No Problem (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)

Revision Note

Jen Davis

Written by: Jen Davis

Reviewed by: Kate Lee

No Problem

Your Edexcel GCSE English Literature Conflict Anthology includes 15 poems. In the poetry question in the exam you will be given one poem on the paper – printed in full – and asked to compare this given poem to one other from the anthology. As this is a “closed book” exam, you will not have access to the other poems, so you will have to know them very well from memory. Fifteen poems is a lot to learn. However, understanding four things about each poem will enable you to produce a top-mark response:

  • The meaning of the poem

  • The ideas and messages the poet wanted to convey

  • How the poet conveys these ideas and messages through their methods

  • How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas and themes of other poems in the anthology

This revision guide to Benjamin Zephaniah’s 'No Problem', from the Conflict Anthology, includes:

  • Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations

  • Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods

  • Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes

  • What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In your exam, you may be asked to compare 'No Problem' with another poem from your Conflict Anthology. When you compare poems, you should focus on the way each writer presents their ideas about conflict. The conflict they depict may be a military conflict, or a personal conflict between two people, or a wider social conflict, like racism. 

If the poem printed on your exam paper is 'No Problem', you should start by stating which poem you’re going to compare it to. For instance, you could compare 'No Problem' with another poem that focuses on racism, like John Agard's 'Half-caste'. Start by introducing the similarities and differences you intend to focus on. The section below on “What to compare it to” offers detailed suggestions about how to compare 'No Problem' with other poems in the anthology. 

Overview

To answer an essay question on any poem, you need to be confident that you understand what it is about. This section includes:

  • The poem in a nutshell

  • An explanation of the poem, stanza-by-stanza

  • A commentary of each of these stanzas, outlining Zephaniah's intention and message

'No Problem' in a nutshell

'No Problem' is about Zephaniah’s personal experience of racism, and is written from a first-person perspective. The poem explores the racial discrimination and abuse the speaker (who represents Zephaniah) has encountered in his life. The speaker details the way that teachers and other students behaved in a prejudiced way. However, he makes it clear that he is “not de problem”; racial prejudice is the real problem. The speaker demonstrates his ability to overcome racist abuse by focusing on his strengths, such as being “versatile”. Finally, he acknowledges that he may have been psychologically damaged by the racism he’s experienced, but that this is not going to affect his whole outlook on life.

'No Problem' breakdown

Lines 1–4

“I am not de problem 

But I bear de brunt 

Of silly playground taunts 

An racist stunts,”

Explanation

  • The speaker asserts that he is not the problem

  • However, he suffers the effects (“bear the brunt”) of being mocked (“taunts”) in the playground and having racist “stunts”, or tricks, played on him

Zephaniah's intention

  • Opening the poem with the speaker’s main assertion – that he is “not de problem” – makes it clear that there is a problem

  • This line is a repeated refrain in the first stanza, emphasising the fact that people with racist views are the problem, not the speaker

  • The following lines clarify the nature of the problem: the racist abuse he suffers at school

  • The use of formal English – “I am not” – suggests the speaker’s anger and his desire to get his point across to those who are responsible for the abuse

  • The use of dialect – “de” instead of “the” – emphasises the speaker’s distinct identity as a person of Caribbean heritage

Lines 5–8

“I am not de problem 

I am born academic 

But dey got me on de run 

Now I am branded athletic” 

Explanation

  • The speaker repeats that he is not the problem

  • He has always been naturally intellectual, but his teachers – “dey” – make him do running

  • Now, he is stereotyped as “athletic”

Zephaniah's intention

  • The repeated refrain “I am not de problem” introduces another way in which the racism of other people is the real problem

  • The speaker is “born academic”, meaning that thinking is a natural part of his personality

  • However, the teachers at his school display racial prejudice by making him run instead:

    • Their behaviour plays into racist stereotypes of Black men and boys being “naturally” good at sports

  • The result is that the speaker’s real strengths are ignored and not valued

  • The verb “branded” demonstrates the negative effects of this stereotyping and lack of choice:

    • “Branded” evokes slavery, as Black slaves were branded by white slave owners

  • The overall meaning of these lines is “don’t judge a person by the colour of their skin”

Lines 9–12

“I am not de problem 

If yu give I a chance 

I can teach yu of Timbuktu 

I can do more dan dance,”

Explanation

  • The speaker repeats that he is not the problem

  • If people gave him a chance, he could teach them about Timbuktu

  • He can do more than stereotypes of Black people (such as being good at dancing) suggest

Zephaniah's intention

  • The problem in these lines is shown to be further examples of racist stereotyping

  • The people around the speaker don’t give him the opportunity to show them how much he knows

  • “Timbuktu” is a symbolic choice of place to represent the speaker’s knowledge:

    • It’s a city that is famous for being a centre of learning and culture for hundreds of years

  • Zephaniah is making the point that his intelligence and knowledge are constantly underestimated because of his racial identity

  • The stereotype of Black people having “natural rhythm” and being good at dancing has been imposed on the speaker and shut him off from more intellectual pursuits

Lines 13–16

“I am not de problem 

I greet yu wid a smile 

Yu put me in a pigeon hole 

But I am versatile”

Explanation

  • The speaker is not the problem; he has a positive attitude and smiles at people

  • However, people still stereotype him – “put me in a pigeon hole” – despite the fact that he is adaptable and multitalented (“versatile”)

Zephaniah's intention

  • These lines sum up the way the speaker has been treated and how he has responded

  • People try to “pigeonhole” him by making him do things that Black people are supposed to be good at, according to racist stereotypes

  • This has restricted him from doing what he’s actually good at:

    • “Pigeon hole” is a metaphor for the way the speaker has been boxed in by racist expectations 

    • But it’s not just other people who do this; the line is addressed to “yu”, the reader

    • This makes us question our own views – do we also use stereotypes?

  • Despite all the ways he has been stereotyped, the speaker maintains his self-belief:

    • He knows he is “versatile” enough to overcome the restrictions other people have placed on him

Lines 17–24

“These conditions may affect me 

As I get older, 

An I am positively sure 

I have no chips on me shoulders, 

Black is not de problem 

Mother country get it right 

An juss fe de record, 

Sum of me best friends are white.”

Explanation

  • The speaker feels that the negative effects of the racism he’s experienced may affect him later in life

  • However, he is absolutely certain he doesn’t hold any grudges or have a sense of inferiority to others 

  • Black people are not the problem, but England gets that wrong and must try harder

  • Just for the record, some of the speaker’s best friends are white people

Zephaniah's intention

  • By acknowledging that the racism he’s experienced might affect him “As I get older”, the speaker recognises the traumatic nature of his experiences

  • However, he shows his resilience by stating that he has no “chips on my shoulders”:

    • He does not feel bitter or inferior to the people who have racially abused him

  • However, there is a sense that this idiom reflects back on his abusers:

    • Perhaps they are the ones with a sense of inferiority 

  • The refrain returns with a slight change, from “I” to “Black”, expanding Zephaniah’s argument from the personal level to a wider social level:

    • The speaker is referring to stereotypical representations of Black people, historically and in the media, in order to challenge them

  • England is the speaker’s “Mother country”, which means it’s his home and he is a part of it, just as much as white people

  • The speaker demands “get it right” to show that racial attitudes in England are wrong and need fixing

  • The final statement can be read as the speaker stating that he has no resentment against white people for the abuse he’s suffered

  • However, it can also be read as sarcastic, because it’s an inversion of a typical (but problematic) assertion: “I can’t be racist – I have Black friends”:

    • This way of judging a whole group of people on the basis of knowing a few individuals creates stereotypes, so the speaker is echoing the stereotypical thinking he has encountered

    • The fact that Zephaniah ends the poem with a joke shows his ability to overcome the cruelty and restrictions of racial prejudice

    • It also undermines racism at a fundamental level by laughing at it 

Writer's methods

This section is split into three separate areas: form, structure and language. It is crucial to link these technical areas of Zephaniah's writing together, in order to understand how he is presenting his ideas and why he has made the choices he has. Think about how Zephaniah's language, structure and form contribute to his theme and message in 'No Problem'. 

You will gain far more marks by focusing on Zephaniah's themes than on individual poetic techniques. Therefore, the analysis in the following sections is arranged by theme, and examines the intentions behind Zephaniah's decisions about:

  • Form

  • Structure

  • Language

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The best way to discuss the technical aspects of poems, such as their form, structure and language, is to link your knowledge of them with the themes and ideas in the poem. That will enable you to demonstrate your understanding of how Zephaniah gets his meaning across. 

Avoid identifying poetic techniques without linking them to the themes of 'No Problem'. You should aim to demonstrate your understanding of how Zephaniah uses form, structure and language to make his ideas clearer and more effective. For instance, instead of writing “Zephaniah uses alliteration”, you could state that “Zephaniah’s use of alliteration emphasises the sense of conflict in the poem”, then give an example.   

Form

Benjamin Zephaniah is a dub poet, and 'No Problem' takes the form of a dub poem. Dub poetry developed out of dub reggae in the West Indies. It is a form of spoken-word poetry, which means it is written to be performed live. The strong rhythms and regular rhyme scheme of 'No Problem' emphasise these origins. 'No Problem' is split into two stanzas, each containing a series of regular quatrains. Dub poetry often focuses on issues of social conflict and injustice, and Zephaniah’s rejection of a series of Black stereotypes in 'No Problem' is typical of the form.

Theme

Evidence

Poet’s intention

The conflict of racism

The poem is split into two stanzas:

  • The first stanza addresses the conflict between stereotypical expectations of the speaker as a Black person and his sense of self

  • The second stanza contains the speaker’s reflection on his experience and a final affirmation of his central message: “Black is not de problem”

In the first stanza, the speaker explores and rejects a series of different Black stereotypes:

  • He does this through descriptions of the conflicts between people’s racist expectations and the reality of his true potential 

  • Zephaniah is illustrating how stereotypical ideas about Black people limit their opportunities

In the second stanza, the speaker shows his strength and resilience:

  • He doesn’t bear a grudge about the abuse he suffered

  • Instead, he resolves to tackle racism in his country 

  • Ending the poem with a joke shows that he has risen above the limited racist mindset of his former abusers

Racism as division

The form of the poem mirrors its content:

  • The first stanza maintains a positive tone; despite the abuses suffered by the speaker, he’ll “greet yu wid a smile” and is confident about his “versatile” talents

  • The second stanza is more reflective in tone, as the speaker acknowledges that his experiences might have caused long-lasting damage

The speaker moves from examining examples of racism in the first stanza to reflecting on their effects in the second stanza:

  • The break between the two stanzas may be symbolic of the gap between the past and the present

  • Alternatively, it may represent the division between the speaker and other people, caused by racism

  • However, the tonal shift between stanzas emphasises Zephaniah’s message: that there’s a long way to go in addressing or resolving racism in England

Structure

The first stanza of 'No Problem' focuses on the speaker’s experiences of being subjected to racist abuse and stereotyping at school, and the second stanza reflects on how this has affected him. Zephaniah employs a regular ABCB rhyme scheme and an even beat, which drives the poem’s strong rhythm. Combined with Zephaniah’s use of repetition, phonetic spelling and direct address (to “yu”, the reader/listener), this makes the insistent tone of the poem match the urgency of its message about racism.

Theme

Evidence

Poet’s intention

The conflict of racism

The repetition of the phrase, “I am not de problem” conveys the theme and message of the poem:

  • The final iteration of this phrase, “Black is not de problem”, directly names the poem’s central conflict

Zephaniah is showing that each of the situations his speaker describes is caused by other people’s racist perceptions of him:

  • He is demonstrating that he is not the source of the problem of racism

  • He feels the need to state this because of stereotypical misperceptions, often promoted by the media, about Black people being the cause of racial issues, rather than the victims

  • Instead, the cause of any problems is the ignorance and prejudice of other people


Conflict and racial identity

While most of the rhyme scheme is consistent, some rhymes are not full ones:

  • For example, “brunt” and “stunts”, or “academic” and “athletic”

The use of subtle rhymes illustrates the gap between the speaker’s feelings and other people’s actions:

  • The speaker bears the “brunt” (suffers the effects), but other students perform the “racist stunts”

  • The speaker knows he’s “academic”, but his teachers make him “athletic”

  • Zephaniah is showing the disconnection between his speaker’s reality and prejudiced assumptions about Black people

With few variations, there are three main beats in each line:

  • This isn’t regular trimeter, because the number of unstressed beats varies

  • For instance, “I am not de problem” has fewer unstressed beats than “Now dey got me on de run”, but the number of stressed syllables is the same

The rhythm of the poem gives it a direct, speech-like quality: 

  • The effect is to emphasise the conversational quality of the poem; it sounds like someone talking to you

  • Zephaniah wants to get his message across as directly and to as wide an audience as possible

He is also consciously rejecting traditional European forms of poetry in order to affirm his identity as a Black man with Jamaican heritage

The directness of the poem’s tone is emphasised by the use of “yu”:

  • This feels as though the reader is being spoken to directly

  • For instance, when the speaker states, “Yu put me in a pigeon hole” 

 

The use of direct address begins halfway through the first stanza, after the speaker has detailed their experiences at school:

  • There is a change in perspective, from being a spectator of the events that the speaker is narrating to being implicated in them

  • The use of “yu” instantly confronts readers/listeners, drawing them into the speaker’s conflict with racism

  • Zephaniah wants to challenge his readers/listeners to question their own actions, and perhaps their unconscious racial prejudices

Language

Zephaniah’s use of phonetic spelling, such as “de” and “yu”, reflects Afro-Caribbean speech patterns. His rejection of standard English expression illustrates his pride in his identity as a Black man and his determination to speak to ordinary people directly. He uses single words, such as “athletic”,  to represent distinct racist attitudes and stereotypes. The sounds of his language, such as his use of alliteration, emphasises the emotions he is expressing, and adds to the speech-like qualities of the poem. 

Theme

Evidence

Poet’s intention

The conflict of racism

The title of the poem clearly indicates a conflict, or “problem”, but it’s open to different interpretations

Zephaniah is indicating that the problem exists by referring to it repeatedly:

  • It could link to the poem’s main message that Black people are not “de problem” and are not to blame for racist abuse

  • It could illustrate the speaker’s resilience, because he shows that he has no problem getting past his experience of racism

  • It could also be referring to a common misperception that, because laws exist to make racial discrimination illegal in certain contexts, racism is no longer a problem in the UK

  • Zephaniah sees racism as a pervasive and continuing problem

The use of phonetic spelling, such as  “yu” and “de” reinforce a sense of the speaker’s identity

Zephaniah uses phonetic spelling to reflect his natural speech patterns:

  • Expressions like “If yu give I a chance” and “juss fe de record” identify the speaker as a Black man with Jamaican heritage

  • Zephaniah is rejecting standard formal English in order to reclaim poetry from the historical dominance of European poetic forms and to assert his unique identity

The poem uses single words to represent concepts and attitudes: 

For instance, “academic” signifies the speaker’s natural interest in intellectual subjects, while “athletic” signifies the expectations of his teachers that he will be “naturally” good at sports like running

By using single words to represent something much bigger, Zephaniah is inviting readers to “unpack”, or investigate, these terms:

  • When people focus on the potential meanings of the words they hear or use, it makes them think more carefully about avoiding (racist) stereotypes and labels

The conflict of racism is illustrated by oppositional language:

  • For instance, in the lines

“Yu put me in a pigeon hole/But I am versatile”, the conflict is between the constriction of pigeonholing someone and their potential to break out of that constraint

Zephaniah maintains a positive tone for most of the poem, but he doesn’t avoid – or want his readers/listeners to forget – the conflict that lies at its heart:

  • The line “I greet yu wid a smile”, which rhymes with “versatile”, takes on a less friendly tone in the context of the conflict between “pigeon hole” and “versatile”

The poem uses alliteration and siblance to emphasise the conflict caused by racism

Zephaniah emphasises the speaker’s anger: 

  • The hard, plosive sounds of “bear de brunt” reflect the force of anger felt 

  • The sibilance of “silly playground taunts/An racist stunts” conveys the speaker’s disgust and contempt for the “racist stunts” played

Context

Context is important, but examiners don’t want to see random chunks of information about Zephaniah's life or historical context, because those don’t demonstrate your understanding of the poem itself. Instead, aim to use contextual information in combination with your analysis of Zephaniah's message and ideas. In 'No Problem', Zephaniah’s main focus is racism and the way it has affected the development of his identity. Therefore, this section has been bullet-pointed under the following themes: 

  • The conflict of racism

  • Conflict and racial identity

The conflict of racism

  • 'No Problem' was published in 1996:

    • Like many of Zephaniah’s poems, it focuses on racial issues and the conflicts caused by racism

  • Zephaniah and his family, like many other immigrants from the Caribbean, encountered conflicts due to racism:

    • For instance, many immigrant families found it hard to find places to live because of racial prejudice against Black people

  • Black children’s education often suffered because of racism:

    • Racial prejudice meant that many teachers and schools thought Black children were less intelligent than white children

    • Black children were often stereotyped as being “naturally” good at sports and poor at academic study

    • This is one of the central themes Zephaniah addresses in ‘No Problem’

Conflict and racial identity

  • Benjamin Zephaniah was born in 1958 in Birmingham, UK

  • His father was from Barbados and his mother was Jamaican:

    • They came to England as part of the Windrush Generation in 1954 

    • Zephaniah spent time in Jamaica while he was growing up

  • Zephaniah grew up listening to reggae and composed poetry from an early age

  • Despite his talent with words, he struggled at school as a Black teenager with dyslexia:

    • He was illiterate when he was expelled from school aged 14

    • He taught himself to read and write as an adult

  • Zephaniah writes about his direct experience of racism and prejudice:

    • He was very active politically throughout his life (he died in 2023)

    • He wanted his poetry to speak to ordinary people about their lives

    • This is reflected in Zephaniah’s use of phonetic spellings to give his poem a speech-like quality

Examiner Tips and Tricks

You should show your understanding of the relationship between the poem and its context in your response. Demonstrating your knowledge of contexts is a great way to enrich your analysis of the themes and ideas Zephaniah presents in 'No Problem'.

However, avoid including information about Zephaniah’s life or racism in the UK without connecting it to his ideas, as that will not gain you marks. Context comes from the key word in the task, so your answer should emphasise Zephaniah’s themes, such as racism or identity, and you should only use contextual information to support your analysis of them.

What to compare it to

Your exam response should compare the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. Therefore, you should aim to revise pairs of poems together, to understand how each poet presents their ideas about conflict in relation to the other poets in your anthology. In 'No Problem', Zephaniah's main themes are the conflict of racism and conflict and identity, so the following comparisons would be a good starting point:

  • 'No Problem' and 'Half-caste'

  • 'No Problem' and 'The Class Game'

For each pair of poems, you will find:

  • The comparison in a nutshell

  • Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem

  • Differences between the ideas presented in each poem

  • Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Your comparison of 'No Problem' with another poem from the anthology should show your in-depth understanding of both poems. You will need to compare how Zephaniah uses language, form and structure to present his themes with the methods used by other writers. Therefore, it’s important that you have a thorough knowledge of all the poems, rather than just memorising a series of quotations. 

Make sure your response is a comparison of the named poem and one other poem in the anthology. If you only write about the poem given on the paper, you will only achieve half the marks available. Writing a comparison of two poems that demonstrates your thorough understanding of both of them will achieve the highest marks. For instance, you could compare Zephaniah's and John Agard’s approaches to racism, or how Mary Casey and Zephaniah present the way in which prejudice affects their sense of identity.  

'No Problem' and 'Half-caste'

Comparison in a nutshell:

Both poems address the writers’ experiences of racism, and both demonstrate that they are not the problem. However, Zephaniah’s poem uses more direct examples of his experience and ends on a positive note. Agard's poem focuses on a single, representative example of racist behaviour and ends as angrily as it began.

Similarities:

Topic sentence

Both poems illustrate their writers’ views about racism through specific examples, and both are clear about where the responsibility for racism lies

Evidence and analysis

'No Problem'

'Half-caste'

Zephaniah tackles racism directly:

  • After describing some of his experiences, he concludes: “Black is not de problem”

Agard also addresses the issue of racism head-on:

  • The poem begins with a short stanza ending “I’m half-caste”

Zephaniah is clear about where the responsibility for racism lies:

  • At the end of the poem, he demands: “Mother country get it right”, implying that England gets race wrong and must improve

Agard is also clear about who is responsible for racism: 

  • When he suggests his listener return “wid de whole of yu eye/ear/mind”, the implication is that the listener has only used half their faculties and not thought things through

The repetition in 'No Problem' shows the speaker’s refusal to accept responsibility for the racism of others:

  • He insists several times: “I am not de problem”, and finally, “Black is not de problem”

The repetition in 'Half-caste' conveys its confrontational tone very effectively:

  • The speaker repeatedly demands that his listener “explain yuself/wha yu mean”

The poem uses phonetic spellings to achieve a speech-like sound and rhythm:

  • A good example is the line “An juss fe de record” 

The poem uses dialect spellings and words to produce a speech-like sound and rhythm:

  • Examples include the line: “So spiteful dem dont want de sun pass/ah rass”

The speaker’s “I” and his multiple opponents – “yu”, and sometimes “dey” – are clearly in opposition:

  • The speaker attempts to put things right when he says “If yu give I a chance” 

The conflict in the poem between the “I” of the speaker and the “yu” of his listener is very clear: 

  • In comments like “An I will tell yu” they confront each other in the same line

Zephaniah avoids using much punctuation, relying on the sounds and rhythms of the poem to show where the pauses and stresses should be

Agard rejects conventional punctuation and spelling completely, which makes the form of the poem a statement about his own identity

Both poems take an confrontational approach to racism, identifying the source of the problem and celebrating their own identities 

Differences:

Topic sentence

Although both poems tackle the issue of racism directly, their approaches differ slightly in their focus, tone and humour

Evidence and analysis

'No Problem'

'Half-caste'

Zephaniah’s humour is more direct and often relies on rhyme to emphasise his point: 

  • For example, in the lines “Yu put me in a pigeon hole/But I am versatile”, “versatile” rhymes with the previous “smile”

  • This emphasises “versatile” and also reflects back on “smile” to make it sound less friendly

Agard’s humour is indirect and metaphorical, using a succession of analogies and satirical speculation:

  • He compares 'No Problem' to painting, the music and the weather

  • He satirises “half”ness with a series of statements about his senses, dreams and shadow

'No Problem' engages with a range of racist experiences over a longer period of time, from school days to adulthood

'Half-caste' focuses on one racist term to illustrate the experience of racism and the case against it

The rhyme scheme in the poem is regular, with an ABCB structure, often using half-rhymes to illustrate the distance between the speaker and the people around him:

  • Rhyming “academic” with “athletic” shows the situation from the perspective of the speaker, then from the perspective of others; the gap in perception is illustrated by the half-rhyme

While there is rhyme in the poem, it is irregular and works to emphasise certain words, usually for humorous effect:

  • “Half-caste till dem overcast” is an example of the way Agard brings together his analogies, suggesting that racism is like the English weather

Zephaniah ends his poem on a fairly positive note:

  • His speaker is “positively sure” that his experiences haven’t left him with grudges

  • “Sum of me best friends are white” conveys hope for the future, although it can also be read as an ironic joke

  • Zephaniah is using a few people (his white friends) to represent all white people, which is typical of the type of thinking he is criticising

Agard ends his poem on a negative note:

  • His speaker’s “but yu must come back tomorrow” isn’t a hopeful request, as it would require the listener to engage with “the whole” of their ear, eye and mind

Zephaniah’s focus is varied, and he ends the poem on a positive, humorous note, while Agard's anger focuses on a single example of racism, and he maintains his angry, confrontational tone to the end of the poem 

'No Problem' and 'The Class Game'

Comparison in a nutshell:

This comparison gives you the opportunity to compare prejudices of two different kinds. Mary Casey’s 'The Class Game' focuses on class prejudice, while 'No Problem' is concerned with racial prejudice. Both poems use forms of direct address and repetition to explore the way that prejudice affects their speakers’ identities.

Similarities:

Topic sentence

Both poems interrogate how prejudice affects their sense of identity directly, and both use humour to make their case

Evidence and analysis

'No Problem'

'The Class Game'

Zephaniah uses repetition to emphasise his theme and subject: 

  • The phrase, “I am not de problem” is repeated as a refrain throughout the poem

  • The final iteration of this phrase, “Black is not de problem”, identifies the poem’s central conflict directly

Casey’s speaker also uses questions to challenge her listener:

  • “How can you tell what class I’m from?” she asks repeatedly, to expose the listener’s prejudices against her working class background

  • The final iteration of her question, “Why do you care which class I’m from”, reveals her central message: that class differences shouldn’t matter as much as they do

The poem has a regular rhyming scheme, and Zephaniah often uses rhyme for humorous effect: 

  • For example, the last lines rhyme “get it right” with “Sum of me best friends are white”

  • His use of rhyme emphasises the ironic humour of the speaker’s demand and his inverted assertion about having white friends to strengthen his message about racial prejudice

After her opening lines, Casey uses rhyming couplets to rhyme each statement, often for dramatic or humorous effect:

  • For example, she rhymes “toil” and “oil” to illustrate the difference between working class hands and hands that don’t do manual work

  • Her use of rhyme emphasises her anger about class prejudice by rhyming examples with each other

Zephaniah focuses on several examples of the way racism has affected his identity:

  • These include being subjected to racist bullying, being made to do sports, and having his intelligence and knowledge underestimated

Casey’s poem also focuses on different examples of class prejudice, which she assembles to make her case: 

  • These include the way she speaks, where she lives and what she calls things

Zephaniah focuses on the way the speaker is seen by other people, as well as the way he feels about it: 

  • When he states that “I can teach yu of Timbuktu/I can do more than dance”, he’s highlighting what he’s capable of, in contrast with what other people expect of him

Casey also draws attention to the way her speaker is seen, as well as the way she sees others:

  • “I can talk posh” and “wear an ’at”, she argues, revealing the underlying prejudice that focuses on her background rather than her behaviour

'No Problem' uses Zephaniah's own Caribbean dialect and register to assert and celebrate his racial identity

'The Class Game' employs Casey’s northern, working class dialect to establish her pride in her class identity

Both poems use techniques like repetition and rhyme to get their message across, and both use humour to critique prejudice

Differences:

Topic sentence

While both poems address the way that prejudice affects identity, they focus on different types of prejudice and use different techniques

Evidence and analysis

'No Problem'

'The Class Game'

Zephaniah focuses on racial prejudice and his racial identity as a Black British man with Jamaican heritage

Casey focuses on class prejudice and her class identity as a northern, working-class woman

The poem uses direct address, but also narrates events: 

  • The speaker addresses “yu”, the reader, directly, but also talks about “dey” when he’s discussing his experiences

  • The switch to “yu” makes readers question their own views

The poem presents its argument in the form of a dramatic monologue:

  • The unseen listener is presented as someone who displays social prejudice against working-class people; somebody who is middle or upper class

Zephaniah employs a fairly regular trimeter, which gives the poem a strong rhythmic quality:

  • The rhythm of his dub poetry is another way in which he affirms his identity as a Black man with Jamaican heritage

Casey’s lines are of different lengths with an irregular number of beats:

  • This reproduces the speech patterns of the speaker in a naturalistic way, reinforcing her sense of identity

Zephaniah uses single words to represent concepts and attitudes:

  • For instance, he uses “academic” to represent the speaker’s natural interest in intellectual subjects 

  • This technique makes people think about how words are used, including their own

Casey includes more detail in her descriptions of class prejudice:

  • For instance, “Don’t I crook me little finger when I drink me tea?” is a very direct, detailed, visual description

  • These realistic descriptions are less open to interpretation; they mean what they say

The poem ends with a demand for change:

  • “Mother country get it right” shows that the speaker (and Zephaniah) are still fighting for racial equality

The poem ends with an assertion of identity: 

  • Casey’s final line, “And I’m proud of the class that I come from”, is a statement, not a demand

Zephaniah uses a range of poetic techniques to address racial identity and argue for change, while Casey addresses class identity in a more realistic way, and doesn’t call directly for change

Last updated:

You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Jen Davis

Author: Jen Davis

Expertise: English

Jen studied a BA(Hons) in English Literature at the University of Chester, followed by an MA in 19th Century Literature and Culture. She taught English Literature at university for nine years as a visiting lecturer and doctoral researcher, and gained a Postgraduate Certificate in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in 2014. She now works as a freelance writer, editor and tutor. While teaching English Literature at university, Jen also specialised in study skills development, with a focus on essay and examination writing.

Kate Lee

Author: Kate Lee

Expertise: English and Languages Lead

Kate has over 12 years of teaching experience as a Head of English and as a private tutor. Having also worked at the exam board AQA and in educational publishing, she's been writing educational resources to support learners in their exams throughout her career. She's passionate about helping students achieve their potential by developing their literacy and exam skills.