No Problem (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)
Revision Note
No Problem
Your Edexcel GCSE English Literature Conflict Anthology includes 15 poems. In the poetry question in the exam you will be given one poem on the paper – printed in full – and asked to compare this given poem to one other from the anthology. As this is a “closed book” exam, you will not have access to the other poems, so you will have to know them very well from memory. Fifteen poems is a lot to learn. However, understanding four things about each poem will enable you to produce a top-mark response:
The meaning of the poem
The ideas and messages the poet wanted to convey
How the poet conveys these ideas and messages through their methods
How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas and themes of other poems in the anthology
This revision guide to Benjamin Zephaniah’s 'No Problem', from the Conflict Anthology, includes:
Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In your exam, you may be asked to compare 'No Problem' with another poem from your Conflict Anthology. When you compare poems, you should focus on the way each writer presents their ideas about conflict. The conflict they depict may be a military conflict, or a personal conflict between two people, or a wider social conflict, like racism.
If the poem printed on your exam paper is 'No Problem', you should start by stating which poem you’re going to compare it to. For instance, you could compare 'No Problem' with another poem that focuses on racism, like John Agard's 'Half-caste'. Start by introducing the similarities and differences you intend to focus on. The section below on “What to compare it to” offers detailed suggestions about how to compare 'No Problem' with other poems in the anthology.
Overview
To answer an essay question on any poem, you need to be confident that you understand what it is about. This section includes:
The poem in a nutshell
An explanation of the poem, stanza-by-stanza
A commentary of each of these stanzas, outlining Zephaniah's intention and message
'No Problem' in a nutshell
'No Problem' is about Zephaniah’s personal experience of racism, and is written from a first-person perspective. The poem explores the racial discrimination and abuse the speaker (who represents Zephaniah) has encountered in his life. The speaker details the way that teachers and other students behaved in a prejudiced way. However, he makes it clear that he is “not de problem”; racial prejudice is the real problem. The speaker demonstrates his ability to overcome racist abuse by focusing on his strengths, such as being “versatile”. Finally, he acknowledges that he may have been psychologically damaged by the racism he’s experienced, but that this is not going to affect his whole outlook on life.
'No Problem' breakdown
Lines 1–4
“I am not de problem
But I bear de brunt
Of silly playground taunts
An racist stunts,”
Explanation
The speaker asserts that he is not the problem
However, he suffers the effects (“bear the brunt”) of being mocked (“taunts”) in the playground and having racist “stunts”, or tricks, played on him
Zephaniah's intention
Opening the poem with the speaker’s main assertion – that he is “not de problem” – makes it clear that there is a problem
This line is a repeated refrain in the first stanza, emphasising the fact that people with racist views are the problem, not the speaker
The following lines clarify the nature of the problem: the racist abuse he suffers at school
The use of formal English – “I am not” – suggests the speaker’s anger and his desire to get his point across to those who are responsible for the abuse
The use of dialect – “de” instead of “the” – emphasises the speaker’s distinct identity as a person of Caribbean heritage
Lines 5–8
“I am not de problem
I am born academic
But dey got me on de run
Now I am branded athletic”
Explanation
The speaker repeats that he is not the problem
He has always been naturally intellectual, but his teachers – “dey” – make him do running
Now, he is stereotyped as “athletic”
Zephaniah's intention
The repeated refrain “I am not de problem” introduces another way in which the racism of other people is the real problem
The speaker is “born academic”, meaning that thinking is a natural part of his personality
However, the teachers at his school display racial prejudice by making him run instead:
Their behaviour plays into racist stereotypes of Black men and boys being “naturally” good at sports
The result is that the speaker’s real strengths are ignored and not valued
The verb “branded” demonstrates the negative effects of this stereotyping and lack of choice:
“Branded” evokes slavery, as Black slaves were branded by white slave owners
The overall meaning of these lines is “don’t judge a person by the colour of their skin”
Lines 9–12
“I am not de problem
If yu give I a chance
I can teach yu of Timbuktu
I can do more dan dance,”
Explanation
The speaker repeats that he is not the problem
If people gave him a chance, he could teach them about Timbuktu
He can do more than stereotypes of Black people (such as being good at dancing) suggest
Zephaniah's intention
The problem in these lines is shown to be further examples of racist stereotyping
The people around the speaker don’t give him the opportunity to show them how much he knows
“Timbuktu” is a symbolic choice of place to represent the speaker’s knowledge:
It’s a city that is famous for being a centre of learning and culture for hundreds of years
Zephaniah is making the point that his intelligence and knowledge are constantly underestimated because of his racial identity
The stereotype of Black people having “natural rhythm” and being good at dancing has been imposed on the speaker and shut him off from more intellectual pursuits
Lines 13–16
“I am not de problem
I greet yu wid a smile
Yu put me in a pigeon hole
But I am versatile”
Explanation
The speaker is not the problem; he has a positive attitude and smiles at people
However, people still stereotype him – “put me in a pigeon hole” – despite the fact that he is adaptable and multitalented (“versatile”)
Zephaniah's intention
These lines sum up the way the speaker has been treated and how he has responded
People try to “pigeonhole” him by making him do things that Black people are supposed to be good at, according to racist stereotypes
This has restricted him from doing what he’s actually good at:
“Pigeon hole” is a metaphor for the way the speaker has been boxed in by racist expectations
But it’s not just other people who do this; the line is addressed to “yu”, the reader
This makes us question our own views – do we also use stereotypes?
Despite all the ways he has been stereotyped, the speaker maintains his self-belief:
He knows he is “versatile” enough to overcome the restrictions other people have placed on him
Lines 17–24
“These conditions may affect me
As I get older,
An I am positively sure
I have no chips on me shoulders,
Black is not de problem
Mother country get it right
An juss fe de record,
Sum of me best friends are white.”
Explanation
The speaker feels that the negative effects of the racism he’s experienced may affect him later in life
However, he is absolutely certain he doesn’t hold any grudges or have a sense of inferiority to others
Black people are not the problem, but England gets that wrong and must try harder
Just for the record, some of the speaker’s best friends are white people
Zephaniah's intention
By acknowledging that the racism he’s experienced might affect him “As I get older”, the speaker recognises the traumatic nature of his experiences
However, he shows his resilience by stating that he has no “chips on my shoulders”:
He does not feel bitter or inferior to the people who have racially abused him
However, there is a sense that this idiom reflects back on his abusers:
Perhaps they are the ones with a sense of inferiority
The refrain returns with a slight change, from “I” to “Black”, expanding Zephaniah’s argument from the personal level to a wider social level:
The speaker is referring to stereotypical representations of Black people, historically and in the media, in order to challenge them
England is the speaker’s “Mother country”, which means it’s his home and he is a part of it, just as much as white people
The speaker demands “get it right” to show that racial attitudes in England are wrong and need fixing
The final statement can be read as the speaker stating that he has no resentment against white people for the abuse he’s suffered
However, it can also be read as sarcastic, because it’s an inversion of a typical (but problematic) assertion: “I can’t be racist – I have Black friends”:
This way of judging a whole group of people on the basis of knowing a few individuals creates stereotypes, so the speaker is echoing the stereotypical thinking he has encountered
The fact that Zephaniah ends the poem with a joke shows his ability to overcome the cruelty and restrictions of racial prejudice
It also undermines racism at a fundamental level by laughing at it
Writer's methods
This section is split into three separate areas: form, structure and language. It is crucial to link these technical areas of Zephaniah's writing together, in order to understand how he is presenting his ideas and why he has made the choices he has. Think about how Zephaniah's language, structure and form contribute to his theme and message in 'No Problem'.
You will gain far more marks by focusing on Zephaniah's themes than on individual poetic techniques. Therefore, the analysis in the following sections is arranged by theme, and examines the intentions behind Zephaniah's decisions about:
Form
Structure
Language
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The best way to discuss the technical aspects of poems, such as their form, structure and language, is to link your knowledge of them with the themes and ideas in the poem. That will enable you to demonstrate your understanding of how Zephaniah gets his meaning across.
Avoid identifying poetic techniques without linking them to the themes of 'No Problem'. You should aim to demonstrate your understanding of how Zephaniah uses form, structure and language to make his ideas clearer and more effective. For instance, instead of writing “Zephaniah uses alliteration”, you could state that “Zephaniah’s use of alliteration emphasises the sense of conflict in the poem”, then give an example.
Form
Benjamin Zephaniah is a dub poet, and 'No Problem' takes the form of a dub poem. Dub poetry developed out of dub reggae in the West Indies. It is a form of spoken-word poetry, which means it is written to be performed live. The strong rhythms and regular rhyme scheme of 'No Problem' emphasise these origins. 'No Problem' is split into two stanzas, each containing a series of regular quatrains. Dub poetry often focuses on issues of social conflict and injustice, and Zephaniah’s rejection of a series of Black stereotypes in 'No Problem' is typical of the form.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
The conflict of racism | The poem is split into two stanzas:
| In the first stanza, the speaker explores and rejects a series of different Black stereotypes:
In the second stanza, the speaker shows his strength and resilience:
|
Racism as division | The form of the poem mirrors its content:
| The speaker moves from examining examples of racism in the first stanza to reflecting on their effects in the second stanza:
|
Structure
The first stanza of 'No Problem' focuses on the speaker’s experiences of being subjected to racist abuse and stereotyping at school, and the second stanza reflects on how this has affected him. Zephaniah employs a regular ABCB rhyme scheme and an even beat, which drives the poem’s strong rhythm. Combined with Zephaniah’s use of repetition, phonetic spelling and direct address (to “yu”, the reader/listener), this makes the insistent tone of the poem match the urgency of its message about racism.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
The conflict of racism | The repetition of the phrase, “I am not de problem” conveys the theme and message of the poem:
| Zephaniah is showing that each of the situations his speaker describes is caused by other people’s racist perceptions of him:
|
Conflict and racial identity | While most of the rhyme scheme is consistent, some rhymes are not full ones:
| The use of subtle rhymes illustrates the gap between the speaker’s feelings and other people’s actions:
|
With few variations, there are three main beats in each line:
| The rhythm of the poem gives it a direct, speech-like quality:
He is also consciously rejecting traditional European forms of poetry in order to affirm his identity as a Black man with Jamaican heritage | |
The directness of the poem’s tone is emphasised by the use of “yu”:
| The use of direct address begins halfway through the first stanza, after the speaker has detailed their experiences at school:
|
Language
Zephaniah’s use of phonetic spelling, such as “de” and “yu”, reflects Afro-Caribbean speech patterns. His rejection of standard English expression illustrates his pride in his identity as a Black man and his determination to speak to ordinary people directly. He uses single words, such as “athletic”, to represent distinct racist attitudes and stereotypes. The sounds of his language, such as his use of alliteration, emphasises the emotions he is expressing, and adds to the speech-like qualities of the poem.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
The conflict of racism | The title of the poem clearly indicates a conflict, or “problem”, but it’s open to different interpretations | Zephaniah is indicating that the problem exists by referring to it repeatedly:
|
The use of phonetic spelling, such as “yu” and “de” reinforce a sense of the speaker’s identity | Zephaniah uses phonetic spelling to reflect his natural speech patterns:
| |
The poem uses single words to represent concepts and attitudes: For instance, “academic” signifies the speaker’s natural interest in intellectual subjects, while “athletic” signifies the expectations of his teachers that he will be “naturally” good at sports like running | By using single words to represent something much bigger, Zephaniah is inviting readers to “unpack”, or investigate, these terms:
| |
The conflict of racism is illustrated by oppositional language:
“Yu put me in a pigeon hole/But I am versatile”, the conflict is between the constriction of pigeonholing someone and their potential to break out of that constraint | Zephaniah maintains a positive tone for most of the poem, but he doesn’t avoid – or want his readers/listeners to forget – the conflict that lies at its heart:
| |
The poem uses alliteration and siblance to emphasise the conflict caused by racism | Zephaniah emphasises the speaker’s anger:
|
Context
Context is important, but examiners don’t want to see random chunks of information about Zephaniah's life or historical context, because those don’t demonstrate your understanding of the poem itself. Instead, aim to use contextual information in combination with your analysis of Zephaniah's message and ideas. In 'No Problem', Zephaniah’s main focus is racism and the way it has affected the development of his identity. Therefore, this section has been bullet-pointed under the following themes:
The conflict of racism
Conflict and racial identity
The conflict of racism
'No Problem' was published in 1996:
Like many of Zephaniah’s poems, it focuses on racial issues and the conflicts caused by racism
Zephaniah and his family, like many other immigrants from the Caribbean, encountered conflicts due to racism:
For instance, many immigrant families found it hard to find places to live because of racial prejudice against Black people
Black children’s education often suffered because of racism:
Racial prejudice meant that many teachers and schools thought Black children were less intelligent than white children
Black children were often stereotyped as being “naturally” good at sports and poor at academic study
This is one of the central themes Zephaniah addresses in ‘No Problem’
Conflict and racial identity
Benjamin Zephaniah was born in 1958 in Birmingham, UK
His father was from Barbados and his mother was Jamaican:
They came to England as part of the Windrush Generation in 1954
Zephaniah spent time in Jamaica while he was growing up
Zephaniah grew up listening to reggae and composed poetry from an early age
Despite his talent with words, he struggled at school as a Black teenager with dyslexia:
He was illiterate when he was expelled from school aged 14
He taught himself to read and write as an adult
Zephaniah writes about his direct experience of racism and prejudice:
He was very active politically throughout his life (he died in 2023)
He wanted his poetry to speak to ordinary people about their lives
This is reflected in Zephaniah’s use of phonetic spellings to give his poem a speech-like quality
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You should show your understanding of the relationship between the poem and its context in your response. Demonstrating your knowledge of contexts is a great way to enrich your analysis of the themes and ideas Zephaniah presents in 'No Problem'.
However, avoid including information about Zephaniah’s life or racism in the UK without connecting it to his ideas, as that will not gain you marks. Context comes from the key word in the task, so your answer should emphasise Zephaniah’s themes, such as racism or identity, and you should only use contextual information to support your analysis of them.
What to compare it to
Your exam response should compare the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. Therefore, you should aim to revise pairs of poems together, to understand how each poet presents their ideas about conflict in relation to the other poets in your anthology. In 'No Problem', Zephaniah's main themes are the conflict of racism and conflict and identity, so the following comparisons would be a good starting point:
'No Problem' and 'Half-caste'
'No Problem' and 'The Class Game'
For each pair of poems, you will find:
The comparison in a nutshell
Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Your comparison of 'No Problem' with another poem from the anthology should show your in-depth understanding of both poems. You will need to compare how Zephaniah uses language, form and structure to present his themes with the methods used by other writers. Therefore, it’s important that you have a thorough knowledge of all the poems, rather than just memorising a series of quotations.
Make sure your response is a comparison of the named poem and one other poem in the anthology. If you only write about the poem given on the paper, you will only achieve half the marks available. Writing a comparison of two poems that demonstrates your thorough understanding of both of them will achieve the highest marks. For instance, you could compare Zephaniah's and John Agard’s approaches to racism, or how Mary Casey and Zephaniah present the way in which prejudice affects their sense of identity.
'No Problem' and 'Half-caste'
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both poems address the writers’ experiences of racism, and both demonstrate that they are not the problem. However, Zephaniah’s poem uses more direct examples of his experience and ends on a positive note. Agard's poem focuses on a single, representative example of racist behaviour and ends as angrily as it began.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems illustrate their writers’ views about racism through specific examples, and both are clear about where the responsibility for racism lies | |
Evidence and analysis | 'No Problem' | 'Half-caste' |
Zephaniah tackles racism directly:
| Agard also addresses the issue of racism head-on:
| |
Zephaniah is clear about where the responsibility for racism lies:
| Agard is also clear about who is responsible for racism:
| |
The repetition in 'No Problem' shows the speaker’s refusal to accept responsibility for the racism of others:
| The repetition in 'Half-caste' conveys its confrontational tone very effectively:
| |
The poem uses phonetic spellings to achieve a speech-like sound and rhythm:
| The poem uses dialect spellings and words to produce a speech-like sound and rhythm:
| |
The speaker’s “I” and his multiple opponents – “yu”, and sometimes “dey” – are clearly in opposition:
| The conflict in the poem between the “I” of the speaker and the “yu” of his listener is very clear:
| |
Zephaniah avoids using much punctuation, relying on the sounds and rhythms of the poem to show where the pauses and stresses should be | Agard rejects conventional punctuation and spelling completely, which makes the form of the poem a statement about his own identity | |
Both poems take an confrontational approach to racism, identifying the source of the problem and celebrating their own identities |
Differences:
Topic sentence | Although both poems tackle the issue of racism directly, their approaches differ slightly in their focus, tone and humour | |
Evidence and analysis | 'No Problem' | 'Half-caste' |
Zephaniah’s humour is more direct and often relies on rhyme to emphasise his point:
| Agard’s humour is indirect and metaphorical, using a succession of analogies and satirical speculation:
| |
'No Problem' engages with a range of racist experiences over a longer period of time, from school days to adulthood | 'Half-caste' focuses on one racist term to illustrate the experience of racism and the case against it | |
The rhyme scheme in the poem is regular, with an ABCB structure, often using half-rhymes to illustrate the distance between the speaker and the people around him:
| While there is rhyme in the poem, it is irregular and works to emphasise certain words, usually for humorous effect:
| |
Zephaniah ends his poem on a fairly positive note:
| Agard ends his poem on a negative note:
| |
Zephaniah’s focus is varied, and he ends the poem on a positive, humorous note, while Agard's anger focuses on a single example of racism, and he maintains his angry, confrontational tone to the end of the poem |
'No Problem' and 'The Class Game'
Comparison in a nutshell:
This comparison gives you the opportunity to compare prejudices of two different kinds. Mary Casey’s 'The Class Game' focuses on class prejudice, while 'No Problem' is concerned with racial prejudice. Both poems use forms of direct address and repetition to explore the way that prejudice affects their speakers’ identities.
Similarities:
Topic sentence | Both poems interrogate how prejudice affects their sense of identity directly, and both use humour to make their case | |
Evidence and analysis | 'No Problem' | 'The Class Game' |
Zephaniah uses repetition to emphasise his theme and subject:
| Casey’s speaker also uses questions to challenge her listener:
| |
The poem has a regular rhyming scheme, and Zephaniah often uses rhyme for humorous effect:
| After her opening lines, Casey uses rhyming couplets to rhyme each statement, often for dramatic or humorous effect:
| |
Zephaniah focuses on several examples of the way racism has affected his identity:
| Casey’s poem also focuses on different examples of class prejudice, which she assembles to make her case:
| |
Zephaniah focuses on the way the speaker is seen by other people, as well as the way he feels about it:
| Casey also draws attention to the way her speaker is seen, as well as the way she sees others:
| |
'No Problem' uses Zephaniah's own Caribbean dialect and register to assert and celebrate his racial identity | 'The Class Game' employs Casey’s northern, working class dialect to establish her pride in her class identity | |
Both poems use techniques like repetition and rhyme to get their message across, and both use humour to critique prejudice |
Differences:
Topic sentence | While both poems address the way that prejudice affects identity, they focus on different types of prejudice and use different techniques | |
Evidence and analysis | 'No Problem' | 'The Class Game' |
Zephaniah focuses on racial prejudice and his racial identity as a Black British man with Jamaican heritage | Casey focuses on class prejudice and her class identity as a northern, working-class woman | |
The poem uses direct address, but also narrates events:
| The poem presents its argument in the form of a dramatic monologue:
| |
Zephaniah employs a fairly regular trimeter, which gives the poem a strong rhythmic quality:
| Casey’s lines are of different lengths with an irregular number of beats:
| |
Zephaniah uses single words to represent concepts and attitudes:
| Casey includes more detail in her descriptions of class prejudice:
| |
The poem ends with a demand for change:
| The poem ends with an assertion of identity:
| |
Zephaniah uses a range of poetic techniques to address racial identity and argue for change, while Casey addresses class identity in a more realistic way, and doesn’t call directly for change |
Last updated:
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?