance in the description of the two young women:
| The combination of alliteration and assonance in this description makes it seem happy and unchallenging:
|
The poem also uses sibilance in the descriptions of both the giggling girls and the war zone:
| The sibilance in these two descriptions connects them with each other:
| |
The horror of conflict
| The poem employs harsh plosive sounds to emphasise the horror of the war zone:
| The harsh, jagged language used to describe the street and the young girl conveys the sounds of war:
|
Sibilance is also used in the third stanza to convey discomfort:
| The sibilance of this line adds to the tone of unease in the stanza:
|
Context
Context can offer important insights into the poem, but avoid using random pieces of information about Satyamurti or her historical context. Aim to combine contextual information with your analysis of the poem's themes to demonstrate your understanding of Satyamurti’s ideas and message. In 'War Photographer', the main focus is on the representation and horror of war, so this section is bullet-pointed under the following themes:
The representation of war
The horror of conflict
The representation of war
Carole Satyamurti (1939–2019) was a British poet, sociologist and translator
She taught at the University of East London and the Tavistock Clinic:
Her work in both places focused on the stories people tell about themselves
She used ideas from psychoanalysis to understand people’s stories
Satyamurti’s interest in psychoanalysis can be seen in her presentation of her speaker’s experience in ‘War Photographer’:
Although the speaker’s tone is precise and observational, the language she uses is often emotive and evocative
Satyamurti reveals the feelings beneath the surface of the speaker’s account, just like psychoanalysis aims to reveal a person’s subconscious feelings
In the same way, she reveals the truth beneath the surface of the picture
War photographers photograph armed conflicts and their effects on people and places:
They often work in very dangerous situations, and are sometimes injured or killed in the process of taking photographs
The tradition of war photography is that war photographers should be neutral observers:
That means they should not influence what they are photographing
This is shown in ‘War Photographer’ when the speaker doesn’t help the girl or the baby
Journalists and photographers who work in areas of conflict are protected by international law:
However, they are sometimes targeted by combatants to prevent photographic evidence being shared publicly in the media
In ‘War Photographer’, the facts are misrepresented by the media, creating a further level of injustice in the conflict
The horror of conflict
Satyamurti’s poetry often deals with painful subjects in a very direct way:
Her subjects include cancer, death and war
One of her main themes is the fragility of human life
Her poems also address the way that suffering affects people as individuals
‘War Photographer’ therefore combines many of her interests as a poet
When ‘War Photographer’ was written in 1987, several major wars and conflicts were going on in the world:
One of these was the Iran-Iraq war of 1980–1988
The Soviet-Afghan War of 1979–1989 was also in progress
The Lebanon War of 1982 happened just before Satyamurti wrote ‘War Photographer’
Satyamurti was aware that, while the UK was not involved in any wars at the time, people in other countries were experiencing terrible suffering:
Instead of presenting a poem about war in general, she chose to present war from the perspective of a war photographer
The details seen by the war photographer reveal the individual suffering caused by war and conflict
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You can use your knowledge of contexts to enrich your analysis of the themes and ideas Satyamurti presents in 'War Photographer'. However, in your response, you should aim to show your understanding of the relationship between the poem and its context.
The key word in the task will identify the relevant context. Satyamurti’s themes, such as the representation or the horror of war, should be central to your argument, and you should only use contextual information to support your analysis.
What to compare it to
In your exam, you will be asked to compare the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. That means it’s a good idea to revise pairs of poems together, in order to understand how each poet presents their ideas about conflict. This will enable you to write a thorough analysis of their similarities and differences. In 'War Photographer', Satyamurti's main themes are the representation of war and the horror of conflict, so the following comparisons would be a good starting point:
'War Photographer' and 'What Were They Like?’
'War Photographer' and 'Belfast Confetti’
For each pair of poems, you will find:
The comparison in a nutshell
Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Your comparison of 'War Photographer' with another poem from the anthology should show your in-depth understanding of both poems. Therefore, it’s important that you have a thorough knowledge of all the poems, rather than just memorising a series of quotations. Your response should focus on the themes of each poem and compare how Satyamurti uses language, form and structure with the methods used by other writers.
Make sure your response is a comparison of the named poem and one other poem in the anthology. If you only write about the poem given on the paper, you will only achieve half the marks available. A comparison of two poems that demonstrates your thorough understanding of both will achieve the highest marks. For instance, you could compare how Denise Levertov and Satyamurti explore the representation of war, or how Satyamurti and Ciaran Carson present the horror of conflict.
'War Photographer' and ‘What Were They Like?'
Comparison in a nutshell:
These poems give you the opportunity to compare two different approaches to the way that conflict is represented. Satyamurti focuses on how conflict can be misrepresented, while Levertov depicts the representation of a war after it has happened. Both poems explore the way that truth can be distorted or concealed, and each poet uses both similar and different techniques to get their message across.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems contain angry critiques of the misrepresentation of war | |
Evidence and analysis | 'War Photographer' | 'What Were They Like?' |
Satyamurti critiques the way that people choose to remain ignorant about the reality of war:
| Levertov also critiques ignorance about the true consequences of war for the Vietnamese people:
| |
The truth of the conflict is conveyed in harsh language:
| Harsh language is also used to convey the truth about the conflict:
| |
Satyamurti reveals the way in which reality is concealed by false representations of the war:
| Levertov also illustrates the way that the reality of the war is concealed in its aftermath:
| |
The ending of the poem shows how the truth about war can be distorted:
| The final line of the poem shows how unreliable representations of war can be:
| |
Satyamurti and Levertov both criticise people’s deliberate ignorance about the reality of war, and both poems reveal the truth that has been obscured by misrepresentation and oppression |
Differences:
Topic sentence | The poems both address the representation of war, but use different structures, voices and descriptive techniques to do so | |
Evidence and analysis | 'War Photographer' | 'What Were They LIke?' |
Satyamurti’s poem is a dramatic monologue, which is narrated in the first person:
| Levertov’s poem is a dialogue, with the second speaker providing answers to questions asked by the third speaker:
| |
The structure of the poem is cyclical:
| The structure of the poem is linear:
| |
The violence of war is referred to indirectly in the poem:
| The speaker refers very directly to the violence of the war in this poem:
| |
Satyamurti uses a direct style and metaphorical descriptions of the effects of war, while Levertov uses an indirect form of narration and direct descriptions of the physical realities of the conflict |
'War Photographer' and 'Belfast Confetti'
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both poems explore their speakers’ experiences of conflict as witnesses who have been involved in a violent event. Both poems address the horror of the violence they witness and the way that ordinary life is torn apart by conflict. Both are angry poems, but while Carson focuses on the immediate effects of violent conflict on his speaker, Satyamurti’s poem addresses the misrepresentation of the horror of war.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems convey the horror of war and the reactions of those who witness it directly | |
Evidence and analysis | 'War Photographer' | 'Belfast Confetti' |
The setting for this poem is “some devastated street” in a city:
| The setting for this poem is also a city street:
| |
Satyamurti’s speaker is trying to represent the horror of the scene she is witnessing:
| Carson’s speaker is trying to describe the horror of his experience:
| |
Satyamurti uses plosives and harsh-sounding language to describe the devastation of the explosion:
| Carson also uses hard plosives and jagged language to convey the harshness of the violence:
| |
The ending of the poem shows how the horror of the conflict has affected the speaker’s perception:
| The ending of the poem shows how the horror of the conflict has affected the speaker’s perception of himself:
| |
Both Satyamurti and Carson illustrate the terror of war and show the way in which it changes their speakers’ perceptions of reality |
Differences:
Topic sentence | Although both poems convey the horror of conflict, their speakers differ in their situations and responses | |
Evidence and analysis | 'War Photographer' | 'Belfast Confetti' |
The speaker is a war photographer who has put herself in the situation deliberately:
| The speaker is a bystander who is accidentally caught up the sudden violence:
| |
Satyamurti’s speaker is able to record an image just before the bomb goes off:
| Carson’s speaker tries to record his responses, but finds it impossible:
| |
Satyamurti’s speaker is angry about the way the horror she has witnessed is misrepresented:
| Carson’s speaker also conveys his anger, but for a different reason:
| |
Satyamurti’s speaker is a professional witness who is angry about the misrepresentation of the horrors she has seen, while Carson’s speaker is angry about being a victim of a horrifying situation that he remains trapped in |
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?