Poppies (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
‘Poppies’
Your GCSE poetry anthology contains 15 poems, and in your exam question you will be given one poem – printed in full – and asked to compare this printed poem to another. As this is a closed-book exam, you will not have access to the second poem, so you will have to know it from memory. Fifteen poems is a lot to revise. However, understanding four things will enable you to produce a top-grade response:
The meaning of the poem and the story it tells
The ideas and messages the poet wanted to convey
How the poet uses poetic techniques to convey their ideas and messages
How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas and themes of other poems in the anthology
Below is a guide to Jane Weir’s poem 'Poppies', from the Conflict anthology. It includes:
Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam
The poem has been taken from Pearson Edexcel’s poetry anthology, the full version of which can be found here.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In your exam, you may be asked to compare 'Poppies' with another poem from your Conflict anthology. Your comparison should focus on the way each writer presents their ideas about conflict. They may be depicting a personal conflict, or an armed conflict, or – as in this poem – the impact of conflict on the people left behind.
If the poem printed on your exam paper is 'Poppies', you should start by stating which poem you’re going to compare it to. For instance, you could compare 'Poppies' with another poem that focuses on suffering, such as Wilfred Owen’s ‘Exposure’, or one that explores what happens to the survivors of war, like Denise Levertov’s ‘What Were They Like?’ Look at the “What to compare it to” section below for detailed suggestions about comparing 'Poppies' with other poems in the anthology.
Overview
In order to answer an essay question on any poem, it is vital that you understand what it is about. This section includes:
The poem in a nutshell
An explanation of the poem, section-by-section
A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Weir's intention and message
'Poppies' in a nutshell
'Poppies' was written by the poet Jane Weir in 2005 to raise awareness of the sacrifices made by British soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq. Weir’s poem 'Poppies' presents the sacrifices made by the soldiers and their families to highlight the wide-reaching impact of conflict. Just before Armistice Sunday, a mother remembers her son, who has died in a conflict. She recalls the last time she saw him, visits the local war memorial, and expresses her feelings of loss.
'Poppies' breakdown
Lines 1–2
“Three days before Armistice Sunday
and poppies had already been placed”
Explanation
The poem begins by referencing Armistice Sunday, which is used to remember those lost in conflict
Poppies are used to remember the day peace was declared at the end of World War I
Weir’s intention
Weir begins the poem by alerting readers to the theme of conflict and remembrance as the poem focuses on remembering those who fell in battle
Lines 3–6
“on individual war graves. Before you left,
I pinned one onto your lapel, crimped petals,
spasms of paper red, disrupting a blockade
of yellow bias binding around your blazer.”
Explanation
Weir refers to an event of commemoration; here she highlights the image of each soldier’s grave
The theme of remembrance is continued as the speaker reflects on the day her loved one left for war, describing in vivid detail her memory of pinning a poppy on his collar
Weir’s intention
Weir’s speaker addresses her son directly:
The change in tone moves from the generic to the personal to highlight how war affects individuals
Weir’s first-person voice conveys the feelings of the loved ones of fallen soldiers:
This raises awareness of the consequences of war for those left behind
Weir makes these lines personal to highlight the intimacy of a parent-child relationship
Lines 7–9
“Sellotape bandaged around my hand,
I rounded up as many white cat hairs
as I could, smoothed down your shirt's
upturned collar,-”
Explanation
The speaker remembers little details that reflect typical behaviour between a parent and child
She makes reference to everyday, familiar activities, such as using sticky tape to stick stray cat hairs from a jacket, to represent the small, everyday acts of love performed by a parent
Weir’s intention
Remembering moments before the child went off to war evokes feelings of sentimentality and nostalgia
The poem narrates familiar memories in order to show the effects of personal loss after a soldier’s death:
This illustrates the impact that war has on individuals who have not been combatants
Lines 9–14
“-steeled the softening
of my face. I wanted to graze my nose
across the tip of your nose, play at
being Eskimos like we did when
you were little.”
Explanation
Here, the speaker hides her powerful emotions: “steeled the softening”:
To “steel” yourself is to make yourself strong and determined against a challenge
“Softening” refers to tender emotion
The speaker refers to a personal moment shared when her son was young:
An Eskimo kiss is a term used to describe touching noses, an affectionate gesture
Weir’s intention
These lines convey a tone of nostalgia in an emotional, free-flowing memory
The speaker indicates the tension of the parent containing her emotion with the words “steeled” and “softening”:
Here, Weir alludes to the powerlessness of parents after a son’s death in conflict
This suggests the parent’s desire to protect her child from the parent’s pain, alluding to self-sacrifice made by parents during war
The speaker remembers physical moments of love and intimacy:
This once again uses images of childhood to evoke empathy
Lines 14–18
“I resisted the impulse
to run my fingers through the gelled
blackthorns of your hair. All my words
flattened, rolled, turned into felt,
slowly melting. I was brave, as I walked”
Explanation
The speaker contains her urge – “resisted the impulse” – to run her fingers through her son’s hair, like she did when he was little, because her son is now grown up
She refers to missing physical moments between parent and child
She refers, symbolically, to their past words as folded up and compressed
She describes the son’s childhood as “melting” and disappearing as he leaves
Weir’s intention
These lines present a sense of the parent’s powerlessness when the son is gone:
Her past words are compared with material being flattened and rolled up, suggesting they are now pointless
Weir uses the adjective “brave” to show the challenge of letting a son go:
This subverts the stereotypical image of a brave soldier by describing a brave parent, thus showing a different perspective
Lines 19–22
“with you, to the front door, threw
it open, the world overflowing
like a treasure chest. A split second
and you were away, intoxicated.”
Explanation
The speaker describes the emotional and dramatic moment when the son leaves
The speaker uses the image of a treasure chest to indicate the son’s hope for adventure
The word “intoxicated” has a double meaning:
It could refer to the son’s excitement to leave
This links with “split second”, showing the son’s desperation to go
However, “intoxicated” by war could also suggest that patriotism is poisonous
Weir’s intention
These lines depict the excitement and pace of the moment the son leaves
Weir shows the innocent excitement of the soldier:
Here, Weir may be implying that patriotism is a naive concept
Weir compares the way the son sees his future with a treasure chest:
This reflects the son’s attitude, not the parent’s, highlighting the opposing experiences of the parent and the child
Weir could be criticising the effect of war propaganda on young people
Lines 23–26
“After you'd gone I went into your bedroom,
released a song bird from its cage.
Later a single dove flew from the pear tree,
and this is where it has led me,”
Explanation
The speaker uses a metaphor of a song bird released to symbolise letting go of the son, despite the joy (represented by the song) he brings her
A dove appears after a period of time, which she follows because there is nothing else for her to do now her son is gone
Weir’s intention
The poem separates the lines with a full-stop to divide the “before” and the “after” of life with their son:
This suggests the parent’s life changed completely after the son’s death
The metaphor of a dove alludes to peace, perhaps signifying the parent’s hope for peace, and that the son would return:
Weir gives an implicit message about war, showing a parent hoping for peace
Lines 27–29
“skirting the church yard walls, my stomach busy
making tucks, darts, pleats, hat-less, without
a winter coat or reinforcements of scarf, gloves.”
Explanation
The poet uses the semantic field of clothes-making to compare it with parenthood, perhaps related to the creation of something new
The speaker describes the unsettling, physical feelings in her stomach, metaphorically comparing it to folding material
The lack of warm clothing is described using a military term, “reinforcements”:
This term refers to back-up personnel sent to increase the strength of an army
Weir’s intention
The broken rhythm of these lines creates an unsettled tone, signifying the parent’s emotions:
This conveys Weir’s message about the impact of grief on soldiers’ parents
The list relating to clothing suggests a sense of being overwhelmed by the physical discomfort of grief:
The words “tucks, darts, pleats” suggest a restriction of material
This reflects the way that the speaker has to restrict her feelings to make them bearable
The speaker’s use of military terminology ironically implies the parent’s lack of strength and support without the son:
It applies ideas of military strength to a parent’s feelings
Lines 30–32
“On reaching the top of the hill I traced
the inscriptions on the war memorial,
leaned against it like a wishbone.”
Explanation
The speaker relates a sensory experience at the graveyard, going over writing on the war memorial with her finger
She compares the way she leans against the memorial to a wishbone, which is known for its connections with good luck
Weir’s intention
The speaker uses evocative imagery to highlight the commemoration of soldiers:
This evokes empathy, raising awareness of the parental grief caused by conflict
The speaker compares her bent body to a curved bone symbolising good luck:
Weir shows the parent’s physical pain and frustrated wishes
The ironic use of a symbol connected with luck suggests a cynical tone
Lines 33–35
“The dove pulled freely against the sky,
an ornamental stitch. I listened, hoping to hear
your playground voice catching on the wind.”
Explanation
The speaker uses the image of a stitch coming loose to symbolise how the image of their son is coming apart in their mind
The speaker listens for his voice, remembering him as a child
Weir’s intention
Weir’s metaphorical description of a stitch coming loose continues the semantic field of clothes-making used in the poem to symbolise parenthood:
This conveys the parent’s feelings of loss and frustration, perhaps that her son died without reaching his potential
Weir leaves the parent stuck in the past, unable to resolve her grief:
This ends the poem with a lack of resolution, and suggests the parent will always mourn her son
Weir alludes to the inevitability of war, and of the resulting grief
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Your exam question will ask you to compare how poets present ideas about conflict in the poem given to you on the exam paper and one other from your Conflict anthology. It is therefore a good idea to begin your answer using the wording of the question and summarising what the poem tells us about the nature of conflict. This demonstrates that you have understood the poem and the poet’s intention. For example, “Weir presents negative ideas about conflict and its effects in 'Poppies' by showing the personal perspective of a parent grieving their son’s death due to war. Similar themes can be found in…”
Writer’s methods
This section is split into three separate areas: form, structure and language. It is crucial to link these technical areas of Weir's writing together, in order to understand how she is presenting her ideas and why she has made the choices she has. Think about how Weir's language, structure and form contribute to her theme and message in 'Poppies’.
Focusing on the poet’s main ideas, rather than individual poetic techniques, will gain you far more marks. Crucially, in the section below, all analysis is arranged by theme, and includes Weir’s intentions behind her choices in terms of:
Form
Structure
Language
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The last thing examiners want to see is what they call “technique spotting”. This is when students use sophisticated terminology unnecessarily, without explaining their analysis. Just knowing the names of sophisticated techniques will not gain you any more marks
Aim to discuss how Weir uses poetic methods to make her meaning clearer and more effective. So, instead of writing “Weir uses enjambment”, you could state that “Weir’s use of enjambment reflects the speaker’s free-flowing thought processes”, then give an example.
Form
The poem is a first-person dramatic monologue written in blank verse. The speaker, the parent, uses the second person to directly address her son, in order to depict her personal experience of grief and highlight a different perspective on conflict.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Remembrance | A dramatic monologue typically takes on the emotional qualities of a character’s speech, sometimes addressing a listener:
| The emotive monologue conveys the parent’s grief when she remembers her son:
directly addresses a soldier, her son, which emphasises strong feelings of loss |
Structure
The poem follows a time sequence that depicts the experience of the parent at the graveside of her son. As time progresses, the rhythm changes, along with the narrator’s emotions, which reflect the complex nature of her grief.
Theme | Evidence | Poet's intention |
Suffering and powerlessness due to conflict | The narrative structure leads the reader through a sequence of events:
| Weir takes the reader on a personal and intimate journey alongside a grieving parent at their son’s graveside:
|
The enjambment throughout the poem reflects the free-flowing rhythm of the speaker as they remember their son as a child | This rhythm is typical of a stream of consciousness which reflects a personal memory, evoking empathy from the reader
| |
In lines 11, 14, 16, 18 and 21 a caesura breaks the line:
| This causes a change in tone:
| |
At the end of the poem, the speaker and the reader are left at the graveside:
| This lack of resolution suggests the inevitability of grief due to conflict:
|
Language
Weir weaves imagery connoting the comfort of home and family through the poem to describe the emotional suffering of a parent’s grief due to conflict. She contrasts this with brutal imagery related to injury and war to highlight the connections.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
Loss of home and family comfort | The poem uses the extended metaphor of clothes-making:
| The metaphorical comparison of raising a child with making clothes is used to convey the frustrated and painful emotions linked to the ending of the project:
|
The speaker uses military terms alongside domestic images:
| Weir contrasts domestic imagery with brutal images related to war:
| |
Weir uses imagery related to injury and war:
| These images convey the violence of war:
| |
Weir describes personal moments:
| The sensory and physical imagery evoke empathy in the reader:
| |
Sacrifice | The metaphor of a bird released and a dove leading to the graveside represents the parent’s son and the idea of peace | Weir’s use of a symbol of peace in a poem about Armistice Sunday comments on the way that war destroys peace:
|
The speaker refers to the bravery required by a parent whose son goes to war | The reference to the bravery of a parent rather than the soldier subverts ideas related to the glorification of war | |
Weir uses sibilance and oxymoron together to highlight the parent’s pain:
| Weir’s oxymoron alludes to self-sacrifice of a parent:
|
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Try not to separate “language”, “form” and “structure” into three separate elements. To achieve top marks, you need to include an integrated comparison of the themes and ideas in this and the other poems in the anthology, and focus on the relevance of the methods used by the poet to how they get their message across.
That means it’s better to structure your answer around an exploration of the ideas and themes in the poems, commenting on the elements of language, form or structure that contribute to the presentation of these themes, rather than simply listing all of the key methods you think should be covered when writing about poetry.
Context
Context is important, but examiners don’t want to see random chunks of information about Weir's life or the war in Afghanistan, because those don’t demonstrate your understanding of the poem itself. Instead, aim to use contextual information in combination with your analysis of Weir's message and ideas. In 'Poppies', her main focus is the loss experienced by parents of soldiers killed in conflicts and the often conflicting effects of the act of remembrance. This section has therefore been divided into two relevant themes that Weir explores:
Loss due to conflict
Conflict and remembrance
Loss due to conflict
Weir grew up in Ireland during the conflicts of the 1980s, exposing her to the consequences of war on home and family:
This could be why she chose to show the perspective of a grieving parent in 'Poppies'
Carol Ann Duffy, Poet Laureate of the United Kingdom between 2009 and 2019, asked Weir to contribute a poem to an anthology which raised awareness of the deaths and suffering of soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan:
This highlights the impact of conflict on individuals left behind, particularly parents
Armistice Day is mentioned in the poem to connect ideas of conflict and peace:
Armistice Day commemorates the peace agreement signed at the end of World War I
Weir’s poem begins by referring to an event that traditionally commemorates conflict and the end of conflict
However, Weir connects the idea of peace with the painful memory of a dead son
Weir’s poem goes on to show a parent alone at a graveside:
This highlights the individual experience of remembrance and loss due to conflict
Conflict and remembrance
Weir uses the symbol of poppies as they represent remembrance of those killed in war:
Small artificial poppies are pinned on collars in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand in the lead up to Remembrance Sunday/Armistice Day
The practice of wearing poppies to commemorate the war dead started in 1921, when the money raised was used to help the families of fallen soldiers
The poppy as a symbol of remembrance was inspired by the World War I poem ‘In Flanders Fields’, which describes how poppies grew in the fields where soldiers died:
The red of the poppies also represents the blood spilled on the battlefields
On Remembrance Sunday, people are silent for two minutes to remember the soldiers killed in World War I and conflicts since then:
Across the UK, people gather at their local war memorial to lay wreaths in remembrance of local people who have died in conflicts
The events that take place on Remembrance Sunday commemorate the war dead as heroes:
This provides a possible reason why the speaker’s son is “intoxicated” about the idea of fighting in a war: he is excited by the idea of being a hero
Weir titles her poem 'Poppies' to raise awareness of the theme of remembrance:
The experience of remembering, however, is shown to be painful and powerfully emotive, raising awareness of the suffering caused by conflict
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember, AO3 is only worth up to 6 marks (out of 25) for this question. However, demonstrating your knowledge of contexts is a great way to enrich your analysis of the themes and ideas Weir presents in 'Poppies'. In your response, aim to show your understanding of the relationship between the poem and its context.
However, avoid including information about Weir’s life or the war in Afghanistan without connecting it to the themes of the poem, as that will not gain you marks. The key word in the task will give you an idea of the relevant context. Weir’s themes, such as the loss and grief caused by conflict, should be central to your argument, and you should only use contextual information to support your analysis.
What to compare it to
In your exam, you will be asked to compare the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. That means it’s a good idea to revise pairs of poems together, in order to understand how each poet presents their ideas about conflict. This will enable you to write a thorough analysis of their similarities and differences. Given that 'Poppies' explores the ideas of the loss due to conflict and powerlessness due to conflict, the following comparisons are the most appropriate:
'Poppies' and ‘What Were They Like?’
'Poppies' and ‘Exposure’
For each pair of poems, you will find:
The comparison in a nutshell
Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Your comparison of 'Poppies' with another poem from the anthology should show your in-depth understanding of both poems. You will need to compare how Weir uses language, form and structure to present her themes with the methods used by other writers. Therefore, it’s important that you have a thorough knowledge of all the poems, rather than just memorising a series of quotations.
Make sure your response is a comparison of the named poem and one other poem in the anthology. If you only write about the poem given on the paper, you will only achieve half the marks available. Writing a comparison of two poems that demonstrates your thorough understanding of both of them will achieve the highest marks. For instance, you could compare Weir's and Denise Levertov’s presentations of loss, or how Wilfred Owen and Weir explore the powerlessness of those left behind.
'Poppies' and ‘What Were They Like?’
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both 'Poppies' and ‘What Were They Like?’ portray loss due to conflict and present the perspectives of the people left behind. Both poems explore ideas related to the deaths of loved ones and show how these losses in particular can lead to a sense of powerlessness. While Weir’s poem focuses on the individual loss of a beloved child, Levertov shows how the loss of many in a conflict can result in a whole nation’s disempowerment.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems show the effects of loss on family members due to conflict | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Poppies' | ‘What Were They Like?’ |
In 'Poppies' the poet shows the effect of loss on those left behind:
| Similarly, ‘What Were They Like?’ shows the tragic losses caused by conflict:
| |
Weir uses enjambment to present a parent’s emotional and evocative stream of consciousness:
| Levertov also uses enjambment as the speaker tries to describe the suffering experienced by the Vietnamese people:
| |
'Poppies' uses sensory imagery to describe intimate moments of the parent-and-son relationship when the speaker’s son was a child:
| ‘What Were They Like?’ also uses images of family intimacy to emphasise the depth of the loss:
| |
The pain of loss is presented in both poems by exploring the memories and perspectives of the people left behind. This technique builds empathy in the reader and conveys the emotional impact of conflict on family life |
Topic sentence | Both poets represent powerlessness of those involved in conflict | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Poppies' | ‘What Were They Like?’ |
The powerlessness of a parent in the face of grief is expressed in 'Poppies’ through the reflective tone of a dramatic monologue:
| ‘What Were They Like?’ also explores the powerlessness of the survivors, but it uses a third-person perspective:
| |
Weir represents the parent’s powerlessness to be with her son, again using sensory imagery:
| Levertov also represents the continuing suffering of the Vietnamese people:
| |
Although different perspectives and forms of address are used in each poem, both illustrate clearly the disempowerment of people – individuals and whole nations – who survive violent conflict |
Differences:
Topic sentence | Both poems convey the suffering caused by conflict, but their subjects and the techniques they use are different | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Poppies' | ‘What Were They Like?’ |
In 'Poppies', the parent suggests the son was innocent to the realities of war:
| In ‘What Were They Like’, there is no suggestion that the Vietnamese are anything other than innocent victims:
| |
The parent describes her son as “intoxicated” with war:
| The speaker describes the Vietnamese people and culture as destroyed by war:
| |
Weir evokes grief and loss using indirect methods, such as metaphor:
| Levertov uses more direct, visual imagery to convey grief and loss:
| |
Weir shows the effects of war on an individual level and uses techniques that evoke loss, while Levertov illustrates how conflict has destroyed a whole society and uses techniques that illustrate this visually |
Examiner Tips and Tricks
It’s a good idea to outline your choice of second poem in your introduction, then give a clear overview of the main themes in both poems. You can then use the themes to move between the two poems and provide evidence to illustrate your points.
However, you may prefer to focus on the main poem on your exam paper first, then link ideas in the second poem back to it. You should choose whichever structure suits you best, as long as your analysis is detailed and your arguments about both texts are well-developed.
'Poppies' and ‘Exposure’
Comparison in a nutshell:
These poems give you the opportunity to compare two different presentations of the loss, suffering and disempowerment of conflict. ‘Poppies’ explores the feelings of someone who has lost their son in a war, while ‘Exposure’ illustrates the feelings of soldiers who are trapped in a situation of conflict. Both poems focus on the meaninglessness of war and the trauma it causes. However, while Weir addresses the feelings of an individual in the aftermath of a war, Owen conveys the experience of a group of soldiers on the front line.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems illustrate the extreme suffering, loss and sense of futility caused by conflict | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Poppies' | ‘Exposure’ |
The poem focuses on the way that conflict has deprived the speaker of any sense of comfort:
| This poem also focuses on the way that the soldiers have been deprived of any comfort:
| |
Weir uses natural imagery to convey her speaker’s sense of loss:
| Owen also uses natural imagery to convey the soldiers’ suffering:
| |
The speaker’s memories of happier times emphasise her present suffering:
| The soldiers also remember the “kind fires” of home:
| |
Weir shows the futility of war and misplaced patriotism:
| Owen also shows the futility of war:
| |
Weir conveys her speaker’s isolation using visual imagery:
| Owen also conveys the soldiers’ isolation:
| |
Although their situations are different, the speakers in both poems experience the same feelings of isolation, misery and futility |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While both poems present the suffering and disempowerment of conflict, Weir focuses on the experience of one person, while Owen’s speaker conveys the experience of a group of people | |
Evidence and analysis | 'Poppies' | ‘Exposure’ |
Weir presents the experience and reflections of an individual who has experienced a terrible loss | Owen presents the collective experience of a group of soldiers who are enduring appalling conditions | |
Weir uses the form of blank verse to mimic her speaker’s thought processes:
| Owen uses a regular, structured verse form to represent the soldiers’ experience:
| |
‘Poppies’ depicts the way that her speaker’s loss has led to her sense of powerlessness as a survivor | ‘Exposure’ shows how war disempowers the soldiers who are fighting it | |
The poem is set in a domestic context:
| This poem is set in a military context:
| |
Weir’s poem explores the powerlessness of a survivor, while Owen’s poem illustrates the powerlessness of soldiers who are still trapped in the conflict |
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Sign up now. It’s free!
Did this page help you?